ABSTRACT
Dolutegravir resistance is emerging in routine clinical contexts in southern Africa, primarily in patients with prior treatment experience failing dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART). This potential issue was raised by The Nucleosides and Darunavir/Dolutegravir in Africa trial that compared dolutegravir and boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy as second-line ART, in which new dolutegravir resistance was observed at failure. However, recent data suggest that also at risk are patients who were transitioned to dolutegravir from non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based ART while viremic. Identifying patients experiencing failure of dolutegravir with resistance will be difficult given current gaps in viral load monitoring and limited capacity for genotypic resistance testing. As a result, in the short term, most patients affected will go unrecognized, with particularly important implications for patients affected who have advanced HIV or who are pregnant/breastfeeding. Prospective research is needed to understand the scope of the problem, identify additional risk factors, and determine best management. In the short term, for most patients with dolutegravir resistance and prior non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor exposure, the best option will be a timely switch to a regimen anchored by a boosted protease inhibitor, with a high genetic barrier to resistance.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Serial measurement of virological and immunological biomarkers in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 can give valuable insight into the pathogenic roles of viral replication and immune dysregulation. We aimed to characterise biomarker trajectories and their associations with clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this international, prospective cohort study, patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 and enrolled in the Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19 platform trial within the Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines programme between Aug 5, 2020 and Sept 30, 2021 were included. Participants were included from 108 sites in Denmark, Greece, Poland, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, Uganda, the UK, and the USA, and randomised to placebo or one of four neutralising monoclonal antibodies: bamlanivimab (Aug 5 to Oct 13, 2020), sotrovimab (Dec 16, 2020, to March 1, 2021), amubarvimab-romlusevimab (Dec 16, 2020, to March 1, 2021), and tixagevimab-cilgavimab (Feb 10 to Sept 30, 2021). This trial included an analysis of 2149 participants with plasma nucleocapsid antigen, anti-nucleocapsid antibody, C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, and D-dimer measured at baseline and day 1, day 3, and day 5 of enrolment. Day-90 follow-up status was available for 1790 participants. Biomarker trajectories were evaluated for associations with baseline characteristics, a 7-day pulmonary ordinal outcome, 90-day mortality, and 90-day rate of sustained recovery. FINDINGS: The study included 2149 participants. Participant median age was 57 years (IQR 46-68), 1246 (58·0%) of 2149 participants were male and 903 (42·0%) were female; 1792 (83·4%) had at least one comorbidity, and 1764 (82·1%) were unvaccinated. Mortality to day 90 was 172 (8·0%) of 2149 and 189 (8·8%) participants had sustained recovery. A pattern of less favourable trajectories of low anti-nucleocapsid antibody, high plasma nucleocapsid antigen, and high inflammatory markers over the first 5 days was observed for high-risk baseline clinical characteristics or factors related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. For example, participants with chronic kidney disease demonstrated plasma nucleocapsid antigen 424% higher (95% CI 319-559), CRP 174% higher (150-202), IL-6 173% higher (144-208), D-dimer 149% higher (134-165), and anti-nucleocapsid antibody 39% lower (60-18) to day 5 than those without chronic kidney disease. Participants in the highest quartile for plasma nucleocapsid antigen, CRP, and IL-6 at baseline and day 5 had worse clinical outcomes, including 90-day all-cause mortality (plasma nucleocapsid antigen hazard ratio (HR) 4·50 (95% CI 3·29-6·15), CRP HR 3·37 (2·30-4·94), and IL-6 HR 5·67 (4·12-7·80). This risk persisted for plasma nucleocapsid antigen and CRP after adjustment for baseline biomarker values and other baseline factors. INTERPRETATION: Patients admitted to hospital with less favourable 5-day biomarker trajectories had worse prognosis, suggesting that persistent viral burden might drive inflammation in the pathogenesis of COVID-19, identifying patients that might benefit from escalation of antiviral or anti-inflammatory treatment. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers , COVID-19 , Hospitalization , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/blood , Prospective Studies , Male , Female , Biomarkers/blood , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Aged , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Interleukin-6/blood , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (nmAbs) failed to show clear benefit for hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Dynamics of virologic and immunologic biomarkers remain poorly understood. METHODS: Participants enrolled in the Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19 trials were randomized to nmAb versus placebo. Longitudinal differences between treatment and placebo groups in levels of plasma nucleocapsid antigen (N-Ag), anti-nucleocapsid antibody, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and D-dimer at enrollment, day 1, 3, and 5 were estimated using linear mixed models. A 7-point pulmonary ordinal scale assessed at day 5 was compared using proportional odds models. RESULTS: Analysis included 2149 participants enrolled between August 2020 and September 2021. Treatment resulted in 20% lower levels of plasma N-Ag compared with placebo (95% confidence interval, 12%-27%; P < .001), and a steeper rate of decline through the first 5 days (P < .001). The treatment difference did not vary between subgroups, and no difference was observed in trajectories of other biomarkers or the day 5 pulmonary ordinal scale. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that nmAb has an antiviral effect assessed by plasma N-Ag among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, with no blunting of the endogenous anti-nucleocapsid antibody response. No effect on systemic inflammation or day 5 clinical status was observed. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04501978.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , BiomarkersABSTRACT
Importance: Current data identifying COVID-19 risk factors lack standardized outcomes and insufficiently control for confounders. Objective: To identify risk factors associated with COVID-19, severe COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary cross-protocol analysis included 4 multicenter, international, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials with harmonized protocols established by the COVID-19 Prevention Network. Individual-level data from participants randomized to receive placebo within each trial were combined and analyzed. Enrollment began July 2020 and the last data cutoff was in July 2021. Participants included adults in stable health, at risk for SARS-CoV-2, and assigned to the placebo group within each vaccine trial. Data were analyzed from April 2022 to February 2023. Exposures: Comorbid conditions, demographic factors, and SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk at the time of enrollment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary outcomes were COVID-19 and severe COVID-19. Multivariate Cox proportional regression models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% CIs for baseline covariates, accounting for trial, region, and calendar time. Secondary outcomes included severe COVID-19 among people with COVID-19, subclinical SARS-CoV-2 infection, and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: A total of 57â¯692 participants (median [range] age, 51 [18-95] years; 11â¯720 participants [20.3%] aged ≥65 years; 31â¯058 participants [53.8%] assigned male at birth) were included. The analysis population included 3270 American Indian or Alaska Native participants (5.7%), 7849 Black or African American participants (13.6%), 17â¯678 Hispanic or Latino participants (30.6%), and 40â¯745 White participants (70.6%). Annualized incidence was 13.9% (95% CI, 13.3%-14.4%) for COVID-19 and 2.0% (95% CI, 1.8%-2.2%) for severe COVID-19. Factors associated with increased rates of COVID-19 included workplace exposure (high vs low: aHR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.16-1.58]; medium vs low: aHR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.21-1.65]; P < .001) and living condition risk (very high vs low risk: aHR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.21-1.66]; medium vs low risk: aHR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08-1.32]; P < .001). Factors associated with decreased rates of COVID-19 included previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (aHR, 0.13 [95% CI, 0.09-0.19]; P < .001), age 65 years or older (aHR vs age <65 years, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.50-0.64]; P < .001) and Black or African American race (aHR vs White race, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.91]; P = .002). Factors associated with increased rates of severe COVID-19 included race (American Indian or Alaska Native vs White: aHR, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.85-3.69]; multiracial vs White: aHR, 2.19 [95% CI, 1.50-3.20]; P < .001), diabetes (aHR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.14-2.08]; P = .005) and at least 2 comorbidities (aHR vs none, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.09-1.76]; P = .008). In analyses restricted to participants who contracted COVID-19, increased severe COVID-19 rates were associated with age 65 years or older (aHR vs <65 years, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.32-2.31]; P < .001), race (American Indian or Alaska Native vs White: aHR, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.38-2.83]; Black or African American vs White: aHR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.03-2.14]; multiracial: aHR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.21-2.69]; overall P = .001), body mass index (aHR per 1-unit increase, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.04]; P = .001), and diabetes (aHR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.37-2.49]; P < .001). Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with decreased severe COVID-19 rates (aHR, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.01-0.14]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary cross-protocol analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials, exposure and demographic factors had the strongest associations with outcomes; results could inform mitigation strategies for SARS-CoV-2 and viruses with comparable epidemiological characteristics.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Demography , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
Although corticosteroid therapy is the standard of care for all patients hospitalized with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the studies demonstrating the mortality-benefit ratio of corticosteroids were limited to fully evaluate their adverse effects. To determine the severity of corticosteroid-induced hyperglycemia in patients with and without diabetes mellitus, we retrospectively collected data from the medical records of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 before and after corticosteroids were the standard of care. Corticosteroid-induced hyperglycemia was more severe in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 with diabetes than those without diabetes. Additionally, patients with diabetes required higher doses of correctional insulin per day when on corticosteroid therapy, suggesting that intensive point-of-care glucose monitoring could be limited in patients without diabetes mellitus and support cautionary use of corticosteroids in patients with COVID-19 discharged with supplemental oxygen.
ABSTRACT
The protection provided by natural versus hybrid immunity from COVID-19 is unclear. We reflect on the challenges from trying to conduct a randomized post-SARS-CoV-2 infection vaccination trial study with rapidly evolving scientific data, vaccination guidelines, varying international policies, difficulties with vaccine availability, vaccine hesitancy, and a constantly evolving virus.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Vaccination , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Inpatients , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Vaccination/methodsABSTRACT
Staphylococcus aureus is the most common bacteria causing purulent skin and soft tissue infections. Many disease-causing S aureus strains are methicillin resistant; thus, empiric therapy should be given to cover methicillin-resistant S aureus. Bacterial wound cultures are important for characterizing local susceptibility patterns. Definitive antibiotic therapy is warranted, although there are no compelling data demonstrating superiority of any one antibiotic over another. Antibiotic choice is predicated by the infection severity, local susceptibility patterns, and drug-related safety, tolerability, and cost. Response to therapy is expected within the first days; 5 to 7 days of therapy is typically adequate to achieve cure.
Subject(s)
Soft Tissue Infections/diagnosis , Soft Tissue Infections/therapy , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Abscess/microbiology , Abscess/therapy , Algorithms , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cellulitis/microbiology , Cellulitis/therapy , Drainage/methods , Humans , Impetigo/microbiology , Impetigo/therapy , Methicillin Resistance , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Risk Factors , Soft Tissue Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/microbiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The rising incidence of MDR uropathogens has driven increased use of oral fosfomycin for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs). However, there are limited data to support its use for cUTI, especially pyelonephritis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all oral fosfomycin prescriptions between 1 January and 31 December 2017 in the Los Angeles County Department of Health Service system, the second largest US municipal health system. We examined demographics, clinical characteristics, adverse events and 30 day treatment success for patients with cUTI. Follow-up urine cultures till 31 December 2018 were examined for emergence of fosfomycin resistance. RESULTS: Of 154 patients prescribed fosfomycin, 99 (64%) had cUTI. Of these, 39 (39%) had lower tract, 37 (37%) pyelonephritis and 23 (23%) non-pyelonephritis upper tract cUTI. Escherichia coli ESBL producers were the predominant pathogens (73%). Of the 63 patients with 30 day follow-up, 49 (78%) had clinical success, including 16/20 (80%) treated for pyelonephritis. Treatment failure was associated with male sex (P < 0.01), urological abnormalities (P = 0.05), non-E. coli cUTI (P = 0.03) and receipt of <25% IV therapy prior to fosfomycin switch (P = 0.03). Of patients prescribed fosfomycin (n = 154), fosfomycin-resistant E. coli were found in 9/64 (14%) of the patients with follow-up urine cultures >30 days after initial treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of data supporting its use, we found that most patients receiving oral fosfomycin off-label for cUTI, including pyelonephritis, had clinical success. However, emergence of subsequent resistance warrants caution. Prospective comparative studies should be done to better evaluate oral fosfomycin use for cUTI.
Subject(s)
Fosfomycin , Pyelonephritis , Urinary Tract Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Delivery of Health Care , Escherichia coli , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Habits , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Pyelonephritis/drug therapy , Pyelonephritis/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Fungal endocarditis remains an uncommon clinical diagnosis, though is likely to become more frequent due to the global increase in transplantations and cardiac valvular surgery. A case of prosthetic valve endocarditis due to Aspergillus fumigatus is described that was diagnosed with serologic fungal markers and confirmed with positive blood cultures, an uncommon finding.
ABSTRACT
Cryptococcal meningitis accounts for an estimated 25% of AIDS-associated mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. Accumulating animal and human evidence suggest that a higher, more fungicidal, dose of fluconazole during consolidation therapy could be more effective in controlling residual infection and may help significantly reduce posthospitalization mortality. Although the potential for toxicity is low, the use of fluconazole at a dose of 800 mg/day during consolidation therapy requires examination in a randomized clinical trial. In the interim, within countries where postdischarge mortality from cryptococcal meningitis is high and amphotericin-flucytosine combination therapy remains unavailable, the use of high-dose fluconazole consolidation therapy deserves serious consideration as a strategy with limited risk and the potential for considerable public health benefit.
Subject(s)
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Fluconazole/administration & dosage , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/drug therapy , Africa South of the Sahara , Antifungal Agents/adverse effects , Fluconazole/adverse effects , HumansSubject(s)
Cryptococcus neoformans/isolation & purification , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/diagnosis , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Skin Ulcer/diagnosis , Adult , Amphotericin B/administration & dosage , Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Diagnosis, Differential , Fluconazole/administration & dosage , Flucytosine/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/complications , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/drug therapy , Necrosis , Skin Ulcer/complications , Skin Ulcer/drug therapy , Skin Ulcer/pathology , ThighABSTRACT
OBJECT: Programmable valves (PVs) for shunting CSF have increasingly replaced nonprogrammable valves (NPVs). There have been only a few longer-term studies (≥ 5 years) conducted that have compared the effectiveness of NPVs with that of PVs for children with hydrocephalus, and only 1 study has reported NPVs as being favorable over PVs. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the long-term survival of these 2 types of shunt valves. METHODS: The authors collected data for all patients who underwent CSF shunt insertion or revision between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008. Patients underwent follow-up for a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Statistical analyses were done using chi-square, Kaplan-Meier survival curve, and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 616 valves were implanted, of which 313 were PVs and 303 were NPVs. Of these, 253 were original shunt implantations and 363 were revisions. The proportion of 5-year survival for NPVs (45.8%) was significantly higher than that for PVs (19.8%) (p = 0.0005, log-rank). The NPVs that survived longer than 6 months also survived through the 5th year better than the PVs (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The authors' data suggest that NPVs survive longer than PVs in children, but there is a need for prospective, case-control studies to confirm these data.