Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Breast Cancer ; 2024 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38896169

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is a common oncoplastic procedure used in breast cancer surgery. This study aims to investigate compliance with prosthetic breast reconstruction guidelines and its impact on perioperative treatment. METHODS: We reviewed data from the National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry between January 2019 and December 2020. We compared perioperative treatment implementation between the IBR and non-IBR groups by subtype matching for age, menopausal status, T stage, N stage, and histology. RESULTS: A total of 8,860 patients with breast cancer who underwent IBR (6,075 breast prostheses, 2,492 autologous tissues, and 293 others) were identified. The compliance rate with the guidelines for prosthetic breast reconstruction was 97.7%. After matching, chemotherapy for luminal A-like diseases was significantly less frequent in the IBR group than in the non-IBR group (16.3% vs 20.5%, p < 0.001), and radiotherapy was less frequent in luminal A-like and HER2-positive patients (7.2% vs 9.0%, p = 0.010 and 7.1% vs 11.4%, p = 0.005, respectively). Among the 1-3 node-positive cases, fewer patients with prosthetic IBR received radiotherapy than those without IBR (15.7% vs 26.4%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prosthetic breast reconstruction was performed with strict adherence to the Japanese guidelines. The implementation rates of chemotherapy and radiotherapy were lower in the specific IBR group than those in the non-IBR group. Therefore, large-scale, long-term follow-up data are required.

2.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 207(2): 393-404, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740665

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemotherapy is a critical component of breast cancer management, yet its effectiveness is not uniform. Moreover, the adverse effects associated with chemotherapy necessitate the identification of a patient subgroup that would derive the maximum benefit from this treatment. This study aimed to establish a method for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients utilizing a metabolomic approach. METHODS: Plasma samples were obtained from 87 breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our facility, collected both before the commencement of the treatment and before the second treatment cycle. Metabolite analysis was conducted using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). We performed comparative profiling of metabolite concentrations by assessing the metabolite profiles of patients who achieved a pathological complete response (pCR) against those who did not, both in initial and subsequent treatment cycles. RESULTS: Significant variances were observed in the metabolite profiles between pCR and non-pCR cases, both at the onset of preoperative chemotherapy and before the second cycle. Noteworthy distinctions were also evident between the metabolite profiles from the initial and the second neoadjuvant chemotherapy courses. Furthermore, metabolite profiles exhibited variations associated with intrinsic subtypes at all assessed time points. CONCLUSION: The application of plasma metabolomics, utilizing CE-MS and LC-MS, may serve as a tool for predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer in the future after all necessary validations have been completed.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Metabolomics , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/blood , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Metabolomics/methods , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Metabolome , Chromatography, Liquid , Mass Spectrometry , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Prognosis , Electrophoresis, Capillary , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
3.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 50(13): 1759-1761, 2023 Dec.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38303198

ABSTRACT

A woman in her 70s underwent mastectomy plus axillary lymph node excision(Bt plus Ax)in December 2011 for left breast cancer classified as pT2N1M0, pStage ⅡB. The tumor was identified as an invasive ductal carcinoma(IDC), neural/ glial antigen 2(NG2), pT2(35 mm), INF γ, ly2, v0, g+, f+, s+, extensive intraductal component(EIC)-negative, ICT- positive, NCAT-positive, n(4/18), estrogen receptor(ER)-negative, progesterone receptor(PgR)-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)-negative, Ki-67 30-40%. Postoperative adjuvant fluorouracil plus epirubicin HCl plus cyclophosphamide(FEC)plus paclitaxel(PTX)therapy was administered. The patient refused to undergo postoperative radiation therapy. Two years after the surgery, she was diagnosed as having a lung metastasis and local disease recurrence. Biopsy of the local recurrent lesion revealed the same histopathological diagnosis as before. Capecitabine was selected for treatment of the recurrent lesion. After 2 years of capecitabine treatment, the response was rated as progressive disease (PD). At this time, eribulin mesylate was selected, along with intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT). This resulted in disappearance of the tumor on imaging. However, considering that the histological findings did not suggest complete response(CR)and that the tumor was triple-negative(TN), we adopted a strategy of continuing the drug therapy at reduced dose level. With this strategy, the disease activity could be successfully controlled for 6.5 years. Subsequently, liver metastasis was detected, and the drug was switched to vinorelbine ditartrate(a drug with less non-hematological toxicity). Meanwhile, a breast cancer susceptibility gene(BRCA)analysis was performed in January 2021, which was negative. Subsequently, in September 2021, we obtained a positive result for PDL1-SP142 and negative result for 22C3. About half a year later, ie, in October 2021(11 years after the surgery), we detected an increase in the size of the liver metastasis and selected atezolizumab and nab-PTX for treatment. Applicable regimens of drug therapy are still available at present and drug therapy has been continued based on a discussion and mutual understanding of the adverse reactions, etc. with the patient. Few reports have been published concerning long-term survivors among TN breast cancer cases.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Liver Neoplasms , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Mastectomy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL