Active infection at the time of CD34+ selected stem cell boost is associated with treatment failure and poor survival.

BACKGROUND: The use of CD34+ selected stem cell boost (SCB) post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) has been increasing. Predictors of treatment failure following SCB, both in the context of poor graft function (PGF) or other settings, are not well-characterized. We report among the largest single center retrospective experiences of the use of SCB and evaluate potential predictors of response and outcomes. METHODS: 58 patients who underwent HCT between 2015 and 2022 and who received SCB were identified. The indication for SCB was predominantly PGF, defined as the presence of 2 or more cytopenias for at least two consecutive weeks beyond day +14 after alloHCT in the presence of ≤ 30% bone marrow cellularity and ≥ 90% donor myeloid chimerism in the absence of morphological disease. RESULTS: The median dose of infused CD34+ selected SCB products was 3.88 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range: 0.99-9.92). The median 2-year OS and NRM following SCB was 47% and 38%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of 6-month grade III-IV acute and 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD following SCB were 3.4% and 12%, respectively. Overall response (CR + PR) was attained in 36/58 (62%) patients, and in 69% with PGF. On multivariable analysis, an active infection at the time of SCB was the greatest predictor of poor response and survival (p=0.013) following SCB. CONCLUSION: SCB can restore hematopoiesis in the majority of patients, particularly for those with poor graft function in whom there is no active infection at infusion.

Trends in volumes and survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation in racial/ethnic minorities.

ABSTRACT: There has been an increase in volume as well as an improvement in overall survival (OS) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for hematologic disorders. It is unknown if these changes have affected racial/ethnic minorities equally. In this observational study from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research of 79 904 autologous (auto) and 65 662 allogeneic (allo) HCTs, we examined the volume and rates of change of autoHCT and alloHCT over time and trends in OS in 4 racial/ethnic groups: non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs), non-Hispanic African Americans (NHAAs), and Hispanics across 5 2-year cohorts from 2009 to 2018. Rates of change were compared using Poisson model. Adjusted and unadjusted Cox proportional hazards models examined trends in mortality in the 4 racial/ethnic groups over 5 study time periods. The rates of increase in volume were significantly higher for Hispanics and NHAAs vs NHW for both autoHCT and alloHCT. Adjusted overall mortality after autoHCT was comparable across all racial/ethnic groups. NHAA adults (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.22; P = .004) and pediatric patients (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.3-2.03; P < .001) had a higher risk of mortality after alloHCT than NHWs. Improvement in OS over time was seen in all 4 groups after both autoHCT and alloHCT. Our study shows the rate of change for the use of autoHCT and alloHCT is higher in NHAAs and Hispanics than in NHWs. Survival after autoHCT and alloHCT improved over time; however, NHAAs have worse OS after alloHCT, which has persisted. Continued efforts are needed to mitigate disparities for patients requiring alloHCT.

Vaccination of Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline.

PURPOSE: To guide the vaccination of adults with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies. METHODS: A systematic literature review identified systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and nonrandomized studies on the efficacy and safety of vaccines used by adults with cancer or their household contacts. This review builds on a 2013 guideline by the Infectious Disease Society of America. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2013, to February 16, 2023. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 102 publications were included in the systematic review: 24 systematic reviews, 14 RCTs, and 64 nonrandomized studies. The largest body of evidence addressed COVID-19 vaccines. RECOMMENDATIONS: The goal of vaccination is to limit the severity of infection and prevent infection where feasible. Optimizing vaccination status should be considered a key element in the care of patients with cancer. This approach includes the documentation of vaccination status at the time of the first patient visit; timely provision of recommended vaccines; and appropriate revaccination after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or B-cell-depleting therapy. Active interaction and coordination among healthcare providers, including primary care practitioners, pharmacists, and nursing team members, are needed. Vaccination of household contacts will enhance protection for patients with cancer. Some vaccination and revaccination plans for patients with cancer may be affected by the underlying immune status and the anticancer therapy received. As a result, vaccine strategies may differ from the vaccine recommendations for the general healthy adult population vaccine.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

Use of subjective minimizing language at hematology and oncology conferences: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Subjective minimizing language in oncology conferences may undermine patient-centered care and hinder comprehensive treatment strategies. Subjective terms like "safe," "tolerable," and "well-tolerated" can vary in interpretation among individuals, making it difficult to compare results across trials and potentially downplaying significant risks and limitations associated with treatments. METHODS: This study evaluates subjective minimizing language in major oncology conferences and its use in adverse event reporting. We conducted a search of three electronic databases, ASCO, ASH, and ESMO, for published abstracts from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. This study included prospective cohort studies or clinical trials in humans that used safety terms like "safe," "well-tolerated," "tolerable," "no new safety signal," or "no new safety concern" in the abstract text. RESULTS: Out of 34,975 reviewed records, 5299 (15.2%) abstracts used subjective minimizing language terms. The analysis included 2797 (52.8%) abstracts meeting the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were Phase 1 trials (45.5%), followed by Phase 2 (29.6%) and Phase 3 trials (7.4%). Solid tumors accounted for the most common disease category (56.5%), followed by malignant hematology following (37.1%). Subjective minimizing terms like "safe" (69.2%), "well-tolerated" (53.2%), "tolerable" (25.6%), and "no new safety signal/concerns" (10%) were used frequently. Of the abstracts using subjective minimizing language (n = 2797), 81.9% reported data on any grade adverse events (AEs). Grade I/II AEs were reported in 62.6% of abstracts, Grade III/IV AEs in 78%, and Grade V AEs (death related to AEs) in 8.8%. Discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 11.4% (SD 9.5%) of studies using subjective minimizing language terms. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent use of subjective minimizing language in major oncology conferences' abstracts may obscure interpretation of study results and the safety of novel treatments. Researchers and clinicians should provide precise and standardized information to avoid overstatement of benefits and understand the true impact of interventions on patients' safety and well-being.

Digital Health to Patient-Facing Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Implications and Threats to Dignity for Patients With Cancer.

Ethical considerations for patient-facing AI for oncology: dignity, autonomy, safety, equity, inclusivity.

Multiple Myeloma in Young Patients: A Scoping Review.

Data on the disease course, presenting features, outcomes, and prognosis of younger patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are lacking. Younger patients with MM have historically been considered to have better outcomes primarily based on better tolerance of treatment and lack of medical comorbidities, but the specific age range of this population has not been uniformly defined. Given the lack of consistent data reporting in patients considered to be young MM patients, we performed a scoping review to highlight the research currently available to start drawing conclusions about these patients and highlight unmet areas of need to focus on further investigation. We searched Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and the OVID version of MEDLINE including broad terms that embody the concept of young patients with MM. Our final review included 201 studies which were then categorized according to age group, number of patients, outcomes, and comparators to older patients, along with location and database when available. We have chosen to categorize 3 age groupings: <50: young adults with MM (YA MM), 50 to 65: mid-life adults with multiple myeloma (ML MM) and 65+: older adults with multiple myeloma (OA MM). This review demonstrates the heterogeneity that exists in defining and describing young patients with MM, highlights the lack of studies specifically addressing the unique needs of younger patients, and emphasizes areas of future research unique to this population.

Second-Line Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

BACKGROUND: First-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) achieves durable remission in approximately 60% of patients. In relapsed or refractory disease, only about 20% achieve durable remission with salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The ZUMA-7 (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel]) and TRANSFORM (lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel]) trials demonstrated superior event-free survival (and, in ZUMA-7, overall survival) in primary-refractory or early-relapsed (high-risk) DLBCL with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) compared with salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative ASCT; however, list prices for CAR-T exceed $400 000 per infusion. OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of second-line CAR-T versus salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative ASCT. DESIGN: State-transition microsimulation model. DATA SOURCES: ZUMA-7, TRANSFORM, other trials, and observational data. TARGET POPULATION: "High-risk" patients with DLBCL. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Health care sector. INTERVENTION: Axi-cel or liso-cel versus ASCT. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net monetary benefit (iNMB) in 2022 U.S. dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $200 000 per QALY. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: The increase in median overall survival was 4 months for axi-cel and 1 month for liso-cel. For axi-cel, the ICER was $684 225 per QALY and the iNMB was -$107 642. For liso-cel, the ICER was $1 171 909 per QALY and the iNMB was -$102 477. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: To be cost-effective with a WTP of $200 000, the cost of CAR-T would have to be reduced to $321 123 for axi-cel and $313 730 for liso-cel. Implementation in high-risk patients would increase U.S. health care spending by approximately $6.8 billion over a 5-year period. LIMITATION: Differences in preinfusion bridging therapies precluded cross-trial comparisons. CONCLUSION: Neither second-line axi-cel nor liso-cel was cost-effective at a WTP of $200 000 per QALY. Clinical outcomes improved incrementally, but costs of CAR-T must be lowered substantially to enable cost-effectiveness. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: No research-specific funding.

Characteristics of post hoc subgroup analyses of oncology clinical trials: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Subgroup analyses in clinical trials assess intervention effects on specific patient subgroups, ensuring generalizability. However, they are usually only able to generate hypotheses rather than definitive conclusions. This study examined the prevalence and characteristics of post hoc subgroup analysis in oncology. METHODS: We systematically reviewed published subgroup analyses from 2000 to 2022. We included articles presenting secondary, post hoc, or subgroup analyses of interventional clinical trials in oncology, cancer survivorship, or cancer screening, published separately from the original clinical trial publication. We collected cancer type, year of publication, where and how subgroup analyses were reported, and funding. RESULTS: Out of 16 487 screened publications, 1612 studies were included, primarily subgroup analyses of treatment trials for solid tumors (82%). Medical writers contributed to 31% of articles, and 58% of articles reported conflicts of interest. Subgroup analyses increased significantly over time, with 695 published between 2019 and 2022, compared to 384 from 2000 to 2014. Gastrointestinal tumors (25%) and lymphoid lineage tumors (39%) were the most frequently studied solid and hematological malignancies, respectively. Industry funding and reporting of conflicts of interest increased over time. Subgroup analyses often neglected to indicate their secondary nature in the title. Most authors were from high-income countries, most commonly North America (45%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the rapidly growing use of post hoc subgroup analysis of oncology clinical trials, revealing that the majority are supported by pharmaceutical companies, and they frequently fail to indicate their secondary nature in the title. Given the known methodological limitations of subgroup analyses, caution is recommended among authors, readers, and reviewers when conducting and interpreting these studies.

Family Caregiver Experiences in the Inpatient and Outpatient Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Settings: A Qualitative Study.

Caregivers (ie, family and friends) are essential in providing care and support for patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and throughout their recovery. Traditionally delivered in the hospital, HCT is being increasingly provided in the outpatient setting, potentially heightening the burden on caregivers. Extensive work has examined the inpatient HCT caregiving experience, yet little is known about how caregiver experiences may differ based on whether the HCT was delivered on an inpatient or outpatient basis, particularly during the acute recovery period post-HCT. This study explored the similarities and differences in caregiver experiences in the inpatient and outpatient settings during the early recovery from reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic HCT. We conducted semistructured interviews (n = 15) with caregivers of adults undergoing RIC allogeneic HCT as either an inpatient (n = 7) or an outpatient (n = 8). We recruited caregivers using purposeful criterion sampling, based on the HCT setting, until thematic saturation occurred. Interview recordings were transcribed and coded through thematic analysis using Dedoose v.9.0. The study analysis was guided by the transactional model of stress and coping and the model of adaptation of family caregivers during the acute phase of BMT. Three themes emerged to describe similar experiences for HCT caregivers regardless of setting: (1) caregivers reported feeling like they were a necessary yet invisible part of the care team; (2) caregivers described learning to adapt to changing situations and varying patient needs; and (3) caregivers recounted how the uncertainty following HCT felt like existing between life and death while also maintaining a sense of gratitude and hope for the future. Caregivers also reported distinct experiences based on the transplantation setting and 4 themes emerged: (1) disrupted routines: inpatient caregivers reported disrupted routines when caring for the HCT recipient while simultaneously trying to manage non-caregiving responsibilities at home and work, and outpatient caregivers reported having to establish new routines that included frequent clinic visits with the patient while altering or pausing home and work responsibilities; (2) timing of caregiver involvement: inpatient caregivers felt more involved in care after the patient was discharged from the HCT hospitalization, whereas outpatient caregivers were already providing the majority of care earlier in the post-transplantation period; (3) fear of missing vital information: inpatient caregivers worried about missing vital information about the patient's care and progress if not physically present in the hospital, whereas outpatient caregivers feared overlooking vital information that may warrant contacting the care team as they monitored the patient at home; and (4) perceived adequacy of resources to meet psychosocial and practical needs: inpatient caregivers reported having adequate access to resources (ie, hospital-based services), whereas outpatient caregivers felt they had more limited access and needed to be resourceful in seeking out assistance. Inpatient and outpatient HCT caregivers described both similar and distinct experiences during the acute recovery period post-HCT. Specific interventions should address caregiver psychosocial needs (ie, distress, illness uncertainty, communication, and coping) and practical needs (ie, community resource referral, preparedness for home-based caregiving, and transplantation education) of HCT caregivers based on setting.

Assessing Medicaid Coverage for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: A Project from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and the National Marrow Donor Program ACCESS Initiative.

The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) and the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) formed the ACCESS Initiative to address and reduce barriers to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and cellular therapy (CT) to ensure equal access and outcomes for all patients in need. The 3 committees, addressing awareness, poverty, and racial and ethnic inequity, defined pilot projects focusing on addressing relevant barriers to HCT/CT. Because many socioeconomically disadvantaged HCT/CT recipients receive care through state Medicaid programs, the Poverty Committee conducted a Medicaid scan of all 50 US states with the following objectives: to define beneficiary coverage for allogeneic and autologous HCT and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy; to define support for travel, temporary lodging, and meals for both beneficiaries and caregivers; and to determine search and cell acquisition payment procedures. Here we summarize the results of the Medicaid scan and highlight significant variations and gaps in coverage for HCT/CT recipients. We also provide an initial roadmap for addressing gaps in Medicaid support for HCT and CAR-T therapy recipients.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Long-Term Outcomes in ≥1 Year Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors: A CIBMTR Analysis.

Racial/ethnic minorities have demonstrated worse survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) compared to whites. Whether the racial disparity in HCT outcomes persists in long-term survivors and possibly may be even exacerbated in this population, which frequently transitions back from the transplant center to their local healthcare providers, is unknown. In the current study, we compared long-term outcomes among 1-year allogeneic HCT survivors by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES). The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database was used to identify 5473 patients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes who underwent their first allogeneic HCT between 2007 and 2017 and were alive and in remission for at least 1 year after transplantation. The study was restricted to patients who underwent HCT in the United States. SES was defined using patient neighborhood poverty level estimated from the recipient's ZIP code of residence; a ZIP code with ≥20% of persons below the federal poverty level was considered a high poverty area. The primary outcome was to evaluate the associations of race/ethnicity and neighborhood poverty level with overall survival (OS), relapse, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Cox regression models were used to determine associations of ethnicity/race and SES with OS, relapse, and NRM. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated to compare mortality rates of the study patients and their general population peers matched on race/ethnicity, age, and sex. The study cohort was predominately non-Hispanic white (n = 4385) and also included non-Hispanic black (n = 338), Hispanic (n = 516), and Asian (n = 234) patients. Overall, 729 patients (13%) resided in high-poverty areas. Significantly larger proportions of non-Hispanic black (37%) and Hispanic (26%) patients lived in high-poverty areas compared to non-Hispanic whites (10%) and Asians (10%) (P < .01). Multivariable analysis revealed no significant associations between OS, PFS, relapse, or NRM and race/ethnicity or poverty level when adjusted for patient-, disease- and transplantation-related covariates. Our retrospective cohort registry study shows that among adult allogeneic HCT recipients who survived at least 1 year in remission, there were no associations between race/ethnicity, neighborhood poverty level, and long-term outcomes.

High Cost of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells: Challenges and Solutions.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells are a cellular immunotherapy with remarkable efficacy in treating multiple hematologic malignancies but they are associated with extremely high prices that are, for many countries, prohibitively expensive. As their use increases both for hematologic malignancies and other indications, and large numbers of new cellular therapies are developed, novel approaches will be needed both to reduce the cost of therapy, and to pay for them. We review the many factors that lead to the high cost of CAR T-cells and offer proposals for reform.

Long-term health outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Background: Fifty years of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has ushered in an exciting era of cellular therapy and has led to enormous progress in improving the outcomes of patients with both malignant and non-malignant hematologic disease. As the survival of transplanted patients has increased, so has the recognition of long-term complications related to this therapy. Purpose: The goal of this review is to highlight some of the most common long-term complications of HCT. Data sources: To this end, we have conducted a review of the published literature on the long-term complications of HCT encompassing the past 50 years. Study selection: We have endeavored to include long-term complications reported in research articles, case series and case reports, reviews, and abstracts. We have focused primarily on adult allogeneic HCT, but have included some data from studies of pediatric allogeneic HCT as well. We have also prioritized the literature published in the last 15 years. Data extraction: Key data supporting the onset and prevalence of the most common long-term complications was extracted. Limitations: While the list of long-term complications extracted and reported was comprehensive, it was not exhaustive. Conclusions: We have endeavored to highlight some of the most common long-term complications of HCT, the recognition and management of which constitutes an important part of HCT survivorship care.

Cytokine release syndrome in haploidentical stem cell transplant may impact T-cell recovery and relapse.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) following haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) resembles CRS after chimeric antigen receptor-T therapy. We conducted this single-center retrospective study to evaluate the association of posthaploidentical HCT CRS with clinical outcomes and immune reconstitution. One hundred sixty-nine patients who underwent haploidentical HCT between 2011 and 2020 were identified. Of these, 98 patients (58%) developed CRS after HCT. CRS was diagnosed based on the presence of fever within the first 5 days after HCT without evidence of infection or infusion reaction and was graded according to established criteria. The development of posthaploidentical HCT CRS was associated with a lower incidence of disease relapse (P = .024) but with an increased risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease GVHD (P = .01). The association of CRS with a lower incidence of relapse was not confounded by graft source or disease diagnosis. Neither CD34 nor total nucleated cell dose was associated with CRS independently of graft type. In patients developing CRS, CD4+ Treg (P < .0005), CD4+ Tcon (P < .005), and CD8+ T cells (P < .005) increased 1 month after HCT compared with those who did not develop CRS, but not at later time points. The increase in CD4+ regulatory T cells 1 month after HCT was most notable among patients with CRS who received a bone marrow graft (P < .005). The development of posthaploidentical HCT CRS is associated with a reduced incidence of disease relapse and a transient effect on post-HCT immune reconstitution of T cells and their subsets. Therefore, the validation of these observations in a multicenter cohort is required.

Clinical Features of Acute Kidney Injury in the Early Post-Transplantation Period Following Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative therapy for patients with hematologic malignancies but is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). To date, few studies have examined risk factors for AKI at engraftment, or the relationship between AKI and clinical outcomes. This study examined the incidence and risk factors for periengraftment AKI, as well as the association between AKI and overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic HCT at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2012 and 2019. Periengraftment (day 0 to day 30) AKI incidence and severity were defined using modified KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) criteria. Factors associated with periengraftment AKI risk were examined using Cox regression analysis. The impact of periengraftment AKI on OS and NRM (defined as death without recurrent disease after HCT), was evaluated using Cox regression and the Fine and Gray competing risks model, respectively. Kidney recovery, defined as a return of serum creatinine (SCr) to within 25% of baseline or liberation from kidney replacement therapy (KRT), was examined at day 90 post-HCT. Periengraftment AKI occurred in 330 of 987 patients (33.4%) at a median of 13 days (interquartile range, 4 to 30 days) post-transplantation. Factors associated with a higher multivariable-adjusted risk of AKI were supratherapeutic rapamycin (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20 to 2.03; P < .001), fludarabine/melphalan conditioning (HR, 1.35, 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.81; P = .05, compared to fludarabine/busulfan and fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation), HCT Comorbidity Index ≥4 (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.79; P = .002), albumin <3.4 g/dL (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.33 to 3.12; P = .001), hemoglobin ≤12 (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.38 to 2.78; P < .001), supratherapeutic tacrolimus (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.95; P = .02), and baseline SCr >1.1 mg/dL (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.48 to 2.35; P < .001). Periengraftment AKI was associated with worse OS (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.71; P < .001) and NRM (subdistribution HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.89; P < .001). Kidney recovery occurred in 18%, 15%, and 30% of patients with stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3 AKI without KRT, respectively, and 4 of 16 patients (25%) were liberated from KRT. Periengraftment AKI is common among RIC allogeneic HCT recipients. We identified several important risk factors for periengraftment AKI. Its association with worse OS and NRM underscores the importance of timely recognition and management.

