Correlation of Ablation Volume with Renal Function Loss after Cryoablation in Solitary Functioning Kidneys.

PURPOSE: To determine the degree of renal function deterioration after renal cryoablation in patients with a solitary functioning kidney on the basis of ablation volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 15-year period, 81 percutaneous cryoablations were performed in solitary functioning kidneys. After exclusion of patients with baseline end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and insufficient follow-up, analysis was performed on 65 procedures in 52 patients (40 men; mean age, 63.5 years). The postcryoablation renal function was based on the lowest serum creatinine within 6 months after procedure. Renal function change was defined as percentage glomerular filtration rate (GFR) change. Volumetric analysis was performed on the target lesion, renal parenchyma, and ablation zone. RESULTS: The median tumor diameter was 2.0 cm (range, 0.8-4.7 cm). The median baseline GFR decreased from 56.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range, 17.5-89.7 mL/min/1.73 m2) to 46.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range, 16.5-89.7 mL/min/1.73 m2) at median of 95 days (P < .001), equating to a -7.9% median renal function change (range, -45.0% to +30.7%). All patients had Stage 2 or worse chronic kidney disease, and baseline function did not correlate with renal function change. The median volume of ablated parenchyma was 19.7 mL (range, 2.4-87.3 mL), equating to 8.1% (range, 0.7%-37.2%) of total parenchyma. The volume of parenchymal volume ablated correlated significantly with renal function loss, whereas age, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus did not. No patient developed ESRD within 1 year after cryoablation. CONCLUSIONS: Cryoablation in solitary functioning kidneys resulted in a modest reduction in renal function, even in patients with chronic kidney disease and ablations up to 20% of renal parenchymal volume.

Long term impact of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation on hepatic morphology.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term morphologic changes occurring in the liver after TIPS creation with correlation with hepatic function to gain insight on the physiologic impact of TIPS on the liver. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent TIPS creation between 2005 and 2022 and had contrasted CT or MRI studies prior to and between 1 and 2 years post procedure. Strict exclusion criteria were applied to avoid confounding. Parenchymal volume and vessel measurements were assessed on the pre- and post-TIPS CT or MRI and MELD scores calculated. RESULTS: Of 580 patients undergoing TIPS creation, 65 patients (mean age, 55 years; 36 males) had pre-TIPS and post-TIPS imaging meeting inclusion criteria at median 16.5 months. After TIPS, the mean MELD score increased (12.9 to 15.4; p = 0.008) and total liver volume decreased (1730 to 1432 mL; p < 0.001). However, the magnitude of volume change did not correlate with MELD change. Neither portosystemic gradient nor TIPS laterality correlated with total or lobar hepatic volume changes or MELD changes. The main portal vein diameter increased (15.0 to 18.7 mm; p < 0.001). Thrombosis of the hepatic vein used for TIPS creation resulted in a mean increase in MELD of +4.1 compared to -2.1 in patients who had a patent and normal hepatic vein (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Given lack of correlation between portosystemic gradient, hepatic atrophy, hepatic function, and TIPS laterality, the alterations in portal flow dynamics after TIPS may not be impactful to hepatic function. However, hepatic vein patency after TIPS correlated with improved hepatic function.

Short-term outcomes after third-time lung transplantation: A single institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Reoperative lung transplantation (LTx) survival has improved over time such that a growing number of patients may present for third-time LTx (L3Tx). To understand the safety of L3Tx, we evaluated perioperative outcomes and 3-year survival after L3Tx at a high-volume US LTx center. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent bilateral L3Tx at our institution. Using an optimal matching technique, a primary LTx (L1Tx) cohort was matched 1:2 and a second-time LTx (L2Tx) cohort 1:1. Recipient, operative, and donor characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and 3-year survival were compared among L1Tx, L2Tx, and L3Tx groups. RESULTS: Eleven L3Tx, 11 L2Tx, and 22 L1Tx recipients were included. Among L3Tx recipients, median age at transplant was 37 years and most (73%) had cystic fibrosis. L3Tx was performed median 6.0 and 10.6 years after L2Tx and L1Tx, respectively. Compared to L1Tx and L2Tx recipients, L3Tx recipients had greater intraoperative transfusion requirements, a higher incidence of postoperative complications, and a higher rate of unplanned reoperation. Rates of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours, reintubation, and in-hospital mortality were similar among groups. There were no differences in 3-year patient (log-rank p = 0.61) or rejection-free survival (log-rank p = 0.34) after L1Tx, L2Tx, and L3Tx. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, L3Tx was associated with similar perioperative outcomes and 3-year patient survival compared to L1Tx and L2Tx. L3Tx represents the only safe treatment option for patients with allograft failure after L2Tx; however, further investigation is needed to understand the long-term survival and durability of L3Tx.