Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Microb Ecol ; 82(2): 470-483, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33443587

ABSTRACT

Microbial spatial distribution has mostly been studied at field to global scales (i.e., ecosystem scales). However, the spatial organization at small scales (i.e., centimeter to millimeter scales), which can help improve our understanding of the impacts of spatial communities structure on microbial functioning, has received comparatively little attention. Previous work has shown that small-scale spatial structure exists in soil microbial communities, but these studies have not compared soils from geographically distant locations, nor have they utilized community ecology approaches, such as the core and satellite hypothesis and/or abundance-occupancy relationships, often used in macro-ecology, to improve the description of the spatial organization of communities. In the present work, we focused on bacterial diversity (i.e., 16S rRNA gene sequencing) occurring in micro-samples from a variety of locations with different pedo-climatic histories (i.e., from semi-arid, alpine, and temperate climates) and physicochemical properties. The forms of ecological spatial relationships in bacterial communities (i.e., occupancy-frequency and abundance-occupancy) and taxa distributions (i.e., habitat generalists and specialists) were investigated. The results showed that bacterial composition differed in the four soils at the small scale. Moreover, one soil presented a satellite mode distribution, whereas the three others presented bimodal distributions. Interestingly, numerous core taxa were present in the four soils among which 8 OTUs were common to the four sites. These results confirm that analyses of the small-scale spatial distribution are necessary to understand consequent functional processes taking place in soils, affecting thus ecosystem functioning.


Subject(s)
Microbiota , Soil , Biodiversity , Ecosystem , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Soil Microbiology
2.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 14883, 2019 10 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31619759

ABSTRACT

Control of common scab disease can be reached by resistant cultivars or suppressive soils. Both mechanisms are likely to translate into particular potato microbiome profiles, but the relative importance of each is not known. Here, microbiomes of bulk and tuberosphere soil and of potato periderm were studied in one resistant and one susceptible cultivar grown in a conducive and a suppressive field. Disease severity was suppressed similarly by both means yet, the copy numbers of txtB gene (coding for a pathogenicity determinant) were similar in both soils but higher in periderms of the susceptible cultivar from conducive soil. Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA genes for bacteria (completed by 16S rRNA microarray approach) and archaea, and of 18S rRNA genes for micro-eukarytes showed that in bacteria, the more important was the effect of cultivar and diversity decreased from resistant cultivar to bulk soil to susceptible cultivar. The major changes occurred in proportions of Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Proteobacteria. In archaea and micro-eukaryotes, differences were primarily due to the suppressive and conducive soil. The effect of soil suppressiveness × cultivar resistance depended on the microbial community considered, but differed also with respect to soil and plant nutrient contents particularly in N, S and Fe.


Subject(s)
Actinobacteria/growth & development , Archaea/growth & development , Disease Susceptibility/immunology , Plant Diseases/microbiology , Soil Microbiology , Solanum tuberosum/microbiology , Actinobacteria/classification , Actinobacteria/genetics , Actinobacteria/pathogenicity , Archaea/classification , Archaea/genetics , Archaea/pathogenicity , Chloroflexi/classification , Chloroflexi/genetics , Chloroflexi/growth & development , Chloroflexi/pathogenicity , Crops, Agricultural , Disease Resistance/drug effects , Eukaryotic Cells/metabolism , Genotyping Techniques , Iron/metabolism , Iron/pharmacology , Microbiota/genetics , Nitrogen/metabolism , Nitrogen/pharmacology , Plant Diseases/immunology , Proteobacteria/classification , Proteobacteria/genetics , Proteobacteria/growth & development , Proteobacteria/pathogenicity , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 18S/genetics , Solanum tuberosum/drug effects , Solanum tuberosum/immunology , Sulfur/metabolism , Sulfur/pharmacology , Virulence Factors/genetics , Virulence Factors/metabolism
3.
Microb Ecol ; 72(3): 717-24, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27418177

ABSTRACT

The spatial distributions of bacteria in the soil matrix have a role in ecosystem function, for example, at the small scale, through gene transfer or xenobiotic degradation. Soil bacterial biogeography has been evidenced at the large scale, but data are scarce at the small scale. The objective of this work was to determine the spatial pattern of bacterial diversity, in spatially referenced microsamples, in order to define bacterial community spatial traits. Two soils with different physical structures, moderately aggregated (La Côte St André (LCSA)) or poorly aggregated (La Dombes (LD)), were studied. The spatial distribution of bacteria was studied in microsamples (diameter 3 mm) along 10- and 20-cm transects, with a taxonomic microarray. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to further study the spatial characteristics of the microbial communities in LD soil. The frequency-occupancy plot, in the LCSA and LD soils, using microarray and sequencing data, followed Hanski's core-satellite theory. The frequency-occupancy distribution plots obtained in two different soils showed bimodality and indicated that the microscale spatial distributions were different, particularly core taxa percentage. Core taxa are widespread and abundant, while satellite taxa are restricted in their distribution. The spread of satellite taxa was at a distance range larger than 5 cm, whereas the core taxa were distributed in a distance range less than 3 mm. Besides, there was a positive abundancy-occupancy relationship at this fine scale. It may be interesting to further evaluate the role of the different bacterial spatial distributions at the fine scale on soil function.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , Biodiversity , Soil Microbiology , Soil/chemistry , Bacteria/genetics , Base Sequence , DNA, Bacterial , Ecosystem , France , Molecular Typing , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics
4.
Environ Microbiol Rep ; 6(4): 346-53, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24992533

ABSTRACT

Very few soil quality indicators include disease-suppressiveness criteria. We assessed whether 64 16S rRNA microarray probes whose signals correlated with tobacco black root rot suppressiveness in greenhouse analysis could also discriminate suppressive from conducive soils under field conditions. Rhizobacterial communities of tobacco and wheat sampled in 2 years from four farmers' fields of contrasted suppressiveness status were compared. The 64 previously identified indicator probes correctly classified 72% of 29 field samples, with nine probes for Azospirillum, Gluconacetobacter, Sphingomonadaceae, Planctomycetes, Mycoplasma, Lactobacillus crispatus and Thermodesulforhabdus providing the best prediction. The whole probe set (1033 probes) revealed strong effects of plant, field location and year on rhizobacterial community composition, and a smaller (7% variance) but significant effect of soil suppressiveness status. Seventeen additional probes correlating with suppressiveness status in the field (noticeably for Agrobacterium, Methylobacterium, Ochrobactrum) were selected, and combined with the nine others, they improved correct sample classification from 72% to 79% (100% tobacco and 63% wheat samples). Pseudomonas probes were not informative in the field, even those targeting biocontrol pseudomonads producing 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol, nor was quantitative polymerase chain reaction for 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-synthesis gene phlD. This study shows that a subset of 16S rRNA probes targeting diverse rhizobacteria can be useful as suppressiveness indicators under field conditions.


Subject(s)
Biota , Microarray Analysis/methods , Nicotiana/growth & development , Plant Diseases/prevention & control , Plant Roots/growth & development , Soil Microbiology , Humans , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics
5.
Mol Ecol ; 21(9): 2297-309, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22433115

ABSTRACT

Mosquitoes transmit numerous arboviruses including dengue and chikungunya virus (CHIKV). In recent years, mosquito species Aedes albopictus has expanded in the Indian Ocean region and was the principal vector of chikungunya outbreaks in La Reunion and neighbouring islands in 2005 and 2006. Vector-associated bacteria have recently been found to interact with transmitted pathogens. For instance, Wolbachia modulates the replication of viruses or parasites. However, there has been no systematic evaluation of the diversity of the entire bacterial populations within mosquito individuals particularly in relation to virus invasion. Here, we investigated the effect of CHIKV infection on the whole bacterial community of Ae. albopictus. Taxonomic microarrays and quantitative PCR showed that members of Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria phyla, as well as Bacteroidetes, responded to CHIKV infection. The abundance of bacteria from the Enterobacteriaceae family increased with CHIKV infection, whereas the abundance of known insect endosymbionts like Wolbachia and Blattabacterium decreased. Our results clearly link the pathogen propagation with changes in the dynamics of the bacterial community, suggesting that cooperation or competition occurs within the host, which may in turn affect the mosquito traits like vector competence.


