Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Med Robot ; 14(4): e1914, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29708640

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since the introduction of wearable head-up displays, there has been much interest in the surgical community adapting this technology into routine surgical practice. METHODS: We used the keywords augmented reality OR wearable device OR head-up display AND surgery using PubMed, EBSCO, IEEE and SCOPUS databases. After exclusions, 74 published articles that evaluated the utility of wearable head-up displays in surgical settings were included in our review. RESULTS: Across all studies, the most common use of head-up displays was in cases of live streaming from surgical microscopes, navigation, monitoring of vital signs, and display of preoperative images. The most commonly used head-up display was Google Glass. Head-up displays enhanced surgeons' operating experience; common disadvantages include limited battery life, display size and discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Due to ergonomic issues with dual-screen devices, augmented reality devices with the capacity to overlay images onto the surgical field will be key features of next-generation surgical head-up displays.


Subject(s)
Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Wearable Electronic Devices , Computer Simulation , Equipment Design , Humans , Surgeons , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/trends , Wearable Electronic Devices/trends
2.
Int J Med Robot ; 13(3)2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27569781

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of capturing and streaming neuronavigation images onto a head-up display during spine instrumentation. METHODS: Using a novel device, neuronavigation images were captured and transferred wirelessly via a password-encrypted network to the head-up display. At the end of the procedure, the surgeons completed a survey to gather their opinions of the system. RESULTS: Forty pedicle screws were placed using the head-up display. The average screw placement time was slightly shorter when the head-up display was used (4.13 min with vs. 4.86 min without). The post-procedure survey demonstrated that 79% of surgeon's responses were positive. CONCLUSION: A wearable head-up display can benefit current neuronavigation systems, but larger, outcomes-based trials are needed. Higher processing speed would allow streaming of higher resolution images. Along with an enlarged display, these may significantly improve utilization of this technology. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Subject(s)
Monitoring, Intraoperative/instrumentation , Neuronavigation/instrumentation , Spine/surgery , Wearable Electronic Devices , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Equipment Design , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Middle Aged , Pedicle Screws , Safety , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Wireless Technology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...