ABSTRACT
We describe the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies employed in the management of a patient with subfoveal pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) combined with full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) and discuss the possible pathophysiology of these diseases occurring concurrently. A 38-year-old patient with a history of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) presented with FTMH overlying a large subfoveal serous PED. Multimodal imaging confirmed the same and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and eplerenone failed to resolve the PED. Spontaneous resolution of the large PED was observed later and pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling closed the macular hole successfully. However, the PED with fibrinous CSC recurred postoperatively and low fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT) was done to tackle the same. At 10 months' follow-up, the final vision was 6/9, the macular hole remained closed, and the PED had not recurred. Macular hole formation may be the result of choroidal hyperpermeability and leakage in the backdrop of CSC which gives rise to an exudative component causing mechanical stretching and disruption of the overlying sensory retina. Spontaneous uncomplicated resolution of large subfoveal PED in CSCR is rare. This case was managed with a combination of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, surgery, and PDT. The therapeutic challenge here was the timing of surgery.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The authors compare low fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT) against graded subthreshold transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two eyes of 42 patients with chronic CSC were included in this prospective, nonrandomized, interventional trial. All patients were offered PDT as an initial intervention. If they declined PDT, TTT was offered. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent PDT and 22 underwent TTT. The difference in best-corrected visual acuity between the TTT and PDT groups at baseline and at 6 months after treatment was not significant (P = .728). The mean foveal thickness decreased significantly in both groups (P = .001). However, patients in the TTT group required more treatments (P = .013) and longer time for resolution of the CSC (P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Both PDT and TTT may be equally effective in the treatment of chronic CSC. Graded subthreshold TTT may be a cost-effective and safe alternative for PDT. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:334-338.].