Subject(s)
Aedes/microbiology , Aedes/virology , Bacterial Physiological Phenomena , Chikungunya virus/physiology , Insect Vectors/microbiology , Insect Vectors/virology , Symbiosis , Alphaproteobacteria/physiology , Animals , Bacteroidetes/physiology , Biodiversity , Chikungunya virus/genetics , Enterobacteriaceae/physiology , Gammaproteobacteria/physiology , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Virus Replication , Wolbachia/physiology
6.
Mol Ecol ; 21(1): 195-206, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22126532

ABSTRACT

A wide range of plant lines has been propagated by farmers during crop selection and dissemination, but consequences of this crop diversification on plant-microbe interactions have been neglected. Our hypothesis was that crop evolutionary history shaped the way the resulting lines interact with soil bacteria in their rhizospheres. Here, the significance of maize diversification as a factor influencing selection of soil bacteria by seedling roots was assessed by comparing rhizobacterial community composition of inbred lines representing the five main genetic groups of maize, cultivated in a same European soil. Rhizobacterial community composition of 21-day-old seedlings was analysed using a 16S rRNA taxonomic microarray targeting 19 bacterial phyla. Rhizobacterial community composition of inbred lines depended on the maize genetic group. Differences were largely due to the prevalence of certain Betaproteobacteria and especially Burkholderia, as confirmed by quantitative PCR and cloning/sequencing. However, these differences in bacterial root colonization did not correlate with plant microsatellite genetic distances between maize genetic groups or individual lines. Therefore, the genetic structure of maize that arose during crop diversification (resulting in five main groups), but not the extent of maize diversification itself (as determined by maize genetic distances), was a significant factor shaping rhizobacterial community composition of seedlings.


Subject(s)
Burkholderia/genetics , Genetic Variation , Plant Roots/microbiology , Soil Microbiology , Zea mays/genetics , Agriculture , Burkholderia/isolation & purification , Cloning, Molecular , Databases, Genetic , Evolution, Molecular , Genotype , Microarray Analysis , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , Plant Diseases/microbiology , Rhizosphere , Seedlings/growth & development , Selection, Genetic , Soil/analysis , Zea mays/microbiology
7.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol ; 78(2): 386-94, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22092176

ABSTRACT

Members of the Actinobacteria are among the most important litter decomposers in soil. The site of a waterlogged deciduous forest with acidic soil was explored for actinobacteria because seasonality of litter inputs, temperature, and precipitation provided contrasting environmental conditions, particularly variation of organic matter quantity and quality. We hypothesized that these factors, which are known to influence decomposition, were also likely to affect actinobacterial community composition. The relationship between the actinobacterial community, soil moisture and organic matter content was assessed in two soil horizons in the summer and winter seasons using a 16S rRNA taxonomic microarray and cloning-sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. Both approaches showed that the community differed significantly between horizons and seasons, paralleling the changes in soil moisture and organic matter content. The microarray analysis further indicated that the actinobacterial community of the upper horizon was characterized by high incidence of the genus Mycobacterium. In both horizons and seasons, the actinobacterial clone libraries were dominated (by 80%) by sequences of a separate clade sharing an ancestral node with Streptosporangineae. This relatedness is supported also by some common adaptations, for example, to soil acidity and periodic oxygen deprivation or dryness.


Subject(s)
Actinobacteria/classification , Soil Microbiology , Soil/chemistry , Trees/microbiology , Actinobacteria/genetics , Actinobacteria/growth & development , Base Sequence , Climate , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Molecular Sequence Data , Seasons
8.
Environ Sci Technol ; 44(7): 2386-92, 2010 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20192168

ABSTRACT

Bacterial pesticide degraders are generally heterogeneously distributed in soils, leaving soil volumes devoid of degradation potential. This is expected to have an impact on degradation rates because the degradation of pollutant molecules in such zones will be contingent either on degraders colonizing these zones or on pollutant mass transfer to neighboring zones containing degraders. In a model system, we quantified the role exerted by water on mineralization rate in the context of a heterogeneously distributed degradation potential. Alginate beads colonized by Pseudomonas putida KT2440 were inserted at prescribed locations in sand microcosms so that the initial spatial distribution of the mineralization potential was controlled. The mineralization rate was strongly affected by the matric potential (decreasing rate with decreasing matric potential) and by the initial distribution of the degraders (more aggregated distributions being associated with lower rates). The mineralization was diffusion-limited, as confirmed with a mathematical model. In wet conditions, extensive cell dispersal was observed for the flagellated wild type and, albeit to a lesser extent, for a nonflagellated mutant, partially relieving the diffusion limitation. Dry conditions, however, sustained low mineralization rates through the combined effects of low pollutant diffusivity and limited degrader dispersal.


Subject(s)
Pseudomonas putida/metabolism , Silicon Dioxide/metabolism , Water/metabolism , Benzoates/metabolism , Biodegradation, Environmental , Flagella/metabolism , Minerals/metabolism , Models, Biological , Movement , Mutation/genetics , Pseudomonas putida/cytology , Pseudomonas putida/physiology
9.
ISME J ; 3(10): 1127-38, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19554036

ABSTRACT

Work on soils suppressive to Thielaviopsis basicola-mediated tobacco black root rot has focused on antagonistic pseudomonads to date. The role of non-Pseudomonas rhizosphere populations has been neglected, and whether they differ in black root rot-suppressive versus -conducive soils is unknown. To assess this possibility, tobacco was grown in a suppressive and a conducive soil of similar physicochemical properties, and rhizobacterial community composition was compared using a 16S rRNA taxonomic microarray. The microarray contains 1033 probes and targets 19 bacterial phyla. Among them, 398 probes were designed for Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinomycetes, Cyanobacteria and Bacteroidetes genera/species known to include strains relevant for plant protection or plant growth promotion. Hierarchical clustering as well as principal component analysis of microarray data discriminated clearly between black root rot-suppressive and -conducive soils. In contrast, T. basicola inoculation had no impact on rhizobacterial community composition. In addition to fluorescent Pseudomonas, the taxa Azospirillum, Gluconacetobacter, Burkholderia, Comamonas and Sphingomonadaceae, which are known to comprise strains with plant-beneficial properties, were more prevalent in the suppressive soil. Mycobacterium, Bradyrhizobium, Rhodobacteraceae, Rhodospirillum and others were more prevalent in the conducive soil. For selected taxa, microarray results were largely corroborated by quantitative PCR and cloning/sequencing. In conclusion, this work identified novel bacterial taxa that could serve as indicators of disease suppressiveness in soil-quality assessments, and it extends the range of bacterial taxa hypothesized to participate in black root rot suppression.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Biodiversity , Nicotiana/microbiology , Plant Diseases/microbiology , Plant Roots/microbiology , Soil Microbiology , Bacteria/genetics , Cluster Analysis , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/chemistry , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Microarray Analysis , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA
10.
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek ; 94(3): 439-53, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18600470

ABSTRACT

Actinomycetes are known for their secondary metabolites, which have been successfully used as drugs in human and veterinary medicines. However, information on the distribution of this group of Gram-positive bacteria in diverse ecosystems and a comprehension of their activities in ecosystem processes are still scarce. We have developed a 16S rRNA-based taxonomic microarray that targets key actinomycetes at the genus level. In total, 113 actinomycete 16S rRNA probes, corresponding to 55 of the 202 described genera, were designed. The microarray accuracy was evaluated by comparing signal intensities with probe/target-weighted mismatch values and the Gibbs energy of the probe/target duplex formation by hybridizing 17 non-actinomycete and 29 actinomycete strains/clones with the probe set. The validation proved that the probe set was specific, with only 1.3% of false results. The incomplete coverage of actinomycetes by a genus-specific probe was caused by the limited number of 16S rRNA gene sequences in databases or insufficient 16S rRNA gene polymorphism. The microarray enabled discrimination between actinomycete communities from three forest soil samples collected at one site. Cloning and sequencing of 16S rRNA genes from one of the soil samples confirmed the microarray results. We propose that this newly constructed microarray will be a valuable tool for genus-level comparisons of actinomycete communities in various ecological conditions.


Subject(s)
Actinobacteria/genetics , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , RNA, Bacterial/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Actinobacteria/classification , Actinobacteria/isolation & purification , Base Sequence , Cloning, Molecular , DNA Primers/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/chemistry , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Databases, Genetic , Ecosystem , Nucleic Acid Conformation , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Soil Microbiology , Species Specificity
11.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 72(6): 4302-12, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16751545

ABSTRACT

Bacterial diversity is central to ecosystem sustainability and soil biological function, for which the role of roots is important. The high-throughput analysis potential of taxonomic microarray should match the breadth of bacterial diversity. Here, the power of this technology was evidenced through methodological verifications and analysis of maize rhizosphere effect based on a 16S rRNA-based microarray developed from the prototype of H. Sanguin et al. (Environ. Microbiol. 8:289-307, 2006). The current probe set was composed of 170 probes (41 new probes in this work) that targeted essentially the Proteobacteria. Cloning and sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons were carried out on maize rhizosphere and bulk soil DNA. All tested clones that had a perfect match with corresponding probes were positive in the hybridization experiment. The hierarchically nested probes were reliable, but the level of taxonomic identification was variable, depending on the probe set specificity. The comparison of experimental and theoretical hybridizations revealed 0.91% false positives and 0.81% false negatives. The microarray detection threshold was estimated at 0.03% of a given DNA type based on DNA spiking experiments. A comparison of the maize rhizosphere and bulk soil hybridization results showed a significant rhizosphere effect, with a higher predominance of Agrobacterium spp. in the rhizosphere, as well as a lower prevalence of Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Planctomycetes, a new taxon of interest in soil. In addition, well-known taxonomic groups such as Sphingomonas spp., Rhizobiaceae, and Actinobacteria were identified in both microbial habitats with strong hybridization signals. The taxonomic microarray developed in the present study was able to discriminate and characterize bacterial community composition in related biological samples, offering extensive possibilities for systematic exploration of bacterial diversity in ecosystems.


Subject(s)
Proteobacteria/classification , Proteobacteria/genetics , RNA, Bacterial/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Rhizobium/classification , Rhizobium/genetics , Zea mays/microbiology , Cloning, Molecular , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Phylogeny , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Proteobacteria/growth & development , Rhizobium/growth & development , Soil Microbiology
12.
Environ Microbiol ; 8(2): 289-307, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16423016

