Chemical Localization With Robotic Bronchoscopy: Can It Aid Resection of Subsolid Lung Nodules?

INTRODUCTION: Subsolid nodules or those located deep in lung parenchyma are difficult to localize using minimally invasive thoracic surgery. While image-guided percutaneous needle localization has been performed, it is inconvenient and has potential complications. In this study, the role of chemical localization using robotic bronchoscopy to facilitate resection was evaluated. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing surgical resection for lung nodules between 8/2019-3/2022 were included. Patients with subsolid lung nodules, or small nodules deep in lung parenchyma that were deemed difficult to localize, were chemically localized (CL) using robotic bronchoscopy before resection. Clinico-demographic data were obtained retrospectively using a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: Localization of lung nodules before resection was performed in 139 patients while 110 patients were not localized. Daily activity score was higher for localized patients. Nodules in the localized group were smaller (P < 0.001) and had similar solid:ground glass ratio. In the localized group, larger margins were observed, and no re-resection of the parenchymal margin was required. Twenty patients in the non-localized group required re-resection intraoperatively due to close pathological margins or inability to locate the nodule in the resected specimen. Operative time was a median of 10-15 min longer for localized patients, P < 0.001. Length of stay was shorter in the localized group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Chemical localization of lung nodules using robotic bronchoscopy appears to be a safe and effective method of identifying the location of nodules with small size and less density and aids increased tumor margins intraoperatively.

Perioperative Esophagectomy Outcomes in Older Esophageal Cancer Patients in Two Different Time Eras.

To investigate perioperative outcomes of esophagectomies by age groups. Retrospective analysis of esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at a single academic institution. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were analyzed by 3 age groups: <70, 70-79, and ≥80 years-old. Sub-analysis was done for 2 time periods: 2005-2012 and 2013-2020. Of 1135 patients, 789 patients were <70, 294 were 70-79, and 52 were ≥80 years-old. Tumor characteristics, and operative technique were similar, except positive longitudinal margins rates (all <3%) (P = 0.008). Older adults experienced increased complications (53.6% vs 69.7% vs 65.4% respectively; P < 0.001) attributable to grade II complications (41.4% vs 62.2% vs 63.5% respectively; P < 0.001). Hospital length of stay (LOS) and rehabilitation requirements were higher in older adults (both P < 0.05). 30-day readmissions, reoperation, and 30-day mortality rates (all <2%) showed no association with age group. Overall complications, LOS, discharge disposition and re-operative rates improved from 2005 to 2012 to 2013-2020 for all (P < 0.05). Increasing age was an independent risk factor for cardiovascular complications (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.23-2.46 for ages 70-79 and OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.37-5.10 for ages ≥80 ), inpatient rehabilitation (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.26-5.05 for ages 70-79 and OR 12.1 95% CI 5.83-25.04 for ages ≥80), and prolonged LOS (OR 1.64 95% CI 1.16-2.31 for ages 70-79 and OR 3.6 95% CI 1.71-7.67 for ≥80. After adjusting for time period, older age remained associated with complications (P < 0.05). Highly selected older adults at a large volume esophagectomy center can undergoesophagectomy with increased minor complication and rehabilitation needs.

Hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy (HIOC) for Stage IVa thymic malignancy may improve 5-year disease-free survival.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stage IVa thymic malignancy has limited treatments. This study evaluated whether hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy (HIOC) after radical resection of Stage IVa thymic malignancy improves survival. METHODS: All patients who underwent resection, with or without HIOC, for Stage IVa thymic malignancy at a single center from 1990 to 2021 were reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were identified; 22 surgery-only versus 12 surgery and HIOC (60 min cisplatin regimen 175 mg/m2 ). Demographics and comorbidities were similar between groups. Three patients in each group were carcinomas; remainder were thymomas. Thirty-two patients underwent attempted macroscopic complete resection; 22 operations succeeded, 68.8%. Significant complications were similar between groups, 18.2% surgery-only versus 25.0% HIOC, p = 0.68. Median time to recurrence trended longer for HIOC patients (42.9 vs. 32.9 months in surgery-only, p = 0.77). Overall survival, 5-year, was similar (75.8% HIOC vs. 76.2% surgery-only, p = 0.91). On stratified analysis, thymoma patients with macroscopic complete resection and HIOC experienced similar 5-year Overall (80.0% vs. 100.0% surgery-only, p = 0.157) but longer trending 5-year disease-free (85.7% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.18) and 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (85.7% vs. 68.6%, p = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study treating Stage IVa thymic malignancy with radical pleurectomy, with or without HIOC, found addition of HIOC-signaled delayed recurrence and improved disease-free survival.

Report on lung cancer surgery during COVID-19 pandemic at a high volume US institution.

Background: The impact of COVID-19 has been felt in every field of medicine. We sought to understand how lung cancer surgery was affected at a high volume institution. We hypothesized that patients would wait longer for surgery, have more advanced tumors, and experience more complications during the COVID-19 crisis. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted, comparing pathologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgical cases performed in 2019 to cases performed from March to May 2020, during the height of the COVID-19 crisis. Clinical and pathologic stage, tumor size, time to surgery, follow up time, and complications were evaluated. Results: A total of 375 cases were performed in 2019 vs. 58 cases in March to May 2020. Overall, there were no differences in the distribution of clinical stages or in the distribution of median wait times to surgery between groups (COVID-19 16.5 days vs. pre-COVID-19 17 days, P=0.54), nor were there differences when subdivided into Stage I-II and Stage III-IV. Case volume was lowest in April 2020 with 6 cases vs. 37 in April 2019, P<0.01. Tumor size was clinically larger in the COVID-19 group (median 2.1 vs. 1.9 cm, P=0.05) but not at final pathology. No differences in complications were observed between groups (COVID-19 31.0% vs. pre-COVID-19 30.9%, P=1.00). No patients from the COVID-19 group tested positive for the disease during their hospital stay or by the median 15 days to first follow-up. Conclusions: Surgical wait time, pathologic tumor size, and complications were not different among patients undergoing surgery before vs. during the pandemic. Importantly, no patients became infected as a result of their hospital stay. The significant decrease in surgical cases is concerning for untreated cancers that may progress without proper treatment.

Salvage surgery for local recurrence after sublobar surgery in Stages I and II non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To examine if patients undergoing salvage surgery for local recurrence following sublobar resection (SLR) have similar perioperative complications and overall survival (OS) compared to lobectomy patients for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients undergoing lobectomy and SLR (segmentectomy or wedge resection) for Stages I and II NSCLC from 2010 to 2016 were reviewed. Lobectomy patients and those who underwent salvage surgery for local recurrence after SLR were compared. Salvage surgeries were curative-intent resections for recurrence. RESULTS: Cases included 634 lobectomies and 986 SLR. Fifty-nine SLR patients (6.0%) recurred at a local site compared to 11 lobectomy patients (1.7%; p < 0.001). Twenty-three locally recurrent SLR patients (39.0%) went on to salvage surgery. Peri-operative complications after salvage surgeries were similar to lobectomies (34.8% 8/23 vs. 34.7% 220/634, p = 1.00). OS at 5 years for salvage surgery patients was similar to lobectomy patients (79.6% 13/23 vs. 70.6% 227/634, p = 0.23). OS for patients who underwent salvage surgery was significantly better than those who did not have salvage surgery for recurrence (79.6% vs. 53.0%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo salvage surgery for local recurrence after SLR had similar perioperative complications and OS compared to lobectomy patients but less than half underwent salvage surgery.

Long-term Outcomes Following Esophagectomy in Older and Younger Adults with Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patterns of overall and disease-free survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in older adults have not been carefully studied. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at our institution was performed. Differences in outcomes were stratified by age groups, < 75 and ≥ 75 years old, and two time periods, 2005-2012 and 2013-2020. RESULTS: A total of 1135 patients were included: 979 (86.3%) patients were < 75 (86.3%), and 156 (13.7%) were ≥ 75 years old. Younger patients had fewer comorbidities, better nutritional status, and were more likely to receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy (all p < 0.05). However, tumor stage and operative approach were similar, except for increased performance of the McKeown technique in younger patients (p = 0.02). Perioperatively, younger patients experienced fewer overall and grade II complications (both p < 0.05). They had better overall survival (log-rank p-value < 0.001) and median survival, 62.2 vs. 21.5 months (p < 0.05). When stratified by pathologic stage, survival was similar for yp0 and pathologic stage II disease (both log-rank p-value > 0.05). Multivariable Cox models showed older age (≥ 75 years old) had increased hazard for reduced overall survival (HR 2.04 95% CI 1.5-2.8; p < 0.001) but not disease-free survival (HR 1.1 95% CI 0.78-1.6; p = 0.54). Over time, baseline characteristics remained largely similar, while stage became more advanced with a rise in neoadjuvant use and increased performance of minimally invasive esophagectomy (all p < 0.05). While overall complication rates improved (p < 0.05), overall and recurrence-free survival did not. Overall survival was better in younger patients during both time periods (both log-rank p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar disease-free survival rates, long-term survival was decreased in older adults as compared to younger patients. This may be related to unmeasured factors including frailty, long-term complications after surgery, and competing causes of death. However, our results suggest that survival is similar in those with complete pathologic responses.

