[A case report of bi-weekly docetaxel and S-1 combination chemotherapy for gastric cancer with carcinomatous lymphangitis of the lung].

A 38-year-old man with complaints of nausea, epigastralgia, cough, and decrease body weight was given a diagnosis of advanced gastric cancer (type 4) with carcinomatous lymphangitis of the lung (UM-circ cT3, N3, H0, P0, M1, stage IV, por2). He was treated with combination of docetaxel (DOC) 40 mg/m(2)/day (days 1, 15) and S-1 orally 80 mg/m(2)/day (days 1-7, 15-21), 1 week administered 1 week rest. After 2 courses of treatment, the patient achieved a partial response in the carcinomatous lymphangitis of the lung. Tumor markers decreased and symptoms improved. He experienced grade 2 peripheral neuropathy but with no grade 3 adverse events. Although the prognosis of gastric cancer with carcinomatous lymphangitis is poor. These results indicate that bi-weekly DOC and S-1 combination chemotherapy might be effective for gastric cancer with carcinomatous lymphangitis of the lung.

A case of neurofibroma of the appendix in von Recklinghausen disease.

A 67-year-old man with von Recklinghausen disease (VRD) was found to have an ill-defined large mass in the ileocecal area on abdominal computed tomography when he was examined for abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant. Because of high serum C-reactive protein level and leukocytosis appendiceal tumor complicated by appendicitis was diagnosed. Due to the possibility of malignancy, standard cancer surgery was carried out to remove the mass, i.e., ileocecal resection together with dissection of the regional lymph nodes. The cecum was displaced by a remarkably enlarged appendix with a firm and thickened wall. The distal portion of the appendix was cystically dilated, forming an abscess. The pathological diagnosis was neurofibromatosis with mucus hyperplasia and abscess formation in the appendix. Neurofibroma of the appendix is very rare, even in patients with VRD. Although it is benign, prompt resection is recommended because of a high risk of appendicitis and malignant transformation.

Phase II study of biweekly docetaxel and S-1 combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of biweekly S-1 and docetaxel combination therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with histologically proven, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, a performance status (PS) of 0-2 and no prior chemotherapy history were eligible for inclusion (n = 45). Patients received a total of 215 treatment courses (median, 4; range, 2-12) of S-1 oral administration twice daily for 1 week followed by a drug-free interval of 1 week. Docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) was administered intravenously on days 1 and 15. RESULTS: We observed 25 partial responses (55.6%) and one complete response (2.2%), resulting in an overall response rate of 57.8%. Twenty-four patients (53.3%) received second-line chemotherapy. Five patients (11.1%) underwent R0 gastrectomy during the course of the study. The median overall survival time was 15.3 months, the median time to progression was 6.9 months, and the median duration of response in 26 patients was 8.0 months. Neutropenia was the most frequently observed (40.4%) haematological toxicity at grades 3 and 4 and leucopenia was the second most common (29.8%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: S-1 plus docetaxel combination therapy in an outpatient setting provided promising activity with acceptable adverse toxicities.

[A case report of bi-weekly docetaxel and S-1 combination chemotherapy for gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases and esophageal invasion].

A 61-year-old man with the chief complaint of pressure with swallowing was referred to our hospital with type 3 cardiac gastric cancer. Gastrofiberscope showed type 3 cardiac cancer with esophageal invasion. On the abdominal computed tomography, there was evidence of lymph node swelling in the lesser curvature and multiple liver metastases. Blood tumor markers were elevated: CEA 200 ng/mL, CA19-9 2,490 U/mL. He was diagnosed as unresectable advanced gastric cancer UE-circ, type-3, c-T3N2H1P0M1, Stage IV. A biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma (tub2-por1). We started bi-weekly docetaxel and S-1 combination chemotherapy(DOC 40 mg/m2 day 1, 14, S-180 mg/m2 day 1-7, 14-21). After completion of the first course of this combination therapy, his feeling of pressure was relieved and CT showed reduction of multiple liver lesions and lymph node metastases, indicating partial response. No regrowth was seen for 7 courses of the therapy. Regarding toxicity, grade 2 nausea and grade 1 nail pain were observed. After 7 courses, because of serum CEA elevation, bi-weekly CPT-11/CDDP therapy (CPT-11 60 mg/m2, CDDP 30 mg/m2) was administered followed by weekly PTX therapy (65 mg/m2 day 1, 7, 14; total of 4 weeks). To date, 17 months after administration of chemotherapy, he has been treated on an outpatient basis. Biweekly DOC/S-1 therapy can be novel antitumor therapy which can be conducted safely in an outpatient setting for advanced gastric cancer.

Clinical significance of the metastatic lymph-node ratio in early gastric cancer.

