Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Publication year range
1.
Dokl Biochem Biophys ; 518(1): 403-416, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39196526

ABSTRACT

. Previously, 24-week results of phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical study (SOLAR) of levilimab in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) proved a superiority of levilimab over placebo. Here, we present 1-year efficacy and safety data of the SOLAR study. OBJECTIVES: . To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levilimab in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in subjects with MTX resistant active RA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: : The study was conducted at 21 clinical sites in Russia and Belarus. All randomized subjects have completed the study between November 2019 and October 2021. Adult subjects (154) aged ≥18 years with confirmed diagnosis of RA1 were randomly assigned (2 : 1) to receive either levilimab (162 mg, SC, QW) + MTX (n = 102) or placebo + MTX (n = 52). After W24 of the study all subjects continued to  receive open label levilimab. Subjects who have achieved DAS28-CRP ≤ 2.6 at W24 were switched to maintenance (Q2W) regimen of levilimab at W28 (LVL QW/Q2W and PBO/LVL Q2W arms). Those with DAS28-CRP > 2.6 at W28 continued with QW regimen (LVL QW and PBO/LVL QW arm). The PBO/LVL Q2W arm contained only one subject, thus not included in the analysis. The efficacy analysis was performed in a population of all randomized subjects. Those with missing data due to study discontinuation or rescue therapy prescription were considered non-responders. Otherwise, the analysis was performed on complete cases. Safety was assessed through monitoring of adverse events (AEs) in a population of those, who received at least on dose of LVL (n = 152). RESULTS: : Better response to treatment was observed in LVL QW/Q2W as it composed of those who reach DAS28-CRP ≤ 2.6 at W24. At this time point 15/27 (55.6%) of them achieved ACR70; 23/27 (85.2%) achieved DAS28-CRP remission (<2.6) and 7/27 (25.9%) achieved ACR/EULAR2011 remission of RA. After switching to LVL Q2W, rates of ACR70 and DAS28-CRP<2.6 did not significantly changed until W52: 17/27 (63.0%) and 21/27 (77.8%), respectively, yet the proportion of subject with ACR/EULAR 2011 remission further increased and reached 12/27 (44.4%). LVL QW arm was diminished by subjects who achieved high response to treatment at W24 and composed LVL QW/Q2W arm. Thus, ACR70, and remissions rate in this arm was close to zero at W24. However, continuation of LVL QW in those who not achieved DAS28-CRP ≤ 2.6 at W24 induced ACR70 response in 37/75 (36.0%), DAS28-CRP remission in 35/75 (46.7%) and ACR/EULAR 2011 remission in 8/75 (10.7%) at W52. The most common adverse events (reported in ≥5% of subjects) were blood cholesterol increase (30.3%), ALT increase (23.0%), lymphocyte count decrease (17.1%), ANC decrease (16.4%), blood triglycerides increase (13.8%), bilirubin increase (11.2%), AST increase (9.9%), WBC decrease (9.9%), IGRA with Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen positive (7.2%), and injection site reactions (5.9%). No deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: : Open label period confirmed the lasting efficacy and safety of levilimab in combination with MTX in subjects with MTX resistant active RA and suggested the possibility of switching to levilimab maintenance regimen (once every 2 weeks) (Q2W) in those who achieved remission of RA at week 24.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Drug Therapy, Combination , Methotrexate , Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
2.
Kardiologiia ; 59(9): 97-100, 2019 Sep 17.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31540581

ABSTRACT

In the conclusion of the council of experts (list of participants see text) the following issues are discussed: regional specifics of diagnostics and therapy of patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and / or peripheral arterial disease (PAD), methods of risk assessment in patients with stable course of atherosclerotic disease, pathogenetic validity of simultaneous inhibition of coagulation and platelet thrombus formation, as well as clinical significance of a novel therapeutic approach - combined use of rivaroxaban and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Possible problems and ways to their solution at implementation in clinical practice of the novel scheme of antithrombotic therapy are presented. Importance of multidisciplinary approach to management of patients with IHD and concomitant diseases is stressed. Experts have noted that after registration of the corresponding indication therapy with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily and ASA 75-100 mg once daily might be recommended to majority of patients with atherosclerotic involvement of blood vessels. In real clinical practice prescription of this therapy is appropriate first of all in patients with IHD and high risk of complications - with multifocal atherosclerosis, with history of myocardial infarction after stoppage of dual antiplatelet therapy, - patients with concomitant diabetes, heart failure, and other prognosis worsening comorbid diseases. Experts express hope that in the nearest time combined antithrombotic therapy will be included into corresponding national clinical recommendations.


Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis , Aspirin , Atherosclerosis/therapy , Blood Coagulation , Humans , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Rivaroxaban
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL