Comparison of onset time, duration of action, and intubating conditions after cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg in young and elderly patients.

INTRODUCTION: Tracheal intubation during anesthesia can be facilitated by the neuromuscular blocking agent cisatracurium. However, limited data exists about onset time, duration of action and effect on intubating conditions in elderly patients above 80 years of age. We hypothesized that elderly patients would present a longer onset time and duration of action compared to younger adults. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 31 young (18-40 years) and 29 elderly (≥ 80 years) patients. Patients were given fentanyl 2 µg/kg and propofol 1.5-2.5 mg/kg for induction of anesthesia and maintained with remifentanil and propofol. Monitoring of neuromuscular function was performed with acceleromyography. Primary outcome was onset time defined as time from injection of cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg (based on ideal body weight) to a train-of-four (TOF) count of 0. Other outcomes included duration of action (time to TOF ratio ≥ 0.9), intubation conditions using the Fuchs-Buder scale and the Intubating Difficulty Scale (IDS), and occurrence of hoarseness and sore throat postoperatively. RESULTS: Elderly patients had significantly longer onset time compared with younger patients; 297 seconds (SD 120) vs. 199 seconds (SD 59) (difference: 98 seconds (95% CI: 49-147), P < 0.001)). Duration of action was also significantly longer in elderly patients compared with younger patients; 89 minutes (SD 17) vs. 77 minutes (SD 14) (difference: 12 minutes (95% CI: 2.5-20.5) P = 0.01)). No difference was found in the proportion of excellent intubating conditions (Fuchs-Buder); 19/29 (66%) vs 21/31 (68%) (P = 0.86) or IDS score (P = 0.74). A larger proportion of elderly patients reported hoarseness 24 hours postoperatively; 62% vs 34% P = 0.04. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg had significantly longer onset time and duration of action compared with younger patients. No difference was found in intubating conditions at a TOF count of 0. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04921735, date of registration 10 June 2021).

Low-dose hydrocortisone in patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxia: The COVID STEROID randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In the early phase of the pandemic, some guidelines recommended the use of corticosteroids for critically ill patients with COVID-19, whereas others recommended against the use despite lack of firm evidence of either benefit or harm. In the COVID STEROID trial, we aimed to assess the effects of low-dose hydrocortisone on patient-centred outcomes in adults with COVID-19 and severe hypoxia. METHODS: In this multicentre, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, blinded, centrally randomised, stratified clinical trial, we randomly assigned adults with confirmed COVID-19 and severe hypoxia (use of mechanical ventilation or supplementary oxygen with a flow of at least 10 L/min) to either hydrocortisone (200 mg/d) vs a matching placebo for 7 days or until hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the number of days alive without life support at day 28 after randomisation. RESULTS: The trial was terminated early when 30 out of 1000 participants had been enrolled because of external evidence indicating benefit from corticosteroids in severe COVID-19. At day 28, the median number of days alive without life support in the hydrocortisone vs placebo group were 7 vs 10 (adjusted mean difference: -1.1 days, 95% CI -9.5 to 7.3, P = .79); mortality was 6/16 vs 2/14; and the number of serious adverse reactions 1/16 vs 0/14. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial of adults with COVID-19 and severe hypoxia, we were unable to provide precise estimates of the benefits and harms of hydrocortisone as compared with placebo as only 3% of the planned sample size were enrolled. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04348305. European Union Drug Regulation Authorities Clinical Trials (EudraCT) Database: 2020-001395-15.