Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 23(2): 207-221, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36206793

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Strategies to reduce antibiotic overuse in hospitals depend on prescribers taking decisions to stop unnecessary antibiotic use. There is scarce evidence for how to support these decisions. We evaluated a multifaceted behaviour change intervention (ie, the antibiotic review kit) designed to reduce antibiotic use among adult acute general medical inpatients by increasing appropriate decisions to stop antibiotics at clinical review. METHODS: We performed a stepped-wedge, cluster (hospital)-randomised controlled trial using computer-generated sequence randomisation of eligible hospitals in seven calendar-time blocks in the UK. Hospitals were eligible for inclusion if they admitted adult non-elective general or medical inpatients, had a local representative to champion the intervention, and could provide the required study data. Hospital clusters were randomised to an implementation date occurring at 1-2 week intervals, and the date was concealed until 12 weeks before implementation, when local preparations were designed to start. The intervention effect was assessed using data from pseudonymised routine electronic health records, ward-level antibiotic dispensing, Clostridioides difficile tests, prescription audits, and an implementation process evaluation. Co-primary outcomes were monthly antibiotic defined daily doses per adult acute general medical admission (hospital-level, superiority) and all-cause mortality within 30 days of admission (patient level, non-inferiority margin of 5%). Outcomes were assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population (ie, excluding sites that withdrew before implementation). Intervention effects were assessed by use of interrupted time series analyses within each site, estimating overall effects through random-effects meta-analysis, with heterogeneity across prespecified potential modifiers assessed by use of meta-regression. This trial is completed and is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN12674243. FINDINGS: 58 hospital organisations expressed an interest in participating. Three pilot sites implemented the intervention between Sept 25 and Nov 20, 2017. 43 further sites were randomised to implement the intervention between Feb 12, 2018, and July 1, 2019, and seven sites withdrew before implementation. 39 sites were followed up for at least 14 months. Adjusted estimates showed reductions in total antibiotic defined daily doses per acute general medical admission (-4·8% per year, 95% CI -9·1 to -0·2) following the intervention. Among 7 160 421 acute general medical admissions, the ARK intervention was associated with an immediate change of -2·7% (95% CI -5·7 to 0·3) and sustained change of 3·0% (-0·1 to 6·2) in adjusted 30-day mortality. INTERPRETATION: The antibiotic review kit intervention resulted in sustained reductions in antibiotic use among adult acute general medical inpatients. The weak, inconsistent intervention effects on mortality are probably explained by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Hospitals should use the antibiotic review kit to reduce antibiotic overuse. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health and Care Research.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Hospitals , Adult , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Hospitalization , Pandemics
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(11): 3820-8, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21940477

ABSTRACT

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important nosocomial pathogen, and morbidity and mortality rates associated with this pathogen have increased markedly in recent years. MRSA strains are generally resistant to several classes of antibiotics and are therefore difficult and costly to treat. A major issue is to identify the sources of MRSA infections and to monitor their epidemic spread. In this study, we report the development of a typing technique for S. aureus, based on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variations in and around SmaI-restriction sites (CCCGGG). An assessment of the SmaI restriction site-based multiplex PCR (SmaI-multiplex PCR) typing (SMT) with respect to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) revealed a high level of concordance in the clustering of the test strains. The SmaI-multiplex PCR was found to be more discriminatory than MLST/staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing but less discriminatory than PFGE. SMT can provide real-time information for the investigation of ongoing S. aureus hospital outbreaks. SMT meets the criteria of a practical typing method: it is simple, reproducible, and highly discriminatory and does not require expensive equipment or specialist expertise. Consequently, SmaI-multiplex PCR has the potential to be used in routine clinical microbiology laboratories.


Subject(s)
Molecular Typing/methods , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Cluster Analysis , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Genotype , Humans , Multilocus Sequence Typing/methods , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...