Appendicitis after colonoscopy-a case report, literature review, and synopsis of the pitfalls in diagnosis.

A case is described in which appendicitis presented in a 73-year-old woman the day after a colonoscopy. Possible mechanisms for appendicitis aggravated by colonoscopy include barotrauma, irritation by residual glutaraldehyde type solution used for cleaning the endoscope, fecalith, and/or appendicolith being pushed into the orifice of the appendix by insufflation during the colonoscopy. This rare complication is likely most often unavoidable due to the pressure required to properly visualize the colon (which typically ranges from 9 to 57 mmHg) and the manipulation required to visualize and cannulate the ileocecal valve. Physicians should consider possibility of acute appendicitis after colonoscopy when evaluating abdominal pain after a recent colonoscopy.

The association of bariatric surgery with myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization: a propensity score match analysis of National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) not only leads to a durable weight loss but also lowers mortality, and reduces cardiovascular risks. OBJECTIVES: The current study aims to investigate the association of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) with admissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), as well as, coronary revascularization procedures, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and thrombolysis. SETTING: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. METHODS: The NIS data from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed. A propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was performed to match patients with history of MBS with non-MBS group. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-three thousand seven hundred twenty-nine patients from the non-MBS group were matched with 233,729 patients with history of MBS. The MBS group had about 52% reduced odds of admission for AMI compared to the non-MBS group (adjusted odd ratio: .477, 95% confidence interval: .454-.502, P value <.001). In addition, the odds of STEMI and NSEMI were significantly lower in the MBS group in comparison to the non-MBS group. Also, the MBS group had significantly lower odds of CABG, PCI, and thrombolysis compared to the non-MBS group. In addition, in patients with AMI, MBS was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted odd ratio: .627, 95% confidence interval: .469-.839, P value = .004), length of hospital stays, and total charges. CONCLUSIONS: History of MBS is significantly associated with reduced risk of admission for AMI including STEMI and NSTEMI, as well as the, need for coronary revascularization such as PCI and CABG.

The Impact of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery on Cardiovascular Diseases in Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.

PURPOSE: There is a strong association between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and obesity which are both important risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). The current study aimed to assess the association of MBS with different CVDs in patients with MASLD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed by using ICD-10 codes. A propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was done to match the MBS and non-MBS groups. RESULTS: After weighted analysis, 1,124,155 and 68,215 patients were included in non-MBS and MBS groups, respectively. MBS was associated with significantly lower risk of hospitalization for coronary artery disease (OR 0.633 (0.569-0.703), p value < 0.001), acute myocardial infarction (OR 0.606 (0.523-0.701), p value < 0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 0.578 (0.489-0.682), p value < 0.001), and thrombolysis (OR 0.765 (0.589-0.993), p value = 0.044) compared to the non-MBS group in patients with MASLD. Furthermore, MBS was associated with 52% reduced risk of hospitalization for hemorrhagic stroke in patients with MASLD (OR 0.481, 95% CI 0.337-0.686, p value < 0.001). However, ischemic stroke was not significant between the two groups (OR 1.108 (0.905-1.356), p value = 0.322). In addition, MBS was associated with 63% and 60% reduced risk of hospitalization for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with MASLD (OR 0.373, 95% CI 0.300-0.465 and OR 0.405, 95% CI 0.325-0.504, p value < 0.001 for both), respectively. CONCLUSION: The current study showed that MBS is significantly associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization for CVD in patients with MASLD.

Successful treatment of binge eating disorder with the GLP-1 agonist semaglutide: A retrospective cohort study.

Objective: Binge eating disorder (BED) is the most common eating disorder, and yet only one pharmacotherapy (lisdexamfetamine), which has known abuse-potential, is FDA-approved. Topiramate is also commonly prescribed off-label for binge eating but has many contraindications. In contrast, the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) analog semaglutide has profound effects on central satiety signaling leading to reduced food intake, and has been approved for the treatment of obesity based on its efficacy and safety profile. Semaglutide would thus seem to be a potential candidate for the treatment of BED. Methods: This open-label study examined the effects of semaglutide on Binge Eating Scale (BES) scores in individuals with BED. Patients were divided into three groups: those prescribed semaglutide, those prescribed either lisdexamphetamine or topiramate, and those prescribed a combination of semaglutide with lisdexamphetamine or topiramate. Results: Patients receiving semaglutide only exhibited greater reductions in BES scores compared to the other groups. Combined pharmacotherapy with both semaglutide and the other anti-obesity medications did not result in greater reductions in BES scores compared to the semaglutide-only group. Findings were similar in patients with moderate/severe BED, as well as the full sample. Conclusion: The therapeutic effects of semaglutide in binge eating disorder warrant further investigation.

The Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Patients with Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The current study aims to evaluate the effect of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with diagnosed heart failure (HF). Fourteen related articles with 217 patients were included in the final analysis. LVEF significantly improved after BMS in patients with HF with a mean difference of 7.78% (CI 95%: 3.72, 11.84, I2 = 83.75, p-value < 0.001). Also, the NYHA class significantly decreased after BMS with a mean difference of - 0.40 (CI 95%: - 0.62, - 0.19, I2: 47.03, p-value < 0.001). A total of 27 patients with obesity and HF were listed for cardiac transplantation after BMS. Of those, 20 patients successfully underwent heart transplantation after BMS.

Bariatric Surgery and Risk of Hospitalization for Gastrointestinal Cancers in the USA: a Propensity Score Matched Analysis of National Inpatient Sample Study.

BACKGROUND: There are some concerns about the higher risk of certain gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in patients with a history of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS). The current study aimed to investigate the association of BMS with GI cancer hospital admission including esophageal, gastric, colorectal, small intestinal, liver, gallbladder, bile duct, and pancreatic cancers. METHODS: The analysis utilized the US national inpatient sample (NIS) data from 2016 to 2020, employing ICD-10 codes. A propensity score matching in a 3:1 ratio was done to match the BMS and non-BMS groups. RESULTS: A total of 328,369 patients with a history of BMS and 4,989,154 with obesity and without a history of BMS were included in this study. BMS was independently associated with a higher risk of gastric and pancreatic cancers hospital admission (OR: 1.69 (CI 95%: 1.42-2.01) and OR: 1.46 (CI 95%: 1.27-1.68)), respectively. In addition, BMS was independently associated with a lower risk of colorectal and liver cancer hospital admission (OR: 0.57 (CI 95%: 0.52-0.62) and OR: 0.72 (CI 95%: 0.52-0.98)), respectively. Besides, esophageal, gallbladder, bile duct, and small intestinal cancer were not significantly different between the two groups. In patients with GI cancer, although the BMS group had significantly lower total charges and length of hospital stay compared to the non-BMS group, the rate of in-hospital mortality was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The current study showed that bariatric surgery may be associated with a higher risk of gastric and pancreatic cancer and a lower risk of colorectal and liver cancer hospital admission. Further research is needed to explore this association.

The Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-ileostomy with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S) in Mid- and Long-Term Follow-Up: a Systematic Review.

This systematic review of 10 studies aimed to investigate the mid- and long-term results of duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) according to the PRISMA guideline. Related articles, which reported outcomes of laparoscopic SADI-S with follow-up ≥ 3 years, were selected and analyzed. The percentage of excess weight loss (EWL) was 70.9-88.7%, and 80.4% at 6, and 10 years, respectively. The more common late complications were malabsorption (6.3%) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (3.6%). The remission rates of hypertension, diabetes, GERD, obstructive sleep apnea, and dyslipidemia were 62.9%, 81.3%, 53.2%, 60.9%, and 69.7%, respectively. In conclusion, SADI-S is a safe and effective surgical technique with durable weight loss and a high rate of comorbidity resolution in mid and long term.

Does One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Expose Patients to Gastroesophageal Reflux: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the incidence of new-onset gastroesophageal reflux, reflux change, esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and revision due to reflux, gastritis, and marginal ulcer after one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). We performed subgroup analyses based on primary and revisional OAGB and time of follow-up. Meta-analysis of 87 studies with 27,775 patients showed a 6% rate of new-onset reflux after OAGB. Preoperative reflux status did not change significantly after OAGB. The rate of esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus was 15% and 1%, respectively. The new-onset reflux rate after OAGB was significantly higher than gastric bypass but not different with sleeve gastrectomy. The current study showed a relatively low rate of reflux and its complications after OAGB, but it was significantly higher than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Use of GLP-1 agonists in high risk patients prior to bariatric surgery: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Body mass index (BMI) > 50 kg/m2 is associated with relatively increased morbidity and mortality with bariatric surgery (BS). There is reluctance to consider these patients operative candidates without preoperative weight loss. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have demonstrated effective weight loss in the post-BS setting. This study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of GLP-1 agonists in the pre-habilitation of patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of bariatric surgery patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2 from a single bariatric center. Patients were compared by preoperative GLP-1 therapy status. All patients received medical, surgical, psychiatric, and nutritional evaluation and counseling. Preoperative BMI, change in weight from program intake until surgery, time to surgery, and perioperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: 31 patients were included in the analysis. 18 (58%) received a GLP-1 agonist preoperatively. GLP-1 agonist use was associated with a 5.5 ± 3.2-point reduction in BMI compared to 2.9 ± 2.4 amongst controls (p = 0.026). There was no difference in the mean length of time in the bariatric program prior to surgery between groups (p = 0.332). There were no reported complications related to GLP-1 use in the preoperative setting and no difference in perioperative complications between groups (p = 0.245). DISCUSSION: GLP-1 agonist use in patients with a BMI > 50 kg/m2 results in significantly more weight loss prior to bariatric surgery, without increased time to surgery or complication rate. Further study is required to evaluate the long-term impact of preoperative GLP-1 agonist use prior to bariatric surgery. This therapy may improve perioperative and long-term outcomes in the very high-risk BMI population.

National usage of bariatric surgery for class I obesity: an analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program.

BACKGROUND: National and international consensus statements, as well as the National Institutes of Health (NIH), support the use of bariatric surgery for the treatment of class I obesity. Despite this, most payors within the United States limit reimbursement to the outdated 1991 NIH guidelines or a similar adaptation. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the safety of bariatric surgery in patients with lower BMI compared with standard patients, as well as determine U.S. utilization of bariatric surgery in class I obesity in 2015-2019. SETTING: A retrospective analysis was performed of the 2015-2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database. METHODS: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients were divided into body mass index cohorts: class I obesity (<35 kg/m2) and severe obesity (≥35 kg/m2). Differences in preoperative patient selection and postoperative outcomes were established, and frequency trends were delineated. RESULTS: Analysis included 760,192 surgeries with 8129 (1%) for patients with class I obesity. The patients with class I obesity were older, more commonly female, and with lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, but with higher rates of type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (P < .05). Variation was found for operative time, length of stay, 30-day readmission, and composite morbidity. Minimal annual variation was found for bariatric surgeries performed for patients with class I obesity. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term safety of bariatric surgery in patients with class I obesity was corroborated by this study. Despite consensus statements and robust support, rates of bariatric surgery in patients with class I obesity have failed to increase and remain limited to 1%. This demonstrates the impact of the outdated 1991 NIH guidelines regarding access to care for these potentially life-saving surgeries.

Impact of bariatric surgery on carotid intima-media thickness, flow-mediated dilation, and nitrite-mediated dilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Obesity is considered one of the independent risk factors for atherosclerosis and is strongly correlated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Previous studies showed carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and nitrite-mediated dilatation (NMD) are reliable non-invasive markers of arterial damage and dysfunction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery on CIMT, FMD, and NMD markers in patients with obesity. A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until May 2022. All the English-published studies on the effect of bariatric surgery on CIMT, FMD, and NMD were included. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed, as well as subgroup analyses for the type of procedure and duration of follow-up. Meta-analysis of 41 studies with 1639 patients showed CIMT was significantly reduced by .11 mm after bariatric surgery (95% CI, -.14 to -.08; P < .001; mean follow-up = 10.8 mo). The pooled analysis of 23 studies with 1106 patients showed an increase of FMD by 4.57% after bariatric surgery (95% CI, 2.69-6.44; P < .001; mean follow-up = 11.5 mo). The results of a pooled analysis of 12 studies with 346 patients showed a significant increase of NMD by 2.46% after bariatric surgery (95% CI, .99-3.94; P < .001; mean follow-up = 11.4 mo). The random effect meta-regression demonstrated that baseline CIMT and FMD significantly affect the changes in CIMT and FMD. This meta-analysis showed bariatric surgery can improve CIMT, FMD, and NMD markers in patients with obesity. These improvements show the known effect of metabolic surgery in decreasing cardiovascular risk.

American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery literature review on the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass limb lengths on outcomes.

This literature review is issued by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery regarding limb lengths in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and their effect on metabolic and bariatric outcomes. Limbs in RYGB consist of the alimentary and biliopancreatic limbs and the common channel. Variation of limb lengths in primary RYGB and as a revisional option for weight recurrence after RYGB are described in this review.

Medical student preparation for the operating room.

BACKGROUND: This study examines student perceptions of preparedness for the operating room (OR), resources used, and time spent in preparation. METHODS: Third-year medical and second-year physician assistant students across two campuses at a single academic institution were surveyed to assess perceptions of preparedness, time spent in preparation, resources used, and perceived benefits of preparation. RESULTS: 95 responses (response rate 49%) were received. Students reported being most prepared to discuss operative indications and contraindications (73%), anatomy (86%), and complications (70%), but few felt prepared to discuss operative steps (31%). Students spent a mean of 28 min preparing per case, citing UpToDate and online videos as the most used resources (74%; 73%). On secondary analysis, only the use of an anatomic atlas was weakly correlated with improved preparedness to discuss relevant anatomy (p = 0.005); time spent, number of resources or other specific resources were not associated with increased preparedness. CONCLUSION: Students felt prepared for the OR, though there is room for improvement and a need for student-oriented preparatory materials. Understanding the deficits in preparation, preference for technology-based resources, and time constraints of current students can be used to inform optimisation for medical student education and resources to prepare for operating room cases.

The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Cardiac Structure, and Systolic and Diastolic Function in Patients with Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study was to provide pooled data from all studies on the impact of bariatric surgery on cardiac structure, and systolic and diastolic function evaluated by either echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched. Almost all of cardiac left-side structural indices improved significantly after bariatric surgery. However, right-side structural indices did not change significantly. Left ventricular ejection fraction and most of the diastolic function indices improved significantly after the bariatric surgery. The subgroup analysis showed that the left ventricular mass index decreased more in long-term follow-up (≥ 12 months). In addition, subgroup analysis of studies based on surgery type did not reveal any difference in outcomes between gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy groups.

Medicaid Expansion: the impact of health policy on bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Underutilization of bariatric surgery in uninsured and marginalized communities is well-documented. When discussing population health, healthcare access and equity are crucial components often influenced by health policy. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine if disparities in the use of bariatric surgery were influenced by changes in healthcare policy from the Affordable Care Act's 2014 expansion of Medicaid. SETTING: A retrospective analysis of the 2012-2018 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample was performed for elective Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy surgeries performed within the United States. METHODS: States were grouped into regions as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. Medicaid as the primary payor for bariatric surgery was compared by region and year, as well as utilization by marginalized populations. RESULTS: Analysis included 212,776 bariatric surgeries. Medicaid as the primary payor increased from 9% to 19% from 2012 to 2018. A greater share of bariatric surgeries with Medicaid as the primary payor was located in the Northeast and West, as compared with those located in the Midwest and South. Medicaid beneficiaries in marginalized communities (Black race, Hispanic race, lowest income quartile, rural communities) made up a larger share of the bariatric surgery population over time. CONCLUSIONS: The Affordable Care Act's Medicaid Expansion improved health coverage and access to care, including bariatric surgery. An increase in bariatric surgeries among Medicaid beneficiaries correlated with the 2014 expansion of Medicaid. Social and economic disparities regarding bariatric surgery have improved though more progress may be seen with the adoption of Medicaid Expansion by the remaining U.S. states.

Effect of obesity on outcomes after breast reconstruction surgery, an analysis of national surgical quality improvement program.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for breast cancer and may affect the incidence, and outcomes of surgical treatment for breast cancer, including breast reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of breast reconstruction in patients with obesity. METHODS: In a retrospective review of the NSQIP 2013-2018, adult patients who underwent breast reconstruction were included. Procedures were categorized to with or without an implant. Obesity was considered as body mass index(BMI)≥30 kg/m2. We made composite variables for 30-day any complication, wound complications, and major complications. Regression analysis was used to identify the independent effect of obesity on outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 46,042 patients were included(mean age 51.4 ± 11.1 years, 99.8% female). There were 3134(6.8%) patients with any complication, 2429(5.3%) with major, and 2772(6%) with wound complications, 2795 patients(6.1%) with unplanned re-operation, and 3 deaths. Obesity was an independent predictor of any complication, major complications, and wound complications(OR:1.83-1.87), and unplanned re-operation(OR:1.52). Wound complication was lower in the implant group(3.7% vs 10.9%) but obesity had a higher odds of wound complications in the implant group(2 vs 1.4). There was an increase in the odds of complications as BMI rises. CONCLUSION: Patients with a BMI>30 kg/m2 have a significantly higher risk of developing surgical complications following breast reconstruction with both implant and tissue reconstruction. Weight loss strategies should be considered in patients who need breast reconstruction surgeries and this may decrease the risk of postoperative wound complication and the need for reoperation.

Venous thromboembolism as the first sign of malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is commonly associated with hypercoagulability in patients with cancer; however, there have been few investigations of VTE as the first sign of malignancy and even fewer performed in the United States. The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence and predictors of unrecognized malignancy in patients presenting with VTE. METHODS: We performed a 1-year retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Readmission Database, including patients aged 18 years or older, presenting with a primary diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or a pulmonary embolism (PE). Patients known to have preexisting malignant diseases were excluded. Outcomes included the rate of newly diagnosed malignancy within 6 months from the discovery of VTE and demographic or associated illness predictors for the diagnosis of malignancy. A regression analysis was performed, based on which a VTE malignancy score was developed. RESULTS: A total of 116,048 patients were identified with VTE (49.8% DVT, 41.7% PE, 8.6% DVT and PE), 16% (n = 18,294) with malignancy. Of the remaining 97,754 patients, 31% were readmitted within 6 months. The incidence of newly diagnosed malignancy within 6 months was 2.4% (n = 2354). The most common malignancies were gastrointestinal in origin (29.2%). Demographic and diagnostic predictors for malignancy included age 65 years or older, female sex, inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus, upper extremity thrombus, and a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 5 or more. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis found a cutoff VTE Malignancy score of 3 (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 89%) to be predictive of an increased risk of a newly discovered malignancy within 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: VTE can be a risk indicator of underlying malignancy. Validation of a patient risk stratification score using multiple demographic or comorbid predictors for VTE on index admission may offer an opportunity for earlier diagnosis of occult malignancy.

The level of impaired esophageal bolus transit measured by multichannel intraluminal impedance: Cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) are often diagnosed manometrically, yet the underlying pathology is not always clear. Esophageal function testing (EFT), which incorporates manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII), is considered a useful tool in the assessment of EMDs. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the most likely level of impaired bolus transit within the esophagus which may help further localize and characterize EMDs. METHODS: In a retrospective study design, we reviewed consecutive EFTs over a period of 12 months. Data included diagnosis, presenting symptoms, and EFT results of liquid and viscous swallows. Each patient underwent 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows, and bolus transit is measured at 5, 10, 15 and 20 cm above the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). We recorded the initial level of impaired bolus transit for each swallow. RESULTS: A total of 2358 swallows in 118 patients was included for analysis. Of these, 837 swallows (35.5%) were incompletely transmitted. The proportions of impaired bolus transit were 39%, 41%, 15.6%, 4.4% at 20 cm, 15 cm, 10 cm, and 5 cm above the GEJ, respectively. The common symptoms at presentation were dysphagia (47%), heartburn (44%), chest pain (24.6%) and regurgitation (18%). The mean lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was 24 ± 13.9 mmHg whereas the mean contraction amplitude was 84 ± 46.6 mmHg. CONCLUSION: In patients with abnormal esophageal clearance, the most likely levels of impaired bolus transit are 15 and 20 cm above the GEJ. These levels of the esophagus should be a focus of attention in future studies evaluating the pathophysiology of esophageal dysmotility.