Demographics, Motivations, and Experiences of Participants in Transplantation or Cellular Therapy Fellowships.

Recent American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy guidelines have sought to establish clinical and research expectations for participants in blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) and cellular therapy (CT) fellowships. However, little is known about participants in BMT/CT fellowships and the value they find from this additional training. We wanted to characterize the demographics, motivations, and experiences of recent participants in BMT/CT fellowships. We developed a 27-item online survey addressing backgrounds, application processes, training experiences, and perceived benefits among physicians who had started a clinical U.S.-based BMT/CT fellowship between 2012 to 2021. Anonymous responses were solicited through program director outreach, society website postings, targeted emails, and social media. Of 105 respondents (44% pediatric trainees), 4% were URMs and 39% were non-U.S. IMGs. The most important motivations for applying were comfort with allogeneic BMT, improved career prospects, and opportunities for research and publication. Almost all respondents (92%) attended donor selection meetings, whereas smaller proportions visited cell processing facilities (65%), HLA laboratories (57%), or good manufacturing practice facilities (22%). Most respondents reported ≥1 publication (26% reported 4+) based on research or experiences during their fellowship. Respondents reported improved post-fellowship comfort with all queried BMT/CT-related competencies. Seventy percent of respondents stated that they would recommend their fellowship highly to others; this corresponded to a Net Promoter Score of +65%, consistent with a strongly positive experience. Most respondents reported currently being in clinical practice (89% at academic centers), with a median of 70% of time currently spent caring for BMT/CT recipients. Although limited by recruitment methods and recall bias, our study demonstrated that BMT/CT fellowships are effective at increasing comfort with BMT/CT management and that most participants would highly recommend this BMT/CT training to others. Nevertheless, our study identified substantial heterogeneity in clinical responsibilities and BMT/CT-related laboratory exposure. The high representation of non-U.S. IMGs underscores the distinct role of BMT/CT fellowships for this group, whereas improved URM recruitment remains an important future direction for the field. Whether advanced fellowships will ever become required for the future BMT/CT workforce, analogous to the additional training required for solid organ transplantation in other medical and pediatric subspecialties, remains uncertain.

Analysis of repeated roles in editorial boards at oncology focused journals.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Our objective was to investigate current landscape of editorial board members at oncology journals with a focus on characteristics of editorial board members who serve on editorial boards at multiple journals concurrently. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study describing characteristics of editorial board members at oncology journals with an impact factor (IF) of ≥ 10 in the 2020 Journal Citation Reports. RESULTS: A total of 73 journals in the period of 2016-2020 were analyzed. A total of 5833 editorial roles were included in our final analysis of which 3979 (68%) roles were carried by men and 3572 (61%) were members located in the US. Repeated roles occurred in 1101 (19%; range: 2-6 roles) of total included editorial roles and were distributed in 488 distinct editorial members. Most editorial board members with repeated roles carried either 2 roles (80%) or 3 roles (17%); however, 18 (3%) editorial board members carried ≥ 4 roles at different journals. A total of 23% of editors-in-chief carried another editorial role at a different journal. Only 1% of all editorial roles were carried by individuals affiliated with universities located in low- or middle-income countries. CONCLUSION: One-fifth of the editorial board positions were held by members who served on more than one editorial board, including members serving as editors-in-chief. Editors with repeated roles may be at higher risk for influence from competing interests and diminished quality of work, may contribute to publication delays, and may limit editorial opportunities for other qualified scientists. POLICY STATEMENT: A considerable number of editorial team members had multiple roles across various cancer-focused journals, including members serving as editors in chief. Such repeated roles limit appropriate representation and hinders diversity in academia. Regulations to prevent repeated editorial roles are needed.