Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 268
Filter
1.
Cancer Diagn Progn ; 4(4): 496-502, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38962540

ABSTRACT

Background/Aim: The prognostic impact of the administration of antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced cancer has recently been documented. However, how these drugs affect the outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 128 patients with RCC who received first-line ICI combination therapy. The patients were grouped according to their history of antibiotics and PPIs use one month before the initiation of ICI combination therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) after ICI combination therapy were compared between patients treated with and without antibiotics or PPIs. Results: Of the 128 patients, 30 (23%) and 44 (34%) received antibiotics and PPIs, respectively. Patients treated with antibiotics exhibited shorter PFS and OS compared to those who did not receive antibiotics (median PFS: 4.9 vs. 16.1 months, p<0.0001; OS: 20.8 vs. 49.0 months, p=0.0034). Multivariate analyses showed that antibiotic administration was an independent predictor of shorter PFS (hazard ratio: 2.54: p=0.0002) and OS (hazard ratio: 2.56: p=0.0067) after adjusting for other covariates. In contrast, there were no significant differences in either PFS or OS between patients who received PPIs and those who did not. (PFS: p=0.828; OS: p=0.105). Conclusion: Antibiotics administration before ICI combination therapy was negatively associated with outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced RCC. Therefore, careful monitoring is required for potentially high-risk patients undergoing ICI combination therapy.

3.
Anticancer Res ; 44(7): 3213-3220, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38925814

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: There is limited evidence regarding the systemic treatment of retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma, and the current Japanese guidelines fail to make definitive suggestions. Here, we report our experience with combination chemotherapy of mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and dacarbazine (MAID) in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of eight patients (three male and five female) who received MAID for pathologically diagnosed metastatic unresectable retroperitoneal sarcoma (either leiomyosarcoma or pleomorphic sarcoma) between October 2019 and January 2022. Treatment efficacy, tolerability (need for dose reduction), and safety profiles were evaluated and summarized. RESULTS: At initiation, the median age was 56.0 years, and the body mass index was 20.0 kg/cm2 Six patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores of 0. The net clinical benefit was a partial response in three (37.5%) patients, stable disease in four (50.0%), and progressive disease in one (12.5%). During the median 90.8 weeks of follow-up, disease in five patients progressed, resulting in a median progression-free survival of 48.4 weeks, and five deaths occurred, resulting in an overall survival of 95.1 weeks. Commonly observed adverse events were neutropenia (eight patients), anemia (eight patients), and decreased platelet count (seven patients), which led to dose reduction (60-80%) in six patients. CONCLUSION: MAID combination therapy may be an acceptable option for advanced retroperitoneal sarcoma; however, its benefits must be carefully assessed owing to its not insignificant toxicity.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Dacarbazine , Doxorubicin , Ifosfamide , Mesna , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms , Sarcoma , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Ifosfamide/administration & dosage , Ifosfamide/adverse effects , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Doxorubicin/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Sarcoma/drug therapy , Sarcoma/pathology , Mesna/administration & dosage , Mesna/therapeutic use , Aged , Dacarbazine/administration & dosage , Dacarbazine/adverse effects , Dacarbazine/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Adult
4.
Target Oncol ; 19(4): 623-633, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819770

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of glucocorticoid administration for adverse events (AEs), including immune-related AEs, on the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To clarify the prognostic impact of glucocorticoid use for AEs during first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data from 194 patients who received dual ICI combination therapy [i.e., immunotherapy (IO)-IO] or combinations of ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapy. The patients were divided into two groups according to the history of glucocorticoid administration in each treatment group. Survival based on glucocorticoid administration was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 101 (52.0%) and 93 (48.0%) patients received IO-IO and IO-TKI combination therapy, respectively. Glucocorticoids were administered to 46 (46%) and 22 (24%) patients in the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups, respectively. In the IO-IO group, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in patients with glucocorticoid administration than in those without administration (median PFS: 14.4 versus 3.45 months, p = 0.0005; median OS: 77.6 versus 33.9 months, p = 0.0025). Multivariable analysis showed that glucocorticoid administration was an independent predictor of longer PFS (hazard ratio: 0.43, p = 0.0005) and OS (hazard ratio: 0.35, p = 0.0067) after adjustment for covariates. In the IO-TKI group, neither PFS nor OS significantly differed between patients treated with and without glucocorticoid administration (PFS: p = 0.0872, OS: p = 0.216). CONCLUSIONS: Glucocorticoid administration did not negatively impact the effectiveness of ICI combination therapy for RCC, prompting glucocorticoid treatment use when AEs develop.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Glucocorticoids , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Male , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Female , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Adult
5.
Urol Oncol ; 42(9): 291.e27-291.e37, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653590

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data on the association between body composition and outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy are limited. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic data of 159 patients with advanced RCC, including 84 receiving ICI dual combination therapy (immunotherapy [IO]-IO group) and 75 receiving combinations of ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (IO-TKI group). Pretreatment computed tomography images were used to calculate body composition, including skeletal muscle mass and fat tissue area. Sarcopenia was defined based on skeletal muscle and psoas muscle indexes. The total fat index, subcutaneous fat index (SFI), and visceral fat index were also calculated. RESULTS: In the IO-IO treatment group, there was no significant association between body composition and survival or tumor response (P > 0.05). In the IO-TKI treatment group, the high SFI was associated with longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.70; P = 0.0091) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 26.0; P = 0.0246) than the low SFI, which remained significant after adjusting for covariates. Furthermore, in the high-SFI population, patients treated with IO-TKI therapy had longer progression-free survival (P = 0.0019) and overall survival (P = 0.0287) than those treated with IO-IO therapy, while there was no significant survival difference between the 2 treatment groups in the low-SFI population (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The SFI can be potentially utilized as an effective predictive and prognostic biomarker for first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced RCC.


Subject(s)
Body Composition , Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Male , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Body Composition/drug effects , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Aged, 80 and over
8.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 29(4): 473-480, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38345708

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are few comparative studies on dual immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (i.e., IO-IO) and combination therapies comprising ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (i.e., IO-TKI) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), especially in real-world settings. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data of 175 patients with IMDC intermediate-risk or poor-risk RCC; as first-line therapy, 103 received IO-IO, and 72 received IO-TKI. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was conducted to balance patients' backgrounds in the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups. RESULTS: Based on the IPTW analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (median: 15.6 vs. 8.3 months; p = 0.0386). In contrast, overall survival was not different between groups (median: 46.7 vs. 49.0 months; p = 0.465). Although the IPTW-adjusted objective response rate was not significantly different (51.2% vs. 43.9%; p = 0.359), the progressive disease rate as the best overall response was lower in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (3.3% vs. 27.4%; p < 0.0001). Regarding the safety profile, the treatment interruption rate was higher in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (70.3% vs. 49.2%; p = 0.005). In contrast, the IO-IO group had a higher corticosteroid administration rate (43.3% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: IO-TKI therapy exhibited superior effectiveness over IO-IO therapy in terms of PFS improvement and immediate disease progression prevention and was associated with a higher risk of treatment interruption and a lower risk of needing corticosteroids.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
10.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(4)2024 Feb 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38398167

ABSTRACT

With emerging options in immediate postoperative settings for high-risk renal cell carcinoma (hrRCC), further risk stratification may be relevant for informed decision making. Balancing the benefits and drawbacks of adjuvant immunotherapy is recommended. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) in this setting. This bi-institutional retrospective study recruited 235 patients who underwent radical surgery for hrRCC between 2004 and 2021. LIPI scores were calculated based on the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase levels. The association between LIPI scores and local or distant recurrence was analyzed, along with other possible clinical factors. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) period was 36.4 months. Based on the LIPI scores, 119, 91, and 25 patients were allocated to the good, intermediate, and poor groups, respectively. The RFS was significantly correlated with the LIPI scores, and the 36 month survival rates were 67.3, 36.2, and 11.0% in the good, intermediate, and poor groups, respectively. In the multivariate model, the LIPI independently predicted the RFS, along with symptoms at diagnosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, pT status, pN status, and tumor grade. The C-index of the LIPI in predicting RFS was 0.63, and prediction accuracy improved with the addition of the LIPI to both GRade, Age, Nodes, Tumor, and the UCLA Integrated Staging System. Conclusively, the LIPI can be a significant prognostic biomarker for predicting hrRCC recurrence, particularly for identifying the highest-risk cohort.

11.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 54(5): 577-583, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38251783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up data regarding treatment outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma as a first-line therapy are limited in real-world Japanese populations. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data of 56 advanced renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with a follow-up of at least 3 years. Survival, tumour response and adverse event profiles were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients (73%) were histopathologically diagnosed with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, and 34 (61%) were categorized into the International Metastatic renal cell carcinoma Database Consortium intermediate-risk group. The median follow-up period was 34.4 months. Regarding an effectiveness profile, median progression-free survival, time to treatment failure and overall survival were 9.01, 12.5 and 49.0 months, respectively. Objective response was observed in 27 patients (48%), including eight patients with complete response (14%), and the median duration of response was 30.8 months. Multivariate analyses showed that clear-cell histology was an independent factor of longer overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.23, P = 0.0013). Regarding safety profiles, adverse events of any grade and those with grade ≥3 developed in 40 (71%) and 25 patients (45%), respectively. Median time to adverse event development was 1.68 months. Treatment was interrupted in 28 patients (50%), and corticosteroid administration was needed in 25 (45%). CONCLUSION: The 3-year follow-up data showed that nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy exhibited a feasible effectiveness in real-world Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Accordingly, the high risk of adverse event development, which often requires treatment withdrawal and corticosteroid administration, should be considered.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Ipilimumab , Kidney Neoplasms , Nivolumab , Humans , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Ipilimumab/administration & dosage , Male , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Follow-Up Studies , Japan , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , East Asian People
12.
Geriatr Gerontol Int ; 24(3): 269-274, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38246656

ABSTRACT

AIM: We compared survival and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for older patients (age 70 years or older) with stage 1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included 260 patients who underwent RAPN and 44 patients who underwent LRN. The overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were compared between these two groups using an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. RESULTS: Compared with the LRN group, a trend of more complications was observed in the RAPN group, including a higher body mass index (24 vs. 22 kg/m2 ; P = 0.0002) and higher rates of hypertension (77% vs. 55%; P = 0.0029) and chronic kidney disease (62% vs. 36%; P = 0.0027). After adjustment by the IPTW analysis, the RAPN group had a shorter operative time (143 vs. 282 min; P = 0.033), shorter postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS) (4.1 vs. 7.9 days; P = 0.004), and less change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate during surgery (-8.4% vs. -32%; P < 0.0001) than the LRN group; however, the perioperative complication rates were similar. Patients who underwent RAPN had better 5-year OS than those who underwent LRN (95% vs. 90%; log-rank, P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: RAPN resulted in better OS and surgical outcomes, with shorter operative time, shorter PLOS, and better renal function preservation, than LRN for older patients with stage 1 RCC. Therefore, RAPN may be the primary option for patients indicated for surgical intervention. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 269-274.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Laparoscopy , Humans , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Nephrectomy/adverse effects , Nephrectomy/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Propensity Score
13.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(2): 549-557.e5, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38281878

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether kidney function affects outcomes following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data of 167 patients with advanced RCC, including 98 who received ICI dual combination therapy (ie, immunotherapy [IO]-IO) and 69 who received ICI combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (ie, IO-TKI). In each regimen, treatment profiles were assessed according to the grade of chronic kidney disease (CKD) as defined by the KDIGO 2012 criteria. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients who received IO-IO, 31 (32%), 30 (31%), 15 (15%), and 22 (22%) had CKD G1/2, G3a, G3b, and G4/5, respectively. Of the 69 patients who received IO-TKI, 18 (26%), 25 (36%), and 26 (38%) had G1/2, G3a, and G3b/4/5, respectively. Regarding efficacy, progression-free survival, overall survival, or objective response rate was not different according to the CKD grade in both treatment groups (P > .05). Regarding safety, the rate of adverse events, treatment interruption, or corticosteroid administration was not different according to the CKD grade in the IO-IO group (P > .05), whereas in the IO-TKI group, the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events were significantly higher (P = .0292), and the rates of ICI interruption (P = .0353) and corticosteroid administration (P = .0685) increased, according to the CKD grade. CONCLUSION: There is a differential safety but comparable efficacy profile between the IO-IO and IO-TKI regimens in patients with CKD. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Kidney
14.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(5): 3513-3522, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285306

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Considering the reported greater benefits of immunotherapy and its unignorable adverse events in adjuvant therapy for high-risk renal cell carcinoma (hrRCC), accurate prediction may optimize drug use. METHODS: The primary objective of this study was to generate a score-based prognostic model of recurrence-free survival in hrRCC. The study retrospectively evaluated 456 patients at two institutions who underwent radical surgery for nonmetastatic pT3-4 and/or N1-2 or pT2 and G4 disease. Clinical variables deemed universally available were selected through backward stepwise analysis and fitted by a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model. A point-based score was derived from regression coefficients. Discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analyses were conducted to evaluate predictive performance. Internal validation with bootstrapping was performed to correct for optimism. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 55.3 months, and the median follow-up period was 28.0 months. During the follow-up period, the recurrence rate was 48.2% (n = 220) during a median of 75.7 months. Stepwise variable selection retained age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, presence or absence of symptoms, size of the primary tumor, pathologic T stage, pathologic N stage, tumor grade, and histology. Subsequently, the TOWARDS score (range 0-53) was developed from these variables. Internal validation showed an optimism-corrected C-index of 0.723 and a calibration slope of 0.834. The decision curve analysis showed the superiority of this score over the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Integrated Staging System and GRade, Age, Nodes, and Tumor score. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' novel TOWARDS scoring model had good accuracy for predicting disease recurrence in patients with hrRCC, and the clinical practicability was superior to that of the existing models.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Prognosis , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology
15.
Int J Urol ; 31(1): 73-81, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37798866

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to analyze the outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) over a 40-year span. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data of patients with ESRD-RCC diagnosed between 1979 and 2020 at two institutions. We assessed changes in stage, surgical approaches, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) following nephrectomy according to era between ESRD-RCC and sporadic RCC. Furthermore, perioperative outcomes in patients with ESRD-RCC were compared between laparoscopic and open surgery. RESULTS: Patients with ESRD-RCC (n = 549) were diagnosed at an earlier stage (p = 0.0276), and the ratio of laparoscopic nephrectomy was increased (p < 0.0001) according to eras. Since 2000 (i.e., after implementation of laparoscopic nephrectomy), patients with ESRD-RCC (n = 305) had significantly shorter CSS (p = 0.0063) after nephrectomy than sporadic RCC (n = 2732). After adjustment by multivariate analysis and propensity score matching, ESRD status was independently associated with shorter CSS (p = 0.0055 and p = 0.0473, respectively). Improved CSS in sporadic RCC (p < 0.0001), but not ESRD-RCC (p = 0.904), according to era contributed to this difference. Laparoscopic nephrectomy showed favorable outcomes, including shorter surgery time, lower estimated bleeding volumes, transfusion rates, and readmission rates, and shorter postoperative hospitalization than open nephrectomy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Advances in diagnostic and treatment modalities potentially enable early diagnosis and minimally invasive surgery for patients with ESRD-RCC. As ESRD-RCC may not present indolently, careful post-operative monitoring is needed.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/complications , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/complications , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Japan/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Nephrectomy
17.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 54(2): 160-166, 2024 Feb 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37840320

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate predictive factors and oncological outcomes of pathological T3a upstaging in renal cell carcinoma patients who were initially diagnosed as clinical T1 and treated with partial nephrectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The clinical records and survival data of 1617 patients, who had undergone partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma at Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan between January 2011 and December 2020, were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Of 1617 clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma patients who underwent partial nephrectomy, 28 (1.73%) had pathological T3a upstaging. In the multivariable analysis for pathological T3a upstaging using logistic regression models, male sex and clinical T1b were significant factors associated with pathological T3a upstaging (male sex: odds ratio = 5.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-21.8, clinical T1b: odds ratio = 8.36, 95% confidence interval: 3.56-19.6). The Kaplan-Meier method of the recurrence-free survival showed shorter recurrence-free survival in patients with pathological T3a upstaging than in those with pathological T1 (P < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression models, pathological T3a upstaging was no longer significantly associated with recurrence-free survival after adjustment for other pathological factors (hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 0.58-4.36). In a sensitivity analysis that analyzed its components individually instead of whole pathological T3a, neither perinephric fat invasion, sinus fat invasion, nor renal vein invasion was associated with recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Male sex and clinical T1b were significant predictors for pathological T3a upstaging after partial nephrectomy in clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma patients. Although patients with pathological T3a upstaging had worse recurrence-free survival compared with those without upstaging, multivariable analyses revealed that pathological T3a upstaging was not an independent predictor for poor recurrence-free survival.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Staging , Nephrectomy/methods
18.
Int J Urol ; 31(3): 194-207, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38113344

ABSTRACT

This article is an English translation of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (2nd edition) published in June 2023. The Japanese Urological Association's (JUA) Guidelines Committee on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) created a 2023 update guideline to support clinicians' current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate its recommendations into clinical practice. The new guideline adhered as closely as possible to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020 ver. 3.0. Findings related to epidemiological, pathological, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up were reviewed. In addition, seven clinical questions (CQs) were set to determine the grade of recommendation and level of evidence. Preconceptions and biases were removed from the preparation process, the overall evidence was evaluated appropriately, and recommendations were made after fully considering the balance between benefits and harms. Although the evidence is still insufficient to be taken up as a CQ, the latest important information is described in seven columns, and clinical issues that should be resolved in the future related to the CQ are described as recommendations for tomorrow. We hope that these guidelines will help medical professionals, patients, and their families involved in the treatment of UTUC in their decision-making, and hope that a critical review of these guidelines will lead to further refinements in the next edition.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Japan/epidemiology
20.
Int J Urol ; 31(4): 355-361, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38146740

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the surgical and functional outcomes of patients who have undergone repeat open partial nephrectomy (reOPN) or robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (reRAPN). METHODS: Until May 2022, 3310 patients with renal tumors underwent nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) at affiliated institutions. Of these, 22 and 17 patients who underwent reOPN and reRAPN, respectively, were included in this study. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of sex, age, comorbidities, recurrent tumor size at repeat NSS, interval from recurrence to initial NSS, and nephrometry score. ReRAPN had a shorter operative time (median: 138.0 vs. 214.0 min; p = 0.0023) and less estimated blood loss (median: 50.0 vs. 255.0 mL; p = 0.0261) than reOPN. The incidence of complications with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 was higher in the reOPN group than in the reRAPN group (31.8 vs. 5.9%; p = 0.0467). The mean decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months postoperatively was not significantly different between the groups. The trifecta achievement rates in the reRAPN (64.7%) and reOPN (27.3%) groups were significantly different (p = 0.0194). On multivariate analysis, age and surgical method were significant predictors of trifecta achievement after partial nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in postoperative renal functional outcomes between reOPN and reRAPN. ReRAPN is superior to reOPN in terms of surgical burden. Therefore, ReRAPN is an important minimally invasive surgery for recurrent renal cell carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms , Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Nephrectomy/adverse effects , Nephrectomy/methods , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Glomerular Filtration Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL