ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atorvastatin is a drug widely used to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Current observational studies suggest that atorvastatin may be associated with cognitive dysfunction (especially memory loss). However, some studies have suggested that dyslipidemia may be an important factor in cognitive dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to perform a pharmacovigilance analysis using real-world data from the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to assess whether memory loss is an adverse effect of atorvastatin and to further clarify its causality through Mendelian randomization (MR). METHODS: We extracted real-world data from the FAERS database (Quarter 1 2004 to Quarter 1 2023). Disproportionality analysis methods and measures of association such as the reporting odds ratio (OR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network, and polynomial Gamma Poisson distribution reduction were used to assess whether memory loss was an adverse effect of atorvastatin. In addition, we used MR to evaluate causality in depth. RESULTS: In the pharmacovigilance analysis of atorvastatin, we extracted four datasets of clinical symptoms associated with memory loss from the FAERS database [Amnesia (n = 1196), Memory impairment (n = 840), Transient global amnesia (n = 38), and Retrograde amnesia (n = 9)]. The reporting OR, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network, and Gamma Poisson distribution reduction all showed positive results for amnesia, transient global amnesia, and retrograde amnesia, while the reporting OR and Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network also showed positive results for memory disorders. Thus, memory loss was a frequent side effect of atorvastatin. The MR analyses were used to further evaluate the association between statins and memory loss. The results of the MR analysis (statins and memory loss) are as follows: Ivw (mre) (ß = 0.11 [OR = 1.11], P = 0.01 < 0.05) and the OR and ß directions of MR-Egger and weighted mode were the same. The results of the MR analysis (statins and mitochondrial DNA copy number) are as follows: Ivw(mre) (ß = -0.03 [OR = 0.96], P < 0.01) and the OR and ß direction of MR-Egger and weighted mode are the same. The results of the MR analysis (DNA copy number and memory loss) are as follows: Ivw(ß = - 0.06 [OR = 0.94], P = 0.04 < 0.05) and the OR and ß direction of MR-Egger and weighted mode were the same. The pleiotropy test did not find horizontal diversity in our results. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that memory loss is a notable adverse event associated with atorvastatin and provides evidence indicating a potential causal relationship between atorvastatin and memory loss. We also found that statins may further affect memory by affecting mitochondrial function. Therefore, in the clinical use of atorvastatin, it is important to carefully monitor the changes in cognitive function of patients. Second, a pharmacovigilance analysis combined with MR was used in this study to provide a new approach for the study of adverse drug reactions. This comprehensive analysis method helps to evaluate the safety of drugs and the risk of adverse reactions more comprehensively and provides doctors with a more accurate clinical decision-making basis.
Subject(s)
Atorvastatin , Memory Disorders , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Pharmacovigilance , Atorvastatin/adverse effects , Atorvastatin/therapeutic use , Humans , Memory Disorders/chemically induced , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Bayes Theorem , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Databases, Factual , United States Food and Drug Administration , Aged , AdultABSTRACT
Background: Atorvastatin is a commonly prescribed medication for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Recent observational studies have suggested a potential association between atorvastatin use and the occurrence of Erectile Dysfunction (ED). In this study, we aimed to explore the relationship between atorvastatin and ED using real-world data from the FAERS database and employed Mendelian randomization to assess causality. Methods: To evaluate the disproportionality of atorvastatin in relation to ED, we conducted several pharmacovigilance analyses, including odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and gamma-Poisson contractile apparatus (GPS). Additionally, we employed Mendelian randomization to investigate the causal relationship between atorvastatin and ED. Results: Pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis revealed a significant association between atorvastatin and ED, as indicated by the following results: ROR [3.707078559, 95% CI (3.33250349, 4.123756054)], PRR [3.702969038, χ2 (669.2853829)], IC [1.870490139, IC025 (1.702813857)], and EBGM [3.656567867, EBGM05 (3.28709656)]. Furthermore, the two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis provided evidence supporting a causal relationship between atorvastatin use and ED, with an inverse variance weighted estimate of ß = 3.17 (OR = 23.91, p = 0.02 < 0.05). Conclusion: Based on comprehensive analyses incorporating pharmacovigilance and Mendelian randomization, our findings suggest that atorvastatin use is associated with an increased risk of ED and indicate a causal relationship. These results emphasize the importance of considering potential adverse effects, such as ED, when prescribing atorvastatin for cardiovascular disease prevention. Further research and clinical monitoring are warranted to better understand the underlying mechanisms and develop appropriate strategies to mitigate this side effect.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are current clinical observations that atorvastatin may promote subdural hematoma resorption. We aimed to assess the causal effects of lipid-lowering agents 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) inhibitors, Proproteinconvertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and Niemann-Pick C1-like protein 1 (NPC1L1) inhibitors on traumatic subdural hematomas. METHODS: We used genetic instruments to proxy lipid-lowering drug exposure, with genetic instruments being genetic variants within or near low-density lipoprotein (LDL cholesterol)-associated drug target genes. These were analyzed by using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study. RESULTS: A causal relationship was found between HMGCR inhibitors and traumatic subdural hematoma (Inverse variance weighted (ß = -0.7593341 (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.4679779), p = 0.008366947 < 0.05)). However, no causal relationship was found between PCSK9 inhibitors and NPC1L1 inhibitors and traumatic subdural hematoma (PCSK9 inhibitors: Inverse variance weighted (ß = 0.23897796 (OR = 1.2699505), p = 0.1126327), NPC1L1 inhibitors: Inverse variance weighted (ß = -0.02118558 (OR = 0.9790373), p = 0.9701686)). Sensitivity analysis of the data revealed good stability of the results. CONCLUSIONS: This two-sample MR study suggests a potential causal relationship between HMGCR inhibition (atorvastatin) and traumatic subdural hemorrhage.
Subject(s)
Hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA Reductases , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Proprotein Convertase 9 , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Hematoma, Subdural , PCSK9 Inhibitors , Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Hypolipidemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypolipidemic Agents/pharmacology , Atorvastatin/adverse effects , Atorvastatin/administration & dosage , Atorvastatin/pharmacologyABSTRACT
The sulfinamidines as aza analogues of sulfinamides received limited attention from both organic chemists and pharmaceutical chemists. Herein, we present a tandem oxidative/nucleophilic substitution approach for the synthesis of sulfinamidines in high yield (up to 98%). This cascade reaction method is enabled by N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) as an oxidant and diverse readily available amines as nucleophiles without any additives or catalysts. Notably, this method is highly time-economical, safe to operate, and easy to scale up and has excellent functional group compatibility.
ABSTRACT
Sulfilimines are valuable compounds both in organic synthesis and in pharmaceuticals. Here we developed a mild and simplified method for preparation of sulfilimines via selective S-C bond formation rather than traditional S-N bond formation. The method is both attractive and useful for the following reasons: it uses a readily available alkylation reagent such alkyl bromide or alkyl iodide, it uses water as solvent, it is easy to perform, and it is convenient for late-stage diversification of drugs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The incidence of sinonasal adenocarcinoma is low, and there are few studies on survival and prognosis. Therefore, we aim to develop and validate a prognostic model for predicting the overall survival of sinonasal adenocarcinoma and provide guidance for clinical management. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed as sinonasal adenocarcinoma through Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1975 and 2015 were randomly divided into a training group and validation group. Univariate, multivariate survival analysis was performed to screen independent survival factors. A nomogram was established to predict the overall survival rate of sinonasal adenocarcinoma. Receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration plot were performed to verify the discrimination and accuracy of the model. A decision curve analysis was performed to verify the clinical applicability of the model. RESULTS: A total of 423 patients with sinonasal adenocarcinoma were randomly divided into training group (n = 299) and verification group (n = 124). We established and verified the Nomo map including age, marriage, grade, surgery and tumour size. The c-index of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results stage, T stage and this model are 0.635, 0.626 and 0.803, respectively. The survival rate of the high-risk group scored by this model was lower than that of the low-risk group (P < 0.001). Decision curve analysis shows that the model has advantages in predicting survival rates. CONCLUSION: Our model is considered to be a useful tool for predicting the overall survival of sinonasal adenocarcinoma, with good discrimination and clinical applicability. We hope that this model will help rhinologists to make clinical decisions and manage patients diagnosed with sinonasal adenocarcinoma.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Humans , Nomograms , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/mortality , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/surgery , Prognosis , SEER Program , Survival RateABSTRACT
Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) is one of the most common malignancies, and identification of HNSC biomarkers is critical. LIM Domain And Actin Binding 1 (LIMA1) is involved in actin cytoskeleton regulation and dynamics. The role of LIMA1 in HNSC is unclear. This is the first study to investigate the expression of LIMA1 in HNSC patients and its prognostic value, potential biological functions, and impact on the immune system. Methods: Gene expression and clinicopathological analysis, enrichment analysis, and immune infiltration analysis were all based on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) with additional bioinformatics analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using TIMER and ssGSEA to analyze the immune response to LIMA1 expression in HNSCs. In addition, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), Kaplan-Meier(K-M) survival analysis, and data from the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) were used to validate the results. Results: LIMA1 played a key role as an independent prognostic factor in HNSC patients. GSEA found that LIMA1 is associated with promoting cell adhesion and suppressing immune function. LIMA1 expression was significantly correlated with infiltration of B cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, dendritic cells, and neutrophils and was coexpressed with immune-related genes and immune checkpoints. Conclusion: The expression of LIMA1 is increased in HNSC, and the high expression of LIMA1 is associated with poor prognosis. LIMA1 may affect tumor development by regulating tumor-infiltrating cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). LIMA1 may be a potential target for immunotherapy.