Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 38
Filter
1.
Acta Diabetol ; 56(8): 947-954, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30927105

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is known to be associated with high BMI and waist circumference (WC). These measures do not discriminate well between skeletal muscle (SM) and body fat (BF), which may have opposite influences. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of population-based data from 58,128 aged 18-85 yrs from Scottish Health Surveys (2003, 2008-2011) and Health Surveys for England (2003-2006, 2008-2013), excluding pregnant women and insulin-treated diabetes. Logistic regression was used to assess associations of known T2D, and of screened HbA1c > 48 mmol/mol (> 6.5%), with sex-specific quintiles of BMI, WC, and BF% and SM% estimated by validated anthropometric equations, adjusted for age, sex, smoking, ethnicity, country, and survey year. RESULTS: As expected, ORs for having known T2D rose with quintiles of BMI (1, 1.5, 2.3, 3.1, and 6.5) and WC (1, 1.8, 2.5, 3.5, and 8.7). Compared to the lowest BF% quintile, OR for having T2D in highest BF% quintile was 11.1 (95% CI = 8.4-14.6). Compared to the highest SM% quintile, OR for having T2D in lowest SM% quintile was 2.0 (1.7-2.4). Of 72 adults with T2D/HbA1c > 6.5% in the lowest quintile of BF%, 27 (37.5%) were in quintile 1 of SM%. Similar patterns of OR were observed for having HbA1c > 6.5% in those without known T2D. CONCLUSIONS: Estimated BF% associates strongly with T2D. Low SM% also has a significant association, suggesting a neglected aspect of aetiology within T2D. These two simple measures with biological relevance, available from data collected in most health surveys, may be more useful than the purely statistical terms BMI.


Subject(s)
Adiposity , Body Mass Index , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Waist Circumference , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , England , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/anatomy & histology , Scotland
2.
J Intellect Disabil Res ; 63(1): 49-63, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30417575

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Providing effective weight management to adults with intellectual disabilities is necessary to challenge the high rates of obesity. The aim of this process evaluation was to explore the feasibility of conducting a full-scale clinical trial of the TAKE 5 multi-component weight management programme. METHODS: The study was a 12-month pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial. Adults with intellectual disabilities and obesity were randomised to either TAKE 5, which included an energy deficit diet (EDD) or Waist Winners Too, based on health education principles. A mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted focussing on the reach, recruitment, fidelity, implementation, dose (delivered/received) and context. RESULTS: The study successfully recruited adults with intellectual disabilities. Both weight management programmes were delivered with high fidelity and implemented as intended. Only one weight management programme, TAKE 5, demonstrated potential efficacy in reducing body weight and body composition. The effectiveness was largely attributed to the EDD and social support from carers. CONCLUSIONS: The extensive process evaluation illustrated that a full-scale trial of a multi-component programme including an EDD is feasible and an acceptable approach to weight management for adults with intellectual disabilities and obesity.


Subject(s)
Intellectual Disability/rehabilitation , Obesity/therapy , Process Assessment, Health Care , Weight Reduction Programs/methods , Adult , Comorbidity , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Male , Obesity/epidemiology , Pilot Projects , Weight Reduction Programs/standards
3.
Obes Rev ; 19(1): 1-13, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28975722

ABSTRACT

This systematic review synthesized the available evidence on the effect of short-term periods of intermittent energy restriction (weekly intermittent energy restriction; ≥7-d energy restriction) in comparison with usual care (daily continuous energy restriction), in the treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Six electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2016. Only randomized controlled trials of interventions (≥12 weeks) in adults with overweight and obesity were included. Five studies were included in this review. Weekly intermittent energy restriction periods ranged from an energy intake between 1757 and 6276 kJ/d-1 . The mean duration of the interventions was 26 (range 14 to 48) weeks. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in weight loss between weekly intermittent energy restriction and continuous energy restriction post-intervention (weighted mean difference: -1.36 [-3.23, 0.51], p = 0.15) and at follow-up (weighted mean difference: -0.82 [-3.76, 2.11], p = 0.58). Both interventions achieved comparable weight loss of >5 kg and therefore were associated with clinical benefits to health. The findings support the use of weekly intermittent energy restriction as an alternative option for the treatment of obesity. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the long-term sustainable effects of weekly intermittent energy restriction on weight management.


Subject(s)
Caloric Restriction , Obesity/diet therapy , Overweight/diet therapy , Weight Loss , Diet, Reducing , Humans , Life Style , Patient Compliance , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
4.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 70(3): 386-92, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26486302

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: There is limited evidence that prominent calorie labelling on out-of-home meals helps consumers reduce calorie intakes and avoid weight gain, but no evidence on its effects on macro- and micro-nutrients. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of prominent calorie labelling on energy, macro- and micro-nutrients. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Young adults in a catered residential setting were observed when choosing main meals over three study periods in fixed order in this observational study. Period 1: with calorie labels (20 weeks); period 2: without calorie labels (10 weeks); period 3: with calorie labels plus information on estimated energy requirements (10 weeks). Nutrient contents of meal choices were analysed from food composition tables. RESULTS: Energy, 4 macronutrients and 19 micronutrients levels were derived from 4200 meals chosen by 120 subjects over 40 weeks. Means (s.d. or Median) for key macro- and micro-nutrients were for period 1: energy=658 (94) kcal, fat=31 (8.6) g, saturated fat=10.5 (2.7) g, B12=2.5 (1.7) µg, folate=119 (46.8) µg, vitamin C=80.0 (42) mg, Ca=278 (129) mg, Na=1230 (119) mg, Fe=22 (10) g, Se=19 (10.1) µg, I=34 (10.1) µg, period 2: energy=723 (87) kcal, fat=35 (7.6) g, saturated fat=12 (2.7) g, B12=3.4 (1.7) µg, Folate=182 (13.3) µg, vitamin C=87.0 (49.7) mg, Ca=379 (149) mg, Na=1352 (114) mg, Fe=41.6 (14) g, Se=26 (10.3) µg, I=38.0 (18.4) µg, period 3: energy=578 (109) kcal, fat=27.3 (9.1) g, saturated fat=8.5 (2.7) g, B12=2.2 (0.5) µg, Folate=90 (50.8) µg, vitamin C=75.0 (34) mg, Ca=277 (119) mg, Na=1205 (99) mg, Fe=14.5 (10.9) g, Se=15.0 (10) µg, I=32.0 (18.4) µg. All macro- and micro-nutrients, except for B1, vitamin C, vitamin E and Ca were significantly different between the three periods (P<0.001), but all mean intakes remained above recommended levels. CONCLUSIONS: Calorie labelling resulted in reductions in calories, fat and saturated fat contents of the meals chosen, without compromising micronutrient consumptions.


Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Energy Intake , Food Labeling , Micronutrients/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Body Weight , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Dietary Carbohydrates/analysis , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Dietary Fats/analysis , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Dietary Proteins/analysis , Fatty Acids/administration & dosage , Fatty Acids/analysis , Female , Food Preferences , Humans , Male , Meals , Micronutrients/analysis , Nutritional Requirements , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
5.
BMC Obes ; 2: 49, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26693285

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity is more prevalent in adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) compared to the general population. Motivations for weight loss may influence engagement with weight management programmes and have only been studied in adults without ID. AIMS: To determine reasons given by adults with ID and obesity for seeking weight loss and whether these reasons differ from those of their carers. METHODS: Prior to a multi-component weight management intervention, participants were asked "why do you want to lose weight?" Carers were asked their views and these were compared to the answers given by the adult with ID. Responses were themed. The Fisher's Exact analysis was used to test for any relationship between reasons for seeking weight loss and participants' level of ID, age, gender and BMI. RESULTS: Eighteen men and 32 women; age 41.6 SD 14.6 years; BMI 40.8 SD 7.5 kg/m(2); Level ID Mild (28 %), Moderate (42 %), Severe (22 %), Profound (8 %). Eleven were unable to respond. Six themes emerged; Health; Fitness / Activity / Mobility; Appearance / Clothes; Emotional / Happiness; For Others; Miscellaneous. The most frequent reason given overall and by women was "appearance." Carers cited "health" most frequently and "appearance" least, rarely agreeing with participants. "Health" was given as a reason more from older adults and those with milder ID. No statistically significant associations were found between reasons for seeking weight loss and BMI age, gender or level of ID but the differing views of adults with ID and their carers were clear. CONCLUSIONS: Views of adults with obesity and mild or moderate ID can be collected. The opposing views of adults and their carers may affect motivation for weight loss.

6.
Clin Obes ; 5(4): 198-210, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26126951

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to examine the literature on randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of physical activity interventions to prevent weight gain and the effects on body composition in young adults with intellectual disabilities.A systematic search of Medline, Emabse, CINHAL, PsychINFO, Cochrane library and ERIC was conducted from 1946 to September 2014. Eligibility criteria included; randomized controlled trials of a physical activity intervention: objective measure of body weight and body composition; young adults (age range 16-24 years) with intellectual disabilities. Six studies met the eligibility criteria. The interventions varied in their prescription of physical activity including aerobic and strength-based activities. The mean duration of the interventions was 15.3 (range 10-21 weeks). There was no significant effect of physical activity interventions on body weight (weighted mean difference: -0.17 kg, 95% confidence interval, -1.04 kg to 0.72 kg) and body composition outcomes. The meta-analysis showed that physical activity interventions did not prevent weight gain in young adults with intellectual disabilities. Published studies are inadequate to form firm conclusions. Future longer term studies of interventions specifically designed for this population group are required to elucidate the effects of physical activity interventions on body composition and the prevention of weight gain in young adults with intellectual disabilities.


Subject(s)
Body Composition , Intellectual Disability/physiopathology , Motor Activity , Weight Gain , Adolescent , Humans , Young Adult
7.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 39(3): 508-13, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25152239

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In both the United States and United Kingdom, countries with high prevalence of obesity, weight gain is particularly rapid in young adulthood and especially identified among first-year students. DESIGN: A triangulation protocol was used, incorporating quantitative and qualitative research methods. A 27-question online survey was sent to all first-year undergraduates twice, with a 9-month interval. An online focus group was conducted at the end of the year, analysed by content and thematically. Self-reported weights and heights were validated against objectively measured data. RESULTS: From a total of 3010 first-year students, 1440 (female=734) responded at baseline mean (s.d.) age 20 (3.6) years, body mass index 22.3 (4.6) kg m(-2), 17% smokers and 80% alcohol drinkers. At follow-up, 1275 students reported a mean weight change of 1.8 (s.d. 2.6) kg over the 9-month period. Self-reported data correlated strongly with measured weights (r=0.999, P<0.001) and heights (r=0.998, P<0.001). Predictors of weight gain were baseline weight (P<0.001). Dairy products consumption was associated with less weight gain (P<0.001). Fruit and vegetable consumption, and time spent on physical activity or sleeping were associated with neither weight gain nor weight loss. Focus group content analysis revealed weight gain as a major concern, reported by half the participants, and increased alcohol consumption was considered the most common lifestyle change behind weight gain. Thematic analysis identified three main themes as barriers to or facilitators of healthy lifestyles and weight; budget, peer influence and time management. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid weight gain is of concern to young adults. Students living away from home are at particular risk, owing to specific obesogenic behaviours. Consumption of fruit and vegetables, and physical activity, despite popular beliefs, were not associated with protection against weight gain.


Subject(s)
Life Style , Obesity/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Weight Gain , Weight Loss , Budgets , Energy Intake , Female , Focus Groups , Follow-Up Studies , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Obesity/prevention & control , Peer Group , Qualitative Research , Self Report , Time Management , United Kingdom/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
8.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 39(3): 542-5, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25174452

ABSTRACT

Calorie-labelling of meals has been suggested as an antiobesity measure, but evidence for impact is scarce. It might have a particular value for young adults, when weight gain is most rapid. A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis was performed to assess the effect of calorie-labelling on calories purchased. Seven studies met the inclusion and quality criteria of which six provided data allowing a meta-analysis. Three reported significant changes, all reductions in calories purchased (-38.1 to -12.4 kcal). Meta-analysis showed no overall effect, -5.8 kcal (95% confidence interval (CI)=-19.4 to 7.8 kcal) but a reduction of -124.5 kcal (95% CI=-150.7 to 113.8 kcal) among those who noticed the calorie-labelling (30-60% of customers). A questionnaire, to gauge views on calorie-labelling, was devised and sent to young adults in higher education: 1440 young adults (mean age 20.3 (s.d.=2.9) years) completed the survey. Nearly half (46%) said they would welcome calorie information in catering settings and on alcoholic drinks. Females opposing to calorie-labelling were heavier to those who did not (64.3 kg vs. 61.9 kg, P=0.03; BMI=22.4 kg m(-2) vs. 21.7 kg m(-2), P=0.02). In conclusion, the limited evidence supports a valuable effect from clearly visible calorie-labelling for obesity prevention, and it appears an attractive strategy to many young adults.


Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Fast Foods , Food Labeling , Marketing , Obesity/prevention & control , Energy Intake , Female , Food Labeling/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Marketing/statistics & numerical data , Restaurants , Surveys and Questionnaires , Weight Gain , Young Adult
9.
J Hum Nutr Diet ; 27(1): 22-9, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23531190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity in adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) is rising, although the evidence base for its treatment in this population group is minimal. Weight management interventions that are accessible to adults with ID will reduce the inequalities that they frequently experience in health services. This short report compared the effectiveness of weight management in those with and without ID who completed nine sessions of a multi-component weight management programme. METHODS: TAKE 5 is a 16-week multi-component weight management intervention for adults with ID and obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg m(-2) ]. This intervention is an adaption of the weight management programme provided by the Glasgow & Clyde Weight Management Service (GCWMS) for adults without ID and obesity (National Health Service based). Fifty-two participants of the TAKE 5 programme were individually matched by baseline characteristics (sex, age and BMI) with two participants without ID of the GCWMS programme. Comparisons in terms of weight and BMI change and rate of weight loss were made for those who attended all nine sessions. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in the amount of weight loss (median: -3.6 versus -3.8 kg, respectively, P = 0.4), change in BMI (median: -1.5 versus -1.4 kg m(-2) , P = 0.9), success of achieving 5% weight loss (41.3% versus 36.8%, P = 0.9) and rate of weight loss across the 16-week intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A multi-component weight loss intervention can be equally effective for adults with and without ID and obesity.


Subject(s)
Feeding Behavior , Intellectual Disability , Obesity/therapy , Weight Loss , Weight Reduction Programs/methods , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Body Weight , Diet , Energy Intake , Female , Health Behavior , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Activity , Prevalence
10.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 13: 10, 2013 Jan 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23324195

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Excessive gestational weight gain is associated with adverse infant, childhood and maternal outcomes and research to develop interventions to address this issue is ongoing. The views of women on gestational weight gain and the resources they would consider helpful in addressing this are however largely unknown. This survey aimed to determine the views of newly pregnant women, living in areas of social disadvantage, on 1) their current body weight and potential gestational weight gain and 2) the resources or interventions they would consider helpful in preventing excessive gestational weight gain. METHODS: A convenience sample of overweight and obese pregnant women living in Fife, UK, were invited to complete a short anonymised questionnaire at their 12 week booking visit. RESULTS: 428 women, BMI>25 kg/m(2), completed the questionnaire. Fifty-four per cent of respondents were obese (231) and 62% were living in areas of mild to moderate deprivation. Over three-quarters of participants felt dissatisfied with their current weight (81%). The majority of women (60%) expressed some concern about potential weight gain. Thirty-nine percent were unconcerned about weight gain during their pregnancy, including 34 women (19%) who reported having retained weight gained in earlier pregnancies. Amongst those concerned about weight gain advice on physical activity (41%) and access to sports/leisure facilities were favoured resources (36%). Fewer women (12%) felt that group sessions on healthy eating or attending a clinic for individualised advice (14%) would be helpful. "Getting time off work" was the most frequently cited barrier (48%) to uptake of resources other than leaflets. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a lack of awareness amongst overweight and obese women regarding excessive gestational weight gain. Monitoring of gestational weight gain, and approaches for its management, should be formally integrated into routine antenatal care. Barriers to the uptake of resources to address weight gain are numerous and must be considered in the design of future interventions and services.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Obesity/complications , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Pregnant Women/psychology , Weight Gain , Adolescent , Adult , Counseling , Diet , Employment , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Motor Activity , Obesity/prevention & control , Obesity/psychology , Poverty Areas , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Young Adult
11.
J Intellect Disabil Res ; 57(1): 90-102, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22369631

