Pilot study of the prospective identification of changes in cognitive function during chemotherapy treatment for advanced ovarian cancer.

Change in cognitive function is increasingly being recognized as an adverse outcome related to chemotherapy treatment. These changes need not be severe to impact patient functional ability and quality of life. The primary goal of this study was to determine if there is evidence of changes in the cognitive function domains of attention, processing speed, and response time among women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who receive chemotherapy. Eligible patients were women diagnosed with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer who had not yet received chemotherapy but who were prescribed a minimum of six cycles (courses) of chemotherapy treatment. Cognitive function was assessed by a computerized, Web-based assessment (attention, processing speed, and reaction time) and by patient self-report. Cognitive function was assessed at three time points: prior to the first course (baseline), course three, and course six. Medical records were reviewed to abstract information on chemotherapy treatment, concomitant medications, and blood test results (e.g., hemoglobin, CA-125). Of the 27 eligible participants, 92% and 86% demonstrated cognitive impairments from baseline to course three and from baseline to course six of chemotherapy, respectively. Impairment was detected in two or more cognitive domains among 48% (12 of 25) and 41% (9 of 22) of participants at course three and course six of chemotherapy, respectively. This study shows evidence of decline in cognitive function among women being treated for ovarian cancer. There is a need for additional, prospective research to better understand the impact of chemotherapy on cognitive function among ovarian cancer patients so that effective preventive and treatment strategies can be developed.

Learning and teaching advanced laparoscopic procedures: do alternating trainees impair a laparoscopic surgeon's learning curve?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: In this study we investigated whether teaching advanced laparoscopic procedures like laparoscopic-assisted surgical staging (LASS) for endometrial cancer negatively affects the learning curve of the attending surgeon. DESIGN: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3.) SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona, Tucson. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-four patients undergoing LASS for endometrial cancer at our institution from 1992 through 2004 were included for analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Cases were classified into 3 groups. Group A comprised the initial learning phase where 2 attending gynecologic oncologists used other faculty as assistants (first 30 cases). Groups B and C comprised procedures after the learning phase involving attendings (n = 27, group B) or obstetrics and gynecology residents (n = 67, group C) as trainees. Groups were compared with respect to general outcome parameters and disease-free survival. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients within all groups were comparable with respect to age and height or body mass index. In the subgroup analysis, a decrease in blood loss and length of stay occurred mainly during the group B series. Pelvic lymph node yield reached oncologic standards during the initial learning curve (median 12-13) and remained stable during both teaching phases. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 2.4% and 13.7% of cases, respectively. Ninety percent of intraoperative and 64% of postoperative complications occurred within the first half of the series and were not correlated with type of assistance. Survival data were obtainable in 65% of cases with a median follow-up of 3.6 years. Disease free-survival was 92.5% in stage I disease and without significant difference among the groups. CONCLUSION: After gaining proficiency in the procedure, more or less surgically experienced trainees can be actively included without hampering the progress of the attending's learning curve.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin with amifostine in advanced, recurrent, or refractory endometrial adenocarcinoma: a phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the response rate and progression free and overall survival of patients with advanced endometrial cancer treated with paclitaxel, carboplatin and amifostine. To evaluate the toxicity of amifostine when used in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel. METHODS: Forty-seven eligible patients (median age: 66; range 45-82) with bidimensionally measurable advanced, recurrent, or refractory endometrial cancer were treated with carboplatin (AUC = 6), paclitaxel (175 mg/M2) and amifostine (740 mg/M2) every 4 weeks for 6 cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: There were 4 CRs (8%) (2 confirmed, 2 unconfirmed) and 15 PRs (32%) (9 confirmed, 6 unconfirmed) for a total response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26% to 56%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months (95% CI, 6-9 months) and a 6-month PFS rate of 64% (95% CI, 50% to 78%). The median overall survival was 14 months (95% CI, 12 to 17 months). Toxicity was tolerable. While 79% of patients developed Grade 3/4 neutropenia (30% Grade 3, 49% Grade 4), there were no episodes of Grade 4 febrile neutropenia and one episode of infection with grades 3-4 neutropenia. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin with amifostine was well reasonably tolerated in this cohort. The regimen demonstrated significant activity in endometrial cancer, comparable to other multi-agent chemotherapy programs in terms of response rate and survival, and with a favorable toxicity profile.

Amifostine pretreatment for protection against topotecan-induced hematologic toxicity: results of a multicenter phase III trial in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if amifostine could reduce the hematologic toxicity associated with topotecan. METHODS: Thirty patients with recurrent/refractory gynecologic malignancies were randomized to receive topotecan (TOPO) (1.5 mg/m(2)/day days 1-5) with or without amifostine (AMI/TOPO) (500 mg/m(2)/day days 1-5) every 3 weeks for six cycles. The primary study endpoints were the incidence of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were randomized to each arm for a total of 49 TOPO and 53 AMI/TOPO cycles. Patient characteristics and pretreatment ANC were similar between groups. Topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2)/day days 1-5 was initially administered to seven patients. Five developed neutropenic fevers, one an uncomplicated grade 4 neutropenia, and the other an uncomplicated grade 3 neutropenia. There were two treatment-related deaths due to sepsis (one in each treatment arm). The starting dose was thereafter reduced to 1.25 mg/m(2)/day days 1-5 every 21 days. No treatment related deaths occurred after this dose reduction. The incidence of combined grade 3/4 neutropenia was reduced from 67% (33/49 cycles) to 38% (20/53 cycles) with the addition of amifostine (P = 0.003; OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.12-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan at 1.5 mg/m(2)/day days 1-5 in heavily pretreated patients resulted in excessive toxicity not manageable with amifostine. At the reduced topotecan dose (1.25 mg/m(2) x 5 days), pretreatment with amifostine reduced the hematologic toxicity associated with topotecan chemotherapy in women with recurrent/refractory gynecologic malignancies.