Local control and toxicity outcomes following consolidative radiation therapy in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma: a 20-year experience at a single center.

BACKGROUND: Intensive multimodal treatment can improve survival in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma, and consolidative radiation therapy has contributed to local control. We examined the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent consolidative radiation therapy at our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma who underwent consolidative radiation therapy from March 2001 to March 2021 at Asan Medical Center. Patients underwent multimodal treatment including high-dose chemotherapy, surgery, stem cell transplantation, and maintenance therapy. Radiation (median, 21.0 Gy; range, 14-36) was administered to the primary site and surrounding lymph nodes. RESULTS: This study included 37 patients, and the median age at diagnosis was 2.8 years (range, 1.3-10.0). Four patients exhibited local failure, and 5-year free-from locoregional failure rate was 88.7%, with a median followup period of 5.7 years. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 59.1% and 83.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with neuron-specific enolase levels > 100 ng/mL had significantly worse DFS and OS (P = 0.036, 0.048), and patients with no residual disease before radiation therapy showed superior OS (P = 0.029). Furthermore, patients with 11q deletion or 17q gain exhibited poor DFS and OS, respectively (P = 0.021, 0.011). Six patients experienced grade 1 acute toxicity. Late toxicity was confirmed in children with long-term survival, predominantly hypothyroidism and hypogonadism, typically < grade 3, possibly attributed to combination treatment. Four patients experienced late toxicity ≥ grade 3 with chronic kidney disease, growth hormone abnormality, ileus, premature epiphyseal closure, and secondary tumor, and recovered by hospitalization or surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with high-risk neuroblastoma, consolidative radiotherapy to the primary tumor site resulted in excellent local control and a tolerable safety profile.

Contribution of Enhanced Locoregional Control to Improved Overall Survival with Consolidative Durvalumab after Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Insights from Real-World Data.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the real-world clinical outcomes of consolidative durvalumab in patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) and to explore the role of radiotherapy in the era of immunotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study assessed 171 patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with or without consolidative durvalumab at Asan Medical Center between May 2018 and May 2021. Primary outcomes included freedom from locoregional failure (FFLRF), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Durvalumab following CCRT demonstrated a prolonged median PFS of 20.9 months (p=0.048) and a 3-year FFLRF rate of 57.3% (p=0.008), compared to 13.7 months and 38.8%, respectively, with CCRT alone. Furthermore, the incidence of in-field recurrence was significantly greater in the CCRT-alone group compared to the durvalumab group (26.8% vs. 12.4%, p=0.027). While median OS was not reached with durvalumab, it was 35.4 months in patients receiving CCRT alone (p=0.010). Patients positive for programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression showed notably better outcomes, including FFLRF, DMFS, PFS, and OS. Adherence to PACIFIC trial eligibility criteria identified 100 patients (58.5%) as ineligible. The use of durvalumab demonstrated better survival regardless of eligibility criteria. CONCLUSION: The use of durvalumab consolidation following CCRT significantly enhanced locoregional control and OS in patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC, especially in those with PD-L1-positive tumors, thereby validating the role of durvalumab in standard care.

Application of surface-guided radiation therapy in prostate cancer: comparative analysis of differences with skin marking-guided patient setup.

PURPOSE: Surface-guided radiation therapy is an image-guided method using optical surface imaging that has recently been adopted for patient setup and motion monitoring during treatment. We aimed to determine whether the surface guide setup is accurate and efficient compared to the skin-marking guide in prostate cancer treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The skin-marking setup was performed, and vertical, longitudinal, and lateral couch values (labeled as "M") were recorded. Subsequently, the surface-guided setup was conducted, and couch values (labeled as "S") were recorded. After performing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), the final couch values was recorded (labeled as "C"), and the shift value was calculated (labeled as "Gap (M-S)," "Gap (M-C)," "Gap (S-C)") and then compared. Additionally, the setup times for the skin marking and surface guides were also compared. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-five patients were analyzed, totaling 2,735 treatment fractions. Gap (M-S) showed minimal differences in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral averages (-0.03 cm, 0.07 cm, and 0.06 cm, respectively). Gap (M-C) and Gap (S-C) exhibited a mean difference of 0.04 cm (p = 0.03) in the vertical direction, a mean difference of 0.35 cm (p = 0.52) in the longitudinal direction, and a mean difference of 0.11 cm (p = 0.91) in the lateral direction. There was no correlation between shift values and patient characteristics. The average setup time of the skin-marking guide was 6.72 minutes, and 7.53 minutes for the surface guide. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference between the surface and skin-marking guides regarding final CBCT shift values and no correlation between translational shift values and patient characteristics. We also observed minimal difference in setup time between the two methods. Therefore, the surface guide can be considered an accurate and time-efficient alternative to skin-marking guides.