ABSTRACT

The microarray approach has been proposed for high throughput analysis of the microbial community by providing snapshots of the microbial diversity under different environmental conditions. For this purpose, a prototype of a 16S rRNA-based taxonomic microarray was developed and evaluated for assessing bacterial community diversity. The prototype microarray is composed of 122 probes that target bacteria at various taxonomic levels from phyla to species (mostly Alphaproteobacteria). The prototype microarray was first validated using bacteria in pure culture. Differences in the sequences of probes and potential target DNAs were quantified as weighted mismatches (WMM) in order to evaluate hybridization reliability. As a general feature, probes having a WMM > 2 with target DNA displayed only 2.8% false positives. The prototype microarray was subsequently tested with an environmental sample, which consisted of an Agrobacterium-related polymerase chain reaction amplicon from a maize rhizosphere bacterial community. Microarray results were compared to results obtained by cloning-sequencing with the same DNA. Microarray analysis enabled the detection of all 16S rRNA gene sequences found by cloning-sequencing. Sequences representing only 1.7% of the clone library were detected. In conclusion, this prototype 16S rRNA-based taxonomic microarray appears to be a promising tool for the analysis of Alphaproteobacteria in complex ecosystems.


Subject(s)
Alphaproteobacteria/classification , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Phylogeny , RNA, Bacterial/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Alphaproteobacteria/genetics , Base Sequence , Molecular Sequence Data , Sensitivity and Specificity
13.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 71(12): 8123-31, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16332794

ABSTRACT

Soil bioaugmentation is a promising approach in soil bioremediation and agriculture. Nevertheless, our knowledge of the fate and activity of introduced bacteria in soil and thus of their impact on the soil environment is still limited. The microscale spatial distribution of introduced bacteria has rarely been studied, although it determines the encounter probability between introduced cells and any components of the soil ecosystem and thus plays a role in the ecology of introduced bacteria. For example, conjugal gene transfer from introduced bacteria to indigenous bacteria requires cell-to-cell contact, the probability of which depends on their spatial distribution. To quantitatively characterize the microscale distribution of an introduced bacterial population and its dynamics, a gfp-tagged derivative of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 was introduced by percolation in repacked soil columns. Initially, the introduced population was less widely spread at the microscale level than two model indigenous functional communities: the 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid degraders and the nitrifiers (each at 10(6) CFU g(-1) soil). When the soil was percolated with a substrate metabolizable by P. putida or incubated for 1 month, the microscale distribution of introduced bacteria was modified towards a more widely dispersed distribution. The quantitative data indicate that the microscale spatial distribution of an introduced strain may strongly limit its contacts with the members of an indigenous bacterial community. This could constitute an explanation to the low number of indigenous transconjugants found most of time when a plasmid-donor strain is introduced into soil.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/growth & development , Pseudomonas putida/physiology , Pseudomonas/physiology , Soil Microbiology , Agriculture , Bacteria/classification , Environment , Genes, Reporter , Green Fluorescent Proteins/analysis , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Pseudomonas/growth & development , Pseudomonas putida/genetics , Pseudomonas putida/growth & development
14.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol ; 48(2): 119-27, 2004 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19712395

ABSTRACT

The spatial distribution of the tremendous bacterial diversity in soil partially depends on the broad range of scales of soil physical structures and the size of bacteria. The aim of this article is to collect information on spatial distribution of bacteria, the genetic structure of bacterial populations and communities, and on spatial constraints that operate in soil. This has been addressed by studying the spatial pattern of micro-habitats for various bacterial types and the spatial spread of clones in soil environment. The clones were considered as the units of genetic population structure. Experimental findings from a number of studies provide evidence that in soils a clone and a micro-colony are not necessarily identical. For some bacterial types, members of the same clone have been found far apart. Besides, micro-colonies of a few cells have also been reported. Short-range cell movements seem to be common in soil, in agreement with the observation of high small-scale diversity (millimetre scale). The mechanisms for the spread of clones are complex and probably operate at different spatial scales, even for soil bacteria with no specific vectors. The hypothesis underlying the study of the spatial dimension of diversity is that it can reveal mechanisms of diversity maintenance and contribute to their evaluation, complementing available knowledge of genetic processes.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/growth & development , Soil Microbiology , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , Biodiversity , DNA Fingerprinting/methods , DNA, Bacterial/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL