Performance of intraoperative neurocognitive tests during awake surgery for patients with diffuse low-grade glioma.

Despite great advancements and the diffusion of awake surgery for brain tumors, the literature shows that the tests applied during the procedure are heterogeneous and non-standardized. This prospective, observational, descriptive study collected data on intraoperative brain mapping and the performance of multiple neurocognitive tests in 51 awake surgeries for diffuse low-grade glioma. Frequency of use and rate of intraoperative findings of different neurocognitive tests were analyzed. Patients mean age at the time of surgery was 35.1 (20-57) years. We performed 26 (51.0%) surgeries on the left hemisphere (LH) and 25 (49.0%) on the right hemisphere (RH). Significant differences were observed between the total number of functional findings (cortical and subcortical) identified in the LH and RH (p = 0.004). In subcortical findings alone, the differences remained significant (p = 0.0004). The RH subcortical region showed the lowest number of intraoperative findings, and this was correlated with functional outcome: Karnofsky performance scale at five days (p = 0.022), three months (p = 0.002) and one year (p = 0.002) post-surgery. On average, more tests were used to map the RH, with a lower frequency of both cortical and subcortical functional findings. Even though subcortical findings were less frequent than cortical findings, they were crucial to defining the resection margins. Based on the intraoperative findings, frequency of use, and rate of findings per use of the tests analyzed, the most relevant tests for each hemisphere for awake brain mapping were identified.

Understanding Decision Making as It Influences Treatment in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurological Deficit: Conceptual Framework and Methodology.

STUDY DESIGN: This paper presents a description of a conceptual framework and methodology that is applicable to the manuscripts that comprise this focus issue. OBJECTIVES: Our goal is to present a conceptual framework which is relied upon to better understand the processes through which surgeons make therapeutic decisions around how to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures (TL) fractures. METHODS: We will describe the methodology used in the AO Spine TL A3/4 Study prospective observational study and how the radiographs collected for this study were utilized to study the relationships between various variables that factor into surgeon decision making. RESULTS: With 22 expert spine trauma surgeons analyzing the acute CT scans of 183 patients with TL fractures we were able to perform pairwise analyses, look at reliability and correlations between responses and develop frequency tables, and regression models to assess the relationships and interactions between variables. We also used machine learning to develop decision trees. CONCLUSIONS: This paper outlines the overall methodological elements that are common to the subsequent papers in this focus issue.

Using Equipoise to Determine the Radiographic Characteristics Leading to Agreement on Best Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficits.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to assess radiographic characteristics associated with agreement and disagreement in treatment recommendation in thoracolumbar (TL) burst fractures. METHODS: A panel of 22 AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma experts reviewed 183 cases and were asked to: (1) classify the fracture; (2) assess degree of certainty of PLC disruption; (3) assess degree of comminution; and (4) make a treatment recommendation. Equipoise threshold used was 77% (77:23 distribution of uncertainty or 17 vs 5 experts). Two groups were created: consensus vs equipoise. RESULTS: Of the 183 cases reviewed, the experts reached full consensus in only 8 cases (4.4%). Eighty-one cases (44.3%) were included in the agreement group and 102 cases (55.7%) in the equipoise group. A3/A4 fractures were more common in the equipoise group (92.0% vs 83.7%, P < .001). The agreement group had higher degree of certainty of PLC disruption [35.8% (SD 34.2) vs 27.6 (SD 27.3), P < .001] and more common use of the M1 modifier (44.3% vs 38.3%, P < .001). Overall, the degree of comminution was slightly higher in the equipoise group [47.8 (SD 20.5) vs 45.7 (SD 23.4), P < .001]. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement group had a higher degree of certainty of PLC injury and more common use of M1 modifier (more type B fractures). The equipoise group had more A3/A4 type fractures. Future studies are required to identify the role of comminution in decision making as degree of comminution was slightly higher in the equipoise group.

Predictive Algorithm for Surgery Recommendation in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurological Deficits.

STUDY DESIGN: Predictive algorithm via decision tree. OBJECTIVES: Artificial intelligence (AI) remain an emerging field and have not previously been used to guide therapeutic decision making in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Building such models may reduce the variability in treatment recommendations. The goal of this study was to build a mathematical prediction rule based upon radiographic variables to guide treatment decisions. METHODS: Twenty-two surgeons from the AO Knowledge Forum Trauma reviewed 183 cases from the Spine TL A3/A4 prospective study (classification, degree of certainty of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury, use of M1 modifier, degree of comminution, treatment recommendation). Reviewers' regions were classified as Europe, North/South America and Asia. Classification and regression trees were used to create models that would predict the treatment recommendation based upon radiographic variables. We applied the decision tree model which accounts for the possibility of non-normal distributions of data. Cross-validation technique as used to validate the multivariable analyses. RESULTS: The accuracy of the model was excellent at 82.4%. Variables included in the algorithm were certainty of PLC injury (%), degree of comminution (%), the use of M1 modifier and geographical regions. The algorithm showed that if a patient has a certainty of PLC injury over 57.5%, then there is a 97.0% chance of receiving surgery. If certainty of PLC injury was low and comminution was above 37.5%, a patient had 74.2% chance of receiving surgery in Europe and Asia vs 22.7% chance in North/South America. Throughout the algorithm, the use of the M1 modifier increased the probability of receiving surgery by 21.4% on average. CONCLUSION: This study presents a predictive analytic algorithm to guide decision-making in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits. PLC injury assessment over 57.5% was highly predictive of receiving surgery (97.0%). A high degree of comminution resulted in a higher chance of receiving surgery in Europe or Asia vs North/South America. Future studies could include clinical and other variables to enhance predictive ability or use machine learning for outcomes prediction in thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Interobserver Reliability in the Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures Using the AO Spine TL Injury Classification System Among 22 Clinical Experts in Spine Trauma Care.

STUDY DESIGN: Reliability study utilizing 183 injury CT scans by 22 spine trauma experts with assessment of radiographic features, classification of injuries and treatment recommendations. OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability of the AOSpine TL Injury Classification System (TLICS) including the categories within the classification and the M1 modifier. METHODS: Kappa and Intraclass correlation coefficients were produced. Associations of various imaging characteristics (comminution, PLC status) and treatment recommendations were analyzed through regression analysis. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used for making predictive algorithms. RESULTS: Reliability of the AO Spine TLICS at differentiating A3 and A4 injuries (N = 71) (K = .466; 95% CI .458 - .474; P < .001) demonstrated moderate agreement. Similarly, the average intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) amongst A3 and A4 injuries was excellent (ICC = .934; 95% CI .919 - .947; P < .001) and the ICC between individual measures was moderate (ICC = .403; 95% CI .351 - .461; P < .001). The overall agreement on the utilization of the M1 modifier amongst A3 and A4 injuries was fair (K = .161; 95% CI .151 - .171; P < .001). The ICC for PLC status in A3 and A4 injuries averaged across all measures was excellent (ICC = .936; 95% CI .922 - .949; P < .001). The M1 modifier suggests respondents are nearly 40% more confident that the PLC is injured amongst all injuries. The M1 modifier was employed at a higher frequency as injuries were classified higher in the classification system. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of surgeons differentiating between A3 and A4 injuries in the AOSpine TLICS is substantial and the utilization of the M1 modifier occurs more frequently with higher grades in the system.

Expert Opinion, Real-World Classification, and Decision-Making in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficits?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVES: To compare decision-making between an expert panel and real-world spine surgeons in thoracolumbar burst fractures (TLBFs) without neurological deficits and analyze which factors influence surgical decision-making. METHODS: This study is a sub-analysis of a prospective observational study in TL fractures. Twenty two experts were asked to review 183 CT scans and recommend treatment for each fracture. The expert recommendation was based on radiographic review. RESULTS: Overall agreement between the expert panel and real-world surgeons regarding surgery was 63.2%. In 36.8% of cases, the expert panel recommended surgery that was not performed in real-world scenarios. Conversely, in cases where the expert panel recommended non-surgical treatment, only 38.6% received non-surgical treatment, while 61.4% underwent surgery. A separate analysis of A3 and A4 fractures revealed that expert panel recommended surgery for 30% of A3 injuries and 68% of A4 injuries. However, 61% of patients with both A3 and A4 fractures received surgery in the real world. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a 1% increase in certainty of PLC injury led to a 4% increase in surgery recommendation among the expert panel, while a .2% increase in the likelihood of receiving surgery in the real world. CONCLUSION: Surgical decision-making varied between the expert panel and real-world treating surgeons. Differences appear to be less evident in A3/A4 burst fractures making this specific group of fractures a real challenge independent of the level of expertise.

The Influence of Comminution and Posterior Ligamentous Complex Integrity on Treatment Decision Making in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit?

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study. OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the impact of vertebral body comminution and Posterior Ligamentous Complex (PLC) integrity on the treatment recommendations of thoracolumbar fractures among an expert panel of 22 spine surgeons. METHODS: A review of 183 prospectively collected thoracolumbar burst fracture computed tomography (CT) scans by an expert panel of 22 trauma spine surgeons to assess vertebral body comminution and PLC integrity. This study is a sub-study of a prospective observational study of thoracolumbar burst fractures (Spine TL A3/A4). Each expert was asked to grade the degree of comminution and certainty about the PLC disruption from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the intact vertebral body or intact PLC and 100 representing complete comminution or complete PLC disruption, respectively. RESULTS: ≥45% comminution had a 74% chance of having surgery recommended, while <25% comminution had an 86.3% chance of non-surgical treatment. A comminution from 25 to 45% had a 57% chance of non-surgical management. ≥55% PLC injury certainity had a 97% chance of having surgery, and ≥45-55% PLC injury certainty had a 65%. <20% PLC injury had a 64% chance of having non-operative treatment. A 20 to 45% PLC injury certainity had a 56% chance of non-surgical management. There was fair inter-rater agreement on the degree of comminution (ICC .57 [95% CI 0.52-.63]) and the PLC integrity (ICC .42 [95% CI 0.37-.48]). CONCLUSION: The study concludes that vetebral comminution and PLC integrity are major dterminant in decision making of thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit. However, more objective, reliable, and accurate methods of assessment of these variables are warranted.

The AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System and Treatment Algorithm in Decision Making for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective Observational Study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the alignment of the AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification system and treatment algorithm with contemporary surgical decision making. METHODS: 183 cases of thoracolumbar burst fractures were reviewed by 22 AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma experts. These experienced clinicians classified the fracture morphology, integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex and degree of comminution. Management recommendations were collected. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant stepwise increase in rates of operative management with escalating category of injury (P < .001). An excellent correlation existed between recommended expert management and the actual treatment of each injury category: A0/A1/A2 (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.70-1.69, P = .71), A3/4 (OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.98-2.66, P = .58) and B1/B2/C (1.00, 95% CI 0.87-1.14, P = .99). Thoracolumbar A4 fractures were more likely to be surgically stabilized than A3 fractures (68.2% vs 30.9%, P < .001). A modifier indicating indeterminate ligamentous injury increased the rate of operative management when comparing type B and C injuries to type A3/A4 injuries (OR 39.19, 95% CI 20.84-73.69, P < .01 vs OR 27.72, 95% CI 14.68-52.33, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification system introduces fracture morphology in a rational and hierarchical manner of escalating severity. Thoracolumbar A4 complete burst fractures were more likely to be operatively managed than A3 fractures. Flexion-distraction type B injuries and translational type C injuries were much more likely to have surgery recommended than type A fractures regardless of the M1 modifier. A suspected posterior ligamentous injury increased the likelihood of surgeons favoring surgical stabilization.

Anatomy of the posterior Fossa: a comprehensive description for pediatric brain tumors.

Posterior fossa tumors are the most common pediatric brain tumors, and present unique challenges in terms of their location and surgical management. The posterior fossa comprehends complex anatomy and represents the smallest and deepest of the three cranial base fossae. An in-depth understanding of posterior fossa anatomy is crucial when it comes to the surgical resection of pediatric brain tumors. Mastering the knowledge of posterior fossa anatomy helps the neurosurgeon in achieving a maximal and safe volumetric resection, that impacts in both overall and progression free survival. With the advancements in microsurgery, the telovelar approach has emerged as the workhorse technique for the resection of posterior fossa tumors in pediatric patients. This approach involves meticulously dissecting of the natural clefts present in the cerebellomedullary fissure, making a comprehensive understanding of the underlying anatomy key for its success.

Posterior fossa tumors in children: current insights.

While in adults most intracranial tumors develop around the cerebral hemispheres, 45 to 60% of pediatric lesions are found in the posterior fossa, although this anatomical region represents only 10% of the intracranial volume. The latest edition of the WHO classification for CNS tumors presented some fundamental paradigm shifts that particularly affected the classification of pediatric tumors, also influencing those that affect posterior fossa. Molecular biomarkers play an important role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of childhood posterior fossa tumors and can be used to predict patient outcomes and response to treatment and monitor its effectiveness. Although genetic studies have identified several posterior fossa tumor types, differing in terms of their location, cell of origin, genetic mechanisms, and clinical behavior, recent management strategies still depend on uniform approaches, mainly based on the extent of resection. However, significant progress has been made in guiding therapy decisions with biological or molecular stratification criteria and utilizing molecularly targeted treatments that address specific tumor biological characteristics. The primary focus of this review is on the latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of common subtypes of posterior fossa tumors in children, as well as potential therapeutic approaches in the future.   Conclusion: Molecular biomarkers play a central role, not only in the diagnosis and prognosis of posterior fossa tumors in children but also in customizing treatment plans. They anticipate patient outcomes, measure treatment responses, and assess therapeutic effectiveness. Advances in neuroimaging and treatment have significantly enhanced outcomes for children with these tumors. What is Known: • Central nervous system tumors are the most common solid neoplasms in children and adolescents, with approximately 45 to 60% of them located in the posterior fossa. • Multimodal approaches that include neurosurgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy are typically used to manage childhood posterior fossa tumors What is New: • Notable progress has been achieved in the diagnosis, categorization and management of posterior fossa tumors in children, leading to improvement in survival and quality of life.

Surgical outcome of spinal schwannoma and neurofibroma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome and surgical complications in patients with spinal schwannoma or neurofibroma surgically treated at the Hospital das Clínicas of the State University of Campinas. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study, using medical records of patients operated between 2011 and 2021. The sample distribution was verified using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The dynamics between qualitative variables were assessed using Fisher's exact test. We used means analysis to assess patient improvement based on Frankel scores. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were evaluated, of whom 56.25% (9) were men and 43.75% (7) were women. There were 13 (81.25%) patients with schwannomas and 3 (18.75%) with neurofibromas. Patients with deficits had neurological improvement, such as walking or with at least Frankel D or E after surgery. Laminectomy, performed in 8 patients (50%), and laminoplasty, used in 9 patients (56.25%), were the main techniques. CONCLUSION: The surgical approach was proved to be an effective and safe alternative to the treatment of these tumors, with neurological improvement and minor surgical complications.

Surgical outcome of spinal schwannoma and neurofibroma

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome and surgical complications in patients with spinal schwannoma or neurofibroma surgically treated at the Hospital das Clínicas of the State University of Campinas. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study, using medical records of patients operated between 2011 and 2021. The sample distribution was verified using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The dynamics between qualitative variables were assessed using Fisher's exact test. We used means analysis to assess patient improvement based on Frankel scores. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were evaluated, of whom 56.25% (9) were men and 43.75% (7) were women. There were 13 (81.25%) patients with schwannomas and 3 (18.75%) with neurofibromas. Patients with deficits had neurological improvement, such as walking or with at least Frankel D or E after surgery. Laminectomy, performed in 8 patients (50%), and laminoplasty, used in 9 patients (56.25%), were the main techniques. CONCLUSION: The surgical approach was proved to be an effective and safe alternative to the treatment of these tumors, with neurological improvement and minor surgical complications.

Awake Craniotomy for Diffuse Low Grade Gliomas in a Resource Limited Setting: Lessons Learned with a Consecutive Series of 51 Surgeries.

OBJECTIVE: Despite benefits of awake craniotomy (AC) many centers do not have access to it. We demonstrated the oncological and functional results of our initial experience in implementing AC in a context of resource limited setting. METHODS: This prospective, observational, and descriptive study collected the first 51 AC for diffuse low-grade glioma, classified according to the 2016 World Health Organization. RESULTS: Mean age was 35.09 ± 9.91 years old. The most common clinical presentation was seizure (89.58%). The average segmented volume was 69.8 cc; with 51% of lesions with more than 6 cm in the largest diameter. Resection of more than 90% of the lesion was achieved in 49% of cases, and greater than 80% in 66.6% of cases. The mean follow-up was 835 days (2.29 years). Satisfactory Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (80 to 100) was observed in 90.1% presurgery, 50.9% at 5 days, 93.7% at 3 months, and 89.7% at 1-year postoperation. At multivariate analysis, tumor volume, new postoperative deficit, and extent of resection were related to KPS at 1 year of follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Functional decline was clearly observed in the immediate postoperative period, but excellent recovery of functional status was observed in the medium and long term. The data presented indicate the benefits of this mapping in both cerebral hemispheres, addressing several cognitive functions in addition to motricity and language. The proposed AC model is a reproducible technique and resource sparing that can be performed safely and with good functional outcomes.

Temporopolar Amygdalohippocampectomy for Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Two-Dimensional Anatomical Operative Video.

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy is the most frequent type of focal epilepsy in young adults and the most commonly reported in surgical series worldwide.1,2 When seizures become refractory to drug therapy, they are unlikely to remit spontaneously, and for the 30% of patients with epilepsy that is refractory to antiepileptic drugs, resection of the mesial temporal lobe structures provides seizure control rates of 70%-80%.3,4 The transsylvian route for amygdalohippocampectomy has been used at our institution for many years, evolving from the first description of Yasargil through the inferior circular sulcus of insula to the most recent one through the amygdala trying to preserve the temporal stem.5,6 Despite good outcomes according to the Engel classification, analysis of late postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans of our patients showed a high incidence of temporal pole atrophy and potential gliosis.7,8 Therefore, we decided to keep the transsylvian route, but we removed a portion of the temporal pole anterior to the limen insula, resulting in a temporopolar amygdalohippocampectomy.4,9 Temporopolar amygdalohippocampectomy demonstrated good temporal stem preservation, good visual outcomes, and good memory results.4 We also advocate that the transsylvian route has the potential to provide a superior view and resection of the piriform cortex, that is associated with seizure outcome after surgery.10 We present a case of a 42-year-old woman who had refractory seizures secondary to mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and underwent temporopolar amygdalohippocampectomy with a good outcome, remaining seizure-free (Engel IA) (Video 1). The patient provided consent for surgery and video publication.

Growing skull fracture in a child with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Growing skull fracture (GSF) is a rare complication of head trauma in the pediatric population, commonly observed in children younger than 3 years. DISCUSSION: In this report, the authors describe a case of a 3-year-old male child, with clinical features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), who developed a GSF in frontal bone after a crib fall, treated with duraplasty and cranioplasty with autologous craft. Here, pertinent literature was reviewed with an emphasis on surgical techniques, and correlation with the mentioned syndrome. CONCLUSION: This is the first case of GSF in association with EDS in the literature. The relevance of the case described concerns the rarity of the condition itself, the atypical presentation, and the intraoperative findings, which showed the important fragility of the dura mater, probably due to EDS. Therefore, this syndrome, besides having influenced the pathogenesis, was also a challenging factor in the surgical treatment.

The Diagnostic Process of Spinal Post-traumatic Deformity: An Expert Survey of 7 Cases, Consensus on Clinical Relevance Does Exist.

STUDY DESIGN: Survey of cases. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the opinion of experts in the diagnostic process of clinically relevant Spinal Post-traumatic Deformity (SPTD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SPTD is a potential complication of spine trauma that can cause decreased function and quality of life impairment. The question of when SPTD becomes clinically relevant is yet to be resolved. METHODS: The survey of 7 cases was sent to 31 experts. The case presentation was medical history, diagnostic assessment, evaluation of diagnostic assessment, diagnosis, and treatment options. Means, ranges, percentages of participants, and descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Seventeen spinal surgeons reviewed the presented cases. The items' fracture type and complaints were rated by the participants as more important, but no agreement existed on the items of medical history. In patients with possible SPTD in the cervical spine (C) area, participants requested a conventional radiograph (CR) (76%-83%), a flexion/extension CR (61%-71%), a computed tomography (CT)-scan (76%-89%), and a magnetic resonance (MR)-scan (89%-94%). In thoracolumbar spine (ThL) cases, full spine CR (89%-100%), CT scan (72%-94%), and MR scan (65%-94%) were requested most often. There was a consensus on 5 out of 7 cases with clinically relevant SPTD (82%-100%). When consensus existed on the diagnosis of SPTD, there was a consensus on the case being compensated or decompensated and being symptomatic or asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: There was strong agreement in 5 out of 7 cases on the presence of the diagnosis of clinically relevant SPTD. Among spine experts, there is a strong consensus to use CT scan and MR scan, a cervical CR for C-cases, and a full spine CR for ThL-cases. The lack of agreement on items of the medical history suggests that a Delphi study can help us reach a consensus on the essential items of clinically relevant SPTD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Chamberlain's Line Violation in Basilar Invagination Patients Compared with Normal Subjects: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the measured odontoid tip violation above Chamberlain's line described in the literature to diagnose basilar invagination (BI) and to establish the normal placement of the dens tip defining individuals without BI (normal subjects). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify clinical or radiological studies that expressed the amount of odontoid violation above Chamberlain's line in patients with a BI diagnosis. In addition, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate normal subjects' values of Chamberlain's line violation (CLV). RESULTS: There were 23 studies included (13 radiological and 10 clinical). Most studies used computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Eight different cutoff values were used to measure dislocated odontoid apexes above Chamberlain's line regardless of the radiological modality. The mean measured amount of CLV was 3.95 mm (median 5 mm; range, 0-9 mm). The meta-analysis included 8 studies (1233 patients) with a normal sample population with a mean normal CLV of -0.63 mm (below the line) (95% confidence interval [-0.8, 1.18 mm], random effects model). CONCLUSIONS: Different values were found in the assessed studies used for CLV in BI diagnosis. This variability is especially important for type B BI, as type A BI has other craniocervical diagnostic parameters. Considering the results obtained in this meta-analysis, BI should be diagnosed in the case of any dens violation >1.18 mm.

How Knowledgeable Are Spine Surgeons Regarding EMG-NCS for Cervical Spine Conditions? An International Aospine Survey.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, international survey. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the knowledge of spine surgeons regarding the use of electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) for degenerative cervical spine conditions (DCC). METHODS: All members of AO Spine International were emailed an anonymous survey to evaluate their clinical knowledge about the use of EMG and nerve conduction studies for DCC. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results, as well as to compare the answers among different groups of surgeons and assess demographic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 402 participants answered the survey, 91.79% were men from the 5 continents. There were 221 orthopedic surgeons (55.39%) and 171 neurosurgeons (42.86%), more than a half of them with a complete spinal fellowship (56.44%). The most common reasons that surgeons obtain the test is to differentiate a radiculopathy from a peripheral nerve compression (88.06%). As a group, the responding surgeons' knowledge regarding EMG-NCS was poor. Only 53.46% of surgeons correctly answered that EMG-NCS is unable to differentiate a C5 from a C6 radiculopathy. Only 23.47% of the surgeons knew that EMG-NCS are not able to diagnose a pre vs a post-fixed brachial plexus. Only 25% of the surgeons correctly answered a question regarding the test's ability to diagnose other neurological diseases. CONCLUSIONS: We found that our respondents' knowledge regarding EMG-NCS for DCC was poor. Identifying the weak points of knowledge about EMG-NCS may help to educate surgeons on the indications for the test and the proper way to interpret the results.