Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 44(3): 278-82, 2016 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26704827

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infection is one of the most serious complications following surgical placement of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Infection prevention efforts are necessary in reducing CIED infectious outcomes. These devices, however, are commonly inserted in higher risk patients, which may explain the ongoing risk of surgical site infection (SSI) in this population. The rates of CIED infection and utilization vary widely in the literature. The definitions of infection may also vary between clinical definitions and the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) criteria. METHODS: The primary objective of this study was to review patient data to identify risk factors for infection and readmission after CIED placement at an academic medical center. The secondary objectives were to compare the rates of SSI identified by NHSN criteria compared to that obtained by applying clinical infection definitions. RESULTS: The overall rate of infection (SSI) was 1.9%, which was identical in both the clinical definition and NHSN reported data. The 30 day readmission rate and the 90 day readmission rate were 12.7% and 25.6% respectively with the most readmissions related to the patients' underlying medical conditions. A lower ejection fraction (EF) was identified as an independent risk factor for readmission, inpatient procedures, smoking and device infection were also significantly associated with readmission after CIED insertion.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/adverse effects , Patient Readmission , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors
2.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 31(2): 139-47, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23455328

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to ascertain attitudes of health care workers on end-of-life care (EOLC) issues and to highlight the disparity that exists in countries with different backgrounds. METHODS: It is a cross-sectional questionnaire survey across heterogeneous health care providers in India, Chile, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands using an indigenously prepared questionnaire considering regional variations, covering different areas of EOLC. RESULTS: Of the 109 participants, 68 (62.4%) felt that cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be done selectively, 25 (22.9%) had come in contact with at least 1 patient who had asked them to hasten death, and 36 (33%) felt that training was insufficient to prepare them for skills in issues of EOLC. CONCLUSION: To avoid cumbersome through well-meant interventions, it is important that the caregiving team is aware of the patient's own wishes with respect to EOLC issues.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Personnel/psychology , Social Values , Terminal Care/psychology , Adult , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/psychology , Chile , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Cross-Sectional Studies , Euthanasia/psychology , Female , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , India , Male , Netherlands , Personal Autonomy , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Suicide, Assisted/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom , Withholding Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL