Loss-of-Function FLNC Variants Are Associated With Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Phenotypes When Identified Through Exome Sequencing of a General Clinical Population.

BACKGROUND: The FLNC gene has recently garnered attention as a likely cause of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, which is considered an actionable genetic condition. However, the association with disease in an unselected clinical population is unknown. We hypothesized that individuals with loss-of-function variants in FLNC (FLNCLOF) would have increased odds for arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy-associated phenotypes versus variant-negative controls in the Geisinger MyCode cohort. METHODS: We identified rare, putative FLNCLOF among 171 948 individuals with exome sequencing linked to health records. Associations with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy phenotypes from available diagnoses and cardiac evaluations were investigated. RESULTS: Sixty individuals (0.03%; median age 58 years [47-70 interquartile range], 43% male) harbored 27 unique FLNCLOF. These individuals had significantly increased odds ratios for dilated cardiomyopathy (odds ratio, 4.9 [95% CI, 2.6-7.6]; P<0.001), supraventricular tachycardia (odds ratio, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.1-5.6]; P=0.048), and left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (odds ratio, 4.2 [95% CI, 1.4-7.9]; P=0.03). Echocardiography revealed reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (52±13% versus 57±9%; P=0.001) associated with FLNCLOF. Overall, at least 9% of FLNCLOF patients demonstrated evidence of penetrant disease. CONCLUSIONS: FLNCLOF variants are associated with increased odds of ventricular arrhythmia and dysfunction in an unselected clinical population. These findings support genomic screening of FLNC for actionable secondary findings.

Clinical Findings and Diagnostic Yield of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Through Genomic Screening of Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Desmosome Gene Variants.

BACKGROUND: Genomic screening holds great promise for presymptomatic identification of hidden disease, and prevention of dramatic events, including sudden cardiac death associated with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM). Herein, we present findings from clinical follow-up of carriers of ACM-associated pathogenic/likely pathogenic desmosome variants ascertained through genomic screening. METHODS: Of 64 548 eligible participants in Geisinger MyCode Genomic Screening and Counseling program (2015-present), 92 individuals (0.14%) identified with pathogenic/likely pathogenic desmosome variants by clinical laboratory testing were referred for evaluation. We reviewed preresult medical history, patient-reported family history, and diagnostic testing results to assess both arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and left-dominant ACM. RESULTS: One carrier had a prior diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy with arrhythmia; no other related diagnoses or diagnostic family history criteria were reported. Fifty-nine carriers (64%) had diagnostic testing in follow-up. Excluding the variant, 21/59 carriers satisfied at least one arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy task force criterion, 11 (52%) of whom harbored DSP variants, but only 5 exhibited multiple criteria. Six (10%) carriers demonstrated evidence of left-dominant ACM, including high rates of atypical late gadolinium enhancement by magnetic resonance imaging and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Two individuals received new cardiomyopathy diagnoses and received defibrillators for primary prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic screening for pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in desmosome genes can uncover both left- and right-dominant ACM. Findings of overt cardiomyopathy were limited but were most common in DSP-variant carriers and notably absent in PKP2-variant carriers. Consideration of the pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant as a major criterion for diagnosis is inappropriate in the setting of genomic screening.

Prevalence and Electronic Health Record-Based Phenotype of Loss-of-Function Genetic Variants in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy-Associated Genes.

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is associated with variants in desmosome genes. Secondary findings of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, primarily loss-of-function (LOF) variants, are recommended for clinical reporting; however, their prevalence and associated phenotype in a general clinical population are not fully characterized. METHODS: From whole-exome sequencing of 61 019 individuals in the DiscovEHR cohort, we screened for putative loss-of-function variants in PKP2, DSC2, DSG2, and DSP. We evaluated measures from prior clinical ECG and echocardiograms, manually over-read to evaluate ARVC diagnostic criteria, and performed a PheWAS (phenome-wide association study). Finally, we estimated expected penetrance using Bayesian inference. RESULTS: One hundred forty individuals (0.23%; 59±18 years old at last encounter; 33% male) had an ARVC variant (G+). None had an existing diagnosis of ARVC in the electronic health record, nor significant differences in prior ECG or echocardiogram findings compared with matched controls without variants. Several G+ individuals satisfied major repolarization (n=4) and ventricular function (n=5) criteria, but this prevalence matched controls. PheWAS showed no significant associations of other heart disease diagnoses. Combining our best genetic and disease prevalence estimates yields an estimated penetrance of 6.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ARVC loss-of-function variants is ≈1:435 in a general clinical population of predominantly European descent, but with limited electronic health record-based evidence of phenotypic association in our population, consistent with a low penetrance estimate. Prospective deep phenotyping and longitudinal follow-up of a large sequenced cohort is needed to determine the true clinical relevance of an incidentally identified ARVC loss-of-function variant.