Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 63
Filter
1.
J Grad Med Educ ; 16(3): 304-307, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38882418

ABSTRACT

Background Inpatient internal medicine (IM) residents spend most of their time on indirect patient care activities such as clinical documentation. Objective We developed optimized electronic health record (EHR) templates for IM resident admission and progress notes, with the objective to reduce note-writing time, shorten note length, and decrease the percentage of progress note text that was copy-forwarded from prior notes. Methods In 2022, a multidisciplinary team created, over an 8-month period, optimized EHR templates for IM resident admission and progress notes. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess differences in resident time spent writing notes, note length in characters, and percentage of progress note text that was copy-forwarded. All 94 residents in the IM residency program had the opportunity to use the novel templates. Results Following implementation of the novel templates, residents spent on average 3.6 minutes less per progress note compared to pre-intervention (P=.008; 95% CI of the difference: 1.1-6.0 minutes). Notes in the post-intervention period were shorter for admission notes (mean reduction of 1041 characters; P<.001; 95% CI of the difference: 448-1634 characters) and progress notes (mean reduction of 764 characters; P<.001; 95% CI of the difference: 103-1426 characters). Progress notes also saw an average 22% decrease of copy-forwarded text (P<.001, 95% CI of the difference: 18.7%-25.4%). Conclusions The optimized note templates led to a reduction in resident progress note-writing time, shortened note length, and a lower percentage of copy-forwarded text.


Subject(s)
Documentation , Electronic Health Records , Internal Medicine , Internship and Residency , Internal Medicine/education , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Documentation/methods , Time Factors
7.
Am J Infect Control ; 2024 Mar 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537678

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Candida auris (C auris) is a fungal pathogen that has the potential for environmental persistence leading to outbreaks in health care settings. There has been a worldwide surge in C auris outbreaks during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this report, we describe an outbreak of C auris, its control, patient outcomes, and lessons learned. METHODS: The outbreak occurred in a 600-bed adult academic tertiary care hospital. Contact tracing was initiated immediately after identification of the index case and surveillance testing for C auris was obtained from patients who were exposed to the index case. Infection prevention measures were closely followed. RESULTS: A total of 560 cultures were performed on 453 unique patients between August 2021 and December 2021. Of those, 31 cultures (5.5%) were positive for C auris; 27 (87.1%) were colonized with C auris, while 4 patients developed a clinical infection (12.9%). The secondary attack rate was 6.8% (31/453). The 30-day all-cause mortality rate for all patients who tested positive for C auris was 9.7%. DISCUSSION: C auris can cause protracted outbreaks that result in colonization and invasive infections. Multidisciplinary work to improve adherence to infection prevention measures as well as targeted admission screening are essential to limit outbreaks.

14.
Am J Infect Control ; 52(2): 195-199, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37295676

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospital acquired infections (HAIs) are a major driver of morbidity and cost in health systems. Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) require intensive surveillance and review. All-cause hospital-onset bacteremia (HOB) may be a simpler reporting metric, correlates with CLABSI, and is viewed positively by HAI experts. Despite the ease in the collection, the proportion of HOBs that are actionable and preventable is unknown. Moreover, quality improvement strategies targeting it may be more challenging. In this study, we describe the bedside provider-perceived sources of HOB in order to provide insight into this new metric as a target for HAI prevention. METHODS: All cases of HOBs in 2019 from an academic tertiary care hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Information was collected to assess provider-perceived etiology and associated clinical factors (microbiology, severity, mortality, and management). HOB was categorized as preventable or not preventable based on the perceived source from the care team and management decisions. Preventable causes included device-associated bacteremias, pneumonias, surgical complications, and contaminated blood cultures. RESULTS: Of the 392 instances of HOB, 56.0% (n = 220) had episodes that were determined not preventable by providers. Excluding blood culture contaminates, the most common cause of preventable HOB was secondary to CLABSIs (9.9%, n = 39). Of the HOBs that were not preventable, the most common sources were gastrointestinal and abdominal (n = 62), neutropenic translocation (n = 37), and endocarditis (n = 23). Patients with HOB were generally medically complex with an average Charlson comorbidity index of 4.97. This translated into a higher average length of stay (29.23 vs 7.56, P < .001) and higher inpatient mortality (odds ratio 8.3, confidence interval [6.32-10.77]) when compared to admissions without HOB. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of HOBs were not preventable and the HOB metric may be a marker of a sicker patient population making it a less actionable target for quality improvement. Standardization across the patient mix is important if the metric becomes linked to reimbursement. If the HOB metric were to be used in lieu of CLABSI, large tertiary care health systems that house sicker patients may be unfairly financially penalized for caring for more medically complex patients.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Catheter-Related Infections , Cross Infection , Humans , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Harm Reduction , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/complications , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/etiology , Hospitals
17.
Radiol Artif Intell ; 5(6): e220259, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38074778

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a biopsy decision support algorithmic model, the intelligent-augmented breast cancer risk calculator (iBRISK), on a multicenter patient dataset. Materials and Methods: iBRISK was previously developed by applying deep learning to clinical risk factors and mammographic descriptors from 9700 patient records at the primary institution and validated using another 1078 patients. All patients were seen from March 2006 to December 2016. In this multicenter study, iBRISK was further assessed on an independent, retrospective dataset (January 2015-June 2019) from three major health care institutions in Texas, with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions. Data were dichotomized and trichotomized to measure precision in risk stratification and probability of malignancy (POM) estimation. iBRISK score was also evaluated as a continuous predictor of malignancy, and cost savings analysis was performed. Results: The iBRISK model's accuracy was 89.5%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.95), sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 81%. A total of 4209 women (median age, 56 years [IQR, 45-65 years]) were included in the multicenter dataset. Only two of 1228 patients (0.16%) in the "low" POM group had malignant lesions, while in the "high" POM group, the malignancy rate was 85.9%. iBRISK score as a continuous predictor of malignancy yielded an AUC of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.97, 0.98). Estimated potential cost savings were more than $420 million. Conclusion: iBRISK demonstrated high sensitivity in the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 lesions. iBRISK may safely obviate biopsies in up to 50% of patients in low or moderate POM groups and reduce biopsy-associated costs.Keywords: Mammography, Breast, Oncology, Biopsy/Needle Aspiration, Radiomics, Precision Mammography, AI-augmented Biopsy Decision Support Tool, Breast Cancer Risk Calculator, BI-RADS 4 Mammography Risk Stratification, Overbiopsy Reduction, Probability of Malignancy (POM) Assessment, Biopsy-based Positive Predictive Value (PPV3) Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.See also the commentary by McDonald and Conant in this issue.

18.
Skin Appendage Disord ; 9(5): 351-354, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37900778

ABSTRACT

Background: Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that causes non-scarring alopecia. A few studies have shown increased odds of AA in Black individuals compared to White individuals and increased odds of AA in Latinos compared to non-Latinos. Another study showed that Asians have lower odds of AA compared to Whites. Baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi), became the first Federal Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication for adult patients with severe AA in June 2022. Objectives: The aim of this review was to analyze published JAKi AA randomized controlled trials to characterize and assess the racial and ethnic representation of participants. Animal studies, studies unrelated to AA, and studies not investigating JAKis were excluded. Methods: PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for systematic reviews of clinical trials between 1990 and 2022. Results: Six clinical trials were included with a total of 1,690 subjects. Four trials were industry-sponsored, while two were university-sponsored. The three largest races represented included White (59.9%), Asian (28.0%), and African American/Black (8.1%). Three out of the 10 patients identified as Hispanic. None of the trials included sub-analyses of clinical efficacy based on race and/or ethnicity. Conclusions: Our results show that populations with lower odds of AA (Whites and Asians) are overrepresented in JAKi AA clinical trials compared to Black and Hispanic/Latino patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...