ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Bronchiolitis is the most common respiratory infection and reason for hospitalisation in infancy; however, outcomes of infants with bronchiolitis who require interhospital transfer by specialist medical retrieval services are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to summarise current evidence of the rate, therapy, and outcomes of infants with bronchiolitis who required medical retrieval for ongoing management. REVIEW METHOD: A scoping literature review informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was used including published studies in any language covering the period 1996 to December 2022 and grey literature sources comprised of reports from retrieval services in high-income countries with comparable healthcare systems. DATA SOURCES: Medline, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews electronic databases were the sources for published studies. Grey literature sources were retrieval service web pages/social media sites from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. RESULTS: Searching identified 12 677 records, with 12 069 ineligible records and 286 duplicates excluded at screening. Of the 72 papers included for title and abstract review, 16 were selected for full-text review. Six papers fulfilled inclusion criteria. Infants with bronchiolitis were the primary focus of three studies. Transfer rate was reported in four studies, ranging from 4.3% to 18.5%. Use of respiratory therapy was variably reported and was associated with prematurity. Outcomes following retrieval such as respiratory therapies, days on therapies, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and hospital length of stay were only reported in two studies. Of 103 identified medical retrieval services and data registries, no reports were found that included information on the number of transfers or outcomes for infants with bronchiolitis. CONCLUSIONS: Up to one in five infants with bronchiolitis require medical retrieval. Only two published studies and no reports reported on the number and outcomes of infants. Given the frequency and severity of bronchiolitis, understanding indications for medical retrieval and outcomes of those infants may help to better target care and interventions for this common illness. Benefits could include diminishing the costly burden to families and the healthcare system of avoidable medical retrieval and interhospital transfer.
Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Humans , Developed Countries , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Bronchiolitis/therapy , Hospitalization , Infant, PrematureABSTRACT
AIM: This paper compares two qualitative approaches used to thematically analyse data obtained from focus groups conducted with critical care nurses from Australia. BACKGROUND: Focus groups are an effective mechanism to generate understanding and gain insight into the research participants' world. Traditional verbatim transcription of participants' recorded words necessitates significant investment of time and resources. An alternative approach under reported in the literature is to directly analyse the audio recordings. To identify the effectiveness of the audio recording only approach, the study aimed to independently compare two qualitative methods of data analysis, namely the traditional transcribed method with the audio recording method. METHODS: The study to revise the specialist critical care competency standards included focus groups conducted in each state in Australia (n=12) facilitated by experienced researchers. Two of the research team analysed transcribed focus group data and two team members were blinded to the transcription process and directly analysed audio recordings from the focus groups. A process of thematic analysis used independently by the two teams was used to identify themes. RESULTS: When the findings were compared, the themes generated using each technique were consistent and there were no different themes or subthemes identified. The two techniques appeared to be comparable. Overarching key themes were consistent with the approach. CONCLUSION: The direct analysis method appears to have advantages. It is cost effective, trustworthy and possibly a superior alternative when used with focus group data. However, the audio only method requires experienced researchers who understand the context and if combining the two approaches takes time to do.
Subject(s)
Focus Groups/methods , Nursing Research/methods , Statistics as Topic/methods , Video Recording , Adult , Australia , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Observational work to develop the ACCCN Competency Standards was undertaken more than 20 years ago. Since then the landscape of critical care nursing as a specialty has changed and it is not known if the Competency Standards reflected contemporary practice. OBJECTIVES: To revise the ACCCN Competency Standards for Specialist Critical Care Nurses to ensure they continue to meet the needs of critical care nurses and reflect current practice. METHODS: A two-phased project was undertaken. In Phase I focus groups were held in all states. Thematic analysis was conducted using two techniques. The standards were revised based on the main themes. Phase II consisted of an eDelphi technique. A national panel of critical care nurses responded to three survey rounds using a 7 point likert-type scale to indicate their level of agreement with the revised standards. A 70% agreement level for each statement was determined a priori. RESULTS: Phase I: 12 focus groups (79 participants) were conducted. Phase II: A panel of specialist critical care nurses (research, management, clinical practice and education) responded to round 1 (n=64), round 2 (n=56), and round 3 (n=40). Fifteen practice standards with elements and performance criteria were grouped into four domains (professional practice, provision and coordination of care, critical thinking and analysis, collaboration and leadership). The revised Practice Standards for Specialist Critical Care Nurses build upon and are additional to the Nursing & Midwifery Board of Australia National Competency Standards for Registered Nurses. The standards reflect contemporary critical care nurse practices using an expanded range of technologies to care for complex critically ill patients across the lifespan in diverse settings. CONCLUSION: The national study has resulted in the 3rd edition of the Practice Standards for Specialist Critical Care Nurses. There was input from stakeholders and agreement that the revised standards capture contemporary Australian critical care nursing practice.
