Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on liver function in patients with type 2 diabetes in Japan: A real-world data analysis.

AIM: To compare the effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) on liver function in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a Japanese retrospective cohort study using the RWD Database (1 January 2015 to 24 September 2021). Patients newly treated with an SGLT2i or a DPP4i were matched 1:4 (SGLT2i:DPP4i) using propensity score. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to 1 year after the index date in alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in various laboratory test results, including the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), albumin and HbA1c. Endpoints were compared between treatment groups using Welch's t-test in the full population and in subgroups stratified by baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of 955 and 3063 matched patients newly treated with an SGLT2i and a DPP4i, respectively, were well balanced. Patients receiving an SGLT2i had significantly greater reductions in ALT, FIB-4 index and GGT and a significantly greater increase in albumin than patients receiving a DPP4i. A significantly greater change from baseline in ALT was observed in the SGLT2i group than in the DPP4i group among subgroups with lower baseline FIB-4 index and HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, improvements in various measures, including ALT, the FIB-4 index, GGT and albumin, were observed with SGLT2is compared with DPP4is, suggesting that SGLT2is may provide hepatoprotective benefits, including the prevention of liver fibrosis, in patients with T2D in Japan.

Long-term prolonged-release tacrolimus outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation: The Japan Academic Consortium of Kidney Transplantation study-II.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 10-year efficacy and safety of a prolonged-release tacrolimus-based combination immunosuppressive regimen on longer-term outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: Data from Japanese living donor kidney transplant recipients (n = 410) maintained on continuous prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppression from 2009-2013 were analyzed with a median follow-up of 9.9 years. RESULTS: A prolonged-release, tacrolimus-based combination regimen provided death-censored graft failure and all-cause death rates at 10 years of 7.0% and 6.8%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, acute and chronic rejection and 'throughout' (new-onset plus preexisting) diabetes mellitus were risk factors for death-censored graft failure. Recipient age ≥ 65 years, throughout diabetes mellitus and malignancy were common risk factors for all-cause death. Throughout diabetes mellitus was the most common risk factor for both death-censored graft failure and all-cause death. Additional analyses showed 10-year cumulative rates of death-censored graft failure were 14.0% and 5.4% for recipients with or without preexisting diabetes mellitus, respectively (log-rank test: p = 0.009). All-cause death rates were 12.7% and 5.4% in the preexisting and non-diabetes mellitus groups, respectively (log-rank test: p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world, retrospective, living donor kidney transplantation study, a prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive combination regimen provided 10-year death-censored graft failure rates of 14.0% and 5.4% in diabetes mellitus and non-diabetes mellitus patients, respectively; Similarly, 10-year all-cause death rates were 12.7% and 5.4% in diabetes mellitus and non-diabetes mellitus patients, respectively. To our knowledge, the data in this study are the first to provide 10-year transplant outcomes in living donor kidney transplant recipients under prolonged-release tacrolimus-based regimen.

Interim results from a postmarketing surveillance study of patients with FLT3-mutated relapsed/refractory AML treated with the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Gilteritinib received approval for the treatment of FLT3-mutated relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia in Japan in 2018. In accordance with regulatory requirements, we conducted a multicenter, observational surveillance of gilteritinib use in Japan. METHODS: Patients were followed for 6 months from gilteritinib treatment initiation. The primary endpoint of the surveillance was incidence of adverse drug reactions related to each element of the safety specification defined in the Japanese Risk Management Plan. This interim analysis presents data collected from 3 December 2018 to 20 September 2020. RESULTS: Among 204 patients with case report forms, 107 consented to data publication. Of these 107 patients, 59.8% (n = 64) were male and 58.9% (n = 63) were aged ≥65 years; most received a 120-mg/day initial (80.4%; 86/107) and maximum (74.8%; 80/107) daily dose. The discontinuation rate was 61.7% (66/107); the most common reasons for discontinuation were disease progression (18.7%), transplantation (16.8%) and adverse events (15.0%). The adverse drug reaction rate was 77.6%. The incidences of adverse drug reactions (grade ≥ 3) related to each element of the safety specification were myelosuppression, 44.9% (38.3%); liver function disorder, 24.3% (6.5%); infections, 24.3% (21.5%); prolonged QT interval, 10.3% (2.8%); hemorrhage, 9.3% (6.5%); renal dysfunction, 6.5% (0); hypersensitivity, 5.6% (1.9%); interstitial lung disease, 4.7% (3.7%); cardiac failure/pericarditis/pericardial effusion, 1.9% (0.9%); pancreatitis, 0.9% (0); posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, 0.9% (0.9%). The composite complete remission rate was 62.7%; the 6-month overall survival rate was 77.7%. CONCLUSION: Gilteritinib treatment for 6 months in Japan was associated with acceptable efficacy and no new safety concerns were observed.

Real-world use of enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to evaluate real-world effectiveness and safety of enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in Japan. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of medical records from men in Japan who started enzalutamide treatment from November 1, 2014, to March 31, 2018, and received androgen deprivation therapy throughout. The primary endpoint was time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression. Secondary endpoints included PSA response rate, time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy, time to first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy, and enzalutamide treatment duration. An exploratory analysis of metastasis-free survival (MFS) was also performed. Adverse events (AEs) were analyzed to assess safety. RESULTS: Based on data from medical records of 205 men in Japan, median time to PSA progression was 27 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 19-not reached [NR]), with 82.5% and 52.0% of men achieving PSA response rates of ≥ 50% and ≥ 90%, respectively. Median time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy was 36 months (95% CI 27-NR) and median enzalutamide treatment duration was 13 months (interquartile range: 7-24). Median time to first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy was NR (95% CI 41-NR). Median MFS was 29 months (95% CI 23-35). In total, 51.7% of men experienced AEs, with malaise (18.5%), decreased appetite (10.7%), and nausea (4.9%) the most frequently reported. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the real-world effectiveness and safety of enzalutamide in men with nmCRPC in Japan, further informing healthcare providers about available treatment options for this patient population.

[Safety and efficacy of midazolam in children under mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit].

BACKGROUND: The use of midazolam for children was approved in March, 2010. Since the efficacy and safety data of midazolam used in children, excluding low-birth-weight infants and newborns, for "sedation under artificial respiration in intensive care units" were quite limited, a post-marketing survey was carried out to confirm the validity of the established dosage and administration. METHODS: A consecutive enrollment method was adopted. Based on the data of 153 patients collected from 8 institutes, efficacy and safety profiles were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 149 patients included in the safety analysis set, 6 adverse reactions were reported in 6 patients. The incidence of adverse events was 4.0% (6/149). Reported adverse reactions included depressed level of consciousness: 1 event, delirium: 1 event, psychomotor hyperactivity: 1 event, hypotension: 2 events, and blood pressure increase: 1 event. Serious adverse drug reaction (ADR) reported in this survey was depressed level of consciousness. This ADR resolved on the following day after the treatment with flumazenil. Paradoxical reactions were reported in 1 patient, and tolerance was reported in 2 patients. The efficacy rate was 96.5% (138/143). CONCLUSIONS: No additional safety issues (status of adverse reactions, status of adverse events, status of serious adverse events, etc.) and efficacy issue were manifest in the patients treated with the dosage and administration method established at the approval of the drug.