Self-Monitoring and Self-Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease During Low-Sodium Diet Self-Management Interventions: Secondary Analysis of the ESMO and SUBLIME Trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease are often requested to engage in self-monitoring sodium (i.e. salt) intake, but it is currently unknown how self-monitoring would empower them. This study aims to assess: (1) how frequent self-monitoring tools are being used during low-sodium diet self-management interventions; (2) whether self-efficacy (i.e. trust in own capability to manage the chronic disease) is associated with self-monitoring frequency; and (3) whether higher self-monitoring frequency is associated with an improvement in self-efficacy over time. METHOD: Data from two multicenter randomized controlled trials (ESMO [n = 151] and SUBLIME [n = 99]) among adult Dutch patients with chronic kidney disease (eGFR ≥ 20-25 mL/min/1.73 m2) were used. In both studies, routine care was compared to a 3-month low-sodium diet self-management intervention with several self-monitoring tools (online food diary, home blood pressure monitor, and urinary sodium measurement device [only ESMO]). Data was collected on usage frequency of self-monitoring tools. Frequencies during the interventions were compared between low and high baseline self-efficacy groups using the Mann-Whitney U test and T-test and associated with changes in self-efficacy during the interventions using Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Large variations in self-monitoring frequency were observed. In both interventions, usage of self-monitoring tools was highest during the first month with sharp drops thereafter. The online food diary was the most frequently used tool. In the ESMO intervention, low baseline self-efficacy was associated with a higher usage frequency of self-monitoring tools. This finding was not confirmed in the SUBLIME intervention. No significant associations were found between usage frequency of self-monitoring tools and changes in self-efficacy over time. CONCLUSION: Patients with low self-efficacy might benefit most from frequent usage of self-monitoring tools when sufficient guidance and support is provided.

Decreasing incidence of dialysis in older patients in The Netherlands as compared with other European countries: an international perspective.

Introduction: After decades of increasing dialysis incidence, we observed a decreasing trend in the Netherlands in the last decade. We compared this trend with trends in other European countries. Materials and Methods: Aggregated data for calendar years 2001-2019 from the Dutch registries of kidney replacement therapy patients and the European Renal Association Registry were used. Dialysis incidence in the Netherlands was compared with that in 11 other European countries/regions using three age groups: 20-64, 65-74, and ≥75 years, taking into account pre-emptive kidney transplantation (PKT) incidence. Time trends were assessed as annual percentage change (APC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using joinpoint regression analysis. Results: Between 2001 and 2019 the Dutch dialysis incidence decreased slightly among patients aged 20-64 years (APC -0.9, 95% CI -1.4; -0.5). For patients 65-74 and ≥75 years old, a peak was seen in 2004 and 2009, respectively. Afterwards, the decrease was most marked in patients aged ≥75 years: APC -3.2 (-4.1; -2.3) versus APC -1.8 (-2.2; -1.3) for patients 65-74 years old. PKT incidence increased significantly during the study period but remained limited compared to the observed decrease in dialysis incidence, especially among older patients. Large differences in dialysis incidence were observed among European countries/regions. A decreasing dialysis incidence among older patients was also seen in Austria, Denmark, England/Wales, Finland, Scotland, and Sweden. Conclusions: The Dutch dialysis incidence decreased most profoundly among older patients. This was also observed in several other European countries/regions. Although PKT incidence increased, it can only explain a minor part of the decrease in dialysis incidence.

Traditional and disease-related cardiovascular risk factors in ANCA-associated vasculitis: A prospective, two-centre cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. The aim was to assess traditional and disease-related CV risk determinants in a two-centre prospective cohort of AAV patients. METHODS: Patients were recruited from centres in the Netherlands and Canada. A comprehensive CV risk assessment was performed at inclusion. Subjects were followed up yearly for 3-5 years until the first CV event, death or end of follow-up. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to relate baseline characteristics to the first CV event. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included (mean age 62 years, female sex 44%, median Framingham risk score 14.3%). Insulin resistance was present in 73% of patients tested at inclusion, independent of concurrent prednisone therapy. After a median follow-up of 2.90 years, 16 patients (11%) experienced a CV event (14 non-fatal and 2 fatal). The incidence of CV events was 5.45 per 100 patient-years. Age, Framingham risk score, HbA1c level, Diabetes Mellitus (DM), and previous CV event were significantly associated with CV events. Other factors, such as sex, impaired renal function, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking history and microalbuminuria, or disease-specific variables, like ANCA serotype or disease activity, were not significantly related to CV events in univariable or age-adjusted cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Determinants of an increased CV risk were identified. Disease-related factors and treatments can further modify individual risk factors, such as for steroids causing chronic insulin resistance and DM. Treatment of risk factors is essential to optimize long-term outcomes in AAV patients.

Reversal Of Arterial Disease by modulating Magnesium and Phosphate (ROADMAP-study): rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial assessing the effects of magnesium citrate supplementation and phosphate-binding therapy on arterial stiffness in moderate chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Arterial stiffness and calcification propensity are associated with high cardiovascular risk and increased mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Both magnesium and phosphate are recognized as modulators of vascular calcification and chronic inflammation, both features of CKD that contribute to arterial stiffness. In this paper, we outline the rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating whether 24 weeks of oral magnesium supplementation with or without additional phosphate-binding therapy can improve arterial stiffness and calcification propensity in patients with stage 3-4 CKD. METHODS: In this multi-center, placebo-controlled RCT, a total of 180 participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 15 to 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 without phosphate binder therapy will be recruited. During the 24 weeks intervention, participants will be randomized to one of four intervention groups to receive either magnesium citrate (350 mg elemental magnesium/day) or placebo, with or without the addition of the phosphate binder sucroferric oxyhydroxide (1000 mg/day). Primary outcome of the study is the change of arterial stiffness measured by the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity over 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes include markers of calcification and inflammation, among others calcification propensity (T50) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. As explorative endpoints, repeated 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET-scans will be performed in a subset of participants (n = 40). Measurements of primary and secondary endpoints are performed at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. DISCUSSION: The combined intervention of magnesium citrate supplementation and phosphate-lowering therapy with sucroferric oxyhydroxide, in stage 3-4 CKD patients without overt hyperphosphatemia, aims to modulate the complex and deregulated mineral metabolism leading to vascular calcification and arterial stiffness and to establish to what extent this is mediated by T50 changes. The results of this combined intervention may contribute to future early interventions for CKD patients to reduce the risk of CVD and mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NL8252 (registered December 2019), EU clinical Trial Register 2019-001306-23 (registered November 2019).

Comorbidity is not associated with dialysis modality choice in patients with end-stage kidney disease.

AIM: Over the past years the proportion of home dialysis patients has decreased in the Netherlands. In addition, the home dialysis use varies significantly among centres. It is unclear whether this is the result of differences in comorbidity, or other factors. Our aim was to investigate the association between comorbidity and dialysis modality choice. METHODS: The multi-centre DOMESTICO cohort study collected comorbidity data of patients who started dialysis in 35 Dutch centres from 2012 to 2016. Comorbidity was assessed by the Charlson comorbidity index. Home dialysis was defined as any peritoneal dialysis or home haemodialysis treatment during follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between comorbidity and dialysis modality, with a mixed model approach to adjust for clustering of patients within dialysis centres. RESULTS: A total of 1358 patients were included, of whom 628 were treated with home dialysis. In crude mixed model analyses, the probability of receiving home dialysis was lower when comorbidity score was higher: having a high comorbidity score resulted in an odds ratio of 0.74 (95% CI 0.54-1.00) when compared with patients without comorbidities. After adjustments for age, sex, ethnic background, body mass index and dialysis vintage, there was no association between comorbidity and home dialysis. CONCLUSION: Comorbidity was not significantly associated with home dialysis choice, after adjustment for several confounding factors including age and body mass index. Future studies should aim at unravelling the centre-specific characteristics that probably play a role in dialysis modality choice.

Differences in hospitalisation between peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis is associated with frequent hospitalisations. Studies comparing hospitalisations between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and haemodialysis (HD) report conflicting results and mostly analyse data of patients that remain on their initial dialysis modality. This cohort study compares hospitalisations between PD and HD patients taking into account transitions between modalities. METHODS: The Dutch nOcturnal and hoME dialysis Study To Improve Clinical Outcomes collected hospitalisation data of patients who started dialysis between 2012 and 2017. Primary outcome was hospitalisation rate, analysed with a multi-state model that attributed each hospitalisation to the current dialysis modality. RESULTS: In total, 695 patients (252 PD, 443 HD) treated in 31 Dutch hospitals were included. The crude hospitalisation rate for PD was 2.3 ( ± 5.0) and for HD 1.4 ( ± 3.2) hospitalisations per patient-year. The adjusted hazard ratio for hospitalisation rate was 1.1 (95%CI 1.02-1.3) for PD compared with HD. The risk for first hospitalisation was 1.3 times (95%CI 1.1-1.6) higher for PD compared with HD during the first year after dialysis initiation. The number of hospitalisations and number of hospital days per patient-year were significantly higher for PD. The most common causes of PD and HD hospitalisations were peritonitis (23%) and vascular access-related problems (33%). CONCLUSION: PD was associated with higher hospitalisation rate, higher risk for first hospitalisation and higher number of hospitalisations compared with HD. Since the PD hospitalisations were mainly caused by peritonitis, more attention to infection prevention is necessary for reducing the number of hospitalisations in the future.

Dietary magnesium supplementation inhibits abdominal vascular calcification in an experimental animal model of chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Vascular calcification is a key process involved in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Magnesium supplementation may counteract vascular calcification. In this study we aimed to determine whether increased dietary magnesium intake inhibits vascular calcification in CKD in vivo and explore the mechanisms underlying these effects. METHODS: Sprague Dawley rats were partially nephrectomized and fed a diet with high phosphate and either high or normal magnesium content for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was the tissue calcium content of the aorta in the high versus normal dietary magnesium group. In addition, we analysed plasma mineral concentrations, aortic vascular calcification identified with von Kossa staining, calcium apposition time and aortic expression of genes related to vascular calcification. RESULTS: The number of animals in the highest tissue calcium content tertile was significantly lower in the abdominal aorta [1 (10%) versus 6 (55%); P = .03] in the high versus normal dietary magnesium group, but did not differ in the aortic arch and thoracic aorta. Von Kossa staining and calcium apposition time corresponded to these results. The median tissue calcium content was not significantly different between the groups. Serum phosphate concentrations and expression of osteogenic markers in the aorta did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that increased dietary magnesium inhibits abdominal vascular calcification in an experimental animal model of CKD in vivo. These are promising results for CKD patients and further study is needed to identify the mechanisms involved and to determine the clinical relevance in patients.

Magnesium intake and vascular structure and function: the Hoorn Study.

PURPOSE: Circulating and dietary magnesium have been shown to be inversely associated with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality in both high and low-risk populations. We aimed to examine the association between dietary magnesium intake and several measures of vascular structure and function in a prospective cohort. METHODS: We included 789 participants who participated in the vascular screening sub-cohort of the Hoorn Study, a population-based, prospective cohort study. Baseline dietary magnesium intake was estimated with a validated food frequency questionnaire and categorised in energy-adjusted magnesium intake tertiles. Several measurements of vascular structure and function were performed at baseline and most measurements were repeated after 8 years of follow-up (n = 432). Multivariable linear and logistic regression was performed to study the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of magnesium intake and intima-media thickness (IMT), augmentation index (Aix), pulse wave velocity (PWV), flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). RESULTS: Mean absolute magnesium intake was 328 ± 83 mg/day and prior CVD and DM2 was present in 55 and 41% of the participants, respectively. Multivariable regression analyses did not demonstrate associations between magnesium intake and any of the vascular outcomes. Participants in the highest compared to the lowest magnesium intake tertile demonstrated in fully adjusted cross-sectional analyses a PWV of -0.21 m/s (95% confidence interval -1.95, 1.52), a FMD of -0.03% (-0.89, 0.83) and in longitudinal analyses an IMT of 0.01 mm (-0.03, 0.06), an Aix of 0.70% (-1.69, 3.07) and an odds ratio of 0.84 (0.23, 3.11) for PAD CONCLUSION: We did not find associations between dietary magnesium intake and multiple markers of vascular structure and function, in either cross-sectional or longitudinal analyses.

Trends in home dialysis use differ among age categories in past two decades: A Dutch registry study.

BACKGROUND: Although the number of patients with end-stage kidney disease is growing, the number of patients who perform dialysis at home has decreased during the past two decades. The aim of this study was to explore time trends in the use of home dialysis in the Netherlands. METHODS: Dialysis episodes of patients who started dialysis treatment were studied using Dutch registry data (RENINE). The uptake of home dialysis between 1997 through 2016 was evaluated in time periods of 5 years. Home dialysis was defined as start with peritoneal dialysis or home haemodialysis, or transfer to either within 2 years of dialysis initiation. All analyses were stratified for age categories. Mixed model logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for clustering at patient level. RESULTS: A total of 33 340 dialysis episodes in 31 569 patients were evaluated. Mean age at dialysis initiation increased from 62.5 ± 14.0 to 65.5 ± 14.5 years in in-centre haemodialysis patients, whereas it increased from 51.9 ± 15.1 to 62.5 ± 14.6 years in home dialysis patients. In patients <65 years, the uptake of home dialysis was significantly lower during each 5-year period compared with the previous period, whereas kidney transplantation occurred more often. In patients ≥65 years, the incidence of home dialysis remained constant, whereas mortality decreased. CONCLUSIONS: In patients <65 years, the overall use of home dialysis declined consistently over the past 20 years. The age of home dialysis patients increased more rapidly than that of in-centre dialysis patients. These developments have a significant impact on the organization of home dialysis.

Nocturnal Hemodialysis Leads to Improvement in Physical Performance in Comparison with Conventional Hemodialysis.

End-stage kidney disease patients treated with conventional hemodialysis (CHD) are known to have impaired physical performance and protein-energy wasting (PEW). Nocturnal hemodialysis (NHD) was shown to improve clinical outcomes, but the evidence is limited on physical performance and PEW. We investigate whether NHD improves physical performance and PEW. This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized cohort study compared patients who changed from CHD (2−4 times/week 3−5 h) to NHD (2−3 times/week 7−8 h), with patients who continued CHD. The primary outcome was physical performance at 3, 6 and 12 months, assessed with the short physical performance battery (SPPB). Secondary outcomes were a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), physical activity monitor, handgrip muscle strength, KDQOL-SF physical component score (PCS) and LAPAQ physical activity questionnaire. PEW was assessed with a dietary record, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy and subjective global assessment (SGA). Linear mixed models were used to analyze the differences between groups. This study included 33 patients on CHD and 32 who converted to NHD (mean age 55 ± 15.3). No significant difference was found in the SPPB after 1-year of NHD compared to CHD (+0.24, [95% confidence interval −0.51 to 0.99], p = 0.53). Scores of 6MWT, PCS and SGA improved (+54.3 [95%CI 7.78 to 100.8], p = 0.02; +5.61 [−0.51 to 10.7], p = 0.03; +0.71 [0.36 to 1.05], p < 0.001; resp.) in NHD patients, no changes were found in other parameters. We conclude that NHD patients did not experience an improved SPPB score compared to CHD patients; they did obtain an improved walking distance and self-reported PCS as well as SGA after 1-year of NHD, which might be related to the younger age of these patients.

Conducting correlation analysis: important limitations and pitfalls.

The correlation coefficient is a statistical measure often used in studies to show an association between variables or to look at the agreement between two methods. In this paper, we will discuss not only the basics of the correlation coefficient, such as its assumptions and how it is interpreted, but also important limitations when using the correlation coefficient, such as its assumption of a linear association and its sensitivity to the range of observations. We will also discuss why the coefficient is invalid when used to assess agreement of two methods aiming to measure a certain value, and discuss better alternatives, such as the intraclass coefficient and Bland-Altman's limits of agreement. The concepts discussed in this paper are supported with examples from literature in the field of nephrology.

Dialysis withdrawal in The Netherlands between 2000 and 2019: time trends, risk factors and centre variation.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis withdrawal is a common cause of death in dialysis-dependent patients. This study aims to describe dialysis withdrawal practice in The Netherlands, focussing on time trends, risk factors and centre variation. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Dutch registry of kidney replacement therapy patients. All patients who started maintenance dialysis and died in the period 2000-2019 were included. The main outcome was death after dialysis withdrawal; all other causes of death were used for comparison. Time trends were analysed as unadjusted data (proportion per year) and the year of death was included in a multivariable logistic model. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with withdrawal. Centre variation was compared using funnel plots. RESULTS: A total of 34 692 patients started dialysis and 18 412 patients died while on dialysis. Dialysis withdrawal was an increasingly common cause of death, increasing from 18.3% in 2000-2004 to 26.8% in 2015-2019. Of all patients withdrawing, 26.1% discontinued treatment within their first year. In multivariable analysis, increasing age, female sex, haemodialysis as a treatment modality and year of death were independent factors associated with death after dialysis withdrawal. Centre variation was large (80.7 and 57.4% within 95% control limits of the funnel plots for 2000-2009 and 2010-2019, respectively), even after adjustment for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment withdrawal has become the main cause of death among dialysis-dependent patients in The Netherlands, with large variations between centres. These findings emphasize the need for timely advance care planning and improving the shared decision-making process on choosing dialysis or conservative care.

The association between circulating magnesium and clinically relevant outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Despite modern treatment, risk for cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unacceptably high. Observational studies have shown associations of magnesium with risk for several clinical outcomes in CKD of variable magnitude. The aim of this review is to provide a systematic overview and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies assessing the association of plasma magnesium concentration with clinically relevant outcomes in adult patients with chronic kidney disease, with a minimal follow-up of 6 months. Primary outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular events, sudden death and hospitalisation. METHODS: The electronic databases PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library were searched using terms relating to plasma magnesium and CKD patients, and two authors independently selected eligible studies. Study quality was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results of studies with a comparable magnesium exposure and outcome measure, were pooled using a random-effects meta-regression analysis. RESULTS: The search yielded 6156 records of which 33 studies, involving 348,059 patients, met the eligibility criteria. Finally, 22 studies could be included in the meta-analysis. Higher magnesium was associated with a lower risk for all-cause mortality (HR 0.90 [0.87-0.94] per 0.1 mmol/L increase of magnesium) and cardiovascular mortality and events (HR 0.85 [0.77-0.94] per 0.1 mmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium concentration is inversely associated with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality and events. Therefore, increasing magnesium may improve risk in patients with chronic kidney disease. This meta-analysis forms a firm base for future prospective trials to test whether increasing plasma magnesium, indeed has beneficial effects on clinical outcomes.

Funnel plots of patient-reported outcomes to evaluate health-care quality: Basic principles, pitfalls and considerations.

A funnel plot is a graphical method to evaluate health-care quality by comparing hospital performances on certain outcomes. So far, in nephrology, this method has been applied to clinical outcomes like mortality and complications. However, patient-reported outcomes (PROs; eg, health-related quality of life [HRQOL]) are becoming increasingly important and should be incorporated into this quality assessment. Using funnel plots has several advantages, including clearly visualized precision, detection of volume-effects, discouragement of ranking hospitals and easy interpretation of results. However, without sufficient knowledge of underlying methods, it is easy to stumble into pitfalls, such as overinterpretation of standardized scores, incorrect direct comparisons of hospitals and assuming a hospital to be in-control (ie, to perform as expected) based on underpowered comparisons. Furthermore, application of funnel plots to PROs is accompanied by additional challenges related to the multidimensional nature of PROs and difficulties with measuring PROs. Before using funnel plots for PROs, high and consistent response rates, adequate case mix correction and high-quality PRO measures are required. In this article, we aim to provide insight into the use and interpretation of funnel plots by presenting an overview of the basic principles, pitfalls and considerations when applied to PROs, using examples from Dutch routine dialysis care.

Results from the ERA-EDTA Registry indicate a high mortality due to COVID-19 in dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients across Europe.

The aim of this study was to investigate 28-day mortality after COVID-19 diagnosis in the European kidney replacement therapy population. In addition, we determined the role of patient characteristics, treatment factors, and country on mortality risk with the use of ERA-EDTA Registry data on patients receiving kidney replacement therapy in Europe from February 1, 2020, to April 30, 2020. Additional data on all patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were collected from 7 European countries encompassing 4298 patients. COVID-19-attributable mortality was calculated using propensity score-matched historic control data and after 28 days of follow-up was 20.0% (95% confidence interval 18.7%-21.4%) in 3285 patients receiving dialysis and 19.9% (17.5%-22.5%) in 1013 recipients of a transplant. We identified differences in COVID-19 mortality across countries, and an increased mortality risk in older patients receiving kidney replacement therapy and male patients receiving dialysis. In recipients of kidney transplants ≥75 years of age, 44.3% (35.7%-53.9%) did not survive COVID-19. Mortality risk was 1.28 (1.02-1.60) times higher in transplant recipients compared with matched dialysis patients. Thus, the pandemic has had a substantial effect on mortality in patients receiving kidney replacement therapy, a highly vulnerable population due to underlying chronic kidney disease and a high prevalence of multimorbidity.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Home Dialysis Patients Compared to In-Center Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Dialysis patients judge health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as an essential outcome. Remarkably, little is known about HRQoL differences between home dialysis and in-center hemodialysis (HD) patients worldwide. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS: Search strategies were performed on the Cochrane Library, Pubmed, and EMBASE databases between 2007 and 2019. Home dialysis was defined as both peritoneal dialysis and home HD. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared HRQoL in home dialysis patients versus in-center HD patients. DATA EXTRACTION: The data extracted by 2 authors included HRQoL scores of different questionnaires, dialysis modality, and subcontinent. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Data were pooled using a random-effects model and results were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Forty-six articles reporting on 41 study populations were identified. Most studies were cross-sectional in design (90%), conducted on peritoneal dialysis patients (95%), and used the 12-item or 36-item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaires (83%). More than half the studies showed moderate or high risk of bias. Pooled analysis of 4,158 home dialysis patients and 7,854 in-center HD patients showed marginally better physical HRQoL scores in home dialysis patients compared with in-center HD patients (SMD, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.24), although heterogeneity was high (I 2>80%). In a subgroup analysis, Western European home dialysis patients had higher physical HRQoL scores (SMD, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.61), while home dialysis patients from Latin America had lower physical scores (SMD, -0.20; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.12). Mental HRQoL showed no difference in all analyses. LIMITATIONS: No randomized controlled trials were found and high heterogeneity among studies existed. CONCLUSIONS: Although pooled data showed marginally better physical HRQoL for home dialysis patients, the quality of design of the included studies was poor. Large prospective studies with adequate adjustments for confounders are necessary to establish whether home dialysis results in better HRQoL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 95985.

Short-term effects of sevelamer-carbonate on fibroblast growth factor 23 and pulse wave velocity in patients with normophosphataemic chronic kidney disease Stage 3.

BACKGROUND: High concentrations of both phosphate and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) observed in chronic kidney disease (CKD) are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a surrogate marker for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. It is not known whether a reduction of FGF23 or phosphate alters cardiovascular risk. Sevelamer has shown to have the ability to reduce both phosphate and FGF23 concentrations. Furthermore, reduction of PWV is reported with sevelamer use as well, but it is unclear if this is mediated by decline of phosphate or FGF23. We investigated if sevelamer induced a decline in PWV and if this was associated with a reduction in FGF23. METHODS: In all, 24 normophosphataemic CKD Stage 3 patients started treatment with a fixed dose of sevelamer-carbonate (Renvela®) 2.4 g twice daily, with their usual diet for 8 weeks in a single-arm study. PWV was measured and blood samples were obtained before, during and after washout of treatment with sevelamer. Vascular calcification was quantified using the Kauppila Index (KI). The primary outcome was the change of PWV from baseline to 8 weeks of treatment and the secondary endpoint was the difference of FGF23 following treatment with sevelamer. One of the linear mixed models was used to analyse the association between treatment and outcome. Mediation analysis was performed as a sensitivity analysis. The study was registered in the Dutch trial register (http://www.trialregister.nl: NTR2383). RESULTS: A total of 18 patients completed 8 weeks of treatment with sevelamer and were analysed. Overall, treatment with sevelamer did not induce a significant reduction of PWV (ß = -0.36, P = 0.12). However, in patients with less vascular calcification (lower KI score), there was a statistically significant reduction of PWV, adjusted for mean arterial pressure, after treatment (ß = 0.63, P = 0.02). Addition of FGF23 to the model did not alter this association. Mediation analysis yielded similar results. FGF23 did not decrease during treatment with sevelamer. CONCLUSION: In this short-term pilot study in normophosphataemic CKD patients, treatment with sevelamer did not improve PWV. In subgroup analysis, however, PWV improved in patients with no or limited abdominal aorta calcifications. This was not associated with a decline of FGF23.

Coronary Artery Calcification in Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Vascular calcification is seen in most patients on dialysis and is strongly associated with cardiovascular mortality. Vascular calcification is promoted by phosphate, which generally reaches higher levels in hemodialysis than in peritoneal dialysis. However, whether vascular calcification develops less in peritoneal dialysis than in hemodialysis is currently unknown. Therefore, we compared coronary artery calcification (CAC), its progression, and calcification biomarkers between patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. METHODS: We measured CAC in 134 patients who had been treated exclusively with hemodialysis (n = 94) or peritoneal dialysis (n = 40) and were transplantation candidates. In 57 of them (34 on hemodialysis and 23 on peritoneal dialysis), we also measured CAC progression annually up to 3 years and the inactive species of desphospho-uncarboxylated matrix Gla protein (dp-ucMGP), fetuin-A, osteoprotegerin. We compared CAC cross-sectionally with Tobit regression. CAC progression was compared in 2 ways: with linear mixed models as the difference in square root transformed volume score per year (ΔCAC SQRV) and with Tobit mixed models. We adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: In the cross-sectional cohort, CAC volume scores were 92 mm3 in hemodialysis and 492 mm3 in peritoneal dialysis (adjusted difference 436 mm3; 95% CI -47 to 919; p = 0.08). In the longitudinal cohort, peritoneal dialysis was associated with significantly more CAC progression defined as ΔCAC SQRV (adjusted difference 1.20; 95% CI 0.09 to 2.31; p = 0.03), but not with Tobit mixed models (adjusted difference in CAC score increase per year 106 mm3; 95% CI -140 to 352; p = 0.40). Peritoneal dialysis was associated with higher osteoprotegerin (adjusted p = 0.02) but not with dp-ucMGP or fetuin-A. CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal dialysis is not associated with less CAC or CAC progression than hemodialysis, and perhaps with even more progression. This indicates that vascular calcification does not develop less in peritoneal dialysis than in hemodialysis.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and cardiovascular events in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment has been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with solid tumors and with an increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease. The ESA-related risk in patients with hematological neoplasms remains unclear. We, therefore, aimed to assess the ESA-related risk of VTE, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study in Denmark, using medical databases to identify 2,114 MDS patients and 3,105 MM patients diagnosed in 2004-2013. Incidence rates per 1,000 person-years and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for VTE, MI, and stroke associated with ESA treatment were computed. HRs were calculated in time-dependent Cox regression and adjusted for age, sex, MDS prognosis group, comorbidities, and treatments. RESULTS: Incidence rates per 1,000 person-years for VTE, MI, and stroke were 10.8, 8.2, and 16.0 in MDS patients, and 21.9, 10.2 and 9.9 in MM patients without ESA treatment, respectively. MDS patients with ESA treatment had a 1.6-fold increased risk of MI (HR 1.60 [95% CI 0.90-2.86]) and an almost twofold increased risk of stroke (HR 1.94 [95% CI 1.28-2.94]). Adjusted HR for VTE was 1.04 (95% CI 0.57-1.89) compared with MDS patients without ESAs. In MM patients with ESAs compared with patients without ESAs, HRs were 1.41 (95% CI 0.96-2.08) for VTE, 1.23 (95% CI 0.68-2.20) for MI, and 1.63 (95% CI 0.96-2.77) for stroke. CONCLUSION: ESA use was associated with stroke in MDS patients. Among MM patients, ESA treatment was associated with a higher risk of all cardiovascular events, although all CIs included equivalence.

Routine hemodialysis induces a decline in plasma magnesium concentration in most patients: a prospective observational cohort study.

In hemodialysis patients, lower plasma magnesium (Mg) concentrations are associated with a higher overall and cardiovascular mortality. The optimal concentration appears to be above the reference range for the healthy population. Plasma Mg is not routinely measured after hemodialysis. Aim of this study was to determine the effect of routine hemodialysis on plasma Mg. Plasma Mg was measured in duplicate before (Mgpre) and after (Mgpost) dialysis in 6 consecutive hemodialysis sessions of 34 patients using a fixed 0.50 mmol/L dialysate Mg concentration. Mean Mgpre was 0.88 mmol/L (±0.14) and mean Mgpost was statistically significantly lower: mean intra-dialytic decline 0.10 mmol/L (95%-CI 0.06-0.13). A 0.10 mmol/L higher Mgpre was associated with a 0.03 mmol/L higher Mgpost (95%-CI 0.024-0.037). At a Mgpre of 0.74 mmol/L, Mgpost equalled Mgpre. There was an intra-dialytic decline of plasma Mg at higher Mgpre values and an increase at lower Mgpre values. In conclusion, in the majority of the hemodialysis patients, Mgpre concentrations are in the reference range of the healthy population, which may be too low for hemodialysis patients. Routine hemodialysis with the widely used 0.50 mmol/L dialysate Mg concentration, further declines magnesium in the majority of patients. Current dialysate Mg concentrations may be too low.