Selective Personalized RadioImmunotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Trial (SPRINT).

PURPOSE: Standard therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant durvalumab. For biomarker-selected patients with LA-NSCLC, we hypothesized that sequential pembrolizumab and risk-adapted radiotherapy, without chemotherapy, would be well-tolerated and effective. METHODS: Patients with stage III NSCLC or unresectable stage II NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were eligible for this trial. Patients with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥50% received three cycles of induction pembrolizumab (200 mg, once every 21 days), followed by a 20-fraction course of risk-adapted thoracic radiotherapy (55 Gy delivered to tumors or lymph nodes with metabolic volume exceeding 20 cc, 48 Gy delivered to smaller lesions), followed by consolidation pembrolizumab to complete a 1-year treatment course. The primary study end point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included response rates after induction pembrolizumab, overall survival (OS), and adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50% were enrolled. The median age was 71, most patients (88%) had stage IIIA or IIIB disease, and the median PD-L1 TPS was 75%. Two patients developed disease progression during induction pembrolizumab, and two patients discontinued pembrolizumab after one infusion because of immune-related adverse events. Using RECIST criteria, 12 patients (48%) exhibited a partial or complete response after induction pembrolizumab. Twenty-four patients (96%) received definitive thoracic radiotherapy. The 1-year PFS rate is 76%, satisfying our efficacy objective. One- and 2-year OS rates are 92% and 76%, respectively. The most common grade 3 adverse events were colitis (n = 2, 8%) and esophagitis (n = 2, 8%), and no higher-grade treatment-related adverse events have occurred. CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab and risk-adapted radiotherapy, without chemotherapy, are a promising treatment approach for patients with LA-NSCLC with a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50%.

HIV Associated Lung Cancer: Unique Clinicopathologic Features and Immune Biomarkers Impacting Lung Cancer Screening and Management.

OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in people with HIV (PWH). We study the clinicopathologic characteristics and immune microenvironment in HIV associated lung cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinicopathological characteristics including immunotherapy outcomes were collected for 174 PWH diagnosed with lung cancer. Immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1, CD4, and CD8 was performed. RESULTS: At diagnosis, patients with HIV associated lung cancer were significantly younger (56.9 vs. 69 years, P < .0001) and more frequently had advanced disease (70% vs. 53%, P = .01). The majority were African American (60% vs. 42%, P < .0001) and were smoking at the time of diagnosis or smoked in the past (98% vs. 86%, P = .0001). Only 10% of HIV associated lung cancer was diagnosed through the screening program. The median CD4+ lymphocyte count was 334 cells/µL, 31% had a CD4 ≤200 cells/µL and 63% of the cohort was virally suppressed. HIV associated non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC) was characterized by limited PD-L1 expression compared to the HIV negative cohort, 64% vs. 31% had TPS <1%, and 20% vs. 34% had TPS≥50%, respectively (P = .04). Higher CD8+ TILs were detected in PD-L1-high tumors (P < .0001). 50% of patients achieved disease control in the metastatic setting with the use of immunotherapy, and there were no new safety signals in 19 PWH treated with immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Lung cancer in PWH demonstrates unique features highlighting the need for a specialized screening program. Despite low PD-L1 expression, immunotherapy is well tolerated with reasonable disease control. Altered immune system in lung cancer pathogenesis in PWH should be further investigated.

Exploring causes and consequences of early discontinuation of durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Introduction: For most locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients who complete definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and do not experience disease progression, one year of adjuvant durvalumab is recommended. Here, we explore causes and consequences of early durvalumab discontinuation. Materials and Methods: We reviewed patients treated for LA-NSCLC with definitive CRT who began adjuvant durvalumab between 2017 and 2021. Duration of durvalumab receipt and causes for early discontinuation were tabulated. Logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate predictors of early durvalumab discontinuation. Landmark analyses were performed to explore associations between early durvalumab discontinuation and clinical outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)). Results: Fifty-nine patients were included. Forty-one patients (69%) discontinued durvalumab early, most commonly for disease progression (n = 14) or lung toxicity (n = 10). Multivariable analysis revealed mean heart radiotherapy dose (MHD) was associated with risk of durvalumab discontinuation from progression (HR = 2.34 per 10 Gy, p = 0.052), and there was a trend suggesting an association between MHD and risk of durvalumab discontinuation from lung toxicity (HR = 2.16 per 10 Gy, p = 0.126). Median PFS duration following durvalumab initiation was 14 months, and median OS duration was 32 months. Landmark analyses that excluded patients with progression or death within one year of durvalumab initiation demonstrated improved outcomes for patients who completed one year of durvalumab (2-year PFS 100% v. 40%, p < 0.001; 2-year OS 100% v. 67%, p = 0.862). Improved outcomes were observed for patients who received MHD below the cohort median (9.3 Gy) compared to patients with higher MHD (median PFS 32 months v. 8 months, p < 0.001; 2-year OS 69% v. 44%, p = 0.088). Conclusion: For LA-NSCLC patients treated with CRT followed by immunotherapy, extent of cardiac irradiation may be a risk factor for immunotherapy discontinuation, disease recurrence, and death.