Subject(s)
Critical Care Nursing/standards , Australia , Clinical Competence , Delphi Technique , Focus Groups , Humans , Societies, NursingABSTRACT
OBJECT: Time-critical neurosurgical conditions require urgent operative treatment to prevent death or neurological deficits. In New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory patients' distance from neurosurgical care is often great, presenting a challenge in achieving timely care for patients with acute neurosurgical conditions. METHODS: A protocol was developed to facilitate consultant neurosurgery locally. Children with acute, time-critical neurosurgical emergencies underwent operations in hospitals that do not normally offer neurosurgery. The authors describe the developed protocol, the outcome of its use, and the lessons learned in the 9 initial cases where the protocol has been used. Three cases are discussed in detail. RESULTS: Nine children were treated by a neurosurgeon at 5 rural hospitals, and 2 children were treated at a smaller metropolitan hospital. Road ambulance, fixed wing aircraft, and medical helicopters were used to transport the Newborn and Paediatric Emergency Transport Service (NETS) team, neurosurgeon, and patients. In each case, the time to definitive neurosurgical intervention was significantly reduced. The median interval from triage at the initial hospital to surgical start time was 3:55 hours, (interquartile range [IQR] 03:29-05:20 hours). The median distance traveled to reach a patient was 232 km (range 23-637 km). The median interval from the initial NETS call requesting patient retrieval to surgical start time was 3:15 hours (IQR 00:47-03:37 hours). The estimated median "time saved" was approximately 3:00 hours (IQR 1:44-3:15 hours) compared with the travel time to retrieve the child to the tertiary center: 8:31 hours (IQR 6:56-10:08 hours). CONCLUSIONS: Remote urgent neurosurgical interventions can be performed safely and effectively. This practice is relevant to countries where distance limits urgent access for patients to tertiary pediatric care. This practice is lifesaving for some children with head injuries and other acute neurosurgical conditions.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Hemorrhage/surgery , Emergencies , Neurosurgery , Neurosurgical Procedures , Patient Transfer , Accidents, Home , Adolescent , Cerebral Hemorrhage/complications , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Protocols , Craniocerebral Trauma/complications , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Headache/etiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Neurosurgery/methods , Neurosurgery/standards , Neurosurgery/trends , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Neurosurgical Procedures/standards , New South Wales , Seizures/etiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: There is a shortage of intensive care (IC) nurses. A supported transition to IC nursing has been identified as a key strategy for recruitment and retention. In 2004 a discussion document relating to transition of IC nurses was presented to the New South Wales (NSW) Chief Nursing Officer (CNO). A workshop was held with key stakeholders and a Steering Group was established to develop a state-wide transition to IC nursing program. AIMS: To survey orientation programs and educational resources and develop definitions, goals, learning objectives and clinical competencies relating to transition to IC nursing practice. METHODS: A questionnaire and a draft document of definitions, target group, goals, learning objectives and clinical competencies for IC transition was distributed to 43 NSW IC units (ICUs). An iterative process of anonymous feedback and modification was undertaken to establish agreement on content. RESULTS: Responses were received from 29 units (return rate of 67%). The survey of educational resources indicated ICUs had access to educational support and there was evidence of a lack of a common standard or definition for "orientation" or "transition". The definitions, target group, goals and competency statements from the draft document were accepted with minor editorial change. Seventeen learning objectives or psychomotor skills were modified and an additional 19 were added to the draft as a result of the process. CONCLUSION: This work has established valid definitions, goals, learning objectives and clinical competencies that describe transition to intensive care nursing.
Subject(s)
Critical Care , Education, Professional, Retraining/organization & administration , Inservice Training/organization & administration , Needs Assessment , Specialties, Nursing/education , Health Care Surveys , Humans , New South Wales , Program Development , WorkforceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the construct validity of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN) competency standards as a tool for assessing the clinical practice of specialist level critical care nurses in Australia. DESIGN: A comparative descriptive design was used to examine the relationship between the domains, competencies and elements of the ACCCN competency standards. Participants were sent a questionnaire and asked to describe on a 7-point Likert scale how closely each competency statement and related elements reflected their level of critical care nursing practice. SUBJECTS: A systematic sampling method was used to randomly select 1000 critical care nurses from a prelisting of members of ACCCN. A total of 532 completed questionnaires were returned. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The purpose of this study was to determine the construct validity of the ACCCN competency standards by examining two structural models. The first examined how well the descriptive elements fit with their respective competency standard. The second model examined how well the competency standards group together under specific domains. RESULTS: Statistically there was no support for the current structure for the ACCCN competencies because the elements did not fit uniquely to a single competency, but were multidimensional and loaded across several competencies. Competency statements also loaded across several domains. Modification of the current model resulted in the identification of a four-factor competency model, which demonstrated reasonable model fit. CONCLUSION: Several issues are highlighted, resulting in concerns regarding the validity of the ACCCN Competency Elements and Standards as a tool with which to assess the practice of critical care nurses.