Adenoma characteristics in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

AIM: The English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme detects colorectal cancers and premalignant polyps in a faecal occult blood test-positive population. The aim of this work is to describe the detection rates and characteristics of adenomas within the programme, identify predictive factors influencing the presence or absence of carcinoma within adenomas and identify the factors predicting the presence of advanced colonic neoplasia in different colon segments. METHOD: The Bowel Cancer Screening System was retrospectively searched for polyps detected during colonoscopies between June 2006 and June 2012, at which time a guaiac test was being used. Data on size, location and histological features were collected, and described. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the significant factors influencing the development of carcinoma within an adenoma. RESULTS: A total of 229 419 polyps were identified; after exclusions 136 973 adenomas from 58 334 patients were evaluated. Over half were in the rectum or sigmoid colon. Subcentimetre adenomas accounted for 69.8% of the total. The proportion of adenomas containing advanced histological features increased with increasing adenoma size up to 35 mm, then plateaued. A focus of carcinoma was found in 2282 (1.7%) adenomas, of which 95.6% were located distally. Carcinoma was identified even in diminutive adenomas (0.1%). The proportion of adenomas containing cancer was significantly higher in women than men (2.0% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This national, prospectively captured dataset adds robust information about histological features of adenomas that convey an increased risk for colorectal cancer, and identifies caecal adenomas, high-grade dysplasia, increasing adenoma size, distal location and female sex as independent risk factors associated with carcinoma.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of functional dyspepsia

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common disorder of gut­brain interaction, affecting approximately 7% of individuals in the community, with most patients managed in primary care. The last British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guideline for the management of dyspepsia was published in 1996. In the interim, substantial advances have been made in understanding the complex pathophysiology of FD, and there has been a considerable amount of new evidence published concerning its diagnosis and classification, with the advent of the Rome IV criteria, and management. The primary aim of this guideline, commissioned by the BSG, is to review and summarise the current evidence to inform and guide clinical practice, by providing a practical framework for evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of patients. The approach to investigating the patient presenting with dyspepsia is discussed, and efficacy of drugs in FD summarised based on evidence derived from a comprehensive search of the medical literature, which was used to inform an update of a series of pairwise and network meta-analyses. Specific recommendations have been made according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. These provide both the strength of the recommendations and the overall quality of evidence. Finally, in this guideline, we consider novel treatments that are in development, as well as highlighting areas of unmet need and priorities for future research.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of functional dyspepsia.

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction, affecting approximately 7% of individuals in the community, with most patients managed in primary care. The last British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guideline for the management of dyspepsia was published in 1996. In the interim, substantial advances have been made in understanding the complex pathophysiology of FD, and there has been a considerable amount of new evidence published concerning its diagnosis and classification, with the advent of the Rome IV criteria, and management. The primary aim of this guideline, commissioned by the BSG, is to review and summarise the current evidence to inform and guide clinical practice, by providing a practical framework for evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of patients. The approach to investigating the patient presenting with dyspepsia is discussed, and efficacy of drugs in FD summarised based on evidence derived from a comprehensive search of the medical literature, which was used to inform an update of a series of pairwise and network meta-analyses. Specific recommendations have been made according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. These provide both the strength of the recommendations and the overall quality of evidence. Finally, in this guideline, we consider novel treatments that are in development, as well as highlighting areas of unmet need and priorities for future research.

Guidelines for the investigation of chronic diarrhoea in adults: British Society of Gastroenterology, 3rd edition.

Chronic diarrhoea is a common problem, hence clear guidance on investigations is required. This is an updated guideline from 2003 for the investigations of chronic diarrhoea commissioned by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG). This document has undergone significant revision in content through input by 13 members of the Guideline Development Group (GDG) representing various institutions. The GRADE system was used to appraise the quality of evidence and grading of recommendations.

Colonoscopic perforations in the English National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

BACKGROUND: Perforation is the most serious adverse event associated with colonoscopy. In this study of data from the English National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme, we aimed to describe the presentation and management of perforations, and to determine factors associated with poorer outcomes post-perforation. METHODS: The medical records of patients with a perforation following the national screening colonoscopy were retrospectively examined. All colonoscopies performed from 02/08/2006 to 13/03/2014 were studied. Bowel Cancer Screening Centres across England were contacted and asked to complete a detailed dataset relating to perforation presentation, management, and outcome. RESULTS: 263 129 colonoscopies were analyzed, and the rate of perforation was 0.06 %. Complete data were reviewed for 117 perforations: 70.1 % of perforations (82/117) occurred during therapeutic colonoscopies; 54.9 % (62/113) of patients with perforations who were admitted to hospital and in whom data were complete underwent surgery; 26.1 % (30/115) of hospitalized patients left the hospital with a stoma and 19.1 % (22/115) developed post-perforation morbidity. Perforations not detected during colonoscopy were significantly more likely to require surgery (P = 0.03). Diagnostic perforations were significantly more likely to require surgery (P = 0.002) and were associated with higher rates of post-perforation morbidity (P = 0.01). At presentation, the presence of abdominal pain (P = 0.01), a pulse rate > 100 beats per minute (P = 0.049), and a respiratory rate > 20 breaths per minute (P = 0.01) were significantly associated with the patient having surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest retrospective observational case series in Europe to describe post-perforation presentation, management, and outcomes. We have confirmed that perforation leads to surgical intervention, stoma formation, and post-perforation morbidity. Perforations not recognized during the colonoscopy were significantly more likely to require surgery. Diagnostic perforations were at greater risk of requiring surgery and developing post-perforation morbidity.

Post-polypectomy bleeding in the English National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Background and study aims Colonoscopic polypectomy reduces colorectal cancer incidence, but is associated with complications including post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB). PPB ranges in severity from minor to life-threatening, making interpretation and comparison difficult. No previous studies have examined PPB rate according to a standardized severity grading system. We aimed to determine the PPB rate stratified by severity grading, explore factors that contribute to PPB severity grading, and describe PPB management. Methods Data relating to PPB were prospectively collected from all colonoscopies performed in one region of the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) from 06/12/2010 to 15/07/2014. PPB was defined and stratified into major, intermediate, and minor according to BCSP standardized definitions based on the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy adverse events lexicon. Results A total of 15 285 colonoscopies (23 766 polypectomies) were analyzed. The PPB rate per colonoscopy was 0.44 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.34 - 0.54) and the rate per polypectomy was 0.29 % (95 %CI 0.20 - 0.38); 2.9 % of PPBs were major and 42.6 % were intermediate. Repeat endoscopy occurred in 27.9 % and was the most common reason for bleeding being categorized as of intermediate severity, although therapy was applied in only 36.8 % of these cases. A therapeutic intervention was significantly more common in patients with PPB who had either a hemoglobin drop ≥ 2 g/dL and/or a blood transfusion (P = 0.04, relative risk 3.47, 95 %CI 1.05 - 11.52). Conclusions This study specifically examined colonoscopic PPB rate, stratified using standardized criteria. The rates of PPB were low, with the majority of PPB being of minor severity. Current stratification of PPB severity combines measures of bleed severity with interventions. Using only hemoglobin drop ≥ 2 g/dL and/or blood transfusion as markers of PPB severity may simplify stratification, and allow a better assessment of the necessity and impact of an intervention.

Discrepancies between upper GI symptoms described by those who have them and their identification by conventional medical terminology: a survey of sufferers in four countries.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a self-administered questionnaire for upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms using lay vocabulary uninfluenced by established medical terminology or concepts and to conduct a survey of symptom occurrence among sufferers in four countries. METHODS: The questionnaire was designed by integrating information gained from the vocabulary used by 38 upper GI symptom sufferers. There was no medical input to its development. The questionnaire was then used, after appropriate translation, in Brazil, Russia, the UK and the USA. Details of 10 659 symptom episodes were obtained from 2665 individuals. RESULTS: Nine symptoms described in lay vocabulary were identified during questionnaire development. Of these, one corresponded to regurgitation, whereas two that were distinguished by survey participants might both be interpreted as heartburn. One chest symptom for which a corresponding medical term was uncertain occurred in ∼30% of the respondents. Five different 'stomach' or abdominal symptoms were identified. The predominant symptom and the pattern of concurrent symptoms often varied from one symptom episode to another. Use of the terms 'heartburn', 'reflux', 'indigestion' and 'burning stomach' to describe symptoms varied between countries. CONCLUSION: Some common upper GI symptoms described by those who suffer them have no clear counterpart in conventional medical terminology. Inadequacy of the conventional terminology in this respect deserves attention, first, to characterize it fully, and thereafter to construct enquiry that delivers more precise symptom identification. Our results suggest that improvement may require the use of vocabulary of individuals suffering the symptoms without imposing conformity with established symptom concepts.

Developing a clinical research network: the Northern Region Endoscopy Group experience.

Research is central to the National Health Service. Clinical trial recruitment has been aided by the National Institute for Health Research's Comprehensive Research Network but these networks do not support development of research. The Northern Region Endoscopy Group (NREG) was founded in 2007, encompasses 17 endoscopy units and has become a highly successful collaborative research network. The network is now a major contributor to UK trials, has published over 20 papers (>60 abstracts) and holds grants totalling more than £1.5 million. The NREG provides an exemplar model of how collaborative working can contribute significantly to biomedical research.

Nutritional aspects of epigenetic inheritance.

The impact of diet and environmental factors on genes concerned with epigenetic inheritance and the mechanism of evolution has grown significantly beyond the Modern Synthesis period. Epigenetic inheritance is the passing of phenotypic change to subsequent generations in ways that are outside the genetic code of DNA. Recently, polymorphisms of the human Delta-5 (fatty acid desaturase, FADS1) and Delta-6 (FADS2) desaturase genes have been described as being associated with the level of several long-chain n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in serum phospholipids. Increased consumption of refined starches and sugar increases the generation of superoxide anion in the tissues and free fatty acids (FFA) in the blood. There is an increased amount and activity of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), a transcriptional factor regulating the activity of at least 125 genes, most of which are pro-inflammatory. The consumption of glucose may be associated with an increase in 2 other pro-inflammatory transcription factors: activating protein-1 (AP-1), and early growth response protein-1 (Egr-1). AP-1 regulates the transcription of matrix metallo-proteinases and Egr-1 modulates the transcription of tissue factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. It is possible that a complex set of factors, including nutritional factors, come into play during epigenetic inheritance.

The diagnosis of IBS in primary care: consensus development using nominal group technique.

BACKGROUND: The criteria used to identify and diagnose irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in primary care are unclear, even though most patients are managed entirely in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To use a validated method of consensus development [Nominal Group Technique (Rand version)] (NGT-R) in order to construct a diagnostic framework for IBS appropriate to primary care. METHODS: NGT-R is a formal method of consensus development, which uses structured interaction within a group combined with statistical derivation of group judgements. The group comprised 10 GPs with a special interest in gastroenterology and two gastroenterologists, from 10 European countries. Mailed questionnaires elicited judgements on 242 scenarios for the diagnosis of IBS, within four domains of symptoms, social and lifestyle features, psychological features and investigations. Feedback of group decisions was followed by structured face-to-face interaction and private rescoring of the questionnaire. Consensus was defined as 10/12 ratings within one of three bands, 1-3 (disagreement), 4-6 (equivocal) or 7-9 (agreement). RESULTS: The defining features of IBS in primary care are alteration in bowel habit, bloating and abdominal pain, or discomfort or annoyance (the last reflecting important cultural differences in symptom description). These symptoms need to be present for at least 4 weeks. Supportive characteristics include female sex, family history of IBS, frequent clinic attendances, a recent major life event and a history of somatization behaviours. Abdominal examination was considered necessary in all patients and rectal examination, haemoglobin estimation and colonoscopy in those aged > 55 years. The subtypes of IBS are recognized, but the diagnostic process differs only in minor ways. Final consensus was reached on 46% of statements. CONCLUSION: The basis of IBS diagnosis in primary care differs from, and is less exclusive than, existing criteria. Few features are deemed essential for diagnosis, while psychosocial features, patient characteristics and contextual factors are important in increasing diagnostic probability. There are important cultural differences in the description of key symptoms. These results provide information on the defining characteristics of IBS and the diagnostic process, as it occurs in primary care, and can guide clinical practice.

Managing gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care: the patient perspective.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disease that affects up to 20% of the population of Western countries and accounts for around 5% of a primary-care physician's workload. A better understanding of how GERD affects many aspects of patients' lives may aid the management of patients in primary care. We conducted a systematic review of the effect of GERD on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in the primary-care setting and in the community. Validated questionnaires have shown that GERD patients consulting in primary care experience substantial reductions in both physical and psychosocial aspects of HRQL, as well as work productivity. Impairments in HRQL are seen whether or not reflux esophagitis or Barrett's esophagus is present on endoscopy, and are comparable with or worse than those seen in patients with other chronic diseases such as heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. Surveys in primary care and in the community highlight disrupted sleep, reduced concentration at work, and interference with physical activities such as exercise, housework, and gardening. Psychosocial aspects of patient well-being are also impaired, including enjoyment of social gatherings, intimacy, sex, and many individuals with GERD remain worried about the underlying cause of their symptoms. In conclusion, many aspects of HRQL are impaired in GERD patients. The primary-care physician is uniquely placed to assess and address the impact of GERD on patients' lives.