Long-term outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe treatment-resistant autoimmune cytopenia in children.

We analyzed the long-term outcomes of pediatric patients registered in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for severe treatment refractory autoimmune cytopenia. With a median follow-up of 100 months, event-free survival was 54% overall, with no significant difference between allogeneic HSCT (n = 15) and autologous HSCT (n = 7) recipients (58% versus 42%; P = .50). Despite a trend toward failure of response or relapse after autologous HSCT compared with allogeneic HSCT, the difference was not significant (43% versus 13%; P = .30). Treatment-related mortality was high in both HSCT groups (29% and 16%; P = .09). Based on the limited numbers of subjects in this retrospective analysis, both allogeneic and autologous HSCT may induce complete and persistent responses in approximately one-half of pediatric patients with severe refractory autoimmune cytopenia, although treatment-related toxicity is high.

Comparación de dos estrategias iniciales de movilización de sangre periférica de células madre para el trasplante autólogo en pacientes con linfoma y la infección por virus de inmunodeficiencia humana / Comparison of two initial mobilizing strategies of peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation in patients with lymphoma and human immunodeficiency virus infection

Fundamento y objetivo: Varios estudios han demostrado la viabilidad de trasplante de células madre autólogas (ASCT) en pacientes con linfoma y el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). La infección por VIH se ha descrito como un factor de riesgo para la movilización de los pobres. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar los resultados de dos estrategias de movilización de las células madre sanguíneas periféricas (CMSP) en pacientes con linfoma y la infección por VIH en siete hospitales españoles. Pacientes y métodos: Las variables recogidas fueron: características demográficas, clínicas y biológicas, quimioterapias anteriores y los resultados, así como las estrategias de movilización de (clasificados en dos grupos: 1) G-CSF, y 2) el G-CSF de quimioterapia +). Resultados: Entre enero de 2000 y mayo de 2010, 42 pacientes con linfoma y la infección por VIH fueron remitidos para ASCT. La tasa de éxito en la movilización (colección> 1,60 × 10 6 células CD34 / kg) con el primer régimen fue del 67%, sin diferencias entre los pacientes movilizados con G-CSF o con G-CSF + quimioterapia (16 [72%] y 12 [60%], respectivamente, p = 0,382). El estado del linfoma en el momento de la movilización fue el único factor para la movilización de éxito (20/22 pacientes [91%] en remisión completa [RC] movilizado adecuadamente frente a 5/12 [58%] en remisión parcial [RP], p = 0,038). Conclusiones: En los pacientes con linfoma y la infección por el VIH, la movilización con G-CSF fue tan eficaz como la movilización con quimioterapia seguida de G-CSF. El estadio de la enfermedad antes de la movilización fue el principal factor de riesgo para el éxito de la movilización, con mejores resultados en los pacientes movilizados en remisión del linfoma (AU)

Background and objective: Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with lymphoma and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. HIV infection has been described as a risk factor for poor mobilization. The aim of this study was to compare the results of two mobilization strategies of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in patients with lymphoma and HIV infection in seven Spanish hospitals. Patients and methods: The following variables were collected: demographic, clinical and biological features, previous chemotherapies and outcomes, as well as mobilization's strategies (classified in two groups: 1) G-CSF, and 2) G-CSF + chemotherapy). Results: Between January 2000 and May 2010, 42 patients with lymphoma and HIV infection were referred for ASCT. The rate of successful mobilization (collection >1.60 × 106 CD34 cells/kg) with the first regimen was 67%, with no differences between those patients mobilized with G-CSF or with G-CSF + chemotherapy (16 [72%] and 12 [60%], respectively; p=0.382). The status of the lymphoma at the time of mobilization was the only factor for successful mobilization (20/22 patients [91%] in complete remission [CR] mobilized adequately versus 5/12 [58%] in partial remission [PR]; p=0.038). Conclusions: In patients with lymphoma and HIV infection, mobilization with G-CSF was as effective as mobilization with chemotherapy followed by G-CSF. The stage of disease prior to the mobilization was the main risk factor for the success of mobilization, with better results in patients mobilized in remission of the lymphoma (AU)

[Comparison of two initial mobilizing strategies of peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation in patients with lymphoma and human immunodeficiency virus infection]. / Comparación de dos estrategias iniciales de movilización de progenitores hematopoyéticos de sangre periférica para trasplante autogénico en pacientes con linfomas e infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with lymphoma and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. HIV infection has been described as a risk factor for poor mobilization. The aim of this study was to compare the results of two mobilization strategies of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in patients with lymphoma and HIV infection in seven Spanish hospitals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The following variables were collected: demographic, clinical and biological features, previous chemotherapies and outcomes, as well as mobilization's strategies (classified in two groups: 1) G-CSF, and 2) G-CSF + chemotherapy). RESULTS: Between January 2000 and May 2010, 42 patients with lymphoma and HIV infection were referred for ASCT. The rate of successful mobilization (collection >1.60 × 10(6) CD34 cells/kg) with the first regimen was 67%, with no differences between those patients mobilized with G-CSF or with G-CSF + chemotherapy (16 [72%] and 12 [60%], respectively; p=0.382). The status of the lymphoma at the time of mobilization was the only factor for successful mobilization (20/22 patients [91%] in complete remission [CR] mobilized adequately versus 5/12 [58%] in partial remission [PR]; p=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with lymphoma and HIV infection, mobilization with G-CSF was as effective as mobilization with chemotherapy followed by G-CSF. The stage of disease prior to the mobilization was the main risk factor for the success of mobilization, with better results in patients mobilized in remission of the lymphoma.

FLAGIDA-lite is an effective regimen for patients between 70 and 80 years with acute myeloid leukemia or refractory anemia with excess blasts-2 and is feasible as outpatient treatment.

We investigated a FLAGIDA-lite protocol (fludarabine 40 mg/m(2)/d orally days 1-5, cytarabine 20 mg/m(2)/d subcutaneously days 1-5, G-CSF 300 µg/d subcutaneously days 1-5, and idarrubicin 15 mg/m(2)/d orally days 1-3) in 38 consecutive patients older than 70 years of age with acute myeloid leukemia (32 patients) or refractory anemia with excess blasts-2 (six patients) and no prior therapy. Seventy-nine percent had intermediate/unfavorable karyotype and 79% had a high comorbidity. Overall response was 55% [complete response (CR) 47%] and 37% were refractory. CR rate was 52% in patients between 71 and 79 years of age and 38% in patients 80 years or older. The 4-week induction mortality was 16% (8% in patients between 70 and 79 years of age and 32% in patients 80 years or older). Overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 22% (31.3% in patients between 70 and 79 years and 15.4% in patients 80 years or older). Relapse-free survival (RFS) at 3 years was 15%. A total of 65 cycles (47 as induction and 18 as consolidation) were administered, 46 of them (70%) in an outpatient setting. In summary, this FLAGIDA-lite protocol is an effective and well-tolerated option for patients between the ages of 70 and 79 years with acute myeloid leukemia or refractory anemia with excess blasts-2 and is usually feasible as outpatient treatment, but is not beneficial for most patients 80 years or older.

Unrelated transplantation for poor-prognosis adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: long-term outcome analysis and study of the impact of hematopoietic graft source.

Adults with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR-ALL) have a poor outcome with standard chemotherapy and usually undergo unrelated stem cell transplantation (SCT) if a matched sibling donor is not available. We analyzed the outcome of adult patients with unrelated SCT for HR-ALL and studied the possible effect of the hematopoietic stem cell source of the transplant. A total of 149 adult patients (median age, 29 years, range, 15-59 years) with HR-ALL underwent unrelated SCT in 13 Spanish institutions between 2000 and 2007. Patients in first complete remission (CR1) at transplantation had at least one adverse prognostic factor (advanced age, adverse cytogenetics, hyperleukocytosis, or slow response to induction therapy). ALL was in CR1 in 81 patients (54%), in second CR (CR2) in 37 patients (25%), in third CR (CR3) in 11 patients (7%), and with overt disease in 20 patients (13%). The hematopoietic source was unrelated cord blood (UCB) in 62 patients and an unrelated donor (UD) in 87 patients. The patients undergoing UCB-SCT and UD-SCT were comparable in terms of the main clinical and biological features of ALL, except for a higher frequency of patients with more overt disease in the UCB-SCT group. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years between the 2 groups. Treatment-related mortality (TRM) was significantly lower in the UCB-SCT group (P = .021). The probability of relapse at 1 year was 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-27%) for the UD-SCT group and 27% (95% CI, 14%-40%) for the UCB-SCT group (P = .088), respectively. Only disease status at transplantation (CR1, 41% [95% CI, 18%-64%] vs CR2, 51% [95% CI, 17%-85%] vs advanced disease, 66% [95% CI, 46%-86%]; P = .001) and the absence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (74% [95% CI, 46%-100%] vs 33% [95% CI, 17%-49%]; P = .034) were significant factors for relapse. All unrelated transplantation modalities were associated with high treatment-related mortality for adult HR-ALL patients without a sibling donor. UCB-SCT and UD-SCT were found to be equivalent options. Disease status at transplantation and chronic GVHD were the main factors influencing relapse in both transplantation modalities.

Simultaneous cytomorphologic and multiparametric flow cytometric analysis on lymph node samples is faster than and as valid as histopathologic study to diagnose most non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

We evaluated the validity and accuracy of cytomorphology and multiparametric flow cytometry (C-FCM) in diagnosing oncohematologic disease in 223 consecutive lymph node biopsy specimens from patients with lymphadenopathy, from 2004 to 2007. C-FCM and histopathologic studies were interpreted independently by hematologists and pathologists, respectively. C-FCM detected neoplastic disorders in 133 samples (59.6%): 92 non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs; 41.3%), 21 Hodgkin lymphomas (HLs; 9.4%), 19 malignant nonhematologic neoplasms (8.5%), and 1 multiple myeloma (0.4%). Sensitivity and specificity were 87.25% and 95.95%, respectively. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) were 97.74% and 78.89%, respectively. Sensitivity and NPV were 94.79% and 96.81% upon excluding HL and malignant nonhematologic neoplasms from the analysis. Of the 92 NHLs, 89 (97%) were categorized according to the 2001 World Health Organization classification of hematolymphoid neoplasms with a concordance of 87%. The C-FCM study was significantly faster than the histopathologic study. C-FCM has high sensitivity and specificity, allowing for a valid and reliable diagnosis, especially in NHLs and enabling their subclassification. C-FCM is faster than the histopathologic examination, allowing for therapeutic decisions to be made quickly. However, in the samples in which C-FCM cannot establish a diagnosis, histopathologic results are needed.

Is mobilized peripheral blood comparable with bone marrow as a source of hematopoietic stem cells for allogeneic transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors? A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized peripheral blood stem cells are increasingly used instead of bone marrow as a stem cell source for transplantation. Whereas this change is almost complete for autologous transplantation, there are some concerns when considering allogeneic transplants. DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study including 820 adult patients who had received an allogeneic stem cell transplant from an HLA-identical sibling donor. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed in 150 patients using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in overall survival at ten years (bone marrow: 48.9% vs. peripheral blood stem cells: 39.8%; p=0.621), transplant-related mortality (bone marrow: 28.9% vs. peripheral blood stem cells: 34.4%; p=0.682) or relapse incidence at 9 years (29.4% vs. 35.2%, respectively; p=0.688). Similar outcomes were maintained independently of the phase of the disease. However, multivariate analysis identified a higher incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease grades II-IV (p: 0.023; Hazard ratio [HR]: 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.89) and grades III-IV (p: 0.006; HR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.20-2.98), in the peripheral blood stem cells-stem cell transplant group. As previously described, extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease was also more frequent in the peripheral blood stem cells group (28% vs. 15.6%; p<0.001). Patients transplanted with peripheral blood stem cells had significant impairment of role and social functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Although overall survival was not affected by the stem cell source, peripheral blood stem cell transplants were associated with a higher risk of both acute and chronic GvHD. Global quality of life was similar in both groups, but patients transplanted with peripheral blood stem cells showed worse role and social functioning scores, probably related to the increased incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation for Hodgkin's lymphoma: identification of prognostic factors predicting outcome.

BACKGROUND: The role of reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem transplantation (RICalloSCT) in the management of patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma remains controversial. DESIGN AND METHODS: To further define its role we have conducted a retrospective analysis of 285 patients with HL who underwent a RICalloSCT in order to identify prognostic factors that predict outcome. Eighty percent of patients had undergone a prior autologous stem cell transplantation and 25% had refractory disease at transplant. RESULTS: Non-relapse mortality was associated with chemorefractory disease, poor performance status, age >45 and transplantation before 2002. For patients with no risk factors the 3-year non-relapse mortality rate was 12.5% compared to 46.2% for patients with 2 or more risk factors. The use of an unrelated donor had no adverse effect on the non-relapse mortality. Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) grades II-IV developed in 30% and chronic GVHD in 42%. The development of cGVHD was associated with a lower relapse rate. The disease progression rate at one and five years was 41% and 58.7% respectively and was associated with chemorefractory disease and extent of prior therapy. Donor lymphocyte infusions were administered to 64 patients for active disease of whom 32% showed a clinical response. Eight out of 18 patients receiving donor lymphocyte infusions alone had clinical responses. Progression-free and overall survival were both associated with performance status and disease status at transplant. Patients with neither risk factor had a 3-year PFS and overall survival of 42% and 56% respectively compared to 8% and 25% for patients with one or more risk factors. Relapse within six months of a prior autologous transplant was associated with a higher relapse rate and a lower progression-free. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis identifies important clinical parameters that may be useful in predicting the outcome of RICaIICalloSCT in Hodgkin's lymphoma.

CTLA-4 polymorphisms and clinical outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors.

CTLA-4 is an inhibitory molecule that down-regulates T-cell activation. Although polymorphisms at CTLA-4 have been correlated with autoimmune diseases their association with clinical outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has yet to be explored. A total of 5 CTLA-4 single-nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped on 536 HLA-identical sibling donors of allo-HSC transplants. Genotypes were tested for an association with patients' posttransplantation outcomes. The effect of the polymorphisms on cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) mRNA and protein production were determined in 60 healthy control participants. We observed a reduction in the mRNA expression of the soluble CTLA-4 isoform in the presence of a G allele at CT60 and +49. Patients receiving stem cells from a donor with at least 1 G allele in position CT60 had worse overall survival (56.2% vs 69.8% at 5 years; P = .001; hazard ratio [HR], 3.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-8.22), due to a higher risk of relapse (P = .049; HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.00-2.93). Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was more frequent in patients receiving CT60 AA stem cells (P = .033; HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.03-2.29). This is the first study to report an association between polymorphisms at CTLA-4 and clinical outcome after allo-HSCT. The CT60 genotype influences relapse and aGVHD, probably due to its action on CTLA-4 alternative splicing.

Relevance of bone marrow cell dose on allogeneic transplantation outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: results of a European survey.

PURPOSE: Many attempts have been made to improve the results of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Bone marrow cell dose has been reported to be an important factor in alloBMT; however, its true impact on relapse incidence (RI), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in a large cohort of patients is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1992 to December 1999, 572 bone marrow transplantation recipients reported to the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry underwent allografting from an HLA-identical sibling donor with an unmanipulated bone marrow for AML in CR1. RESULTS: The median number of nucleated cells (NCs) infused was 2.6 x 10(8)/kg. Estimated 5-year NRM, LFS, and RI for patients receiving more or less than 2.6 x 10(8) NCs/kg were, respectively, 18% +/- 5% v 30% +/- 5% (P =.001), 68% +/- 3% v 46% +/- 3% (P <.00001), and 14% +/- 4% v 24% +/- 5% (P =.004). The association of cell dose with the above outcomes was confirmed in multivariate analyses for NRM (relative risk [RR], 0.53; P =.0007), for LFS (RR, 0.53; P =.00008), and for RI (RR, 0.57; P =.02). The cell dose was also an important factor for neutrophil (RR, 0.76; P =.009) and platelet (RR, 0.77; P =.03) recoveries; however, it did not statistically influence the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease. CONCLUSION: This study shows that marrow cell dose is one of the most important factors influencing relapse, NRM, and LFS after alloBMT for patients with AML in CR1. Therefore, increasing the marrow cell dose should substantially improve the survival of these patients.