Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen ; 13(1): 54-66, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20214575

ABSTRACT

Nature, especially the plant kingdom, is a rich source for novel bioactive compounds that can be used as lead compounds for drug development. In order to exploit this resource, the two neural network-based virtual screening techniques novelty detection with self-organizing maps (SOMs) and counterpropagation neural network were evaluated as tools for efficient lead structure discovery. As application scenario, significant descriptors for acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors were determined and used for model building, theoretical model validation, and virtual screening. Top-ranked virtual hits from both approaches were docked into the AChE binding site to approve the initial hits. Finally, in vitro testing of selected compounds led to the identification of forsythoside A and (+)-sesamolin as novel AChE inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Acetylcholinesterase/metabolism , Biological Products/pharmacology , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Data Mining/methods , Acetylcholinesterase/chemistry , Biological Products/chemistry , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/chemistry , Drug Discovery , Models, Molecular
2.
J Comput Aided Mol Des ; 21(10-11): 617-40, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18008169

ABSTRACT

Four different ligand-based virtual screening scenarios are studied: (1) prioritizing compounds for subsequent high-throughput screening (HTS); (2) selecting a predefined (small) number of potentially active compounds from a large chemical database; (3) assessing the probability that a given structure will exhibit a given activity; (4) selecting the most active structure(s) for a biological assay. Each of the four scenarios is exemplified by performing retrospective ligand-based virtual screening for eight different biological targets using two large databases--MDDR and WOMBAT. A comparison between the chemical spaces covered by these two databases is presented. The performance of two techniques for ligand--based virtual screening--similarity search with subsequent data fusion (SSDF) and novelty detection with Self-Organizing Maps (ndSOM) is investigated. Three different structure representations--2,048-dimensional Daylight fingerprints, topological autocorrelation weighted by atomic physicochemical properties (sigma electronegativity, polarizability, partial charge, and identity) and radial distribution functions weighted by the same atomic physicochemical properties--are compared. Both methods were found applicable in scenario one. The similarity search was found to perform slightly better in scenario two while the SOM novelty detection is preferred in scenario three. No method/descriptor combination achieved significant success in scenario four.


Subject(s)
Drug Design , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , User-Computer Interface , Artificial Intelligence , Computer-Aided Design , Databases, Factual , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/statistics & numerical data , Ligands , ROC Curve , Structure-Activity Relationship
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL