Serologic response to COVID-19 infection or vaccination in pediatric kidney transplant recipients compared to healthy children.

BACKGROUND: Differences in serologic response to COVID-19 infection or vaccination were reported in adult kidney transplant recipients (KTR) compared to non-immunocompromised patients. This study aims to compare the serologic response of naturally infected or vaccinated pediatric KTR to that of controls. METHODS: Thirty-eight KTR and 42 healthy children were included; aged ≤18 years, with a previously confirmed COVID-19 infection or post COVID-19 vaccination. Serological response was measured by anti-spike protein IgG antibody titers. Response post third vaccine was additionally assessed in KTR. RESULTS: Fourteen children in each group had previously confirmed infection. KTR were significantly older and developed a 2-fold higher antibody titer post-infection compared to controls [median (interquartile range [IQR]) age: 14.9 (7.8, 17.5) vs. 6.3 (4.5, 11.5) years, p = 0.02; median (IQR) titer: 1695 (982, 3520) vs. 716 (368, 976) AU/mL, p = 0.03]. Twenty-four KTR and 28 controls were vaccinated. Antibody titer was lower in KTR than in controls [median (IQR): 803 (206, 1744) vs. 8023 (3032, 30,052) AU/mL, p < 0.001]. Fourteen KTR received third vaccine. Antibody titer post booster in KTR reached similar levels to those of controls post two doses [median (IQR) 5923 (2295, 12,278) vs. 8023 (3034, 30,052) AU/mL, p = 0.37] and to KTR post natural infection [5282 AU/mL (2583, 13,257) p = 0.8]. CONCLUSION: Serologic response to COVID-19 infection was significantly higher in KTR than in controls. Antibody level in KTR was higher in response to infection vs. vaccination, contrary to reports in the general population. Response to vaccination in KTR reached levels comparable to controls only after third vaccine.

Serological Response to the BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in Adolescent and Young Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Initial reports in adult kidney transplant recipients (KTR) indicate low immunogenicity after 2 doses of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. We describe the immunogenicity of this vaccine compared to the serologic response in naturally infected COVID-19 positive adolescent and young adult KTR. METHODS: For this prospective observational study, the study group included 38 KTR who received 2 doses of the tested vaccine, and the control group included 14 KTR who had a previous polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: The mean age was 18 ± 3 y. Positive serologic responses were observed in 63% and 100% of the study and control groups, respectively (P = 0.01). Antibody titers were almost 30-fold higher in the control than the study group (median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 2782 [1908-11 000] versus 100.3 [4.7-1744] AU/mL, P < 0.001), despite the longer time from the COVID-19 infection to serologic testing compared to time from vaccination (median [IQR]: 157.5 [60-216] versus 37 [20.5-53] d, P = 0.011). Among vaccinated patients, higher proportions of those seronegative than seropositive were previously treated with rituximab (50% versus 8%, P = 0.01). Time from the second vaccine dose to serologic testing was longer in seropositive than seronegative patients (median [IQR]: 24.5 [15-40] versus 46 [27-56] d, P = 0.05). No patient developed symptomatic COVID-19 disease postvaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine yielded higher positive antibody response in adolescent and young adult KTR than previously reported for adult KTR. Antibody titers after vaccination were significantly lower than following COVID-19 infection. Longer time may be required to mount appropriate humoral immunity to vaccination in KTR.

Response to erythropoietin in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease: insights from an in vitro bioassay.

BACKGROUND: Decreased production of erythropoietin (EPO) is a major cause of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Treatment with recombinant human EPO (rHuEPO) improves patients' quality of life and survival; however, there is a marked variability in response to rHuEPO. At present, no available laboratory test is capable of evaluating responsiveness to EPO treatment. The aim of the present study was to use an in vitro bioassay to estimate the effect of uremic environment on EPO-dependent erythroid cell proliferation. METHODS: EPO-dependent human erythroleukemia cells (UT-7) were incubated with exogenous EPO (2 u/ml) and sera obtained from 60 pediatric patients (aged 1-23 years). Three groups were studied: (1) 12 children on dialysis (4 peritoneal, 8 hemodialysis); (2) 28 patients with CKD 1-5 (not on dialysis), and (3) 20 healthy children. RESULTS: Sera from dialysis patients inhibited UT-7 cell growth compared to the CKD group and healthy controls at 48 h (p = 0.003 and p = 0.04, respectively) and 72 h of culture (p = 0.02 and p = 0.07, respectively). In 18 patients treated with rHuEPO, a significant inverse correlation was found between the EPO resistance index and cell proliferation at 48 h (p = 0.007, r = - 0.63) and 72 h (p = 0.03, r = - 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the presence of erythropoiesis inhibitory substances in uremic sera. EPO/EPO-R-dependent mechanisms may play a role in inhibiting erythropoiesis. The in vitro bioassay described herein may serve as an indicator of rHuEPO responsiveness which may encourage further investigation of underlying mechanisms of EPO resistance.