Attempt to Substitute the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® Test by Histopathological Factors and MUC1 Protein Expression.

Background/Aim: Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® test (ODx) is a gene profiling assay predicting the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. Meanwhile, to avoid unnecessary financial burden on the patient, many studies have attempted to establish alternatives to ODx using conventional clinicopathological factors, but these have not yet been successful. Thus, we retrospectively investigated clinicopathological factors to establish alternatives to ODx. Patients and Methods: Data from 114 Japanese women who underwent ODx were retrospectively examined to investigate the relationship between ODx recurrence score (RS) and clinicopathological features, including MUC1 staining patterns on immunohistochemical assessment. An RS of 0-25 was defined as low, and 26-100 as high. Results: Ninety patients (79%) had low RS and 24 patients (21%) had high RS. Univariate analysis revealed that low tumor grade, high progesterone receptor (PgR) expression, and low Ki67 labeling index (LI) were significantly associated with low RS (p=0.025, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). Tumors with an apical pattern of MUC1 staining also frequently had a low RS (p=0.024). In multivariate analysis, PgR expression and Ki67 LI were independent factors associated with RS (p<0.001, for both). When the ODx results were categorized with a combination of these two factors, only 2% of the PgR-high and Ki67-low group (one in 51 cases) had a high RS. Conclusion: PgR expression and Ki67 LI were independent factors correlated with RS. MUC1 staining pattern also has the potential to be a useful marker. We believe that it is crucial to continue attempts to identify patients who are unlikely to benefit from ODx.

Absolute lymphocyte count as a biomarker for best supportive care transition in metastatic breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Time is crucial for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and clinicians are expected to determine the optimal timing for best supportive care (BSC) transition but no evident marker has been established. We recently revealed that absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was a prognostic marker for patients with MBC. Thus, we investigated whether ALC could be an indicator of the best timing for the BSC transition. METHODS: 101 patients with MBC were retrospectively investigated, and the relationship between clinicopathological factors, including ALC, and the duration of the last treatment was analysed. RESULTS: Mean ALC significantly gradually decreased during the last three systemic treatments towards BSC transition. Patients of younger age, with special histology type, hormone receptor-positive tumours and low ALC at the start of the last treatment had significantly shorter time-to-treatment-termination (TTT) for the last treatment. When ALC was classified into low and high, the mean TTT of the last treatment in the ALC-low group was significantly shorter (16.4 weeks) compared with that in the ALC-high group (30.2 weeks; p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that ALC values, which decrease as MBC progresses, could serve as a potential indicator for determining the optimal timing of BSC transition.

Efficacy of radiation therapy in Japanese patients with positive margins after breast-conserving surgery.

BACKGROUND: Additional surgical resection is recommended after breast-conserving surgery if the surgical margin is pathologically positive. However, in clinical practice, radiation therapy is sometimes used instead for several reasons. Irradiation may be appropriate for some patients, but real-world data is still insufficient to establish it as standard treatment. We retrospectively investigated the status of local control in patients who received irradiation for positive margins. METHODS: We investigated 85 patients with positive margins after curative partial mastectomy who were treated with irradiation instead of additional excision during the period 2006-2013. The patients received whole-breast irradiation (43.2-50 Gy) using photon beams and additional tumour-bed boost (8.1-16 Gy) using electron beams. Intrabreast tumour recurrence was defined as secondary cancer within the ipsilateral conserved breast. Surgical margin was defined as positive if tumour cell exposure was pathologically confirmed on the margin. RESULTS: Seven patients (8.2%) developed intrabreast tumour recurrence during a mean observation period of 119 months. As to components of positive margin, 76 cases were positive for an intraductal component, of which seven (9.2%) developed intrabreast tumour recurrence. Meanwhile, all nine cases positive for an invasive component were free from intrabreast tumour recurrence. Two of the intrabreast tumour recurrence cases seemed to develop new lesions rather than recurrence, considering tumour location. The cumulative incidence of intrabreast tumour recurrence over 10 years was 6.1%. Limited to true recurrence, intrabreast tumour recurrence incidence was 4.9%. CONCLUSION: Our real-world data supports irradiation as an alternative to additional surgical intervention for positive margins after breast-conserving surgery and offers a basis for further research.