Transition to self-management among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes: a mixed methods study.

Introduction: Emerging adulthood is challenging for young people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This study evaluated transition to diabetes self-management and perceptions of care transfer using mixed methods. Methods: An online survey queried demographics, management characteristics, diabetes knowledge, self-care readiness, adherence, and diabetes distress. T-tests compared survey scores between those with self-reported target A1c <7.0% versus ≥7.0%. Pearson correlations assessed associations between A1c and diabetes distress, stratified by A1c <7.0% versus ≥7.0%. Qualitative semi-structured interviews elicited perceptions of young adults; transcripts were analyzed using directed qualitative content analysis. Results: Of 141 participants (30% male, 84% non-Hispanic white) completing the survey, 41% self-reported target A1c <7.0%. Diabetes knowledge and self-care readiness scores did not differ between those with A1c <7.0% versus ≥7.0%, while diabetes distress was lower (45 ± 20 vs 52 ± 20, p=0.01) and adherence higher (77 ± 12 vs 71 ± 14, p=0.02) in those with A1c <7.0% versus ≥7.0%. Diabetes distress was significantly associated with glycemic outcomes in those reporting A1c ≥7.0% (R=0.36, p<0.01). Qualitative analysis (24 participants) revealed five themes and two sub-themes, notable for need for more mental health support, support from others with T1D, benefits of technology for care autonomy, and challenges of obtaining diabetes supplies. Discussion: Emerging adults with self-reported target A1c endorsed lower diabetes distress and higher adherence than those with elevated A1c. Mental health access, support from others with T1D, technology use, and guidance for supply acquisition may improve transition to self-management and care transfer for emerging adults with T1D.

New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes in a Child With Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Severe Hypertriglyceridemia Without Pancreatitis.

Hypertriglyceridemia is a complication of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) secondary to insulin deficiency inhibiting lipoprotein lipase and increasing lipolysis, but it is rare in children. A 7-year-old boy with history of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) presented with abdominal pain, vomiting, and "heavy breathing." Initial laboratory tests revealed pH 6.87 and glucose 385 mg/dL (21.4 mmol/L), consistent with new-onset diabetes and DKA. His blood appeared lipemic; triglycerides were 17 675 mg/dL (199.6 mmol/L) with normal lipase (10 units/L). He received intravenous insulin and DKA resolved within 24 hours. Insulin infusion continued through day 6 for management of hypertriglyceridemia; triglycerides decreased to 1290 mg/dL (14.6 mmol/L) during this period. He never developed pancreatitis (lipase peaked at 68 units/L) or required plasmapheresis. With his ASD history, he had a restrictive diet high in saturated fat, which included up to 30 breakfast sausages daily. His triglycerides normalized after discharge. Severe hypertriglyceridemia can complicate DKA in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes (T1D). Hypertriglyceridemia can be safely managed with insulin infusion in the absence of end-organ dysfunction. This complication should be considered in patients with DKA at diagnosis of T1D.

"Fear That One Day I May Not Be Able to Afford Insulin": The Emotional Burden of Diabetes Costs During Emerging Adulthood.

Emerging adults (EAs) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) often experience challenges in diabetes management, in particular transitioning to financial independence. EAs 18-30 years of age with T1D completed online surveys about diabetes distress and an open-ended query about the most important worry among survey questions. Most of the 287 respondents (89.5%) endorsed "Agree" or "Somewhat agree" to the statement "I worry about the cost of diabetes." Responses did not differ by gender, age, diabetes duration, race/ethnicity, diabetes technology use, student status, income, or insurance status. However, a greater proportion of those not endorsing cost as a substantial burden achieved A1c <7% (92.9%) versus those who were neutral (46.2%) or who endorsed cost as a burden (50.6%) (P = 0.004). Furthermore, in open-ended responses, cost was the most frequently noted worry. Diabetes costs are a major concern for EAs, likely contributing to diabetes distress during this developmental stage, and clinicians should consider discussing diabetes costs with this population.

Assessing Diabetes Distress in Emerging Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Development and Validation of the Problem Areas in Diabetes-Emerging Adult Version.

OBJECTIVES: Emerging adults (18 to 30 years of age) with type 1 diabetes experience suboptimal glycemic and psychological outcomes compared with other groups. The emotional burden of the unending self-care needs of diabetes management appears to be related to these poor health outcomes. However, there is no validated measure of this emotional burden in the developmental context of emerging adulthood. The primary aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of a new measure of diabetes distress in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes in the United States. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, emerging adults with type 1 diabetes completed an online survey, including measures of diabetes distress, depressive symptomology and the newly developed measure, the Problem Areas in Diabetes-Emerging Adult version (PAID-EA). Participants also answered demographic and clinical outcomes questions. Internal consistency, reliability, construct validity and the underlying factor structure of the PAID-EA were assessed. RESULTS: Participants (N=287, 78% women) had a median age of 24 years, 43% were full-time students, 78% wore an insulin pump and 90% used a continuous glucose monitor. Mean self-reported glycated hemoglobin was 7.1%±1.2%. The PAID-EA demonstrated good internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach alpha=0.89), was composed of 1 component accounting for 29% of the observed variance and demonstrated construct validity as it was significantly correlated with known measures of similar constructs and with glycated hemoglobin levels (ρ=0.20, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PAID-EA holds promise as a reliable and valid measure of diabetes distress in emerging adults.

Therapeutic play to teach children with type 1 diabetes insulin self-injection: A pilot trial in a developing country.

PURPOSE: Child participation in type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-care is needed in developing countries due to a lack of resources, especially during the school day. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of a therapeutic play intervention (ITP) versus standard education (SE) on the ability of children with T1D to correctly perform insulin injection technique. DESIGN AND METHODS: Children with T1D (7-12 years) were recruited at two diabetes clinics in Brazil and randomized to ITP or SE. Registered nurses received protocol training to deliver the intervention and perform data collection. ITP group received an education that included a story about a child with T1D who self-injects insulin at school; SE group received routine clinic-based education. Preintervention, children were video-recorded giving insulin injections to a doll; postintervention, children were rerecorded giving the doll an injection. The research team reviewed the videos and assessed the injection technique using validated checklists. Parents reported children's self-injection practices at baseline and 30 days. RESULTS: Children (N = 20, 40% male) were 9.6 ± 1.3 years old and had T1D for 3.6 ± 2.3 years; HbA1c was 9.1 ± 2.0%; 20% of ITP and 50% of SE children used syringes (vs. pens) for injections. At baseline, 80% of both groups knew how to self-inject; most were taught by a parent/relative. Injection technique scores were low in both groups; ITP group increased their scores significantly postintervention. Practices of self-injection did not change in either group after 30 days. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The play-based intervention appeared to improve the injection technique in the short-term. Pilot findings support the development of a larger trial to evaluate the effectiveness of ITP on educating children on insulin injections.

How Do the Challenges of Emerging Adulthood Inform our Understanding of Diabetes Distress? An Integrative Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Emerging adulthood (ages 18-29) presents many emotional, social, and developmental challenges that can contribute to an increased sense of burden when managing type 1 diabetes (T1D). Diabetes distress (DD) is the concept that captures the emotional burden, frustrations, and worries resulting from living with T1D. This integrative review sets out to examine the impact of developmental context by answering this question: How do the challenges of emerging adulthood inform our understanding of DD? RECENT FINDINGS: DD is highly prevalent in emerging adults and occurs at higher rates than in other age groups. Qualitative studies reveal that DD is embedded within the developmental challenges specific to living with T1D during this stage. Quantitative studies reveal the prevalence and correlates of DD in this age group, and qualitative studies augment these findings by capturing the scope and complexity of the emotional burden of living with T1D as an emerging adult.

Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: Hopes and Expectations of Family Members.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the hopes and expectations that children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes and their families have for new automated insulin delivery systems. The study also aims to examine how the automated insulin delivery system may impact family functioning and individual members' psychosocial adjustment. METHODS: Forty-eight semistructured focus groups (n = 195) and 89 individual interviews were conducted with children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes and parents and partners. Coders reviewed results in key themes most likely to contain references to the family system. Clusters were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify participants' salient hopes and expectations of how new technology may impact family relationships and individual psychosocial functioning. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged for participants' hopes and expectations for implementation of the automated insulin delivery system. First, there is an expectation that this diabetes technology will alleviate diabetes-specific worry and burden for the people with diabetes and other family members. Second, there is also hope that this system may reduce day-to-day stress and, third, improve family relationships. CONCLUSIONS: The unique perspective of a broad age group provides insight into how individuals and families creatively address the multiple tasks required in daily diabetes management. Study findings elucidate the very high hopes and expectations held by those managing type 1 diabetes and the impact this new technology may have on family relationships. Awareness of these hopes and expectations is important for developers and clinicians in addressing potential challenges to uptake and to ensure that expectations are set appropriately.

Disordered Eating Behaviors Are Not Increased by an Intervention to Improve Diet Quality but Are Associated With Poorer Glycemic Control Among Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines whether participation in an 18-month behavioral intervention shown previously to improve overall diet quality inadvertently increases disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) in youth with type 1 diabetes and investigates the association of DEB with multiple measures of glycemic control and variability. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants reported DEB and diabetes management at baseline and 6, 12, and 18 months; masked continuous glucose monitoring, HbA1c, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) were obtained concurrently. Linear mixed models estimated the intervention effect on DEB, the association of DEB with diabetes adherence and measures of glycemic control and variability, and whether DEB modified glycemic trajectories. RESULTS: There was no intervention effect on DEB (P = 0.84). DEB was associated with higher HbA1c (P = 0.001), mean sensor glucose (P = 0.001), and percent sensor glucose values >180 mg/dL (P = <0.001); with lower 1,5-AG (P = 0.01); and with worse diabetes adherence (P = 0.03). DEB was not associated with percent sensor glucose values <70 mg/dL or any measures of glycemic variability. There was a significant DEB × time interaction effect for mean sensor glucose (P = 0.05) and percent sensor glucose values >180 mg/dL (P = 0.04). Participants reporting less DEB had a developmentally expected deterioration in glycemic control throughout the study. Participants reporting more DEB had poor glycemic control at baseline that remained poor throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Findings show a potential to improve diet quality without increasing DEB and indicate an association of DEB with persistent hyperglycemia but not hypoglycemia or glycemic variability.

Influence of HbA1c and BMI on Lipid Trajectories in Youths and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of HbA1c and BMI (measured as BMI z score [zBMI]) on LDL, HDL, and non-HDL trajectories as youths with type 1 diabetes age into early adulthood. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Dynamic, retrospective cohort study examining changes in lipid values in 572 youths with type 1 diabetes followed longitudinally for a median of 9.3 years. Through longitudinal modeling, we describe the relationship of HbA1c and zBMI on lipid values as subjects age after adjusting for other relevant factors, including lipid-lowering medication use. RESULTS: The median number of lipid assessments was 7 (range 2-39). Every 1% increase in HbA1c was associated with an ∼2-6 mg/dL increase in LDL levels, with a greater increase in LDL levels as subjects progressed from prepubertal to postpubertal age ranges. A 1-SD increase in BMI was associated with a mean LDL increase of 2.1 mg/dL when subjects were 10 years old and increased to a mean of 8.2 mg/dL when subjects were 19 years old. The association between changes in HbA1c level and zBMI and changes in non-HDL levels as youths aged were similar to the associations found with LDL. The influence of HbA1c and zBMI on HDL levels was small and not dependent on age. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in HbA1c level and zBMI modestly impact LDL and non-HDL cholesterol and have greater impacts as children age. Addressing elevations in HbA1c and zBMI as children enter into adolescence and beyond may lead to improvements in lipid levels.