The metastatic lymph-node ratio has important prognostic value in gastric cancer; this study focused on its significance in early gastric cancer. In total, 1,472 patients with early gastric cancer underwent curative gastrectomy between 1992 and 2001. Of these, 166 (11.3%) had histologically proven lymph-node metastasis. Prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Metastasis was evaluated using the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (JGC) and the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer/Tumor, Node, Metastasis (UICC/TNM) Classification. The metastatic lymph-node ratio was calculated using the hazard ratio. The cut-off values for the metastatic lymph-node ratio were set at 0, <0.15, >or=0.15 to <0.30, and >or=0.30. The numbers of dissected and metastatic lymph nodes were correlated, but the number of dissected lymph nodes and the metastatic lymph-node ratio was not related. The JGC and UICC/TNM classification demonstrated stage migration and heterogeneous stratification for disease-specific survival. The metastatic lymph-node ratio showed less stage migration and homogenous stratification. The metastatic lymph-node ratio may be a superior method of classification, which provides also accurate prognostic stratification for early gastric cancer patients.

Lymph node status in patients with submucosal gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to clarify the lymph node status in patients with submucosal gastric cancer. METHODS: Between April 1994 and December 1999, 615 patients with histologically proven submucosal gastric cancer who underwent curative resection were included in this study. The results of the surgery and predictive factors for lymph node metastasis were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. The accuracy of the predictive factors was assessed in a second population of a further 186 patients. RESULTS: Lymph node metastasis was observed in 119 patients (19.3%). Multivariate analysis showed that pathologic tumor diameter (> or = 20 mm) and lymphatic invasion were independent predictive factors for lymph node metastasis. The incidence of lymph node metastasis without these 2 predictive factors was 1.8% (2 of 113), and it was 51.2% (85 of 166) with the 2 predictive factors, 9.5% (14 of 148) in tumors < 20 mm in diameter, and 5.3% (22 of 414) in tumors without lymphatic invasion. Among patients with a tumor < 20 mm in diameter, the incidence of lymph node metastasis was significantly reduced in those with a differentiated tumor: 4.2% (4 of 95). These results were almost identical to those observed in the second population. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node status can be accurately predicted on the basis of pathologic tumor diameter < 20 mm, lymphatic invasion (absence), and histological type (differentiated) in patients with submucosal gastric cancer. Less extensive surgery for these patients might be reconsidered after confirmation of the reproducibility of the results of this study by an appropriately designed prospective clinical trial.

Clinicopathological features of gastric carcinoma in younger and middle-aged patients: a comparative study.

Gastric carcinoma is relatively rare in patients under the age of 40. This study was undertaken to clarify the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of gastric carcinoma in younger patients compared with those of middle-aged patients. The surgical results from 131 younger patients (aged < or = 40 years) and 918 middle-aged patients (aged 55-65 years) were compared retrospectively. Female gender, undifferentiated tumor type and lymphatic invasion were significantly more common in the younger patients. Survival time did not differ between the two groups. The depth of tumor invasion was the only prognostic factor in younger patients, whereas macroscopic appearance, tumor diameter, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, and venous invasion were all significant prognostic factors in middle-aged patients. Peritoneal recurrence was significantly more common in younger patients. A family history of gastric adenocarcinoma was observed in 25.9% of younger patients, but this did not affect survival outcomes. As depth of invasion affects prognosis independently, and peritoneal metastasis is the predominant pattern of recurrence, it is essential to establish an optimal prophylactic treatment for peritoneal metastasis to improve surgical outcomes in younger patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Clinicopathological properties of poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomach: comparison of solid- and non-solid-types.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological and biological properties of the poorly-differentiated types of gastric carcinoma (solid-type and non-solid-type). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,558 patients with primary gastric adenocarcinomas were enrolled in this study. The surgical results were compared. RESULTS: Patients with non-solid-type tumors tended to be younger females with peritoneal or lymph node metastases and lymphatic invasion, and with tumors that were ill-defined, of larger diameter and deeper. Those patients with differentiated tumors tended to have the opposite characteristics of those patients with non-solid-type tumors. Patients with solid-type tumors had intermediate characteristics. The survival in patients with non-solid-type tumors was poor compared to those with differentiated or solid-type tumors. There was a significant difference in the survival of stage III tumors with either solid- or non-solid-type tumors (p=0.0480). CONCLUSION: Therapeutic strategies should be based on the histological type of the tumor in patients with poorly-differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma.

Comparison of surgical results of D2 versus D3 gastrectomy (para-aortic lymph node dissection) for advanced gastric carcinoma: a multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: Curative gastrectomy is a promising approach for the treatment of gastric cancer; however, the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for advanced cancer remains controversial. The aim of this multi-institutional study was to evaluate the feasibility of D3 gastrectomy (para-aortic lymph node dissection) for advanced gastric cancer. The surgical results of D2 and D3 gastrectomy (para-aortic lymph node dissection) were retrospectively compared. METHODS: A series of 580 advanced gastric cancer patients were registered between 1992 and 2000. Of these, 430 underwent D2 gastrectomy and 150 underwent D3 gastrectomy. Survival time, prognostic factors, postoperative morbidity/mortality, and pattern of recurrence were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in survival time between D2 and D3 patients. However, the survival times of D3 patients with tumor diameters measuring 50 to 100 mm or with pN1 disease were significantly longer than those of the corresponding D2 patients. Analysis of the survival of patients with tumor diameters measuring 50 to 100 mm revealed that D3 gastrectomy conferred a survival advantage only to patients with pN2 disease. The incidence of lymphatic recurrence was lower in D3 patients with 50- to 100-mm tumors than in the corresponding D2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: D3 gastrectomy might be beneficial in patients with advanced pN2 gastric cancer within the group with tumors measuring 50 to 100 mm. A randomized controlled trial of patients with 50- to 100-mm tumors should be performed to test the validity of this preliminary result.

Significance of long-term follow-up of early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic outcomes for most patients with early gastric cancer are favorable. However, mortality among these patients remains a concern. Improvements in therapeutic outcomes are being sought by studying the timing and causes of death. Here, the results of surgery were evaluated to assess the appropriate treatment and follow-up schedule for early gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 1169 patients with early gastric cancer underwent curative gastrectomy between 1992 and 1999. Survival time, prognostic factors, cause of death, and time of death were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of disease-specific survival identified lymph node metastasis as an independent prognostic factor. The anatomical extent of lymph node metastasis and the number of metastatic lymph nodes influenced the rate of recurrence. Multivariate analysis of overall survival identified age as a prognostic factor. A total of 91 patients (7.8%) from the study group died: 56 from comorbid diseases, 21 from gastric cancer, and 14 from other second primary cancers. Death from gastric cancer was frequently observed within 5 years of surgical resection, whereas death from other diseases usually occurred after 5 years. Patients who died as a result of diseases other than gastric cancer tended to be older. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate lymph node dissection is necessary for patients with early gastric cancer, particularly those with risk factors associated with lymph node metastasis. Meticulous follow-up protocols that can detect second primary cancers, together with the development of treatments for comorbid diseases, are required to improve survival.

Surgical outcomes in patients with T4 gastric carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy about the best therapeutic surgical approach for treatment of patients with T4 gastric cancer. STUDY DESIGN: We used univariate and multivariate analyses to review the surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of 117 patients who underwent surgery for T4 gastric carcinoma. RESULTS: Curative resection was performed in 38 (32.4%) patients, with the pancreas being the most frequently resected organ. The 5-year survival rate was 16.0% and the median survival time (MST) was 11 months for all 117 registered patients. The 5-year survival rates and MSTs in patients after curative and noncurative resection were 32.2% versus 9.5% and 20 months versus 8 months, respectively. These values differed considerably between the two groups (p < 0.0001). Curability was an independent prognostic factor among all registered patients, including those who underwent noncurative resection. A relatively small tumor diameter (< 100 mm) and few lymph node metastases (six or fewer metastatic lymph nodes) were independent prognostic factors when curative resection could be performed. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were acceptable after curative combined resection. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the use of aggressive combined resection of adjacent organs, with extended lymph node dissection, for patients with T4 gastric carcinoma in whom curative resection can be used; that is, those with few metastatic lymph nodes (six or less) and a relatively small tumor diameter (100 mm). But noncurative resection should be avoided in patients with T4 gastric cancer.

Restorative proctocolectomy for pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis.

PURPOSE: A restorative proctocolectomy has become an elective surgical treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). In children with UC, however, the role of this procedure has not yet been well evaluated. We investigated the postoperative status of pediatric patients with UC regarding the side effects of steroids, postoperative complications, and growth. METHODS: The medical records of 15 patients with UC who underwent a restorative proctocolectomy between August 1993 and October 2003 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Their mean age was 12.6 +/- 3.4 years (range 5.7-15.7; boys: 9, girls: 6). All patients had total colitis, except for one who had left-sided colitis. The mean cumulative dose of preoperative prednisolone was 6201 +/- 7980 mg (mean +/- SD). The operative indications were an unsuccessful response to medical treatments in 12 patients (80%) and severe colitis in 3 patients (20%). Surgery was performed in one stage in 6 patients and in two stages in 9 patients. Seven patients (47%) demonstrated growth retardation at the time of operation. Steroid-related complications were seen in 3 cases, i.e., steroid myopathy, glaucoma, and cataracts, respectively. As early postoperative complications, an intestinal obstruction was seen in 2 patients, peritonitis in 1, and pancreatitis in 1. As late complications, anastomotic stenosis was observed in 5 patients, pouchitis in 4, residual proctitis in 3, and anal or proctovaginal fistula in 2. An intestinal obstruction, peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum, and dehydration each was seen in 1 patient. A growth "catch-up" was obtained for all but one patient. All patients became free of corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: A restorative proctocolectomy was found to be an effective treatment alternative even in children with UC when conservative therapy proves to be ineffective.