Thyroid Dysfunction in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs): Outcomes in a Multiethnic Urban Cohort.

We sought to characterize thyroid dysfunction and its association with baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, as well as progression-free survival (PFS), in a multiethnic cohort of lung cancer patients treated with ICIs. A retrospective chart review of lung cancer patients receiving an anti-PD1 or PD-L1 agent was performed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards were fitted to compare time to thyroid dysfunction among race subgroups controlling for age, gender, treatment type, and duration. Thyroid dysfunction was based on laboratory testing; clinical symptoms were not required. PFS at a 24-week landmark analysis point among patients with and without thyroid dysfunction was compared using a log-rank test. We identified 205 subjects that received ICIs, including 76 (37.1%) who developed thyroid dysfunction. Rates of thyroid dysfunction by one year occurred at similar frequencies among all races (p = 0.92). Gender and concurrent chemotherapy showed no significant association with thyroid dysfunction (p = 0.81 and p = 0.67, respectively). Thyrotoxicosis occurred at higher rates in Black (25, 31.6%) subjects than in White (7, 16.7%) and Hispanic (8, 12.7%) subjects when employing the log-rank test (p = 0.016) and multivariate Cox regression (HR 0.48, p = 0.09 for White and HR 0.36, p = 0.01 for Hispanic compared to Black subjects). PFS was similar among subjects with and without thyroid dysfunction when applying the log-rank test (p = 0.353). Gender, concurrent treatment with chemotherapy, and PFS were not associated with thyroid dysfunction in patients receiving ICIs; however, Black race was a risk factor for thyrotoxicosis. The mechanisms underlying the role of race in the development of irAEs warrant further study.

First-in-human study of inhaled Azacitidine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Aerosolized Azacitidine has been shown to inhibit orthotopic lung cancer growth and induce re-expression of methylated tumor suppressor genes in murine models. We hypothesized that inhaled Azacitidine is safe and effective in reversing epigenetic changes in the bronchial epithelium secondary to chronic smoking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report the first in human study of inhaled Azacitidine. Azacitidine in aqueous solution was used to generate an aerosol suspension of 0.25-5 µm particle size. Main inclusion criteria: Stage IV or recurrent NSCLC with predominantly lung involvement, ≥1 prior systemic therapy, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate pulmonary function. Patients received inhaled Azacitidine daily on days 1-5 and 15-19 of 28-day cycles, at 3 escalating doses (15, 30 and 45 mg/m2 daily). The primary objective was to determine the feasibility and tolerability of this new therapeutic modality. The key secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, methylation profiles and efficacy. RESULTS: From 3/2015 to 2/2018, eight patients received a median number of 2 (IQR = 1) cycles of inhaled Azacitidine. No clinically significant adverse events were observed, except one patient treated at the highest dose developed an asymptomatic grade 2 decreased DLCO which resolved spontaneously. One patient receiving 12 cycles of therapy had an objective and durable partial response, and two patients had stable disease. Plasma Azacitidine was only briefly detectable in patients treated at the higher doses. Moreover, in 2 of 3 participants who agreed and underwent pre- and post-treatment bronchoscopy, the global DNA methylation in the bronchial epithelium decreased by 24 % and 79 % post-therapy, respectively. The interval between last inhaled treatment and bronchoscopy was 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled Azacitidine resulted in negligible plasma levels compared to the previously reported subcutaneous administration and was well-tolerated. The results justify the continued development of inhaled Azacitidine at non-cytotoxic doses for patients with lung-confined malignant and/or premalignant lesions.

Who Benefits the Most From Adjuvant Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer? An Exploratory Analysis.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant durvalumab is now recommended for most patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Herein, we explore the clinical factors that may be associated with the benefit from adjuvant durvalumab. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy at our institution between August 2013 and May 2019 were included in this analysis. Clinical and treatment characteristics were tested for associations with progression-free survival (PFS) in Cox models. Interaction terms were added to the PFS Cox models to explore factors that may modulate the effects of adjuvant durvalumab. PFS and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons between patient subgroups were performed using log rank testing. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients met the eligibility criteria. Thirty-five patients (33%) received adjuvant durvalumab. Treatment with durvalumab was associated with significant improvement in PFS (1-year PFS: 67% vs 39%; log rank P = .006) and OS (1-year OS: 88% vs 76%; log rank P = .041). Exploratory analyses identified the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) after radiation therapy (RT) as a factor that may be associated with a benefit from durvalumab. For patients with post-RT NLR exceeding the cohort's median value of 4.3, receipt of adjuvant durvalumab was not associated with a significant PFS improvement (1-year PFS: 45% vs 36%; log rank P = .702). For patients with post-RT NLR <4.3, durvalumab receipt was associated with improved PFS (69% vs 41%; P = .009). High mean RT doses delivered to the heart and esophagus were associated with high post-RT NLR. CONCLUSIONS: We identified low NLR after chemoradiotherapy as a factor that may be associated with a benefit from adjuvant durvalumab. Validation studies are warranted.

Making the case for EGFR TKI sequencing in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: a GioTag study US patient analysis.

Aim: To assess time-to-treatment failure (TTF) in US patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received sequential afatinib-osimertinib treatment in the global, observational GioTag study. Patients & methods: Patients had EGFR T790M mutation-positive disease after first-line afatinib and subsequently received osimertinib. The primary outcome was TTF. Results: In 129 patients at US centers, median TTF was 28.4 months (90% CI: 27.0-34.1). Median overall survival was 47.6 months (90% CI: 35.5-51.5). Conclusion: Sequential afatinib-osimertinib in this US-treated population was associated with long median TTF and represents an effective, evidence-based treatment option for US patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC not presenting with active brain metastases or de novo T790M. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03370770 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Sequential afatinib and osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: final analysis of the GioTag study.

Aim: Final overall survival (OS) and time on treatment analysis of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received sequential afatinib and osimertinib. Patients & methods: Patients (n = 203) had T790M-positive disease following first-line afatinib and started osimertinib treatment ≥10 months before data entry. Primary outcome was time on treatment; OS analysis was exploratory. Results: Median time on treatment with afatinib and osimertinib was 27.7 months (90% CI: 26.7-29.9). Median OS was 37.6 months (90% CI: 35.5-41.3); median OS was 41.6 and 44.8 months in Del19-positive patients and Asian patients, respectively. Conclusion: In real-world clinical practice, sequential afatinib and osimertinib was associated with encouraging outcomes in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, especially in Del19-positive patients and Asian patients. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03370770 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Sequential afatinib and osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated analysis of the observational GioTag study.

Aims: Overall survival (OS) and updated time to treatment failure (TTF) analysis of patients with EGFR mutation-positive (Del19, L858R) non-small-cell lung cancer who received sequential afatinib/osimertinib in the real-world GioTag study. Patients & methods: Patients had T790M-positive disease following first-line afatinib and received osimertinib treatment (n = 203). Primary outcome was TTF. The OS analysis was exploratory. Results: Median OS was 41.3 months (90% CI: 36.8-46.3) overall and 45.7 months (90% CI: 45.3-51.5) in patients with Del19-positive tumors (n = 149); 2-year survival was 80 and 82%, respectively. Updated median TTF with afatinib and osimertinib was 28.1 months (90% CI: 26.8-30.3). Conclusion: Sequential afatinib/osimertinib was associated with encouraging OS/TTF in patients with EGFR T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, especially in patients with Del19-positive tumors. Trial registration number: NCT03370770.

Impact of Primary Care Access on Mortality of Lung Cancer Patients in an Underserved Community.

BACKGROUND: Lack of access to primary care physicians (PCPs) may be an important contributor to mortality differences attributed to race/ethnicity. This study examined the effects of primary care access on mortality of lung cancer patients in an underserved community. METHODS: Medical records of all newly diagnosed patients with primary lung cancer from 2012 to 2016 at a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated center in Bronx, New York were reviewed. Demographic data, PCP status, and residence in primary care shortage areas (PCSAs) were collected. Survival data from time of first imaging to death or the end of follow-up on January 1, 2018 were recorded. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox hazards modeling. RESULTS: Among 1062 patients, 874 (82%) were PCSA residents, 314 (30%) were Hispanic, and 445 (42%) were African American. PCSA residents were likely Hispanics (P<0.001), African Americans (P<0.001), of lower income (P<0.001), and had advanced disease at diagnosis (P=0.01). Patients without established PCPs had more comorbidities (P=0.04), more advanced disease (P<0.001), and less in-network cancer treatment (P<0.001). PCSA residence (P=0.03, hazard ratio [HR]=1.27) and no established PCP (P<0.001, HR=1.50) were associated with increased mortality. In multivariable modeling, lack of established PCP remained a predictor of increased mortality (P=0.02, HR=1.25). DISCUSSION: Among newly diagnosed lung cancer patients, lack of established PCP is associated with increased mortality. Hispanics and African Americans increasingly resided in PCSAs, suggesting race/ethnicity mortality differences may be mediated by primary care shortage. Patients without PCPs had worse health outcomes. Effective health policy efforts to reduce mortality in lung cancer patients must include approaches to improve primary care access.

Sequential treatment with afatinib and osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: an observational study.

AIM: To assess outcomes in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (Del19, L858R) non-small-cell lung cancer receiving sequential afatinib and osimertinib in a real-world clinical setting. Materials & methods: In this retrospective, observational, multicenter study, patients (n = 204) had T790M-positive disease following first-line afatinib and started osimertinib treatment ≥10 months prior to data entry. Primary outcome was time on treatment. RESULTS: Overall median time on treatment was 27.6 months (90% CI: 25.9-31.3), 30.3 months (90% CI: 27.6-44.5) in Del19-positive patients and 46.7 months (90% CI: 26.8-not reached) in Asians. The 2-year overall survival was 78.9%. CONCLUSION: In real-world clinical practice, sequential afatinib and osimertinib facilitates prolonged, chemotherapy-free treatment in patients with T790M acquired resistance, and is a potentially attractive strategy, especially for Del19-positive tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03370770.

Screening Patterns and Mortality Differences in Patients With Lung Cancer at an Urban Underserved Community.

BACKGROUND: The landmark National Lung Screening Trial demonstrated significant reduction in lung cancer-related mortality. However, European lung cancer screening (LCS) trials have not confirmed such benefit. We examined LCS patterns and determined the impact of LCS-led diagnosis on the mortality of newly diagnosed patients with lung cancer in an underserved community. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer in 2013 through 2016 (n = 855) were reviewed for primary care provider (PCP) status and LCS eligibility and completion, determined using United States Preventative Services Task Force guidelines. Univariate analyses of patient characteristics were conducted between LCS-eligible patients based on screening completion. Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: In 2013 through 2016, 175 patients with primary lung cancer had an established PCP and were eligible for LCS. Among them, 19% (33/175) completed screening prior to diagnosis. LCS completion was associated with younger age (P = .02), active smoking status (P < .01), earlier stage at time of diagnosis (P < .01), follow-up in-network cancer treatment (P = .03), and surgical management (P < .01). LCS-eligible patients who underwent screening had improved all-cause mortality compared with those not screened (P < .01). Multivariate regression showed surgery (hazard ratio, 0.31; P = .04) significantly affected mortality. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess LCS patterns and mortality differences on patients with screen-detected lung cancer in an urban underserved setting since the inception of United States Preventative Services Task Force guidelines. Patients with a LCS-led diagnosis had improved mortality, likely owing to cancer detection at earlier stages with curative treatment, which echoes the finding of prospective trials.

Positron Emission Tomography-Adjusted Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: To perform a prospective trial examining positron emission tomography (PET)-based, dose-painted intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the setting of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with stage IIB-III NSCLC were treated with 25 fractions of dose-painted IMRT. Tumors or lymph nodes with metabolic tumor volume exceeding 25 cm3 were deemed "high risk" and received 65 Gy. Smaller lesions were treated with 57 Gy or 52.5 Gy (after November 2014). Patients received concurrent weekly carboplatin (area under the curve = 2) and paclitaxel (45 mg/m2). The primary study endpoint was the absence of high residual metabolic activity (maximum standardized uptake value > 6) in treated lesions on PET 12 to 16 weeks after completion of IMRT. RESULTS: Thirty-five subjects with 116 hypermetabolic lesions were eligible for analysis. The primary endpoint was met for 24 of 30 patients (80%) who underwent posttreatment PET, satisfying our efficacy objective. With a median follow-up duration of 23.8 months for living patients, progression in a lesion targeted with radiation therapy has been observed in 5 patients (14%). Treating progression in other sites and death without progression as competing risks, 2-year cumulative incidence rates of local disease progression in high-risk lesions (n=24) and low-risk lesions (n=92) are 9% and 3%, respectively. The actuarial rate of overall survival at 2 years is 52%. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-painted IMRT based on pretreatment PET metrics with concurrent chemotherapy yields high rates of metabolic response and local disease control for locally advanced NSCLC. Future trials should test this approach to maximize the therapeutic ratio of thoracic radiation therapy.

Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Community-Dwelling Adult Cancer Survivors in the United States: 1999-2012.

Background: Little is known about the prevalence of secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) among cancer survivors. We sought to determine the prevalence, trends, and correlates of SHSe among nonsmoking adult cancer survivors in the United States.Methods: Interview and serum cotinine data for nonsmoking adults, age 20 years and older, with a history of cancer (N = 686) were obtained from consecutive two-year cross-sectional cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1999 to 2012. SHSe was defined as serum cotinine 0.05-10 ng/mL among nonsmokers. We calculated and trended the prevalence of SHSe among nonsmoking cancer survivors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the associations of SHSe with sociodemographic, smoking, and clinical characteristics. Survey weights were applied in estimating prevalence rates, adjusted ORs, and confidence intervals (CI).Results: The weighted aggregate SHSe and self-reported indoor SHSe prevalence rates over the study period were 28.26% (95% CI: 24.97%-31.55%) and 4.53% (95% CI: 3.48%-5.57%), respectively. SHS exposure declined from 39.61% (95% CI: 27.88%-51.34%) in 1999/2000 to 15.68% (95% CI: 9.38%-21.98%) in 2011/2012 (Ptrend < 0.001). Age ≥ 60 years was protective against SHSe, while being black, having less than high school education, poverty, and a smoking-related cancer history were associated with higher odds of SHSe.Conclusions: Fortunately, SHSe among nonsmoking cancer survivors in the United States is on the decline, although certain subgroups remain disproportionately burdened.Impact: These findings highlight clinical and public health imperatives to target socioeconomically disadvantaged nonsmoking cancer survivors to reduce their SHSe. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(8); 1296-305. ©2017 AACR.

Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Pharmacodynamic Separation of Pemetrexed and Intercalated Erlotinib Versus Pemetrexed Alone for Advanced Nonsquamous, Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacodynamic separation of pemetrexed and erlotinib avoids negative cellular interactions and results in antitumor synergy in erlotinib-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells, independent of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) genotype. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with platinum-treated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:2 to pemetrexed alone (500 mg/m2 provided intravenously on day 1) or pemetrexed followed by erlotinib (150 mg provided orally once daily on days 2-17) every 21 days. EGFR genotype was centrally confirmed by Sequenom multiplex oncogenotyping assay. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), which would be considered promising for future study if median PFS was ≥ 4.5 months. RESULTS: Of 83 patients enrolled, 79 were randomized to either pemetrexed alone (n = 27) or in combination (n = 52). Fifty-nine (79%) of 75 eligible patients had tumors with confirmed EGFR genotype: 7 with activating mutations and 52 wild type. Median PFS was 4.7 and 2.9 months in the combination and pemetrexed-alone groups, respectively. In patients with EGFR wild-type tumors, median PFS was 5.3 and 3.5 months in the combination and pemetrexed-alone groups, respectively. Objective response rate (29% vs. 10%, P = .17), 6-month PFS (45% vs. 29%, P = .26), and 12-month PFS (23% vs. 10%, P = .28) were all higher in the combination arm. Rash (67% vs. 26%, P = .0007) and diarrhea (44% vs. 11%, P = .003) were significantly more common in the combination arm. CONCLUSION: In patients with unselected or EGFR wild-type advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, pharmacodynamic separation of pemetrexed and intercalated erlotinib had promising antitumor activity without new safety concerns. The combination merits further evaluation as maintenance or second-line therapy against new standards in patients with EGFR wild-type advanced NSCLC.

Gemcitabine-Induced Pseudocellulitis in a Patient With Recurrent Lymphedema: A Case Report and Review of the Current Literature.

