The Insulin Sensitizer KBP-336 Prevents Diabetes-Induced Cognitive decline in ZDF Rats.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Diabetes and especially insulin resistance are associated with an increased risk of developing cognitive dysfunction, making anti-diabetic drugs an interesting therapeutic option for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders. Dual amylin and calcitonin receptor agonists (DACRAs) elicit beneficial effects on glycemic control and insulin sensitivity. However, whether DACRAs affect cognition is unknown. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: Zucker Diabetic Fatty rats were treated with either the DACRA KBP-336 (4.5 nmol/kg Q3D), the amylin analog AM1213 (25 nmol/kg QD), or vehicle for 18 weeks. Further, the efficacy of a late KBP-336 intervention was evaluated by including a group starting treatment on day 30. Glucose control and tolerance were evaluated throughout the study and spatial learning and memory were evaluated by Morris Water Maze after 17 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: When evaluating spatial learning, rats receiving KBP-336 throughout the study performed significantly better than AM1213, vehicle, and late intervention KBP-336. Both KBP-336 and AM1213 treatments improved spatial memory compared to the vehicle. The overall performance in the cognitive tests was reflected in the treatment efficacy on glycemic control, where KBP-336 was superior to AM1213. CONCLUSION: In summary, the DACRA KBP-336 ameliorates diabetes-induced spatial learning and memory impairment in diabetic rats. Further, KBP-336 improves long-term glycemic control superior to the amylin analog AM1213. Taken together, KBP-336 is, due to its anti-diabetic and insulin-sensitizing properties, a promising candidate for the treatment of cognitive impairments.

Does receptor balance matter? - Comparing the efficacies of the dual amylin and calcitonin receptor agonists cagrilintide and KBP-336 on metabolic parameters in preclinical models.

Cagrilintide is a novel long-acting amylin receptor agonist, which has shown a potent induction of weight loss. Interestingly, cagrilintide is a Dual Amylin and Calcitonin Receptor Agonist (DACRA) derived from an amylin backbone. Another class of long-acting DACRAs exists, namely the KBPs. These are salmon calcitonin-based and have shown preclinical potential; however, how and if they differentiate from amylin-derived molecules remain to be studied. Here, we compare cagrilintide to the DACRA KBP-336 with respect to receptor activation balance in vitro and using metabolic in vivo models. Peptide potencies were assessed using receptor-specific assays in vitro and in vivo. In vivo efficacies on body weight and glucose homeostasis were investigated head-to-head in high-fat diet (HFD) fed obese and T2D (ZDF) rat models. Both peptides activate the amylin and the calcitonin receptor in vitro and in vivo, with KBP-336 being more potent, and showing a CTR bias. KBP-336 and cagrilintide induced a potent and dose-dependent weight loss in HFD rats, with the highest dose of KBP-336 being superior to cagrilintide. In diabetic ZDF rats, DACRA treatment improved fasting blood glucose, HbA1c levels, and insulin action, with KBP-336 being superior to cagrilintide in improving glucose control. In summary, both KBP-336 and cagrilintide are DACRAs, however with KBP-336 being biased towards the CTR resulting in a different receptor activation balance. Interestingly, KBP-336 showed superior long-term efficacy on both weight loss and glucose control, supporting relevance of the receptor balance, and highlighting KBP-336 as a promising agent for the treatment of obesity and T2D.

KBP-066A, a long-acting dual amylin and calcitonin receptor agonist, induces weight loss and improves glycemic control in obese and diabetic rats.

OBJECTIVE: Dual amylin and calcitonin receptor agonists (DACRAs) are novel therapeutic agents that not only improve insulin sensitivity but also work as an adjunct to established T2DM therapies. DACRAs are currently administered once daily, though it is unknown whether DACRAs with increased plasma half-life can be developed as a once-weekly therapy. METHODS: The in vitro potencies of the KBP-066A and KBP-066 (non-acylated) were assessed using reporter assays. Acylation functionality was investigated by a combination of pharmacokinetics and acute food intake in rats. in vivo efficacies were investigated head-to-head in obese (HFD) and T2D (ZDF) models. RESULTS: In in vitro, KBP-066A activated the CTR and AMY-R potently, with no off-target activity. Acylation functionality was confirmed by acute tests, as KBP-066A demonstrated a prolonged PK and PD response compared to KBP-066. Both compounds induced potent and dose-dependent weight loss in the HFD rat model. In ZDF rats, fasting blood glucose/fasting insulin levels (tAUC) were reduced by 39%/50% and 36%/47% for KBP-066 and KBP-066A, respectively. This effect resulted in a 31% and 46% vehicle-corrected reduction in HbA1c at the end of the study for KBP-066 and KBP-066A, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we present pre-clinical data on an acylated DACRA, KBP-066A. The in vivo efficacy of KBP-066A is significantly improved compared to its non-acylated variant regarding weight loss and glycemic control in obese (HFD) and obese diabetic rats (ZDF). This compendium of pre-clinical studies highlights KBP-066A as a promising, once-weekly therapeutic agent for treating T2DM and obesity.

Cost-effectiveness of 12 weeks of supervised treatment compared to written advice in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a secondary analysis of the 2-year outcome from a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the 24-month cost-effectiveness of supervised treatment compared to written advice in knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: 100 adults with moderate-severe OA not eligible for total knee replacement (TKR) randomized to a 12-week individualized, supervised treatment (exercise, education, diet, insoles and pain medication) or written advice. Effectiveness was measured as change in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from baseline to 24 months, including data from baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, while healthcare costs and transfer payments were derived from national registries after final follow-up. Incremental costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. A sensitivity analysis resampling existing data was conducted and the probability of cost-effectiveness was estimated using a 22,665 Euros/QALY threshold. In a sensitivity analysis, cost-effectiveness was calculated for different costs of the supervised treatment (actual cost in study; cost in private practice; and in-between cost). RESULTS: Average costs were similar between groups (6,758 Euros vs 6,880 Euros), while the supervised treatment were close to being more effective (incremental effect (95% CI) of 0.075 (-0.005 to 0.156). In the primary analysis excluding deaths, this led the supervised treatment to be cost-effective, compared to written advice. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the results were sensitive to changes in the cost of treatment, but in all scenarios the supervised treatment was cost-effective (ICERs of 6,229 to 20,688 Euros/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: From a 24-month perspective, a 12-week individualized, supervised treatment program is cost-effective compared to written advice in patients with moderate-severe knee OA not eligible for TKR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01535001.

Solution or suspension - Does it matter for lipid based systems? In vivo studies of chase dosing lipid vehicles with aqueous suspensions of a poorly soluble drug.

In this study, the potential of co-administering an aqueous suspension with a placebo lipid vehicle, i.e. chase dosing, was investigated in rats relative to the aqueous suspension alone or a solution of the drug in the lipid vehicle. The lipid investigated in the present study was Labrafil M2125CS and three evaluated poorly soluble model compounds, danazol, cinnarizine and halofantrine. For cinnarizine and danazol the oral bioavailability in rats after chase dosing or dosing the compound dissolved in Labrafil M21515CS was similar and significantly higher than for the aqueous suspension. For halofantrine the chase dosed group had a tendency towards a low bioavailability relative to the Labrafil M2125CS solution, but still a significant higher bioavailability relative to the aqueous suspension. This could be due to factors such as a slower dissolution rate in the intestinal phase of halofantrine or a lower solubility in the colloidal structures formed during digestion, but other mechanisms may also be involved. The study thereby supported the potential of chase dosing as a potential dosing regimen in situations where it is beneficial to have a drug in the solid state, e.g. due to chemical stability issues in the lipid vehicle.