Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr HIV Res ; 18(1): 19-28, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31870268

ABSTRACT

The main advantage of animal models of infectious diseases over in vitro studies is the gain in the understanding of the complex dynamics between the immune system and the pathogen. While small animal models have practical advantages over large animal models, it is crucial to be aware of their limitations. Although the small animal model at least needs to be susceptible to the pathogen under study to obtain meaningful data, key elements of pathogenesis should also be reflected when compared to humans. Well-designed small animal models for HIV, hepatitis viruses and tuberculosis require, additionally, a thorough understanding of the similarities and differences in the immune responses between humans and small animals and should incorporate that knowledge into the goals of the study. To discuss these considerations, the NIAID hosted a workshop on 'Small Animal Models for HIV, Hepatitis B, and Tuberculosis' on May 30, 2019. Highlights of the workshop are outlined below.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , HIV Infections/pathology , HIV-1/immunology , Hepatitis B virus/immunology , Hepatitis B/pathology , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/immunology , Tuberculosis/pathology , Animals , Coinfection/microbiology , Guinea Pigs , HIV Infections/immunology , Hepatitis B/immunology , Humans , Macaca mulatta , Marmota , Mice , National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.) , Rabbits , Tuberculosis/immunology , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL