Serum Creatinine and Tacrolimus Assessment With VAMS Finger-Prick Microsampling: A Diagnostic Test Study.

Rationale & Objective: Kidney transplant recipients require frequent venipunctures. Microsampling methods that use a finger-prick draw of capillary blood, like volumetric absorptive microsamplers (VAMS), have the potential to reduce the pain, inconvenience, and volume of blood loss associated with venipuncture. This study aimed to provide diagnostic accuracy using VAMS for measurement of tacrolimus and creatinine compared to gold standard venous blood in adult kidney transplant recipients. Study Design: Diagnostic test study. Prospective blood samples for measurement of tacrolimus and creatinine were collected using Mitra VAMS and venipuncture immediately before and 2 hours after tacrolimus dosing. Setting & Participants: A convenience sample of 40 adult kidney transplant participants in the outpatient setting. Tests Compared: Method comparison was assessed by Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis. The predictive performance of VAMS measurement compared to venipuncture was also assessed through estimation of the median prediction error and median absolute percentage prediction error. Results: A total of 74 tacrolimus samples and 70 creatinine samples were analyzed from 40 participants. Passing-Bablok regression showed a systematic difference between VAMS and venipuncture when measuring tacrolimus and creatinine with a slope of 1.08 (95% CI, 1.03-1.13) and a slope of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.6-0.7), respectively. These values were then corrected for the systematic difference. When used for Bland-Altman analysis, corrected values of tacrolimus and creatinine showed a bias of -0.1 µg/L and 0.04 mg/dL, respectively. Tacrolimus (corrected) and creatinine (corrected) microsampling values when compared to corresponding venipuncture values met median prediction error and median absolute percentage prediction error predefined acceptability limits of <15%. Limitations: This study was conducted in a controlled environment using a trained nurse to collect VAMS samples. Conclusions: In this study, VAMS was used to reliably measured tacrolimus and creatinine. This represents a clear opportunity for more frequent and less invasive sampling for patients.

Fingerprick Microsampling Methods Can Replace Venepuncture for Simultaneous Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus, Mycophenolic Acid, and Prednisolone Concentrations in Adult Kidney Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant patients undergo repeated and frequent venepunctures during allograft management. Microsampling methods that use a fingerprick draw of capillary blood, such as dried blood spots (DBS) and volumetric absorptive microsamplers (VAMS), have the potential to reduce the burden and volume of blood loss with venepuncture. METHODS: This study aimed to examine microsampling approaches for the simultaneous measurement of tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG), and prednisolone drug concentrations compared with standard venepuncture in adult kidney transplant patients. DBS and VAMS were simultaneously collected with venepuncture samples from 40 adult kidney transplant patients immediately before and 2 hours after immunosuppressant dosing. Method comparison was performed using Passing-Bablok regression, and bias was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Drug concentrations measured through microsampling and venepuncture were also compared by estimating the median prediction error (MPE) and median absolute percentage prediction error (MAPE). RESULTS: Passing-Bablok regression showed a systematic difference between tacrolimus DBS and venepuncture [slope of 1.06 (1.01-1.13)] and between tacrolimus VAMS and venepuncture [slope of 1.08 (1.03-1.13)]. Tacrolimus values were adjusted for this difference, and the corrected values showed no systematic differences. Moreover, no systematic differences were observed when comparing DBS or VAMS with venepuncture for mycophenolic acid and prednisolone. Tacrolimus (corrected), mycophenolic acid, and prednisolone microsampling values met the MPE and MAPE predefined acceptability limits of <15% when compared with the corresponding venepuncture values. DBS and VAMS, collected in a controlled environment, simultaneously measured multiple immunosuppressants. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that accurate results of multiple immunosuppressant concentrations can be generated through the microsampling approach, with a preference for VAMS over DBS.

Kidney transplant recipient's perceptions of blood testing through microsampling and venepuncture.

A survey of kidney transplant recipients receiving two innovative microsampling methods, dried blood spot and volumetric absorptive microsampling using patient reported methodology. A total of 39 adult transplant patients underwent venepuncture and finger prick-based blood draws on two occasions. They completed a survey of blood test understanding, tolerability, preferences and the burden associated with venepuncture compared with microsampling. A total of 85% of participants (n = 33) preferred finger prick-based sampling and 95% (n = 37) were interested in blood collection using self sampling by finger prick at home; 33% (n = 13) of participants experienced blood test anxiety. To quantify time burden of providing venous samples a total of 44% (n = 17) spent greater than 1 hour to travel and provide venous samples. This study observed a patient preference for microsampling for blood sampling as an alternative to venepuncture in the management of their kidney transplant.