Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34360176

ABSTRACT

The population-level implementation of innovative, evidence-based medical recommendations for adopting health-behaviors depends on the last link in the translation chain: the users. "User-friendly" medical interventions aimed at engaging users to adopt recommended health behaviors are best developed in a collaborative bio-medical and social sciences setting. In the 1990s, National Breast and Colorectal Cancer Early Detection Programs were launched at the Israeli Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology. Operating under the largest HMO (Health Maintenance Organization) in Israel ("Clalit Health Services"), the department had direct access to HMO community primary-care clinics' teams, insured members, and medical records. Academically affiliated, the department engaged in translational research. In a decades-long translational process, this multi-disciplinary unit led a series of interventions built upon basic and applied behavioral/social science phenomena such as framing, "Implementation Intentions," and "Question-Behavior-Effect". A heterogeneous team of disciplinary specialists created an integrated scientific environment. In order to enhance screening, the team focused on the establishment of a systematic mechanism actively inviting programs' "users" (average-risk targeted individuals on the national level), and continuously applied social and health psychology concepts to study individuals' perceptions, expectations, and needs related to cancer screening. The increase in adherence to screening recommendations was slow and incremental. A decrease in late-stage breast and colorectal cancer diagnoses was observed nationally, but participation was lower than expected. This paper positions screening adherence as a unique challenge and proposes new social and network avenues to enhance future participation.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Neoplasms , Humans , Israel , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Translational Research, Biomedical , White People
2.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 7(1): e9351, 2019 01 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30664486

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Text message (short message service, SMS) interrogative reminders were adopted in population screening for the early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine responses to text message (SMS) reminders and associate responses with senders' characteristics, message type (interrogative/declarative), and subsequent screening uptake. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort intervention. Text message (SMS) reminders to undergo CRC screening, randomized into interrogative and declarative phrasing, were sent to nonadherent 40,000 women and men (age 50-74 years) at CRC average risk. We analyzed recipient responses by message phrasing, recipient characteristics, and for content, the latter predicting subsequent CRC screening per program database. RESULTS: While interrogative text message (SMS) reminders elicited 7.67% (1475/19,227) responses, declarative ones elicited 0.76% (146/19,262) responses. Text message (SMS) responses were content analyzed and grouped into attitudes toward CRC screening (1237/1512, 81.8% positive) and intention to screen (1004/1512, 62.6%). Text message (SMS) respondents screened significantly more than nonrespondents after 6 months (415/1621, 25.6% vs 3322/36,868, 9.0%; χ12=487.5, P<.001); 1 year (340/1621, 21.0% vs 4711/36,868; χ12=91.5, P<.001); and 2 years (225/1621, 13.9% vs 3924/36,868; χ12=16.9, P<.001) following the reminders. In a multivariable logistic regression among text message (SMS) respondents, screening after 6 months was significantly predicted by older age, past sporadic screening, attitudes, and intentions. CONCLUSIONS: Interrogative text message (SMS) reminders reached previously uninvolved sectors in the CRC target population-men, sporadic-screenees, and the "never-tested" before. This novel application resulted in a population-level, incrementally enhanced screening. Asking patients about their future health behavior may be relevant for enhancing other health behaviors in preventive medicine and clinical settings.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mass Screening/standards , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/psychology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Female , Humans , Intention , Israel , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reminder Systems/standards , Telemedicine/methods , Telemedicine/standards , Text Messaging
3.
Am J Public Health ; 106(11): 1998-2004, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27631750

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether asking questions about a future behavior changes this behavior (i.e., the question-behavior effect) when applied to a population-level intervention to enhance colorectal cancer screening. METHODS: In 2013, text-message reminders were sent to a national sample of 50 000 Israeli women and men aged 50 to 74 years following a fecal occult blood test invitation. Participants were randomized into 4 intervention groups (2 interrogative reminders, with or without reference to social context; 2 noninterrogative reminders, with or without social context) and a no-intervention control group. The outcome was fecal occult blood test uptake (n = 48 091, following attrition). RESULTS: Performance of fecal occult blood test was higher in the interrogative-reminder groups than in the other 3 groups (odds ratio = 1.11; 95% confidence interval = 1.05, 1.19); the effect size was small, varying in the different group comparisons from 0.03 to 0.06. CONCLUSIONS: The question-behavior effect appears to be modestly effective in colorectal cancer screening, but the absolute number of potential screenees may translate into a clinically significant health promotion change.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Health Promotion/methods , Reminder Systems , Text Messaging , Aged , Female , Humans , Israel , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Psychological , Occult Blood , Odds Ratio , Socioeconomic Factors , Telemedicine
4.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 25(4): 282-7, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26230609

ABSTRACT

Self-rated health (SRH) is a consistent predictor of mortality and other health outcomes. One of the mechanisms hypothesized to explain its validity as a predictor is that SRH affects the adoption of health behaviors. The present study examined the prospective association between SRH and performance of a recommended colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test. One thousand four hundred and seventy-six men and women aged 50-74 years, eligible for CRC screening, who had undergone the test a year before were interviewed 1-2 weeks (long interview, before testing) or 2 months (short interview, after testing) following the mailing of a test kit. Test performance was ascertained using an HMO's computerized data set. Respondents in the long interview group who rated their health as 'higher than others' performed the screening test 2 months following the invitation more than those who rated their health as similar to or lower than that of others (65.4, 61.6, and 49.1%, respectively, χ=8.02, P=0.018). At the same time, these respondents perceived the risk of CRC as significantly lower than that of those who rated their health as comparable with or lower than that of others. In a multivariate logistic regression of CRC screening behavior that included demographic and perceptual variables, age, intentions, and SRH were found to be significant predictors. Among respondents in the short interview, who tested before the interview, there was no significant association between SRH and behavior. SRH prospectively predicts uptake of CRC screening better than other perceptual variables, after accounting for demographic variables.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/psychology , Diagnostic Self Evaluation , Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Early Medical Intervention , Health Behavior , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Prognosis , Prospective Studies
5.
J Med Screen ; 22(3): 119-26, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25967088

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Participation, an indicator of screening programme acceptance and effectiveness, varies widely in clinical trials and population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes. We aimed to assess whether CRC screening participation rates can be compared across organized guaiac fecal occult blood test (G-FOBT)/fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based programmes, and what factors influence these rates. METHODS: Programme representatives from countries participating in the International Cancer Screening Network were surveyed to describe their G-FOBT/FIT-based CRC screening programmes, how screening participation is defined and measured, and to provide participation data for their most recent completed screening round. RESULTS: Information was obtained from 15 programmes in 12 countries. Programmes varied in size, reach, maturity, target age groups, exclusions, type of test kit, method of providing test kits and use, and frequency of reminders. Coverage by invitation ranged from 30-100%, coverage by the screening programme from 7-67.7%, overall uptake/participation rate from 7-67.7%, and first invitation participation from 7-64.3%. Participation rates generally increased with age and were higher among women than men and for subsequent compared with first invitation participation. CONCLUSION: Comparisons among CRC screening programmes should be made cautiously, given differences in organization, target populations, and interpretation of indicators. More meaningful comparisons are possible if rates are calculated across a uniform age range, by gender, and separately for people invited for the first time vs. previously.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Patient Participation , Patient Selection , Aged , Data Collection , Feces , Female , Guaiac , Humans , International Cooperation , Male , Middle Aged , Occult Blood , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Health Expect ; 18(5): 1194-203, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23745608

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) early detection improves health outcomes; screening programmes invest efforts in initiating invitations to target populations to be tested. Enhanced adherence is essential for reduction of morbidity and mortality. Participation rates in Israel are still relatively low. OBJECTIVE: To explore lay views regarding the concept of receiving material incentives in exchange for enhanced adherence to CRC screening. RESEARCH DESIGN: Qualitative study. Between November 2009 and February 2010 six focus group discussions were carried out in two urban, middle and low socio-economic status primary care clinics in a Northern city in Israel. Participants were eligible individuals for CRC screening, aged 50-68 (N = 24). Data analysis followed the principles of grounded theory, supported by qualitative software. RESULTS: Participants found administering incentives in exchange for CRC screening inappropriate on rational and moral grounds. They valued their relations with the medical team and the health system more than the potential gain expected. Individuals eligible for CRC screening perceived themselves as responsible for their health, admitting difficulties in realizing this responsibility. Incentives were reported unsuitable for solving reported screening difficulties and a potential harm to the doctor-patient relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Focus group participants expressed an unconventional voice towards the use of material incentives. They pointed to the need for focused support of health behaviour change and valued their autonomy. While a proportion of the invitees in the target population see the importance of screening and appreciate the HMO's initiative to invite them for testing, they also expressed their need for support from the HMO in realizing the recommended health behaviour.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Mass Screening , Motivation , Reward , Aged , Female , Focus Groups , Grounded Theory , Health Behavior , Health Policy , Humans , Israel , Male , Middle Aged
7.
Am J Prev Med ; 46(3): 273-80, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24512866

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) using fecal occult blood test (FOBT) reduces mortality, yet screening adherence remains low. PURPOSE: Enhancing FOBT adherence in a field experiment, using Implementation Intentions (II) technique. DESIGN: Participants were randomly assigned to a standard care group or to II experimental group. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A test kit was mailed to 29,833 HMO-insured members in two waves in 2011. INCLUSION CRITERIA: eligible persons aged 50-74 who underwent the test the year before. A sample of 2200 participants was interviewed over the telephone for possible cognitive and background moderators. INTERVENTION: Leaflet attached to the test kit containing an "if-then" condition and planning instructions of when, where, and how. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Test performance at 2 and 6 months following mailing of the test kit, retrieved from HMO's computerized database (2011-2012). RESULTS: Adherence in the experimental group ranged 1.2%-6.6% higher than in the control group. Within 6 months of kits' mailing, test uptake for the two waves was 71.4% and 67.9% for experiment and control, respectively (χ(2)=40.58, p=0.0001). The difference remained significant after controlling for age, gender, marital status, and wave (OR=1.17, 95% CI=1.11, 1.23, p<0.0001). Test performance was related to cognitive and background variables. No interaction was found among cognitive or background variables and the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: II technique is useful in increasing adherence to CRC screening, even in a mailed form rather than a face-to-face experimental situation. Mailed II is an inexpensive and effective method, applicable for public health.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Occult Blood , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Health Maintenance Organizations , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postal Service , Public Health
9.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 17(5): 430-7, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18714185

ABSTRACT

The acceptability of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests to the population influences adherence. Population preferences between fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy for CRC screening were examined by previous test experience. The study population was a random sample of 413 members of Israel's largest Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) aged 48-68 years. In a telephone interview, an explanation was provided regarding FOBT and colonoscopy. Participants were asked which they preferred and their degree (1-6) of agreement with each of eight test characteristics. Overall Attitude Scores toward FOBT and colonoscopy were compared. Predictors of colonoscopy preference and of refusal to undergo screening were examined using a logistic regression model. FOBT was preferred as a screening test by 70.2% of the participants, colonoscopy by 9.3%, 7.4% were indecisive, and 13.1% were not interested in screening. FOBT and colonoscopy similarly scored highly as life saving (5.2 vs. 5.1, respectively), with colonoscopy scoring significantly higher as time consuming (3.8 vs. 1.3, P<0.0001), disturbing (4.6 vs. 1.8, P<0.0001), painful (4.1 vs. 1.0, P<0.0001), annoying (4.8 vs. 1.9, P<0.0001), and involving risk (3.2 vs. 1.0, P<0.0001). In a logistic multivariate analysis, preference of colonoscopy was associated with the perception of being at CRC risk [odds ratio (OR): 3.1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-7.6)], with more positive attitude scores towards this test [OR: 2.2 (95% CI: 1.6-3.0)], and with a more negative one toward FOBT [OR: 0.4 (95% CI: 0.3-0.7)]. Target population preferences for CRC screening supports a policy of FOBT screening for an average risk population and colonoscopy for high-risk individuals.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/diagnosis , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Occult Blood , Patient Satisfaction , Public Opinion , Aged , Attitude to Health , Carcinoma/psychology , Colonoscopy/psychology , Colorectal Neoplasms/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care
10.
Womens Health Issues ; 18(2): 110-7, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18319148

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The experience of the mammography testing process and related satisfaction influence women's willingness to undergo the test again. The study goal was to assess women's overall satisfaction with the mammography examination service provided by participating units in the National Program for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Israel. METHODS: Between August 2003 and March 2004, a random sample of 3,295 women from 38 mammography units nationwide was drawn. Women were interviewed within 48 hours of their mammography, regarding their assessment of the examination process: discomfort, overall satisfaction, and intention to rescreen. Overall satisfaction and process items were measured on an ordinal scale ranging from 1 (lowest) to 6 (highest). Multivariate binomial regression was performed to identify significant predictors of being less satisfied and to estimate the associated relative risks with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A response of "very satisfied" (score 6), indicating overall satisfaction with the mammography process, was reported by 77% (95% CI, 73%-80%) of the women, 19% (95% CI, 17%-21%) said they were satisfied. Willingness to rescreen was reported by 95%. Negative assessment of staff attitude was the most influential predictor of being less satisfied. Twenty-six percent of women reported experiencing very discomforting pain. This response was associated with a diagnostic test indication, and with process items directly related to the test (technician's attitude toward the patient; information provided by her; privacy during the test). CONCLUSIONS: Women's satisfaction was high, as was intention to rescreen. The gap between intention and rescreening begs further investigations as to other types of barriers preventing women from adherence to rescreening.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , National Health Programs/standards , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Process Assessment, Health Care , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Mammography/standards , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic , Program Evaluation , Quality Control , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 11(10): 725-36, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14512961

ABSTRACT

The objective of this paper is first to describe the different strategies used to communicate risks to patients in the field of cancer or genetics, to review their effectiveness, and to summarise the state of the art of this practice in particular, in cancer genetics. The target audience is health care professionals involved in the communication of cancer risks, and genetic risks of breast/ovarian or colorectal cancer in particular. The methods include a review of the literature (Medline, Pascal, PsycInfo, Embase) by a panel of researchers and clinicians (cancer geneticists, epidemiologists, health psychologists, sociologists) in the context of a European Project on risk communication. We highlight practices that have been shown to be effective in the context of health psychology research and those being still under consideration for use in routine practice. In conclusion, this paper adds clinical relevance to the research evidence. We propose specific steps that could be integrated in standard clinical practice based on current evidence for their usefulness/effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Genetic Counseling , Neoplasms/genetics , Risk , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Communication , Female , Genetic Services , Genetic Testing , Humans , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Patient Education as Topic , Probability , Risk Factors
12.
Community Genet ; 6(4): 242-8, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15331870

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether being a BRCA1/2 mutation carrier affects a wide array of aspects of life, and if so, how. METHODS: Participants were grouped according to their carrier status (carrier and noncarrier status), health status (affected or unaffected by cancer), and their enrollment at the counseling service (probands and other family members). One hundred and sixty-five women completed a self-administered questionnaire following their genetic consultation session. RESULTS: Probands/nonprobands and carriers/noncarriers did not differ with regard to demographic characteristics, health behaviors including medical checkups, the distress they experience or their resources (sense of coherence, social integration, religiosity). Individuals affected by cancer did differ on some of these aspects from participants without cancer. CONCLUSIONS: From the results of this study, being a carrier could not be considered a psychosocial risk factor, nor does it seem to have an effect on carriers' resources and lifestyle.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/psychology , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Female , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Genetic Counseling , Genetic Testing , Health Behavior , Heterozygote , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Mutation , Social Support
13.
Health Educ Behav ; 29(2): 170-82, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11942712

ABSTRACT

This study attempts to characterize health lifestyles by subgrouping women with similar behavior patterns. Data on background, health behaviors, and perceptions were collected via phone interview from 1,075 Israeli women aged 50 to 74. From a cluster analysis conducted on health behaviors, three clusters emerged: a "health promoting" cluster (44.1%), women adhering to recommended behaviors; an "inactive" cluster (40.3%), women engaging in neither health-promoting nor compromising behaviors; and an "ambivalent" cluster (15.4%), women engaging somewhat in both health-promoting and compromising behaviors. Clustering was cross-tabulated by demographic and perceptual variables, further validating the subgrouping. The cluster solution was also validated by predicting another health behavior (mammography screening) for which there was an external validating source. Findings are discussed in comparison to published cluster solutions, culminating in suggestions for intervention alternatives. The concept of lifestyle was deemed appropriate to summarize the clustering of these behavioral, perceptual, and structural variables.


Subject(s)
Cluster Analysis , Health Behavior , Women's Health , Aged , Diet , Exercise , Female , Health Promotion , Humans , Israel , Life Style , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Smoking
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL