Challenges and dynamics of public health reporting and data exchange during COVID-19: insights from US hospitals.

The US health care response during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic unveiled challenges in public health reporting systems and electronic clinical data exchange. Using data from the 2020 and 2022 American Hospital Association information technology supplement surveys, this study examined US hospitals' experiences in public health reporting, accessing clinical data from external providers for COVID-19 patient care, and their success in reporting vaccine-related adverse events to relevant state and federal agencies. Results showcase significant disparities in reporting practices across government levels due to inconsistent requirements. Although many hospitals leaned toward automated data transmission, a substantial portion continued to depend on manual processes. Pertaining to electronic clinical data, while entities like large commercial laboratories outperformed others, a considerable number were sluggish in delivering critical information. Moreover, a small percentage of hospitals reported challenges in recording vaccine-related adverse events, emphasizing the need for transparent reporting systems. The study underscores the necessity for standardized reporting protocols, explicit directives, and a pivot from manual to automated processes. Tackling these challenges is pivotal for ensuring prompt and reliable data, bolstering future public health responses, and rejuvenating public trust in health institutions.

Factors Associated With Hospital Commercial Negotiated Price for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain.

This cross-sectional study investigates hospital characteristics associated with commercial negotiated price for magnetic resonance imaging of brain.

Pre-pandemic assessment: a decade of progress in electronic health record adoption among U.S. hospitals.

As the COVID-19 pandemic loomed, the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in US hospitals became a pivotal concern. This study provides a pre-pandemic assessment, highlighting a decade of progress in EHR adoption from 2009 to 2019, with the last available survey conducted from January to June of 2020. It delves into the current EHR adoption rates, variations across different hospital categories, the influence of major vendors, and the challenges in implementing these systems. The study found that basic EHR adoption surged from 6.6% to 81.2%, while comprehensive systems increased from 3.6% to 63.2%. Despite this growth, the findings point to enduring disparities among hospitals, a concentrated market share by 6 vendors (90%), and significant concerns regarding maintenance costs. These insights provide an invaluable snapshot of the state of EHR adoption at the brink of the pandemic, serving as a benchmark to assess hospitals' readiness to utilize digital infrastructure in health care. The conclusions underscore the necessity for strategic policy interventions to encourage a competitive landscape and guarantee equitable access, ultimately strengthening the health care system's responsiveness to global health crises such as COVID-19.

Factors Associated with Compliance to the Hospital Price Transparency Final Rule: a National Landscape Study.

BACKGROUND: The Hospital Price Transparency Final Rule, effective January 1, 2021, requires hospitals to post online a machine-readable file that includes payer-specific negotiated commercial prices for all services. The regulation aims to improve the affordability of hospital care by promoting price competition. However, a low compliance level among hospitals would compromise the operational effectiveness of this regulation. Understanding hospitals' compliance status to the regulation has important implications for its enforcement effort and effectiveness assessment. OBJECTIVE: To analyze nationwide hospitals' compliance status to the Hospital Price Transparency Rule. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3558 Medicare-certified general acute-care hospitals were examined. MAIN MEASURES: A binary compliance rating was generated by using data collected by Turquoise Health. "Noncompliance" means that no machine-readable file was posted or the posted file contains no commercial negotiated prices. "Compliance" means that a machine-readable file was posted with commercial negotiated prices for at least one insurance plan. KEY RESULTS: As of June 1, 2021, 55% of the 3558 Medicare-certified general acute-care hospitals we examined had not posted a machine-readable file containing commercial negotiated prices. Wide variations of compliance existed across states and hospital referral regions. A hospital's compliance status is strongly associated with the average compliance status of peer hospitals in the same market. Hospitals with greater IT preparedness, for-profit hospitals, system-affiliated hospitals, large hospitals, and non-urban hospitals had greater compliance. More concentrated hospital markets had greater average compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals take into consideration the behavior of their peers in the same market when making price disclosure decisions. Compliant hospitals are likely to have better IT preparedness, more financial resources and personnel expertise to mitigate the cost required for the implementation of the Price Transparency Rule. The compliance cost, therefore, might be a barrier for some hospitals.