ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of stroke care for patients with preexisting dementia, compared with patients who had only stroke. The secondary aim was to investigate how the quality of stroke care changed during the pandemic and post-pandemic periods compared with the pre-pandemic period in patients with preexisting dementia. DESIGN: A registry-based, nationwide cohort study in Sweden. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We included patients with a first stroke between 2019 and 2022, both with and without dementia. The study periods were defined as follows: pre-pandemic (January 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020), COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2020, to February 24, 2022), and post-COVID-19 pandemic period (February 25, 2022, to September 19, 2022). The outcomes examined were the following quality indicators of stroke care, suggested by the national guideline of stroke care in Sweden: stroke admission site, performance of swallowing assessment, reperfusion treatment, assessment for rehabilitation, and early supported discharge. METHODS: The associations were studied through group comparisons and binary logistic regressions. RESULTS: Of the 21,795 patients with strokes, 1357 had documented preexisting dementia, and 20,438 had stroke without a dementia diagnosis. Throughout all study periods, a significantly lower proportion of patients with stroke with preexisting dementia, compared with stroke-only patients, received reperfusion treatment, assessments for rehabilitation, and early supported discharge from stroke units. In the subgroup of stroke patients with preexisting dementia, no significant associations were found regarding the quality indicators of stroke care before, during, and after the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Disparities in quality of stroke care were observed between stroke patients with preexisting dementia and those with only stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there were no statistically significant differences in stroke care for patients with dementia across the pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dementia , Registries , Stroke , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Dementia/epidemiology , Dementia/therapy , Female , Male , Sweden/epidemiology , Aged , Stroke/therapy , Stroke/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Quality of Health Care , Middle AgedABSTRACT
â¢Compared to Swedish-born people, foreign-born people were less likely to receive dementia diagnostic tests.â¢Being born in Africa or Europe was associated with lower chance of receiving cholinesterase inhibitors.â¢Asian-born people had higher chance of receiving cholinesterase inhibitors, but were less likely to receive memantine.â¢Disparities existed in dementia diagnostics and treatment between Swedish-born and foreign-born people, but were not consistent after adjusting for MMSE scores.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Disturbances in brain cholesterol homeostasis may be involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Lipid-lowering medications could interfere with neurodegenerative processes in AD through cholesterol metabolism or other mechanisms. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between the use of lipid-lowering medications and cognitive decline over time in a cohort of patients with AD or mixed dementia with indication for lipid-lowering treatment. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study using the Swedish Registry for Cognitive/Dementia Disorders, linked with other Swedish national registries. Cognitive trajectories evaluated with mini-mental state examination (MMSE) were compared between statin users and non-users, individual statin users, groups of statins and non-statin lipid-lowering medications using mixed-effect regression models with inverse probability of drop out weighting. A dose-response analysis included statin users compared to non-users. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 15,586 patients with mean age of 79.5 years at diagnosis and a majority of women (59.2 %). A dose-response effect was demonstrated: taking one defined daily dose of statins on average was associated with 0.63 more MMSE points after 3 years compared to no use of statins (95% CI: 0.33;0.94). Simvastatin users showed 1.01 more MMSE points (95% CI: 0.06;1.97) after 3 years compared to atorvastatin users. Younger (< 79.5 years at index date) simvastatin users had 0.80 more MMSE points compared to younger atorvastatin users (95% CI: 0.05;1.55) after 3 years. Simvastatin users had 1.03 more MMSE points (95% CI: 0.26;1.80) compared to rosuvastatin users after 3 years. No differences regarding statin lipophilicity were observed. The results of sensitivity analysis restricted to incident users were not consistent. CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with AD or mixed dementia with indication for lipid-lowering medication may benefit cognitively from statin treatment; however, further research is needed to clarify the findings of sensitivity analyses.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Cognitive Dysfunction , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Mixed Dementias , Humans , Female , Aged , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Atorvastatin/therapeutic use , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Simvastatin/therapeutic use , Cognitive Dysfunction/drug therapy , Cognitive Dysfunction/epidemiology , CholesterolABSTRACT
Importance: Little is known about the specific timing and sequence of incident psychiatric comorbidities at different stages of dementia diagnosis. Objectives: To examine the temporal risk patterns of psychiatric disorders, including depression, anxiety, stress-related disorders, substance use disorders, sleep disorders, somatoform/conversion disorders, and psychotic disorders, among patients with dementia before, at the time of, and after receipt of a diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, nationwide cohort study analyzed data from 796â¯505 participants obtained from 6 registers between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2017, including the Swedish registry for cognitive/dementia disorders. Patients with dementia were matched on year of birth (±3 years), sex, and region of residence with up to 4 controls. Data were analyzed between March 1, 2023, and August 31, 2023. Exposures: Any cause of dementia and dementia subtypes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Flexible parametric survival models to determine the time-dependent risk of initial diagnosis of psychiatric disorders, from 7 years prior to dementia diagnosis to 10 years after diagnosis. Subgroup analysis was conducted for psychiatric drug use among persons receiving a diagnosis of dementia from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2012. Results: Of 796â¯505 patients included in the study (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 80.2 [8.3] years; 448â¯869 (56.4%) female), 209â¯245 had dementia, whereas 587â¯260 did not, across 7â¯824â¯616 person-years. The relative risk of psychiatric disorders was consistently higher among patients with dementia compared with control participants and began to increase from 3 years before diagnosis (hazard ratio, [HR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.67-1.76), peaked during the week after diagnosis (HR, 4.74; 95% CI, 4.21-5.34), and decreased rapidly thereafter. Decreased risk relative to controls was observed from 5 years after diagnosis (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.98). The results were similar for Alzheimer disease, mixed dementia, vascular dementia and unspecified dementia. Among patients with dementia, markedly elevated use of psychiatric medications was observed in the year leading up to the dementia diagnosis and peaked 6 months after diagnosis. For example, antidepressant use was persistently higher among patients with dementia compared with controls, and the difference increased from 2 years before dementia diagnosis (15.9% vs 7.9%, P < .001), peaked approximately 6 months after dementia diagnosis (29.1% vs 9.7%, P < .001), and then decreased slowly from 3 years after diagnosis but remained higher than controls 5 years after diagnosis (16.4% vs 6.9%, P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study that patients with dementia had markedly increased risks of psychiatric disorders both before and after dementia diagnosis highlight the significance of incorporating psychiatric preventative and management interventions for individuals with dementia across various diagnostic stages.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Cognition Disorders , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Female , Child , Male , Cohort Studies , Risk , Anxiety Disorders , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Long-term care improves independence and quality of life of persons with dementia (PWD). The influence of socioeconomic status on access to long-term care was understudied. OBJECTIVE: To explore the socioeconomic disparity in long-term care for PWD. METHODS: This registry-based study included 14,786 PWD, registered in the Swedish registry for cognitive and dementia disorders (2014-2016). Education and income, two traditional socioeconomic indicators, were the main exposure. Outcomes were any kind of long-term care, specific types of long-term care (home care, institutional care), and the monthly average hours of home care. The association between outcomes and socioeconomic status was examined with zero-inflated negative binomial regression and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: PWD with compulsory education had lower likelihood of receiving any kind of long-term care (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.93), or home care (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.97), compared to individuals with university degrees. Their monthly average hours of home care were 0.70 times (95% CI 0.59-0.82) lower than those of persons with university degrees. There was no significant association between education and the receipt of institutional care. Stratifying on persons with Alzheimer's disease showed significant association between lower education and any kind of long-term care, and between income and the hours of home care. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities in long-term care existed in this study population. Lower-educated PWD were less likely to acquire general long-term care, home care and had lower hours of home care, compared to their higher-educated counterparts. Income was not significantly associated with the receipt of long-term care.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Dementia , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/therapy , Long-Term Care , Dementia/epidemiology , Dementia/therapy , Quality of Life , Sweden/epidemiology , Educational StatusABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We aim to analyze the risk of death from specific external causes, including falls, complications of medical and surgical care, unintentional injuries, and suicide, in dementia patients. DESIGN: Swedish nationwide cohort study integrating 6 registers from May 1, 2007, through December 31, 2018, including the Swedish Registry for Cognitive/Dementia Disorders (SveDem). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based study. Patients diagnosed with dementia from 2007 to 2018 and up to 4 controls matched on year of birth (±3 years), sex, and region of residence. METHODS: The exposures of this study were diagnosis of dementia and dementia subtypes. Number of deaths and causes of mortality were obtained from death certificates compiled into the Cause of Death Register. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using Cox and flexible models, adjusted for sociodemographics, medical and psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: The study population included 235,085 patients with dementia [96,760 men (41.2%); mean age 81.5 (SD 8.5) years] and 771,019 control participants [341,994 men (44.4%); mean age 79.9 (SD 8.6) years], over 3,721,687 person-years. Compared with control participants, patients with dementia presented increased risk for unintentional injuries (HR 3.30, 95% CI 3.19-3.40) and falls (HR 2.67, 95% CI 2.54-2.80) during old age (≥75 y), and suicide (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.02-2.39) in middle age (<65 y). Suicide risk was 5.04 times higher (HR 6.04, 95% CI 4.22-8.66) in patients with both dementia and 2 or more psychiatric disorders relative to controls (incidence rate per person-years, 1.6 vs 0.3). For dementia subtypes, frontotemporal dementia had the highest risks of unintentional injuries (HR 4.28, 95% CI 2.80-6.52) and falls (HR 3.83, 95% CI 1.98-7.41), whereas subjects with mixed dementia were less likely to die from suicide (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.46) and complications of medical and surgical care (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40-0.70) compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Suicide risk screening and psychiatric disorders management in early-onset dementia and early interventions for unintentional injuries and falls prevention in older dementia patients should be provided.
Subject(s)
Dementia , Suicide , Male , Middle Aged , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Cause of Death , Death CertificatesABSTRACT
Machine learning (ML) could have advantages over traditional statistical models in identifying risk factors. Using ML algorithms, our objective was to identify the most important variables associated with mortality after dementia diagnosis in the Swedish Registry for Cognitive/Dementia Disorders (SveDem). From SveDem, a longitudinal cohort of 28,023 dementia-diagnosed patients was selected for this study. Sixty variables were considered as potential predictors of mortality risk, such as age at dementia diagnosis, dementia type, sex, body mass index (BMI), mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score, time from referral to initiation of work-up, time from initiation of work-up to diagnosis, dementia medications, comorbidities, and some specific medications for chronic comorbidities (e.g., cardiovascular disease). We applied sparsity-inducing penalties for three ML algorithms and identified twenty important variables for the binary classification task in mortality risk prediction and fifteen variables to predict time to death. Area-under-ROC curve (AUC) measure was used to evaluate the classification algorithms. Then, an unsupervised clustering algorithm was applied on the set of twenty-selected variables to find two main clusters which accurately matched surviving and dead patient clusters. A support-vector-machines with an appropriate sparsity penalty provided the classification of mortality risk with accuracy = 0.7077, AUROC = 0.7375, sensitivity = 0.6436, and specificity = 0.740. Across three ML algorithms, the majority of the identified twenty variables were compatible with literature and with our previous studies on SveDem. We also found new variables which were not previously reported in literature as associated with mortality in dementia. Performance of basic dementia diagnostic work-up, time from referral to initiation of work-up, and time from initiation of work-up to diagnosis were found to be elements of the diagnostic process identified by the ML algorithms. The median follow-up time was 1053 (IQR = 516-1771) days in surviving and 1125 (IQR = 605-1770) days in dead patients. For prediction of time to death, the CoxBoost model identified 15 variables and classified them in order of importance. These highly important variables were age at diagnosis, MMSE score, sex, BMI, and Charlson Comorbidity Index with selection scores of 23%, 15%, 14%, 12% and 10%, respectively. This study demonstrates the potential of sparsity-inducing ML algorithms in improving our understanding of mortality risk factors in dementia patients and their application in clinical settings. Moreover, ML methods can be used as a complement to traditional statistical methods.
Subject(s)
Dementia , Machine Learning , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Cohort Studies , Algorithms , Dementia/diagnosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are 2 frequently used brief cognitive screening tasks. Here, we provide a conversion method from MMSE to MoCA for patients with Alzheimer's dementia, frontotemporal dementia, and Parkinson dementia/Lewy body dementia, as well as for patients with dementia and with or without previous stroke. This conversion is needed as everyday clinical practice varies in their use of the 2 scales, which makes comparisons between studies, meta-analysis, and patient cohorts difficult. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 387 patients with recently diagnosed dementia in memory clinics from the Swedish registry for cognitive/dementia disorders (SveDem) from 2007 to 2018. METHODS: Overall, 387 patients of the Swedish registry for cognitive/dementia disorders with both MMSE and MoCA scores were evaluated. An equipercentile equating method was used to convert MMSE to MoCA scores in the different patient populations. Furthermore, receiver operating curves were used to examine whether MMSE or MoCA scores can distinguish between patients with different dementia types. RESULTS: MMSE scores were converted to MoCA scores for all dementia types and depicted in a conversion table. Results show that the equipercentile equating method and log-linear smoothing allow the creation of a conversion table in which for each test score of the MMSE, the equivalent score of the MoCA for each investigated group can be looked up (and vice-versa). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study reports a reliable and easy conversion for transforming MMSE to MoCA scores (and vice-versa) in patients with Alzheimer's dementia, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson dementia or Lewy body dementia, as well as patients with dementia with and without previous stroke.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Frontotemporal Dementia , Lewy Body Disease , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Lewy Body Disease/diagnosis , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Observational Studies as TopicABSTRACT
AIMS: Exercise is increasingly being studied as treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD). We examined the effects of an acute bout of exercise on alcohol craving, heterogeneity of response, and factors associated with reductions in craving. METHODS: Within the context of a randomized controlled trial, we conducted an exploratory, single-arm study. In total, 117 adults with AUD (52.7 years; SD = 12.3; 68.4% female) and indications of alcohol craving (Desire for Alcohol Questionnaire, DAQ-short version total score >8) were included. The intervention was a 12-min sub-maximal fitness test performed on a cycle ergometer. We examined changes in participant's self-rated desire for alcohol immediately before and after exercise. Personal, clinical, and exercise-related factors associated with reductions (≥0.5 SD) in craving were identified using hierarchical logistic regression. RESULTS: In the total sample craving reduced from pre-to post-exercise (p < 0.001, g = 0.60 [0.40-0.79]). Three groups were observed: those whose craving decreased (70.1%; p < 0.001, g = 1.12 [0.85-1.40]), increased (16.2%; p < 0.001, g = 1.08 [0.51-1.64]), or did not change (13.7%). Forty percent experienced clinically meaningful reductions in craving (≥0.5 SD). In fully adjusted models, two factors were associated with these reductions: higher pre-exercise cravings (OR = 1.15 [1.07-1.23], p < 0.001) and lower cardiorespiratory fitness (OR = 0.88 [0.79-1.00], p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: In most adults with AUD, short bouts of moderately intense aerobic exercise helps reduce cravings for alcohol. Those with higher cravings and lower cardiorespiratory fitness are most likely to benefit.
Subject(s)
Alcoholism , Craving , Adult , Exercise , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore the dementia diagnostic process and drug prescription for persons with dementia (PWD) with different socioeconomic status (SES). DESIGN: Register-based cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study included 74,414 PWD aged ≥65 years from the Swedish Dementia Register (2007-2018). Their data were linked with the Swedish Longitudinal Integrated Database for Health Insurance and Labor Market Studies (2006-2017) to acquire the SES information 1 year before dementia diagnosis. METHODS: Education and income-2 traditional SES indicators-were divided into 5 levels. Outcomes comprised the dementia diagnostic examinations, types of dementia diagnosis, diagnostic unit, and prescription of antidementia drugs. Binary logistic regression was performed to evaluate socioeconomic inequalities. RESULTS: Compared to PWD with the lowest educational level, PWD with the highest educational level had a higher probability of receiving the basic diagnostic workup [odds ratio (OR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.29], clock test (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.24) and neuroimaging (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.39). Compared with PWD in the lowest income quintile, PWD in the highest income quintile presented a higher chance of receiving the basic diagnostic workup (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.26-1.46), clock test (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.28-1.52), blood analysis (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.39), Mini-Mental State Examination (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.26-1.70), and neuroimaging (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.18-1.44). PWD with higher education or income had a higher likelihood of obtaining a specified dementia diagnosis or being diagnosed at a memory clinic. SES presented no association with prescription of antidementia medication, except for the association between education and the use of memantine. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Higher education or income was significantly associated with higher chance of receiving dementia diagnostic examinations, a specified dementia diagnosis, being diagnosed at a memory clinic, and using memantine. Socioeconomic inequalities in dementia diagnostic process and prescription of memantine occurred among PWD with different education or income levels.
Subject(s)
Dementia , Income , Cohort Studies , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/drug therapy , Educational Status , Humans , SwedenABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Exercise is increasingly being used in the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD). We examined the short-term effects of acute exercise on alcohol craving, mood states and state anxiety in physically inactive, non-treatment seeking adults with AUD. METHODS: Exploratory, single-arm study. In total, 140 adults with AUD (53.7 ± 11.8 years; 70 % female) were included in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to study effects of physical activity on alcohol consumption. This acute exercise study was nested within the larger RCT. The intervention was a 12-minute sub-maximal fitness test performed on a cycle ergometer. Participants self-rated their desire for alcohol (DAQ) and completed mood (POMS-Brief) and state anxiety (STAI-Y1) questionnaires 30-minutes before exercise, immediately before, immediately after, and 30-minutes post. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were collected. Effects of exercise were assessed using RM-ANOVA and dependent sample t-tests with effect sizes (Hedges g). RESULTS: In total, 70.6 % had mild or moderate AUD (DSM-5 criteria = 4.9 ± 2). The intervention was generally perceived as 'strenuous' (RPE = 16.1 ± 1.6). In the total sample, there was a main effect of time with reductions in alcohol craving [F(3,411) = 27.33, p < 0.001], mood disturbance [F(3,411) = 53.44, p < 0.001], and state anxiety [F(3,411) = 3.83, p = 0.013]. Between-group analyses indicated larger magnitude effects in those with severe compared to mild AUD, however, AUD severity did not significantly moderate the within-group improvements: group x time interaction for alcohol craving [F(6,411) = 1.21, p = 0.305]. Positive effects of exercise were maintained 30-minutes post-exercise. CONCLUSION: A short bout of aerobic exercise reduced alcohol craving and improved mood states in adults with AUD.
Subject(s)
Alcoholism/therapy , Anxiety/therapy , Craving , Exercise , Mood Disorders/therapy , Adult , Affect , Aged , Exercise Therapy/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patient dissatisfaction with stroke care is associated with poor self-rated health and unmet care needs. Dementia patients' satisfaction with stroke care is understudied. OBJECTIVE: To compare satisfaction with stroke care in patients with and without dementia. METHODS: This longitudinal cohort study included 5,932 dementia patients (2007-2017) who suffered a first stroke after dementia diagnosis and 39,457 non-dementia stroke patients (2007-2017). Data were retrieved by linking the Swedish Stroke Register, the Swedish Dementia Register, the Swedish National Patient Register, and the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. The association between dementia and satisfaction was analyzed with ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: When dementia patients answered themselves, they reported significantly lower odds of satisfaction with acute stroke care (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.60-0.85), healthcare staff's attitude (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.96), communication with doctors (OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66-0.92), stroke information (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.52-0.74); but not regarding inpatient rehabilitation (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.75-1.16), or outpatient rehabilitation (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.73-1.18). When patients answered with caregivers' help, the association between dementia status and satisfaction remained significant in all items. Subgroup analyses showed that patients with Alzheimer's disease and mixed dementia reported lower odds of satisfaction with acute care and healthcare staff's attitude when they answered themselves. CONCLUSION: Patients with dementia reported lower satisfaction with stroke care, revealing unfulfilled care needs among dementia patients, which are possibly due to different (or less) care, or because dementia patients require adaptations to standard care.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/complications , Dementia/complications , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Stroke Rehabilitation/standards , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Dementia/psychology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Registries , Stroke/complications , Stroke/therapy , SwedenABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Evidence is lacking on how treatment of comorbidities improves outcomes in patients with dementia. In this study, we evaluated temporal changes in the management of comorbidities in relation to survival rates in incident dementia over a 10-year period in Sweden. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 40,219 patients with recently diagnosed dementia in memory clinics from the Swedish Dementia Registry (SveDem) from 2008 to 2017. METHODS: In 1-year blocks, pharmacological treatment of dementia and comorbidities in relationship to risk for fractures, major cardiovascular events (MACE), and death were analyzed using Cox models. Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIR) of death are presented. RESULTS: After standardization for demographics and comorbidities, the risk of fracture, MACE, and mortality decreased by 16%, 23%, and 28%, respectively, between 2008 and 2016. Each year decreased the risk of fracture by 3% (hazard ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.96-0.99), MACE by 4% (0.96, 0.95-0.97), and death by 5% (0.95, 0.93-0.97). Adjustment for changes in medication use attenuated these associations. Compared with the general population, the risk of death declined by 11%, corresponding to standardized incidence rate ratio, between 2008 and 2016. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Over 10 years, a reduction in the short-term risks of fracture, MACE, and death in patients with dementia was associated with changes in drug prescribing practices. These improvements seem to be partly explained by progressive implementation of dementia diagnostic, treatment guidelines, and general management of comorbidities.
Subject(s)
Dementia , Cohort Studies , Dementia/drug therapy , Dementia/epidemiology , Drug Prescriptions , Humans , Registries , Sweden/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Stroke and dementia are frequent comorbidities. Dementia possibly increases total costs of stroke care, especially cost of institutionalization and informal medical care. However, stroke rehabilitation costs in dementia patients are understudied. OBJECTIVE: To estimate inpatient stroke rehabilitation costs for Swedish dementia patients in comparison with non-dementia patients. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study with linked data from the Swedish Dementia Register and the Swedish Stroke Register was conducted. Patients diagnosed with dementia who suffered a first ischemic stroke between 2010 and 2014 (nâ=â138) were compared with non-dementia patients (nâ=â935). Cost analyses were conducted from a Swedish health care perspective. The difference of rehabilitation costs between the two groups was examined via simple linear regression (before and after matching by propensity scores of dementia) and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Mean inpatient rehabilitation costs for dementia and non-dementia patients were SEK 103,693/$11,932 and SEK 130,057/$14,966, respectively (median SEK 92,183/$10,607 and SEK 106,365/$12,239) (pâ=â0.001). Dementia patients suffered from more comorbidities and experienced lower functioning, compared to non-dementia patients. The inpatient rehabilitation cost for patients with known dementia was 0.84 times the cost in non-dementia individuals. CONCLUSION: Dementia diagnosis was significantly associated with lower inpatient stroke rehabilitation costs. This might be explained by physicians' beliefs on the limited effectiveness of rehabilitation in dementia patients. Further research on cost-effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation and patients' satisfaction with stroke rehabilitation is necessary.