Gemcitabine is a chemotherapeutic agent used for treatment of a variety of malignancies. It has been associated with multiple cutaneous reactions including rash, alopecia, and pruritus. Less commonly, gemcitabine has been associated with "pseudocellulitis," a noninfectious skin inflammatory reaction, which resembles cellulitis. The majority of cases reported in the literature are radiation recall reactions in which inflammation occurs in areas of previous radiation post drug treatment; however, there are also reports of pseudocellulitis occurring in areas of preexisting lymphedema. The pathophysiology of both of these reactions are still unknown, though it is theorized that areas of lymphedema may both increase concentration of gemcitabine and reduce its rate of metabolism leading to increased drug exposure time. In this study, we report a case of pseudocellulitis in a patient with chronic lower extremity lymphedema and a review of the current literature. By recognizing this side effect of gemcitabine, one can avoid unnecessary hospitalization and exposure to antibiotics.

Evolving Concepts: Immunity in Oncology from Targets to Treatments.

Cancer is associated with global immune suppression of the host. Malignancy-induced immune suppressive effect can be circumvented by blocking the immune checkpoint and tip the immune balance in favor of immune stimulation and unleash cytotoxic effects on cancer cells. Human antibodies directed against immune checkpoint proteins: cytotoxic T lymphocytes antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), have shown therapeutic efficacy in advanced melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer and other malignancies. Immune check point blockade antibodies lead to diminished tolerance to self and enhanced immune ability to recognize and eliminate cancer cells. As a class these agents have immune-related adverse events due to decreased ability of effector immune cells to discriminate between self and non-self. Seventy percent of patients participating in clinical trials have experienced anticancer activities and varying degrees of immune mediated dose-limiting side effects.

Pre-treatment FDG-PET predicts the site of in-field progression following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Locoregional progression following definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is common. In this study, we explore the utility of pre-treatment PET for predicting sites of disease progression following CRT. METHODS: We identified patients treated at our institution with definitive, concurrent CRT for stage III NSCLC in the years 2007-2010 who underwent staging FDG-PET/CT. Using a semiautomatic gradient-based tool, visible thoracic hypermetabolic lesions were contoured on each patient's pre-treatment PET. Post-treatment imaging was reviewed to identify specific locations of disease progression. Patients' maximum SUV (SUVmax_pat) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV_pat) were evaluated as predictors of clinical outcomes using logrank testing. Competing risks analysis was performed to examine the relationship between lesion (tumor or lymph node) MTV (MTV_les) and the risk of local disease progression. Patient death and progression in other sites were treated as competing risks. RESULTS: 28 patients with 82 hypermetabolic lesions (27 pulmonary tumors, 55 lymph nodes) met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 39.0 months for living patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 31.8 months. Low MTV_pat was associated with improved PFS (median 14.3 months for MTV<60 cc vs. 9.7 months for MTV>60 cc, p=0.039). MTV_les was strongly associated with the risk of local disease progression. The 2-year cumulative incidence rate (CIR) for progression in lesions larger than 25 cc was 45%, compared to 5% for lesions under 25 cc (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment PET can be used to identify specific lesions at high risk for treatment failure following definitive CRT for locally advanced NSCLC. Selective treatment intensification to high-risk lesions should be studied as a strategy to improve clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Denosumab for treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy.

CONTEXT: Hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) in patients with advanced cancer is often caused by excessive osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. Patients may not respond to or may relapse after iv bisphosphonate therapy. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether denosumab, a potent inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, reduces serum calcium in patients with bisphosphonate-refractory HCM. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this single-arm international study, participants had serum calcium levels corrected for albumin (CSC) >12.5 mg/dL (3.1 mmol/L) despite bisphosphonates given >7 and ≤30 days before screening. INTERVENTION: Patients received 120 mg sc denosumab on days 1, 8, 15, and 29 and then every 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with CSC ≤11.5 mg/dL (2.9 mmol/L) (response) by day 10. Secondary endpoints included response by visit, duration of response, and the proportion of patients with a complete response (CSC ≤10.8 mg/dL [2.7 mmol/L]) by day 10 and during the study. RESULTS: Patients (N = 33) had solid tumors or hematologic malignancies. By day 10, 21 patients (64%) reached CSC ≤11.5 mg/dL, and 12 patients (33%) reached CSC ≤10.8 mg/dL. During the study, 23 patients (70%) reached CSC ≤11.5 mg/dL, and 21 patients (64%) reached CSC ≤10.8 mg/dL. Estimated median response duration was 104 days. The most common serious adverse events were hypercalcemia worsening (5 patients, 15%) and dyspnea (3 patients, 9%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HCM despite recent iv bisphosphonate treatment, denosumab lowered serum calcium in 64% of patients within 10 days, inducing durable responses. Denosumab may offer a new treatment option for HCM.