Neonatal mortality in singleton pregnancies: a 20-year retrospective study from a tertiary perinatal unit in Hong Kong.

INTRODUCTION: The global neonatal death (NND) rate has been declining in recent decades, but there are no comprehensive data concerning the characteristics of NNDs in Hong Kong. This study investigated the trends and aetiologies of NNDs among singleton pregnancies in Hong Kong. METHODS: This study included all cases of NND from singleton pregnancies in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong between 2000 and 2019. The rates, clinical characteristics, and aetiologies of NND were compared between the first (2000-2009) and the second (2010-2019) decades. RESULTS: The NND rate decreased from 1.66/1000 livebirths (97 cases) in the first decade to 1.32/1000 livebirths (87 cases) in the second decade. Congenital or genetic abnormalities (82 cases) caused 44.6% of all NNDs. There was a significant reduction from 0.82/1000 livebirths in the first decade to 0.52/1000 livebirths in the second decade (P=0.037). Other causes of NND were prematurity (69 cases; 37.5%), sepsis (16 cases; 8.7%), hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (15 cases; 8.2%), and sudden infant death syndrome (2 cases; 1.1%). Gestational age-specific neonatal mortality for moderately preterm neonates (31-33 weeks of gestation) significantly decreased from 34.73/1000 in 2000-2009 to 8.63/1000 in 2010-2019 (P=0.001), but there were no significant changes in neonatal mortality for other gestations. CONCLUSION: The NND rate in Hong Kong is among the lowest worldwide. Neonatal deaths in our centre declined over the past two decades, mainly because of improvements in the prenatal diagnosis and treatment of congenital or genetic abnormalities, as well as an improved survival rate among moderately preterm neonates.

Transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head elevation by maneuvers used for managing umbilical cord prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: To assess objectively the degree of fetal head elevation achieved by different maneuvers commonly used for managing umbilical cord prolapse. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of pregnant women at term before elective Cesarean delivery. A baseline assessment of fetal head station was performed with the woman in the supine position, using transperineal ultrasound for measuring the parasagittal angle of progression (psAOP), head-symphysis distance (HSD) and head-perineum distance (HPD). The ultrasonographic measurements of fetal head station were repeated during different maneuvers, including elevation of the maternal buttocks using a wedge, knee-chest position, Trendelenburg position with a 15° tilt and filling the maternal urinary bladder with 100 mL, 300 mL and 500 mL of normal saline. The measurements obtained during the maneuvers were compared with the baseline measurements. RESULTS: Twenty pregnant women scheduled for elective Cesarean section at term were included in the study. When compared with baseline (median psAOP, 103.6°), the knee-chest position gave the strongest elevation effect, with the greatest reduction in psAOP (psAOP, 80.7°; P < 0.001), followed by filling the bladder with 500 mL (psAOP, 89.9°; P < 0.001) and 300 mL (psAOP, 94.4°; P < 0.001) of normal saline. Filling the maternal bladder with 100 mL of normal saline (psAOP, 96.1°; P = 0.001), the Trendelenburg position (psAOP, 96.8°; P = 0.014) and elevating the maternal buttocks (psAOP, 98.3°; P = 0.033) gave modest elevation effects. Similar findings were reported for HSD and HPD. The fetal head elevation effects of the knee-chest position, Trendelenburg position and elevation of the maternal buttocks were independent of the initial fetal head station, but that of bladder filling was greater when the initial head station was low. CONCLUSIONS: To elevate the fetal presenting part, the knee-chest position provides the best effect, followed by filling the maternal urinary bladder with 500 mL then 300 mL of fluid, respectively. Filling the bladder with 100 mL of fluid, the Trendelenburg position and elevation of the maternal buttocks have modest effects. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Clinical utility of expanded non-invasive prenatal screening and chromosomal microarray analysis in high-risk pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of expanded non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), compared with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities in high-risk pregnancies. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study of singleton pregnancies at high risk for chromosomal abnormality. Patients who underwent expanded NIPS and CMA sequentially during pregnancy from 2015 to 2019 were included in the analysis. Pregnancies with a positive result for sex chromosome aneuploidy were excluded as the full details could not be retrieved. The utility of expanded NIPS and CMA for detection of chromosomal abnormalities in this cohort was compared by assessing the concordance between the results. RESULTS: Of the 774 included high-risk pregnancies, 550 (71.1%) had a positive NIPS result, while a positive CMA result was detected in 308 (39.8%) cases. The rate of full or partial concordance between NIPS and CMA was 82.2%, 59.6% and 25.0% for trisomies 21, 18 and 13, respectively. For rare aneuploidies and segmental imbalances, NIPS and CMA results were fully or partially concordant in 7.5% and 33.3% of cases, respectively. Copy-number variants < 5 Mb were detected more often by CMA, with an incidence of 7.9% (61/774) compared with 3.1% (24/774) by NIPS. A genetic aberration was detected by CMA in 1 in 17 (5.8%) high-risk pregnancies that had a negative or non-reportable NIPS result. CONCLUSION: CMA allows for comprehensive detection of genome-wide chromosomal abnormalities in high-risk pregnancies. CMA should be offered instead of expanded NIPS for high-risk pregnancies. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Outcome of radiofrequency ablation for selective fetal reduction before vs at or after 16 gestational weeks in complicated monochorionic pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether gestational age at intervention (< or ≥ 16 weeks) and other factors affect the risk of loss of the cotwin after selective fetal reduction using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in monochorionic (MC) pregnancy. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of 63 consecutive RFA procedures performed at our institution from January 2011 to October 2019 for selective fetal reduction in complicated MC pregnancies. Indications for RFA were twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (13 cases), twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (12 cases), twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (two cases), selective fetal growth restriction (10 cases), discordant anomalies (17 cases) and multifetal pregnancy reduction in triplets or quadruplets with a MC pair (nine cases). Twenty-six (41.3%) of these procedures were performed before and 37 (58.7%) after 16 weeks. Potential factors that could affect the risk of loss of the cotwin, including gestational age at RFA, order of multiple pregnancy, amnionicity, indication for RFA and number of ablation cycles, were assessed first by univariate analysis and then by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: There were 17 (27.0%) cotwin losses. Ablation cycles numbering four or more was the only factor among those investigated to be associated with loss of the cotwin after RFA (P = 0.035; odds ratio, 5.21), while the indication for RFA, order of multiple pregnancy, amnionicity and gestational age at RFA had no effect. Comparing RFA performed at < 16 vs ≥ 16 weeks, there was no difference in the rate of cotwin loss (23.1% vs 29.7%; P = 0.558) or preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes before 34 weeks (7.7% vs 5.4%; P = 0.853), or in the median gestational age at delivery (36.2 vs 37.3 weeks; P = 0.706). CONCLUSIONS: RFA is a promising tool for early selective fetal reduction in MC pregnancy before 16 weeks. Four or more ablation cycles is a major risk factor for cotwin loss. Careful assessment pre- and post-RFA, together with proficient operative skills to minimize the number of ablation cycles, are the mainstay to ensure that this procedure is effective and safe. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.