ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The arterial anatomy of the pelvic region is highly variable, and variations in the anatomy of the ILA may often be observed in its point of origin. The main objective of the present meta-analysis was to provide the most up-to-date and evidence-based data regarding the complete anatomy of the iliolumbar artery (ILA. It is hoped that our results may aid in reducing possible complications associated with various procedures performed in the pelvis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To perform this meta-analysis, major online medical databases - PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar - were searched through to find all studies considering the anatomy of the ILA. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of the ILA originating from the Internal Iliac Artery, in the overall analysis, was found to be 93.62% (95% CI: 82.96-99.63%). Mean diameter of the ILA was found to be 2.67 mm (Standard Error = 0.19 ; Lower Limit = 2.29 ; Upper Limit = 3.05). Mean length of the ILA was established at 12.50 mm (Standard Error = 1.64 ; Lower Limit = 9.28 ; Upper limit = 15.73). CONCLUSIONS: The anatomy of the ILA was found to be quite constant, in contrast to what has been discussed in the literature. The said artery originated most frequently from the internal iliac artery (93.62%). Most frequently, this artery originated from the internal iliac artery (observed in approximately 93.62% of cases). Notably, the results of our current meta-analysis indicate that the average distance between the ILA's point of origin, the lower margin of the L5 vertebra, and the bifurcation site of the common iliac artery were 43.20 mm and 28.58 mm, respectively.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Our umbrella review aimed to summarize and revisit the evidence from all of the meta-analyses and systematic reviews regarding the treatments of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Major medical databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, BIOSIS, and EBSCO were searched. The overall search process was conducted in 3 stages. RESULTS: Finally, a total of 28 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. Out of those 28 meta-analyses, a total of 315 primary studies were screened in order to extract the data and perform the statistical analysis. In total, data from 22,619 patients was analyzed. CONCLUSION: The main objective of the present umbrella review was to summarize and analyze all of the evidence-based data provided by numerous meta-analyses and systematic reviews regarding the treatment of OPSCC. Our study delivers the most up-to-date and evidence-based results regarding the different therapeutic modalities of this malignancy in one concise review, making it the ultimate tool for physicians treating OPSCC.