Taxane-induced pain in breast cancer patients as perceived by nurses.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment with taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens is crucial for improving survival in patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer. Recent literature describes a high incidence of taxane-induced neuropathic pain or/and muscle and joint pain. For patients, oncology nurses can play an integral role as a resource for pain control. There is a knowledge gap regarding how nurses perceive patients' experienced taxane-induced pain and support from their organizations when caring for patients with such pain. AIM: Investigate nurses' perceptions of occurrence of taxane-induced pain and identify organizational support for managing such pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observation study, conducted in 2017-2018, with a web-based questionnaire to 240 nurses working at oncology outpatient units in Sweden. The areas of concern were start-decline, duration, prevalence, intensity, and bodily distribution of taxane-induced pain. Patient information, guidelines, prophylactic analgesia, and perceived support were used to counteract such pain. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a logistic regression model to estimate associations. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one nurses completed the questionnaire, describing their perceptions of taxane-induced pain in patients with breast cancer. The prevalence and intensity of taxane-induced pain were experienced as divergent. Some consensus was found among the nurses regarding the start of the pain, but not when declined. The body areas where pain was expected to occur were the muscles, joints, legs, feet, and mainly the back of the trunk. Low use of local/national guidelines for managing taxane-induced pain was described. No relationship was found between factors related to the nurses' characteristics (age, work experience in oncology care, or specialist education in oncology) that significantly affected their perceptions regarding the occurrence of taxane-induced pain or pain intensity. Conclusion: This study highlights a need for attention to education and guidelines for how to observe, treat, and evaluate this particular type of pain.

Colored body images reveal the perceived intensity and distribution of pain in women with breast cancer treated with adjuvant taxanes: a prospective multi-method study of pain experiences.

Background and aims Breast cancer is the most prevalent adult cancer worldwide. A broader use of screening for early detection and adjuvant systemic therapy with chemotherapy has resulted in improved survival rates. Taxane-containing chemotherapy is one of the cornerstones of the treatment. However, taxane-containing chemotherapy may result in acute chemotherapy-induced nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Since this pain may be an additional burden for the patient both during and after taxane chemotherapy, it is important to rapidly discover and treat it. There is yet no gold standard for assessing taxane-induced pain. In the clinic, applying multiple methods for collecting information on pain may better describe the patients' pain experiences. The aim was to document the pain during and after taxane through the contribution of different methods for collecting information on taxane-induced pain. Fifty-three women scheduled for adjuvant sequential chemotherapy at doses of ≥75 mg/m2 of docetaxel and epirubicin were enrolled in the study. Methods Prospective pain assessments were done on a visual analog scale (VAS) before and during each cycle of treatment for about 5 months, and using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire's (EORTC-QLQ-C30) two pain questions at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Participants scoring pain on the VAS >30 and undergoing an interview also colored their pain on a body image during treatment and at 12 months. Results Surprisingly widespread, intense pain was detected using a multi-method approach. The colored body image showed pain being perceived on 51% of the body surface area during treatment, and on 18% 12 months after inclusion. In general, the pain started and peaked in intensity after the first cycle of taxane. After Cycle 3, most women reported an increase in pain on the VAS. Some women continued to report some pain even during the epirubicin cycles. The VAS scores dropped after the last chemotherapy cycle, but not to the baseline level. At baseline, 3 months and 12 months after inclusion, the women who estimated VAS >30 reported higher levels of pain on the pain questions of the EORTC-QLQ-C30. Conclusions This study contributes information on how different pain assessment tools offer different information in the assessment of pain. The colored body image brings another dimension to pain diagnostics, providing additional information on the involved body areas and the pain intensities as experienced by the women. A multi-method approach to assessing pain offers many advantages. The timing of the assessment is important to properly assess pain. Implications Pain relief needs to be included in the chemotherapy treatment, with individual assessment and treatment of pain, in the same way as is done in chemotherapy-triggered nausea. There is a time window whereby the risk of pain development is at its highest within 24-48 h after receiving taxane chemotherapy. Proper attention to pain evaluation and treatment should be in focus during this time window.

Women Treated for Breast Cancer Experiences of Chemotherapy-Induced Pain: Memories, Any Present Pain, and Future Reflections.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer survivors make up a growing population facing treatment that poses long-standing adverse effects including chemotherapy-related body function changes and/or pain. There is limited knowledge of patients' lived experiences of chemotherapy-induced pain (CHIP). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore CHIP and any long-standing pain experiences in the lifeworld of breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Fifteen women participated in a follow-up interview a year after having experienced CHIP. They were interviewed from a lifeworld perspective; the interviews were analyzed through guided phenomenology reflection. RESULTS: A past perspective: CHIP is often described in metaphors, leads to changes in a patient's lifeworld, and impacts lived time. The women become entirely dependent on others but at the same time feel isolated and alone. Existential pain was experienced as increased vulnerability. Present perspective: Pain engages same parts of the body, but at a lower intensity than during CHIP. The pain creates time awareness. Expected normality in relationships/daily life has not yet been achieved, and a painful existence emerges in-between health and illness. Future perspective: There are expectations of pain continuing, and there is insecurity regarding whom to turn to in such cases. A painful awareness emerges about one's own and others' fragile existence. CONCLUSIONS: Experiencing CHIP can impact the lifeworld of women with a history of breast cancer. After CHIP, there are continued experiences of pain that trigger insecurity about whether one is healthy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Cancer survivors would likely benefit from communication and information about and evaluation of CHIP.

Women with breast cancer: experience of chemotherapy-induced pain: triangulation of methods.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy treatment for cancer diseases can cause body pain during adjuvant therapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe the perceived impact of adjuvant chemotherapy-induced pain (CHIP) on the daily lives of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, using triangulation. METHOD: Fifty-seven women scheduled for chemotherapy in doses of 75 mg/m or greater of epirubicin and/or docetaxel participated. Twenty-two of these women registered pain with values of 4 or more on the visual analog scale on day 10 following chemotherapy. Of these 22, 16 participated in an interview and colored a printed body image. A qualitative thematic stepwise analysis of the interviews was performed. RESULTS: Chemotherapy-induced pain had a profound impact on daily life. Ten women reported the worst possible pain, with visual analog scale scores of 8 to 10. Three different categories crystallized: perception (A) of manageable pain, which allowed the women to maintain their daily lives; perception (B) of pain beyond imagination, whereby the impact of pain had become more complex; and perception (C) of crippling pain, challenging the women's confidence in survival. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the inability to capture CHIP with 1 method only; it is thus necessary to use complimentary methods to capture pain. We found that pain had a considerable impact on daily life, with surprisingly high scores of perceived pain, findings that to date have been poorly investigated qualitatively. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Nurses need to (1) better identify, understand and treat CHIP, using instruments and protocols; and (2) provide improved communication about pain and pain management.