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To date, no studies have explored the role of carers in supporting adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) and obesity during a weight loss intervention. The present study explored perceptions of carers supporting adults with ID, as they participated in a 6-month multi-component weight loss intervention (TAKE 5). METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the experiences of 24 carers. The transcripts were analysed qualitatively using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the analysis: carers' perceptions of participants' health; barriers and facilitators to weight loss; and carers' perceptions of the weight loss intervention. Data analysis showed similarities between the experiences reported by the carers who supported participants who lost weight and participants who did not. Lack of sufficient support from people from the internal and external environment of individuals with ID and poor communication among carers, were identified as being barriers to change. The need for accessible resources tailored to aid weight loss among adults with ID was also highlighted. CONCLUSION: This study identified specific facilitators and barriers experienced by carers during the process of supporting obese adults with ID to lose weight. Future research could utilise these findings to inform appropriate and effective weight management interventions for individuals with ID.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/psychology , Intellectual Disability/nursing , Obesity/therapy , Weight Loss , Attitude to Health , Female , Humans , Intellectual Disability/complications , Male , Obesity/complications , Obesity/nursing
12.
J Hum Nutr Diet ; 26(4): 387-94, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23240681

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To examine whether the nutritional status of aged undernourished residents in care could be improved through dietary modification to increase energy intake but not portion size. METHODS: A 12-week cluster randomised controlled trial was carried out in 21 residential care homes. Participants comprised undernourished residents with a body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg m(-2) . All menus were analysed to evaluate nutrient provision. Energy and macronutrient intakes of undernourished residents were estimated using 3-day weighed food intake diaries. Those resident in homes randomised to intervention had their usual meals enriched with energy-dense foods to a maximum of +1673 kJ day(-1) . RESULTS: Of 445 residents screened, 41 (9%) had a BMI <18.5 kg m(-2) and entered the study. Despite adequate food provision, energy and macronutrient intakes were below UK dietary reference values. Mean (SEM) energy intake increased [+556 (372) kJ, P = 0.154] in residents allocated to intervention but fell in those residents in 'control homes' receiving usual care [-151 (351) kJ, P = 0.676]. Weight change [+1.3 (0.53) kg, P = 0.03] was seen in intervention residents but not in controls [-0.2 (1.5) kg, P = 0.536]. Between-group differences for changes in weight and energy intake were not significant (P = 0.08 and 0.20, respectively). Six residents allocated to the intervention increased their BMI >18.5 kg m(-2) (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Achieving weight gain in frail older people is difficult. These results suggest that enriching food could help address undernutrition and slow chronic weight loss. Interventions of a longer duration are needed to confirm or exclude the value of food enrichment.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Energy Intake , Feeding Behavior , Malnutrition/diet therapy , Nutritional Status , Residential Facilities , Weight Gain , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Food, Fortified , Geriatric Assessment , Homes for the Aged , Humans , Male , Nursing Homes , Nutrition Assessment , Portion Size , Reference Values , United Kingdom
13.
J Hum Nutr Diet ; 23(3): 260-3, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20163511

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity is a priority for all health professionals and requires resources that are regularly evaluated to ensure that they meet the needs of their target population. Dietitians in Obesity Management UK (DOM UK), a specialist group of the British Dietetic Association, commissioned an evaluation of their resources. These have been developed for use by Dietitians to determine the uptake and implementation of DOM UK resources in dietetic practice, as well as the opinions and suggestions of Dietitians concerning the resource pack. METHODS: A random sample of 20% (n = 33) of the 165 Dietitians who had ordered resources were selected from the DOM UK database along with 20% of DOM UK members who had not (n = 38). Data were then collected using telephone-administered questionnaires. RESULTS: Most of the Dietitians who used the resources favoured them because they improved their consultations and were liked by patients. Resources 'j' (controlling your portions) and 'k' (planning your meals) were most frequently used. However, the cost of the pack was a deterrent to both new and repeat orders. The evaluation also revealed that 17% of DOM UK members were unaware of these resources and 23% who ordered them were unaware that online samples were available. CONCLUSION: The evaluation showed that most Dietitians who used the resources found them very useful especially resources concerning meal planning and portion sizes. However, concerns about cost and the need for greater awareness about the resources among Dietitians were highlighted.


Subject(s)
Body Weight , Dietetics/methods , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Obesity/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Diet , Dietetics/economics , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Health Resources/economics , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
14.
Proc Nutr Soc ; 69(1): 34-8, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20003637

ABSTRACT

Treatments to induce weight loss for the obese patient centre on the achievement of negative energy balance. This objective can theoretically be attained by interventions designed to achieve a reduction in energy intake and/or an increase in energy expenditure. Such 'lifestyle interventions' usually comprise one or more of the following strategies: dietary modification; behaviour change; increases in physical activity. These interventions are advocated as first treatment steps in algorithms recommended by current clinical obesity guidelines. Medication and surgical treatments are potentially available to those unable to implement 'lifestyle interventions' effectively by achieving losses of between 5 kg and 10 kg. It is accepted that the minimum of 5% weight loss is required to achieve clinically-meaningful benefits. Dietary treatments differ widely. Successful weight loss is most often associated with quantification of energy intake rather than macronutrient composition. Most dietary intervention studies secure a weight loss of between 5 kg and 10 kg after intervention for 6 months, with gradual weight regain at 1 year where weight changes are 3-4 kg below the starting weight. Some dietary interventions when evaluated at 2 and 4 years post intervention report the effects of weight maintenance rather than weight loss. Specific anti-obesity medications are effective adjuncts to weight loss, in most cases doubling the weight loss of those given dietary advice only. Greater physical activity alone increases energy expenditure by insufficient amounts to facilitate clinically-important weight losses, but is useful for weight maintenance. Weight losses of between half and three-quarters of excess body weight are seen at 10 years post intervention with bariatric surgery, making this arguably the most effective weight-loss treatment.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Diet, Reducing , Exercise , Obesity/therapy , Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Health Behavior , Humans , Weight Loss
15.
J Hum Nutr Diet ; 23(1): 102-7, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19943844

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dietary patterns and food choices in western and northern European countries can differ from those in countries that surround the Mediterranean basin. However, irregular meal patterns and the consumption of high-energy snacks tend to become common in most countries and their association with the prevalence of obesity has been examined in many studies. The first aim of the present study was to describe the habitual meal and snack intakes, including the use of vending machines, for two groups of first-year university students in two countries of different cultural backgrounds. The second aim was to explore the relationships between body mass index (BMI) and snacking for these two groups. METHODS: One hundred and sixty first-year undergraduate university students from two defined universities in Greece (n = 80) and Scotland (n = 80) volunteered to complete a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The FFQ comprised 16 questions assessing their meal and snacking habits. Self-assessed height and weight data were collected. RESULTS: The majority of the 160 students reported a BMI in the healthy range (<25 kg m(-2)). Overall, 26% of the students reported never consuming breakfast. More Scottish students (74%) used vending machines (P < 0.05). More Scottish students consumed chocolate bars and crisps than Greek students (41% and 34% versus 37.5% and 20%, respectively). Only the choice of chocolate bars from vending machines and the consumption of crisps and low fat yogurts were related to BMI (P < 0.05) for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: University students living in different countries report similar dietary patterns but differ in their snacking habits. No relationships were found between BMI and snacking. There is a need to carry out research to further our understanding of this relationship.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Diet , Fast Foods/statistics & numerical data , Feeding Behavior , Food Dispensers, Automatic/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cacao , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Diet Surveys , Food Supply , Greece , Humans , Reference Values , Scotland , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities , Yogurt , Young Adult
16.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 63(9): 1136-42, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19536164

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This paper discusses the benefits that a 'realist' approach can bring to an outcome study using the example of a nutritional intervention offered as an adjunct to the existing smoking cessation programmes to limit post-cessation weight gain. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Participants of a smoking cessation programme in areas of deprivation in the north, south and west of Glasgow. RESULTS: A realist approach enabled the development of a framework able to investigate both implementation and outcomes of the intervention. Drawing on theoretical and experiential knowledge, context-mechanism-outcome hypotheses were developed for further testing at later stages of evaluation. This will focus the further stages of evaluation on testing these specific hypotheses using outcome data collected at the end of the intervention. CONCLUSION: Adopting such an evaluation approach enables integration of process and outcome data that will refine our understanding of contexts and mechanisms, which are associated with these behavioural changes. It can aid further policy decisions by identifying the type of participant and circumstances that are associated with positive outcomes and those subgroups of participants that can be targeted more effectively using other approaches.


Subject(s)
Overweight/prevention & control , Program Evaluation/methods , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Prevention , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Research Design , Scotland , Treatment Outcome
17.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 62(1): 1-9, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17342166

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between current recommended physical activity levels and body mass index (BMI) with some cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C), C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, and blood pressure), general health score (GHQ12) and predicted coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. DESIGN: Further analysis of the cross-sectional Scottish Health Survey 1998 data. SUBJECTS: Five thousand four hundred and sixty adults 16-74 years of age. RESULTS: After controlling for some confounding factors, obesity was significantly associated with higher odds ratio (OR) for elevated cholesterol, CRP, systolic blood pressure, non-HDL-C and lower HDL-C (P<0.001), and with greater predicted CHD risk compared to BMI <25 kg/m(2). Regular self-reported physical activity was associated with smaller OR of lower HDL-C and higher CRP, and average predicted 10-year CHD risk in obese subjects, but did not eliminate the higher risk of the measured CVD risk factors in this group. The OR of these two risk factors were still high 4.39 and 2.67, respectively, when compared with those who were inactive with BMI <25 kg/m(2) (P<0.001). Those who reported being physically active had better GHQ scores in all BMI categories (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Reporting achievement of recommended physical activity levels may reduce some CVD risk factors, predicted CHD risk and improve psychosocial health, but may not eliminate the extra risk imposed by overweight/obesity. Therefore, increasing physical activity and reducing body weight should be considered to tackle CVD risk factors.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cholesterol/blood , Exercise/physiology , Obesity/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alcohol Drinking , Biomarkers/blood , Body Mass Index , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/blood , Obesity/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Overweight/blood , Overweight/complications , Overweight/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects
18.
QJM ; 100(7): 395-404, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17566010

ABSTRACT

Several drugs, or categories of drugs, listed by the WHO and other writers and used in the treatment of chronic disease, are consistently associated with weight gain as a side effect and considered 'obesogenic'. The extent to which they may contribute to the multifactorial process behind obesity is not well documented. We systematically reviewed papers from Medline 1966-2004, Embase 1980-2004, PsycINFO 1967-2004, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, to determine the effect on body weight of some drugs that are believed to favour weight gain. We included randomized controlled studies of adult participants (>18 years) prescribed a drug considered obesogenic, that compared the 'obesogenic' drug with placebo, an alternative drug or other treatment, and that had a duration of at least 3 months: 43 studies totalling 25,663 subjects met these criteria. The main objective of the majority of studies was to compare the efficacy and safety of drug therapy, with weight change recorded under safety outcomes; weight change was a primary outcome measure in only six studies. There was evidence of weight gain for all drugs included, up to 10 kg at 52 weeks. Differences in dosage, patient population, duration of treatment and dietary advice make generalization of the results difficult. Data on body weight are often not recorded in published clinical trials or is reported in insufficient detail. This side-effect has potentially serious consequences, and should be mentioned to patients. Weight management measures should be routinely considered when prescribing drugs known to promote weight gain. Future clinical trials should always document weight changes.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Weight Gain/drug effects , Adult , Humans
19.
Obes Rev ; 8(4): 339-45, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17578383

ABSTRACT

Obesity is more prevalent in adults with intellectual disabilities than in the general population, and has been shown to contribute to their reduced life expectancy, and increased health needs. Relatively few studies have examined the effectiveness of weight loss interventions for adults with intellectual disabilities. However, there is evidence to support interventions that take account of the context of the lives of adults with intellectual disabilities, including carer involvement in interventions. To reduce the health inequalities experienced by adults with intellectual disabilities, there is a clear need to develop accessible, evidence-based clinical weight management services.


Subject(s)
Intellectual Disability/complications , Obesity/therapy , Weight Loss , Adult , Humans , Intellectual Disability/psychology , Obesity/psychology
20.
Obes Rev ; 8(3): 223-30, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17444964

ABSTRACT

People with intellectual disabilities experience significant health inequalities compared with the general population, including a shorter life expectancy and high levels of unmet health needs. Another accepted measure of health inequalities, the prevalence of obesity, has been shown to be higher in adults with intellectual disabilities than in the general population. While the factors contributing to the increased prevalence among adults with intellectual disabilities are not well understood, the high rates of obesity among younger adults highlight the need for further research involving children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities. To take forward the priorities for research and the development of effective, accessible services, there is a need for collaboration between professionals working in the fields of intellectual disabilities and obesity.


Subject(s)
Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/psychology , Persons with Mental Disabilities , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aging , Exercise/physiology , Exercise/psychology , Female , Humans , Intellectual Disability , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/etiology , Obesity/genetics , Prevalence , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL