Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Chemosphere ; 328: 138597, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37028719

ABSTRACT

The presence and distribution of thirteen organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) were investigated in indoor air and dust samples collected in Hanoi, Vietnam. The total OPFRs (Æ©OPFRs) concentrations in indoor air and dust samples were 42.3-358 ng m-3 (median 101 ng m-3) and 1290-17,500 ng g-1 (median 7580 ng g-1), respectively. The profile of OPFRs in both indoor air and dust indicated that tris(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TCIPP) was the most dominant compound with a median concentration of 75.3 ng m-3 and 3620 ng g-1, contributing 75.2% and 46.1% to Æ©OPFRs concentrations in indoor air and dust, respectively, followed by tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBOEP), with a median concentration of 16.3 ng m-3 and 2500 ng g-1, contributing 14.1% and 33.6% to Æ©OPFRs concentrations in indoor air and dust, respectively. The levels of OPFRs in the indoor air samples and corresponding indoor dust samples showed a strong positive correlation. The total estimated daily intakes (EDItotal) of Æ©OPFRs (via air inhalation, dust ingestion, and dermal absorption) for adults and toddlers under the median and high exposure scenarios were 36.7 and 160 ng kg-1 d-1, and 266 and 1270 ng kg-1 d-1, respectively. Among the investigated exposure pathways, dermal absorption was a primary exposure pathway to OPFRs for both toddlers and adults. The hazard quotients (HQ) ranged from 5.31 × 10-8 to 6.47 × 10-2 (<1), and the lifetime cancer risks (LCR) were from 2.05 × 10-11 to 7.37 × 10-8 (<10-6), indicating that human health risks from exposure to OPFRs in indoor environments are not significant.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor , Flame Retardants , Adult , Humans , Organophosphates/analysis , Environmental Monitoring , Flame Retardants/analysis , Dust/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Vietnam , Environmental Exposure/analysis
2.
Huan Jing Ke Xue ; 31(11): 2627-32, 2010 Nov.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21250443

ABSTRACT

Approximately 1 000 chemicals were screened in surface waters from downstreams of Yellow River and Yangtze River using GC-MS coupled with Automated Identification and Quantification System with a Database (AIQS-DB). 95 pollutants were detected in water samples from Yellow River in Shandong Province and 121 in those from Yangtze River in Jiangsu Province. The pollutants involved n-alkanes, PAHs, phenols, nitro compounds, phthalates esters (PAEs), pesticides and pharmaceuticals, etc. The average concentrations of n-alkanes, 16 priority PAHs and 6 priority PAEs were 1 806 ng/L, 27 ng/L, 77 ng/L in water samples from Yellow River and 720 ng/L, 30 ng/L, 2 166 ng/L in water samples from Yangtze River respectively. Besides, 9 and 11 pesticides were detected in water samples from Yellow River and Yangtze River respectively. The levels of pollutants showed stronger site dependence in samples from Yellow River than those from Yangtze River. Combination of GC-MS and AIQS-DB shows high efficiency in regional pollutants survey.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring/methods , Organic Chemicals/analysis , Rivers/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , China , Databases, Factual , Fresh Water/analysis , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...