Surgical outcome and prognostic factors in spinal cord ependymoma: a single-center, long-term follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord ependymomas account for 3-6% of all central nervous system tumors and around 60% of all intramedullary tumors. The aim of this study was to analyze the neurological outcome after surgery and to determine prognostic factors for functional outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated surgically due to a spinal cord ependymoma between 1990 and 2018 were retrospectively included. Demographics, neurological symptoms, radiological parameters, histopathology, and neurological outcome (using McCormick Score [MCS]) were analyzed. Possible prognostic factors for neurological outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 148 patients were included (76 males, 51.4%). The mean age was 46.7 ±â€„15.3 years. The median follow-up period was 6.8 ±â€„5.4 years. The prevalence was mostly in the lumbar spine (45.9%), followed by the thoracic spine (28.4%) and cervical spine (25.7%). Gross-total resection was achieved in 129 patients (87.2%). The recurrence rate was 8.1% and depended on the extent of tumor resection (p = 0.001). Postoperative temporary neurological deterioration was observed in 63.2% of patients with ependymomas of the cervical spine, 50.0% of patients with ependymomas of the thoracic spine, and 7.4% of patients with ependymomas of the lumbosacral region. MCS 1-2 was detected in nearly two-thirds of patients with cervical and thoracic spinal cord ependymoma 36 months after surgery. Neurological recovery was superior in thoracic spine ependymomas compared with cervical spine ependymomas. Poor preoperative functional condition (MCS >2), cervical and thoracic spine location, and tumor extension >2 vertebrae were independent predictors of poor neurological outcome. CONCLUSION: Neurological deterioration was seen in the majority of cervical and thoracic spine ependymomas. Postoperative improvement was less in thoracic cervical spine ependymomas compared with thoracic spine ependymomas. Poor preoperative status and especially tumor extension >2 vertebrae are predictors of poor neurological outcome (MCS >2).

Risk score for outcome prediction after microsurgical resection of spinal ependymoma (SOURSE score).

OBJECTIVE: Microsurgical resection of spinal ependymomas is associated with a considerable risk of postoperative neurological deterioration. We aimed to develop a risk score for outcome prediction after surgery for spinal ependymoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent microsurgical resection of spinal ependymoma between 1980 and 2015 were included. Different perioperative parameters were collected for the score construction. Poor outcome was defined as the modified McCormick Scale (MMCS) >2 at 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Of 131 patients (mean age: 45.6 ± 16.7 years; 63 females), 38 cases (29%) showed poor outcome. Based on the univariate analysis, preoperative MMCS, subtotal tumor resection, proximal tumor level on the spinal cord, tumor extension, intramedullary location, and WHO grading were included in the multivariate analysis. The final risk score consisted of the following independent predictors: preoperative MMCS > 1 (1 point), proximal tumor level at Th 10 and higher (1 point), and tumor extension ≥ 3 vertebrae (1 point). The constructed score (0-3 points; Score for OUtcome after Resection of Spinal Ependymoma [SOURSE]) showed high diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.883), which was superior to preoperative MMCS (AUC = 0.798) and Karnofsky Performance Status (AUC = 0.794). Patients scoring 0, 1, 2, and 3 points showed poor outcome in 0%, 12.9%, 54.6%, and 76.2% of the cases respectively. CONCLUSION: The presented SOURSE score based on preoperative neurologic condition, tumor location, and tumor extension could accurately predict the postoperative outcome in patients undergoing microsurgery of spinal ependymoma. Our data should be validated in a prospective trial.