ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether all-cause mortality and deaths due to cardiovascular disease are increased in patients who have consulted primary or secondary health care with symptoms and signs of osteoarthritis (OA). METHOD: This study included 383 patients with symptomatic OA at multiple sites from the Genetics ARthrosis and Progression (GARP) study (mean age 60 years, 82% women, 3693 person-years of follow-up) and 459 patients with primary hand, knee, or hip OA from the Osteoarthritis Care Clinic (OCC) study (mean age 61 years, 88% women, 1890 person-years of follow-up). Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for all-cause mortality and causes of deaths in comparison to the general population. Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were used to associate baseline characteristics with all-cause mortality. RESULTS: In the GARP study, 26 patients died whereas 48 deaths were expected (SMR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.79). The SMR was 0.47 (95% CI 0.29-0.76) in women and 0.73 (95% CI 0.39-1.35) in men. Similar results were found in the OCC study (SMR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.82). Malignancy and cardiovascular disease were the main causes of deaths in GARP. Male sex (HR 3.04, 95% CI 1.38-6.69), increasing age (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.16), and self-reported cancer (HR 8.29, 95% CI 3.12-22.03) were associated with increased mortality in GARP. CONCLUSIONS: Patients consulting health care for their OA are not at higher risk of death than the general population. These results suggest that the management of OA patients may not need to focus specifically on the treatment of cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Osteoarthritis, Hip/mortality , Osteoarthritis, Knee/mortality , Aged , Confidence Intervals , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , SiblingsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of erosive disease in first carpometacarpal joints (CMCJs) and investigate its clinical impact compared with radiographic thumb base (TB) osteoarthritis (OA). PATIENT AND METHODS: Standardized assessments with hand radiographs were performed in participants of two population-based cohort studies in North Staffordshire with hand symptoms lasting ≥1 day in the past month. Erosive disease was defined as the presence of eroded or remodeled phase in ≥1 interphalangeal joint (IPJ) or first CMCJ following the Verbruggen-Veys classification. Hand pain and function were assessed with Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN). Prevalence was estimated by dividing the number of persons with erosive lesions by population size. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to contrast clinical determinants between persons with erosions and with radiographic TB OA. Results were presented as mean differences and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), adjusted for age, sex and radiographic severity. RESULTS: 1,076 participants were studied (60% women, mean age 64.7 years (SD 8.3); 24 persons had erosive disease in the TB. The prevalence of erosive disease in first CMCJs was 2.2% (95% CI 1.4, 3.3). Only 0.5% (95% CI 0.2, 1.2) had erosive disease affecting IPJs and first CMCJs combined. More persons with erosive disease of first CMCJs reported pain in their TB than persons with radiographic TB OA, AUSCAN pain and function scores were similar. CONCLUSION: Erosive disease of first CMCJs was present in 2.2% of subjects with hand pain and was often not accompanied by erosions in IPJs. Erosive disease was associated with TB pain, but not with the level of pain, when compared with radiographic TB OA.
Subject(s)
Carpometacarpal Joints/pathology , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis/pathology , Pain Measurement , Thumb/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Carpometacarpal Joints/diagnostic imaging , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hand Strength , Humans , Independent Living , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Residence Characteristics , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors , Sickness Impact Profile , Thumb/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study inflammatory ultrasound (US) features and pain over a 3-month period in hand osteoarthritis (HOA). DESIGN: In 25 consecutive HOA patients (mean age 60 years, 76% female), fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were collected at baseline and 3 months. In 750 [all first carpometacarpal (CMC), metacarpalphalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), distal interphalangeal (DIP) and first interphalangeal (IP)] joints, pain was assessed upon palpation and synovial thickening, effusion and power Doppler signal (PDS) were scored with standardized methods by US. Associations between inflammatory features and painful joints were analysed using generalized estimated equations to account for patient effects, adjusting for confounders, and presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: Inflammatory US features were seen in (nearly) all patients. The median number (range) of inflammatory joints per patient did not change over time: 9 (0-16) to 9 (2-18). In 18.7% of joints inflammatory features were present at both time points; in 20.5% inflammatory features occurred only at baseline or follow-up. Pain decreased over time: median VAS pain 49-39 mm; median number of painful joints 8-3. Synovial thickening, effusion and PDS were associated with pain upon palpation both at baseline and follow-up: OR 2.9 (1.4, 5.7), 2.7 (1.7, 4.3), 3.6 (2.1, 6.3) and 7.3 (3.2, 16.5), 3.3 (2.3, 4.7), 4.1 (2.1, 7.9). respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In HOA inflammatory US features are stable over time at patient level, but vary on joint level. Pain diminished after 3 months, while associations between painful joints and inflammation seem to increase, emphasizing the multifactorial aetiology of pain.
Subject(s)
Hand Joints/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hand Joints/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis/complications , Osteoarthritis/pathology , Pain/diagnostic imaging , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement/methods , Radiography , Synovial Membrane/diagnostic imaging , Synovial Membrane/pathology , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk factors for progression of hand osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: In a systematic review of cohort studies, medical literature databases were searched up to May 2012 for articles reporting data on the association between risk factors and hand OA progression. The quality of these studies was assessed by 2 independent reviewers using a criteria scoring system of 16 items, and studies were dichotomized into those with scores of 69% or over and those with scores under 69%. Best evidence synthesis was used to determine the level of evidence per risk factor. RESULTS: In total, 14 articles that fulfilled the selection criteria were included, of which 8 were high quality. The most frequently investigated risk factors were age, sex, radiographic features (e.g., erosive OA), and scintigraphy. Progression was mostly defined by radiographic criteria, but also clinical progression as an outcome was described. Most of the investigated risk factors showed limited or inconclusive evidence for an association with hand OA progression. Limited evidence according to the best evidence synthesis with most available studies was present for the association between a positive scintigraphic scan and radiographic progression (up to 2.8 times more progression than negative joints). CONCLUSION: Limited evidence is available for a positive association between an abnormal scintigraphic scan and radiographic hand OA progression. These data suggest that a positive scintigraphic scan as an inclusion criterion for studies that aim to show structural modification can increase the power of such studies. Future longitudinal studies with a well-defined baseline population are needed to search for risk factors of hand OA progression.
Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis , Quality of Life , Risk Assessment , Disease Progression , Global Health , Hand , Humans , Incidence , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis/etiology , Radiography , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of joint space width (JSW) measurements in millimeters (mm) in hand osteoarthritis (OA) patients by comparison to controls, grading of joint space narrowing (JSN), and clinical features. METHODS: Hand radiographs of 235 hand OA patients (mean age 65 years, 83% women) and 471 controls were used. JSW was measured with semi-automated image analysis software in the distal, proximal interphalangeal and metacarpal joints (DIPJs, PIPJs and MCPJs). JSN (grade 0-3) was assessed using the osteoarthritis research society international (OARSI) atlas. Associations between the two methods and clinical determinants (presence of pain, nodes and/or erosions, decreased mobility) were assessed using Generalized Estimating Equations with adjustments for age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and mean width of proximal phalanx. RESULTS: JSW was measured in 5631 joints with a mean JSW of 0.98 mm (standard deviation (SD) 0.21), being the smallest for DIPJs (0.70 (SD 0.25)) and largest for MCPJs (1.40 (SD 0.25)). The JSN=0 group had a mean JSW of 1.28 mm (SD 0.34), the JSN=3 group 0.17 mm (SD 0.23). Controls had larger JSW than hand OA patients (P-value<0.001). In hand OA, females had smaller JSW than men (ß -0.08, (95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.15 to -0.01)) and lower JSW was associated with the presence of pain, nodes, erosions and decreased mobility (adjusted ß -0.21 (95% CI -0.27, -0.16), -0.37 (-0.40, -0.34), -0.61 (-0.68, -0.54) and -0.46 (-0.68, -0.24) respectively). These associations were similar for JSN in grades. CONCLUSION: In hand OA the quantitative JSW measurement is a valid method to measure joint space and shows a good relation with clinical features.
Subject(s)
Finger Joint/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Finger Joint/physiopathology , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis/complications , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology , Osteophyte/etiology , Pain/etiology , Radiography , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of erosive hand osteoarthritis (EOA) in the general population and its relation to symptomatic hand osteoarthritis (HOA), hand pain and disability. METHODS: Baseline data of participants from a population-based study (age ≥55 years) were used. Symptomatic HOA was defined as hand pain and in addition to radiographic HOA (at least one interphalangeal (IP) joint or 1st carpometacarpal joint with Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2). EOA was defined as having at least one IP joint with erosions according to the Verbruggen-Veys scoring method. Hand pain and disability were self-reported. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the effect of EOA on pain and disability. Results were presented as OR with a 95% CI, adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: Of 3430 participants, radiographic HOA was seen in 56% (n=1916) and symptomatic HOA in 11% (n=371). Erosions were seen in 96 subjects. The prevalence of EOA in the general, radiographic and symptomatic HOA population was 2.8%, 5.0% and 10.2%, respectively. Presence of EOA led to adjusted ORs for pain of 3.6 (95% CI 2.4 to 5.6) and for disability 2.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 5.4). In radiographic HOA, people with erosion(s) had more hand pain (adjusted OR=3.1, 95% CI 2.0 to 4.8) or disability (adjusted OR=2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.8) than people without erosion(s). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of EOA is 2.8% in the general population and 10.2% in individuals with symptomatic HOA. It has a substantial impact on hand pain and disability.
Subject(s)
Hand Joints , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Activities of Daily Living , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , Disability Evaluation , Female , Hand Joints/diagnostic imaging , Hand Joints/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis/complications , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis/rehabilitation , Pain/epidemiology , Pain/etiology , Prevalence , Radiography , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of limitations in daily activities and pain on quality of life (QoL) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) visiting a rheumatologist. METHODS: Patients diagnosed by the rheumatologist with primary hand, knee or hip OA were consecutively included from August 2005 to April 2009. QoL was assessed by Short Form-36, with the physical component summary score (PCS), calculated using data from a norm-based population. Self-reported pain and function in patients with hand OA was assessed by the Australian/Canadian OA hand index (AUSCAN) pain (range 0-20) and AUSCAN function (range 0-36). Linear regression analyses were performed to investigate associations between PCS and demographic characteristics, and between PCS and pain and function in patients with OA. RESULTS: Hand OA was diagnosed in 95% of 460 included patients (89% women, mean age 61 years). PCS was lowered in patients with OA. Patients with hand OA reported a considerable amount of pain (mean 9.5 (SD 4.3)) and disability (mean 16.5 (SD 8.6)). AUSCAN function was associated with PCS (adjusted ß=-0.3, 95% CI -0.4 to -0.2), but AUSCAN pain was not. CONCLUSIONS: Hand OA was the most common OA subtype in secondary care. Health-related QoL is decreased in patients with OA and is associated with limitations in daily activities.