Survival and Recurrence Following Wedge Resection Versus Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

To determine if wedge resection is equivalent to lobectomy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate the impact of radiologic and pathologic variables not available in large national databases. Records were reviewed from 2010-2016 for patients with pathologic Stage I NSCLC who underwent wedge resection or lobectomy. Propensity score matching was performed on pre-operative variables and patients with ≥1 lymph node removed. Clinical variables were compared. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models for 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free (DFS), and locoregional-recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were created. A total of 1086 patients met inclusion criteria; 391 lobectomies and 695 wedge resections. Propensity score matching yielded 167 pairs of lobectomy and wedge resection patients. Complications were fewer for wedge resections than lobectomies, 19.2% for wedge resection patients vs 34.1% for lobectomy patients, p < 0.01. OS was equivalent between groups, 86.2% for lobectomy patients vs 83.4% for wedge resection patients p = 0.47. DFS was similar, 79.0% for lobectomy patients vs 72.5% for wedge resection patients p = 0.10. Overall LRFS was worse in wedge resection patients vs lobectomy patients, 82.0% vs 93.4% p < 0.01. However, in the matched wedge resection patients with a margin >10 mm the LRFS was equal to that of lobectomy patients, 86.4% for wedge resection patients vs 91.8% for lobectomy patients p = 0.140. Patients with Stage I NSCLC can experience similar OS, DFS, and LRFS with wedge resection as compared to lobectomy, when wedge resection margins are >10 mm and appropriate lymph node dissection is performed.

Short and Long-term Outcomes Among High-Volume vs Low-Volume Esophagectomy Surgeons at a High-Volume Center.

To determine associations between surgeon volume and esophagectomy outcomes at a high-volume institution. All esophagectomies for esophageal cancer at our institution from August 2005 to August 2019 were reviewed. Cases were divided by surgeon into low, <7 cases/year, vs high volume, ≥7 cases/year, based on Leapfrog Group recommendations. Surgeons remained 'high-volume' after one year of ≥7 cases. Demographics, comorbidities, course of care, and long-term outcomes were compared. In total, 1029 cases were evaluated; 120 performed by low-volume surgeons vs 909 by high-volume surgeons. Never-smokers, atrial fibrillation, and clinical Stage IVa patients were associated with high-volume surgeons. Other demographics were similar. Low-volume surgeons did more open cases, 45.8% vs 14.5%, P < 0.01. Low-volume surgeons had more complications than high-volume surgeons (71.7% vs 57.6%, P < 0.01), specifically Grade II and III (59.2% vs 46.8%, P = 0.01, and 44.2% vs 27.0%, P <0.01). No differences were seen in anastomotic leak rate, 90-day mortality, recurrences, 5-year overall survival (46.7% low-volume vs 49.3% high-volume, P = 0.64), or 5-year disease-free survival (35.7% low-volume vs 42.2% high-volume, P = 0.27). In multivariable logistic regression for Grade III or higher complications, high-volume surgeons had an odds ratio of 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.36-0.87) for complications. Our study found higher rates of open esophagectomies and complications in low-volume esophagectomy surgeons compared to high-volume surgeons at the same, high-volume institution. However, low-volume surgeons were not associated with worse survival outcomes compared to high-volume surgeons. Low-volume esophagectomy surgeons may benefit from mentoring and support to improve perioperative outcomes; these efforts are underway at our institution.

Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Performed During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Delay in time to esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has been shown to have worse peri-operative and long-term outcomes. We hypothesized that COVID-19 would cause a delay to surgery, with worse perioperative outcomes, compared to standard operations. All esophagectomies for esophageal cancer at a single institution from March-June 2020, COVID-19 group, and from 2019 were reviewed and peri-operative details were compared between groups. Ninety-six esophagectomies were performed in 2019 vs 37 during March-June 2020 (COVID-19 group). No differences between groups were found for preoperative comorbidities. Wait-time to surgery from final neoadjuvant treatment was similar, median 50 days in 2019 vs 53 days during COVID-19 p = 0.601. There was no increased upstaging, from clinical stage to pathologic stage, 9.4% in 2019 vs 7.5% in COVID-19 p = 0.841. Fewer overall complications occurred during COVID-19 vs 2019, 43.2% vs 64.6% p = 0.031, but complications were similar by specific grades. Readmission rates were not statistically different during COVID-19 than 2019, 16.2% vs 10.4% p = 0.38. No peri-operative mortalities or COVID-19 infections were seen in the COVID-19 group. Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer was not associated with worse outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic with minimal risk of infection when careful COVID-19 guidelines are followed. Prioritization is recommended to ensure no delays to surgery.

Two centres experience of lung cancer resection in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer upon treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors: safety and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Recent trials have begun to explore immune checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer in the neoadjuvant setting, but data on tumour response and surgical outcome remain limited. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of clinical data from patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors followed by lung resection was performed at 2 large volume institutions (1 North American, 1 European). Data were analysed using Chi-squared, Fisher's and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests where appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were identified from 2017 to 2019. Forty-nine per cent were Stage IIIB and IV. Forty-six per cent received immunotherapy alone and 54% in combination with chemo- and/or radiotherapy. Sixteen per cent of cases were successfully performed minimally invasively. Twenty patients were operated with lobectomy (6 of these with wedges or segments of a neighbouring lobe, 2 with sleeve resections and 1 with a chest wall resection), 4 with bilobectomies, 11 with pneumonectomy (including 5 extrapleural pneumonectomies and 1 atrial resection) and 1 with a wedge resection. Overall, 10 patients (27%) developed postoperative complications and the 90-day mortality was zero. One-year recurrence-free survival was 73% for stage II/IIIA and 55% for stage IIIB/stage IV. The major pathologic response rate was 34%. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, lung resection after immunotherapy (alone or in combination) is safe, although often requires complex surgery. Due to increasing number of clinical trials adopting immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, it is likely that this therapy will become part of standard of care. Immunotherapy may also allow surgery to have a role for selected patients with advanced disease.

Chemotherapy and Surgical Resection for N1 Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Better Than Expected Outcomes.

N1-positive (T1-3, N1, M0) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a minority distribution (∼8%) of the approximately 234,000 diagnosed cases per year. As such, there is a paucity of modern high-quality data regarding outcomes following surgically-resected, stage N1-positive NSCLC. Randomized controlled trials from more than a decade ago have demonstrated a modest 5.4% survival benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy but have included heterogenous patient populations and stage distributions. Large database analyses have questioned the role of perioperative chemotherapy in resected patients with N1 disease, but without much granular detail regarding staging, quality of surgery, and chemotherapy. This single-institution study sought to evaluate the role of perioperative chemotherapy, specifically in N1-positive NSCLC patients. Data for all patients with surgically resected N1-positive NSCLC (T1-3, N1, M0) between 2006 and 2016 were collected for this study. Patients who underwent pneumonectomy were excluded from analysis. A retrospective chart review was conducted, and comprehensive clinicopathologic data were collected relative to staging, surgery, pathologic review, and perioperative oncology treatment. After exclusion criteria were applied, 148 patients with surgically resected, N1-positive disease (T1-3, N1, M0) remained for analysis. The majority of patients underwent lobectomy (75.0%), of which 55.4% underwent minimally invasive resection. There were no differences in postoperative complications, length of stay, number of lymph nodes sampled, or mortality associated with the surgery only and surgery with adjuvant therapy subgroups. 107 patients (72.3%) received adjuvant therapy, and this was associated with higher 5-year overall survival (62.8%) and disease-free survival (45.1%) than patients who underwent surgery only (33.9% overall survival at 5 years, P = 0.01; 22.4% disease-free survival at 5 years, P = 0.04). The presence of multistation N1 nodal metastases in patients was associated with lower 5-year overall survival (22.7%) and disease-free survival (5.6%) than patients with single-station N1 nodal metastasis (60.4% overall survival at 5 years, P = 0.003; 46.0% disease-free survival at 5 years, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, receiving any adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival and disease-free survival (Overall Survival HR 0.47, P < 0.01 | Disease-Free Survival HR 0.46, P <0.01). Multistation N1 disease was associated with significantly worse disease-free survival (HR 2.11, P = 0.04). Perioperative chemotherapy was associated with improved survival in N1-positive NSCLC, and the potential magnitude of benefit exceeded 25% in this study. Patients with single-station N1 lymph node metastasis were observed to have better disease-free survival.

Adjuvant therapy following induction therapy and surgery improves survival in N2-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment strategies and factors influencing overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in resectable, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mediastinal (N2) lymph node metastasis. METHODS: All patients undergoing surgery for NSCLC with N2 disease between 2006 and 2016 were included. Treatment approaches included surgery only, neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery, surgery followed by adjuvant therapy, and neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy (triple therapy). Patient clinical and pathologic data were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: A total of 281 patients were included in the study. In total, 209 patients had neoadjuvant therapy, 47.4% of which went on to received additional adjuvant therapy. The pathologic complete response rate was 12.9%. The treatment strategy which included triple therapy was isolated as a significant contributor to improved OS and DFS. Nodal downstaging (N0) after induction therapy conferred an OS benefit (38.3% vs. 15.6%, p = .03). Patients with single-station N2 disease experienced higher DFS. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy completion rates were higher at the end of the study period compared to the beginning (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo neoadjuvant therapy for N2-positive NSCLC may benefit from additional adjuvant therapy. Single-station N2 disease confers higher DFS. VATS completion rates for lobectomy increase as experience increases.

Outcomes of superior segmentectomy versus lower lobectomy for superior segment Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer are equivalent: An analysis of 196 patients at a single, high volume institution.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if superior segmentectomy has equivalent overall (OS), disease-free (DFS), and locoregional-recurrence-free survival (LRFS) to lower lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the superior segment. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all Stage 1 lower lobectomies for superior segment lesions and superior segmentectomies at our hospital from 2000 to 2018. Comparison statistics and Cox hazard modeling were performed to determine differences between groups and attempt to identify risk factors for OS, DFS, and LRFS. RESULTS: Superior segmentectomy patients, compared with lower lobectomy patients, had more current smokers, worse forced expiratory volume in 1 s percentage, radiologic emphysema scores, clinically and pathologically smaller tumors, and more occurrences of 0 lymph nodes examined. Outcomes for superior segmentectomy compared with lower lobectomy were equivalent for 5-year OS (67.0% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.70), DFS (56.9% vs. 60.4%, p = 0.59), and LRFS (87.9% vs. 91.3%, p = 0.46). Multivariable Cox modeling lacked utility due to no outcome differences. CONCLUSIONS: In well-selected patients, superior segmentectomies can have equivalent OS, DFS, and LRFS compared with lower lobectomies of superior segment tumors for early stage lung cancer. Further data are needed to provide better risk estimates.

Completion pneumonectomy is safe and effective in select patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional recurrence rates for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain high, even following curative surgical resection. While national guidelines advocate surgical resection for locoregional recurrence, it is rarely offered when resection would require completion pneumonectomy, which available literature associates with a 12-36% perioperative mortality and 40-80% morbidity. Additionally, survival advantages to radical surgery in this scenario are largely unknown, particularly because available series often include patients undergoing completion pneumonectomy for benign indications or metastatic disease from other primary sites, making extrapolation to primary lung cancer patients challenging. As systemic therapy options continue to evolve, particularly as it relates to immunotherapy, we expect that there will be more and more opportunities for locoregional surgical control. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes following completion pneumonectomy for recurrent NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent completion pneumonectomy for recurrent NSCLC at our institution between 2000 and 2015. Factors affecting perioperative morbidity and mortality, as well as overall survival, were analyzed. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2015, 28 patients underwent completion pneumonectomy for recurrent lung cancer (14 female, 14 male). The median age was 64.2 years (range, 36.7-84.0). There were 11 left-sided and 17 right-sided operations. Fourteen patients (50.0%) underwent chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy prior to surgery. Perioperative morbidity was seen in 13 of 28 (46.4%) patients, and atrial fibrillation was the most common complication. Mortality at 30- and 90-day intervals was 3.6%, and 14.3% respectively. Five-year overall survival was 43.1% and was not associated with preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy use. Patients over 70 years old (n=5) experienced a statistically higher rate of postoperative complications (100.0% vs. 34.8%, P=0.013), and this translated into a higher mortality rate at 60 and 90 days. Left-sided resections were associated with increased risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (RLN) compared to right-sided resections (36.4% vs. 0%, P=0.016), and those patients with RLN injury were more likely to be reintubated (50.0% vs. 4.2%, P=0.04). Bronchopleural fistula occurred in 1 patient (3.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Completion pneumonectomy is a viable treatment option for patients with recurrent NSCLC. We attribute our low risks of major morbidity, such as bronchopleural fistula, to careful patient selection and technique. In patients over 70 years, morbidity is higher which should inform discussion regarding surgical options.

Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: An excellent operation that improves with experience.

OBJECTIVE: Esophagectomy is associated with major morbidity. In this study we sought to assess the learning curve of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIILE) and to evaluate perioperative outcomes, including anastomotic leak and hospital readmission, as a function of graduated surgeon experience. METHODS: Data were extracted from the electronic medical records of patients who underwent MIILE, performed by a single surgeon over an 8-year period (2009-2017). Primary outcomes were 5-year overall survival, postoperative complications, and 90-day readmission rates. Surgeon experience was divided into 4 quartiles, representing graduated experience. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, whereas Kaplan-Meier estimators were used to assess survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients underwent MIILE and were analyzed after exclusion criteria were applied. Five-year overall survival was 50.1% (95% confidence interval, 39.7%-63.2%). Mortality at 90 days was 3.9% (95% confidence interval, 0.8%-6.9%). Major complications occurred in 25.3% (n = 43) and 25.9% (n = 44) were readmitted to the hospital within 90 days after surgery. Conversion to open surgery, anastomotic leaks, and readmissions decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: MIILE can be performed safely and effectively with improving results as the surgeon's experience evolves.

Pneumonectomy is safe and effective for non-small cell lung cancer following induction therapy.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty surrounds the safety and efficacy of pneumonectomy in the setting of induction chemoradiation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to evaluate fifteen years of experience with pneumonectomy with and without induction therapy. METHODS: Over a 15-year period [1999-2014], data were extracted from medical records of patients undergoing pneumonectomy for NSCLC. Primary outcomes were 5-year overall survival and mortality at 30, 60 and 90 days following operation. Morbidity data was also reviewed. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Chi-Square test. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared using the log rank test. Significance was defined as a P value less than 0.05. Patients with a prior cancer history, bilateral lung nodules and oligometastatic disease at presentation were excluded. RESULTS: After exclusion criteria were applied, 240 patients were analyzed and 137 (57%) underwent induction therapy prior to pneumonectomy. Five-year overall survival was 38.5%. Mortality at 90 days was 7.94%. There was no statistically significant difference in perioperative mortality with the addition of induction therapy. In fact, in the subset of patients with N2 disease (n=65), induction therapy was associated with improved 5-year overall survival (10.7% vs. 32.7%, P=0.014). Thirty-five percent of patients with N2 disease exhibited a complete response in the nodal basin following induction therapy; however, this did not confer a statistically significant overall or disease-free survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumonectomy can safely be performed in the setting of induction chemoradiation. In patients with N2 disease, induction therapy may confer a survival benefit when the surgery can be done with limited morbidity and mortality.

Energy-Based Ligation of Pulmonary Vessels: A Six-Year Experience With Ultrasonic Shears in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Segmentectomy.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical staplers are widely employed in minimally invasive anatomic lung resections, but have limitations when managing smaller pulmonary arterial and venous branches. Published data is lacking regarding the safety and efficacy of pulmonary vessel ligation using ultrasonic shears. We describe a single-surgeon experience employing ultrasonic shears for the ligation of pulmonary vasculature during lobectomy and segmentectomy, primarily in the setting of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients, who underwent anatomic resection, between 2008 and 2014. Charts were divided into 2 groups based on method of ligation (energy based or conventional). Dictated operative reports were reviewed and patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Ultrasonic shears were used for pulmonary vessel ligation (5 to 6 mm) in 82 of 283 anatomic resections. A total of 118 vessels were ligated with ultrasonic shears. The majority of patients (83%) in the energy-based ligation group underwent VATS resection. There were fewer complications in the energy-based ligation group (26% vs 38%; p = 0.05); however, rates of intraoperative transfusion, prolonged air leak, empyema, and return to the operating room were similar across the 2 groups, and no statistically significant difference was found. There were no postoperative complications directly attributable to ultrasonic vessel ligation. CONCLUSIONS: Energy-based ligation of small-diameter pulmonary vessels is a safe and useful adjunct in anatomic VATS resection and a viable alternative to mechanical stapling. Its narrow profile and thin blades make it ideal for ligation of pulmonary vasculature, particularly where the size and necessary clearance of mechanical staplers prohibit safe dissection.