Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Oncologists: Results of an International Study.

PURPOSE: As frontline workers facing the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare providers should be well-prepared to fight the disease and prevent harm to their patients and themselves. Our study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice of oncologists in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on them. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a validated questionnaire disseminated to oncologists by SurveyMonkey. The tool had 42 questions that captured participants' knowledge, attitude, and practice; their experiences; and the pandemic's impact on various aspects of their lives. Participants from Middle East and North African countries, Brazil, and the Philippines completed the electronic survey between April 24 and May 15, 2020. RESULTS: Of the 1,010 physicians who participated in the study, 54.75% were male and 64.95% were medical or clinical oncologists. The level of knowledge regarding the prevention and transmission of the virus was good in 52% of participants. The majority (92%) were worried about contracting the virus either extremely (30%) or mildly (62%), and 84.85% were worried about transmitting the virus to their families. Approximately 76.93% reported they would take the COVID 19 vaccine once available, with oncologists practicing in Brazil having the highest odds ratio of intention to receive the COVID-19 vaccine (odds ratio, 11.8, 95% CI, 5.96 to 23.38, P < .001). Participants reported a negative impact of the pandemic on relations with coworkers (15.84%), relations with family (27.84%), their emotional and mental well-being (48.51%), research productivity (34.26%), and financial income (52.28%). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has adverse effects on various personal and professional aspects of oncologists' lives. Interventions should be implemented to mitigate the negative impact and prepare oncologists to manage future crises with more efficiency and resilience.

Aberrant expression of miRNAs predicts recurrence and survival in stage-II colorectal cancer patients from Egypt

Background: Patients with stage II CRC have a varying survival outcome. Therefore, it is critical to identify prognostic biomarkers that can define more aggressive forms of the disease. We assessed the expression levels of five miRNAs that have been previously addressed in relation to the development and progression of solid and hematological tumors. Methods: We measured the expression levels of miR-21, miR-137, miR-145, miR-320 and miR-498in stage II CRC patients from Egypt (124 tissues and 41 blood samples) by quantitative real time PCR (qPCR). The results were correlated with relevant clinicopathological factors, response to treatment and survival rates of the patients. Results: miR-137, miR-145 and miR-320 were significantly reduced in 39.5%, 48.4% and 52.4%; respectively whereas miR-21 and miR-498 were significantly overexpressed in 48.4% and 40.3% of the CRC tissues compared to the control group. In patients' blood, miR-137, miR-145 and miR-320 were significantly reduced in 46.3%, 46.3% and 51. 2%; respectively whereas mir-21 and miR-498 were significantly overexpressed in 46.3% and 43.9% of the cases, respectively. The concordance between tissue and blood was weak for miR-320 and miR-145 (kappa 40-65%), intermediate for miR-498 and miR-137 (kappa 65-75%) and strong for miR-21 (kappa 75-85%). In univariate analysis performance status, over-expression of miR-21 and miR-498 and reduced miR-137, miR-145, and miR-320 associated significantly with reduced DFS and OS. However, in multivariate analysis, miR-498 and miR-320 were independent prognostic factors for DFS whereas miR-21 was independent prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions: miRNAs play an important role in the development and progression of stage II CRC. A five markers panel (miR-21, miR-498, miR-137, miR-145 and miR-320) can predict recurrence and survival in stage II CRC patients from Egypt (AU)