A thermostable, dry formulation inactivated Hikojima whole cell/cholera toxin B subunit oral cholera vaccine.

The feared diarrheal disease cholera remains an important global health problem. Use of oral cholera vaccine (OCV) from a global stockpile against both epidemic and endemic cholera is a cornerstone in the World Health Organisations (WHOs) global program for "Ending cholera by 2030". Three liquid inactivated whole-cell OCVs (Dukoral®, ShancholTM, and Euvichol-Plus®) are WHO prequalified and have proved to be safe and effective. However, their multicomponent composition and cold-chain requirement increase manufacturing, storage and transport costs. ShancholTM and Euvichol-Plus® OCVs used in WHOs global vaccine stockpile also lack the protective cholera toxin B-subunit (CTB) antigen present in Dukoral®, which results in suboptimal efficacy. WHOs Global Task Force on Cholera Control (GTFCC) has identified a thermostable, dry formulation vaccine as a priority for further OCV development. We describe here the development of such a vaccine, based on a lyophilized mixture of a single strain of formalin-killed Hikojima bacteria together with a low-cost, recombinantly produced CTB. The new vaccine, which is easy and inexpensive to manufacture, could be stored for at least 26 months at 25 °C and for at least 8 months at 40 °C with preservation of cell morphology and with no loss of protective Ogawa and Inaba lipopolysaccharides or CTB. It also proved to be well tolerated and to have equivalent oral immunogenicity in mice as ShancholTM and Dukoral® OCVs with regard to both serum and intestinal-mucosal antibody responses.

Development of Hillchol®, a low-cost inactivated single strain Hikojima oral cholera vaccine.

Cholera remains an important global health problem with up to 4 million cases and 140,000 deaths annually. Oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) are now a cornerstone of the WHOs "Ending Cholera - A Global Roadmap to 2030" global program for the eventual elimination of cholera. There are currently three WHO prequalified OCVs available, Dukoral®, Shanchol® and Euvichol-Plus®. These vaccines are effective but due to a multiple strain composition and two different methods of inactivation, are complex and costly to manufacture. We describe here the characterization and industrial scale development of Hillchol®; a novel, likely affordable single-component OCV for low and middle-income countries. Hillchol® consists of formalin-inactivated bacteria of a stable recombinant Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor Hikojima serotype strain expressing approximately 50% each of Ogawa and Inaba O1 LPS antigens. The novel OCV can be manufactured on an industrial scale at a low cost. Hillchol® was well tolerated in animal toxicology studies and shown to have non-inferior oral immunogenicity in mice for both intestinal-mucosal and serological immune responses when compared with a WHO-prequalified OCV. The optimized production of this single component OCV will reduce cost of OCV production and thus substantially increase vaccine availability. Based on these results, Hillchol® has been produced at a GMP facility and used successfully for clinical phase I/II studies.

Safety and immunogenicity of the oral, inactivated, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli vaccine ETVAX in Bangladeshi children and infants: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli causes diarrhoea, leading to substantial mortality and morbidity in children, but no specific vaccine exists. This trial tested an oral, inactivated, enterotoxigenic E coli vaccine (ETVAX), which has been previously shown to be safe and highly immuongenic in Swedish and Bangladeshi adults. We tested the safety and immunogenicity of ETVAX, consisting of four E coli strains overexpressing the most prevalent colonisation factors (CFA/I, CS3, CS5, and CS6) and a toxoid (LCTBA) administered with or without a double-mutant heat-labile enterotoxin (dmLT) as an adjuvant, in Bangladeshi children. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation, age-descending, phase 1/2 trial in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Healthy children in one of three age groups (24-59 months, 12-23 months, and 6-11 months) were eligible. Children were randomly assigned with block randomisation to receive either ETVAX, with or without dmLT, or placebo. ETVAX (half [5·5 × 1010 cells], quarter [2·5 × 1010 cells], or eighth [1·25 × 1010 cells] adult dose), with or without dmLT adjuvant (2·5 µg, 5·0 µg, or 10·0 µg), or placebo were administered orally in two doses 2 weeks apart. Investigators and participants were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, assessed in all children who received at least one dose of vaccine. Antibody responses to vaccine antigens, defined as at least a two-times increase in antibody levels between baseline and post-immunisation, were assessed as secondary endpoints. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02531802. FINDINGS: Between Dec 7, 2015, and Jan 10, 2017, we screened 1500 children across the three age groups, of whom 430 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the different treatment groups (130 aged 24-59 months, 100 aged 12-23 months, and 200 aged 6-11 months). All participants received at least one dose of vaccine. No solicited adverse events occurred that were greater than moderate in severity, and most were mild. The most common solicited event was vomiting (ten [8%] of 130 patients aged 24-59 months, 13 [13%] of 100 aged 12-23 months, and 29 [15%] of 200 aged 6-11 months; mostly of mild severity), which appeared related to dose and age. The addition of dmLT did not modify the safety profile. Three serious adverse events occurred but they were not considered related to the study drug. Mucosal IgA antibody responses in lymphocyte secretions were detected against all primary vaccine antigens (CFA/I, CS3, CS5, CS6, and the LCTBA toxoid) in most participants in the two older age groups, whereas such responses to four of the five antigens were less frequent and of lower magnitude in infants aged 6-11 months than in older children. Faecal secretory IgA immune responses were recorded against all vaccine antigens in infants aged 6-11 months. 78 (56%) of 139 infants aged 6-11 months who were vaccinated developed mucosal responses against at least three of the vaccine antigens versus 14 (29%) of 49 of the infants given placebo. Addition of the adjuvant dmLT enhanced the magnitude, breadth, and kinetics (based on number of responders after the first dose of vaccine) of immune responses in infants. INTERPRETATION: The encouraging safety and immunogenicity of ETVAX and benefit of dmLT adjuvant in young children support its further assessment for protective efficacy in children in enterotoxigenic E coli-endemic areas. FUNDING: PATH (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK's Department for International Development), the Swedish Research Council, and The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research.

Cross-reactivity and avidity of antibody responses induced in humans by the oral inactivated multivalent enterotoxigenicEscherichia coli (ETEC) vaccine ETVAX.

We investigated whether the oral inactivated, multivalent enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) vaccine ETVAX, consisting of four E. coli strains over-expressing the colonisation factors (CFs) CFA/I, CS3, CS5 and CS6, combined with the toxoid LCTBA, could induce cross-reactive antibodies to CFs related to the CFA/I and CS5 families. We also evaluated the avidity of vaccine induced antibodies against the toxoid and CFs. Cross-reactivity was analysed in mucosal (faecal and antibodies in lymphocyte supernatants, ALS) samples, and antibody avidity in serum and ALS samples, from two phase I trials: a primary vaccination study, where two oral doses of ETVAX were given±the double mutant heat labile toxin (dmLT) adjuvant at a 2-week interval, and a booster vaccination study, where a single booster dose of ETVAX was given 13-23months after primary vaccinations. We found that 65-90% of subjects who had responded to CFA/I in ALS or faecal specimens also developed cross-reactive antibodies to the related CFs tested, i.e. CS1, CS14 and CS17, and that approximately 80% of those responding to CS5 also responded to the closely related CS7. For subjects who had developed cross-reactive antibodies, the magnitudes of responses against vaccine CFs and related non-vaccine CFs were comparable. Using both a simple method of antibody avidity determination based on limiting antigen dilution, as well as a chaotropic ELISA method, we found that the avidity of serum and ALS antibodies to key vaccine antigens increased after a late booster dose compared to after primary vaccination. Our results suggest that the cross-reactive antibody responses against multiple CFs may result in expanded ETEC strain coverage of ETVAX and that repeated vaccinations induce vaccine-specific antibodies with increased binding capacity.