Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 72
1.
J Crit Care ; 83: 154828, 2024 May 16.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38759580

PURPOSE: We aimed to identify factors associated with achieving target BL plasma concentrations and describe real world data for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). METHODS: A retrospective single center study was conducted. We collected data from patients admitted to ICU with at least one BL TDM. We assessed the proportion of patients attaining the recommended plasma concentrations (i.e 100%fT > 4 to 8 MIC). Univariate and multivariate analyses was performed to identify the determinants of BL target attainment. RESULTS: 156 patients were included. At the first dosing, 34% achieved target BL plasma concentrations, 50% were overdosed, and 16% were underdosed. Median time for 1st TDM were 4 (SD = 2.9) days. Multivariate analysis revealed that CKD-EPI estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR = 1.02; CI [1.01; 1.03]; p < 0.0001) and total body weight (OR = 1.03; CI [1.01; 1.04]; p = 0.0048) were the main determinant of BL target attainment. Conversely, Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (OR = 0.28; CI [0.09; 0.89]; p = 0.0318) and meropenem use (OR = 0.31; CI [0.14; 0.69]; p = 0.0041) were identified as risk factors for overdosing. No factor was associated with underdosing. CONCLUSION: Achieving target BL plasma concentrations remains challenging in ICUs. Identifying predictive factors of BL target attainment would favor implementing rapid dosing optimization strategies in both under and overdosing high risk patients.

2.
Br J Anaesth ; 120(2): 361-367, 2018 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29406184

BACKGROUND: Previous data showed that non-invasive ventilation (NIV) applied for 3 min before tracheal intubation ensured better oxygenation compared with using a non-rebreather bag-valve-mask. We aimed to determine whether preoxygenation using NIV is effective in reducing the incidence of organ dysfunction in hypoxaemic, critically ill patients in intensive care. METHODS: A multicentre, randomised, open-label trial evaluating 100% FiO2 administered with NIV (99 patients) vs with face mask (102 patients) for 3 min before tracheal intubation. The primary endpoint was the maximal value of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score within 7 days after intubation. RESULTS: The median (inter-quartile range) values of the maximal value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score within 7 days post-intubation were not significantly different between the two randomised groups: nine (6-12) in the NIV group vs 10 (6-12) in the face mask group (P=0.65). In patients treated by NIV prior to the randomisation, there was a significant increase in the occurrence in adverse events in patients randomised to face mask [odds ratio=5.23 (1.61;16.99), P=0.0059]. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to demonstrate any benefits of using NIV as a preoxygenation method to reduce organ dysfunction compared with usual preoxygenation in hypoxaemic, critically ill patients requiring tracheal intubation for invasive ventilation. NIV should not be discontinued for preoxygenation in the cases of patients treated by NIV before the decision to intubate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00472160.


Hypoxia/complications , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Multiple Organ Failure/prevention & control , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Oxygen/therapeutic use , Aged , Critical Care , Critical Illness , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Organ Failure/epidemiology , Negative Results , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Respiratory Insufficiency/prevention & control
3.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 37(3): 201-205, 2018 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28826982

OBJECTIVE: Ensuring the availability of ultrasound devices is the initial step in implementing clinical ultrasound (CUS) in emergency services. In France in 2011, 52% of emergency departments (EDs) and only 9% of mobile intensive care stations (MICS) were equipped with ultrasound devices. The main goal of this study was to determine the movement of these rates since 2011. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive, multicentre study in the form of a questionnaire. To estimate the numbers of EDs and MICS equipped with at least one ultrasound system with a confidence level of 95% and margin of error of 5%, 170 responding EDs and 145 MICS were required. Each service was solicited three times by secure online questionnaire and then by phone. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-eight (84%) services responded to the questionnaire: 179 (86%) EDs and 149 (82%) MICS. At least one ultrasound machine was available in 127 (71%, 95% CI [64; 78]) EDs vs. 52% in 2011 (P<0.01). 42 (28%, 95% CI [21; 35]) MICS were equipped vs. 9% in 2011 (P<0.01). In 97 (76%) EDs and 24 (55%) MICS, less than a half of physicians were trained. CUS was used at least three times a day in 52 (41%) EDs and in 8 (19%) MICS. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates improved access to ultrasound devices in French EDs and MICS. Almost three-quarters of EDs and nearly one-third of MICS are now equipped with at least one ultrasound device. However, the rate of physicians trained per service remains insufficient.


Emergency Medical Services/trends , Emergency Service, Hospital/trends , Point-of-Care Testing/trends , Ultrasonography/trends , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , France , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Point-of-Care Testing/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Ultrasonography/instrumentation , Ultrasonography/statistics & numerical data
4.
Transfus Clin Biol ; 24(2): 47-51, 2017 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28214244

BACKGROUND: In France, blood group determination requires the completion of two samples collected at two different times to detect identity mistake and "wrong blood in tube". The aims of the present study were: (1) to evaluate the compliance with guidelines and (2) to identify risk factors of non-compliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples for ABO group determination collected between January 1st and December 15th, 2013 in the University hospital of Nîmes, France were analyzed. An ABO group determination demand was considered non-compliant if more than one tube arrived in the laboratory within ten minutes apart. Between May 1st and June 30th 2014, a self-administered questionnaire was offered to the nurses of the hospital on a random day for each service during this period. The aim was to validate the non-compliance criterion and the identification of risk factors using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 16,450 analyzed blood samples, the overall compliance rate was 65.1%. Lower compliance rates were found in the surgical services. Independent risk factors for wrong practice were work overload, surgical service and individual intermediate transfusion frequency. DISCUSSION: More than one third of ABO group determinations did not follow national recommendations, which induces a substantial risk of "wrong blood in tube" and group error. The study revealed major variations among hospital services. Identification of risk factors allows targeted corrective actions.


Blood Grouping and Crossmatching/standards , Blood Transfusion/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Medical Errors/statistics & numerical data , Blood Grouping and Crossmatching/statistics & numerical data , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Factor Analysis, Statistical , France , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
5.
Br J Anaesth ; 118(2): 223-231, 2017 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28100526

BACKGROUND: Several techniques exist for measuring central venous pressure (CVP) but little information is available about the accuracy of each method. The aim of this study was to compare different methods of CVP measurements in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: CVP was measured in mechanically ventilated patients without spontaneous breathing using four different techniques: 1) end expiratory CVP measurement at the base of the" c" wave (CVPMEASURED), chosen as the reference method; 2) CVP measurement from the monitor averaging CVP over the cardiac and respiratory cycles (CVPMONITOR); 3) CVP measurement after a transient withdrawing of mechanical ventilation (CVPNADIR); 4) CVP measurement corrected for the transmitted respiratory pressure induced by intrinsic PEEP (calculated CVP: CVPCALCULATED). Bias, precision, limits of agreement, and proportions of outliers (difference > 2 mm Hg) were determined. RESULTS: Among 61 included patients, 103 CVP assessments were performed. CVPMONITOR bias [-0.87 (1.06) mm Hg] was significantly different from those of CVPCALCULATED [1.42 (1.07), P < 0.001 and CVPNADIR (1.04 (1.29), P < 0.001]. The limits of agreement of CVPMONITOR [-2.96 to 1.21 mm Hg] were not significantly different to those of CVPNADIR (-1.49 to 3.57 mm Hg, P = 0.39) and CVPCALCULATED (-0.68 to 3.53 mm Hg, P = 0.31). The proportion of outliers was not significantly different between CVPMONITOR (n = 5, 5%) and CVPNADIR (n = 9, 9%, P = 0.27) but was greater with CVPCALCULATED (n = 16, 15%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In mechanically ventilated patients, CVPMONITOR is a reliable method for assessing CVPMEASURED Taking into account transmitted respiratory pressures, CVPCALCULATED had a higher proportion of outliers and precision than CVPNADIR.


Central Venous Pressure , Critical Illness , Respiration, Artificial , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure Determination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
6.
Br J Anaesth ; 116(2): 215-22, 2016 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26787790

BACKGROUND: Axillary vein catheterization via a distal approach is an alternative to the proximal approach to axillary/subclavian vein catheterization under ultrasound (US) guidance. The aim of this trial was to compare the two approaches. METHODS: In a randomized single-centre study, all patients requiring central vein catheterization in intensive care or the operating room were randomly assigned to proximal or distal approach groups. If catheterization failed after two attempts using the approach allocated, the non-allocated approach was used. The primary endpoint was the initial success rate of distal to compared with the proximal approach, using a non-inferiority analysis (lower limit 90% CI greater than -8% non-inferiority margin for group difference). The secondary endpoints were: overall success rates, catheter position and complications. RESULTS: 119/122 included patients were analysed (57 and 62 in the proximal and distal axillary approach groups, respectively). Primary success rates for proximal and distal sites were 87.7 and 85.5%, respectively (difference -2.2%, 90% CI [-12.5-8.1%], non-inferiority P=0.18). The proximal and distal overall success rates were 96.5 and 98.4%, respectively (difference -1.9%, 90% CI [-4.9-8.7%], non-inferiority P<0.01). Thrombogenic catheter positions were 7 (12.3%) in proximal approach group vs 19 (31.7%) in the distal approach group (P=0.01). Complications were comparable in the two groups (2 (3.3%) vs 4 (6.5%), P=0.68). CONCLUSION: In terms of absolute and overall success rates, a distal approach is not non-inferior to a proximal approach. Although associated with a more thrombogenic catheter extremity position, the distal approach can be considered as a rescue alternative after failure of a proximal approach. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01543360.


Axillary Vein/diagnostic imaging , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
7.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 71(2): 464-70, 2016 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26538503

OBJECTIVES: Few data are available to guide linezolid dosing during renal replacement therapy. The objective of this study was to compare the population pharmacokinetics of linezolid during continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVHF, 30 mL/kg/h) and continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF, 15 mL/kg/h + 15 mL/kg/h). METHODS: Patients requiring linezolid 600 mg iv every 12 h and CVVHF or CVVHDF were eligible for this prospective study. Seven blood samples were collected over one dosing interval and analysed by a validated chromatographic method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was undertaken using Pmetrics. Monte Carlo simulations evaluated achievement of a pharmacodynamics target of an AUC from 0-24 h to MIC (AUC0-24/MIC) of 80. RESULTS: Nine CVVHDF and eight CVVHF treatments were performed in 13 patients. Regimens of CVVHDF and CVVHF were similar. A two-compartment linear model best described the data. CVVHDF was associated with a 20.5% higher mean linezolid clearance than CVVHF, without statistical significance (P = 0.39). Increasing patient weight and decreasing SOFA score were associated with increasing linezolid clearance. The mean (SD) parameter estimates were: clearance (CL), 3.8 (2.2) L/h; volume of the central compartment, 26.5 (10.3) L; intercompartmental clearance constants from central to peripheral, 8.1 (12.1) L/h; and peripheral to central compartments, 3.6 (4.0) L/h. Achievement of pharmacodynamic targets was poor for an MIC of 2 mg/L with the studied dose. CONCLUSIONS: During CVVHF and CVVHDF, there is profound pharmacokinetic variability of linezolid. Suboptimal achievement of therapeutic targets occurs at the EUCAST breakpoint MIC of 2 mg/L using 600 mg iv every 12 h.


Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Hemodiafiltration , Hemofiltration , Linezolid/pharmacokinetics , Aged , Blood Chemical Analysis , Chromatography , Critical Illness , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
10.
Br J Anaesth ; 112(5): 835-41, 2014 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24496782

BACKGROUND: The link between preoperative fasting and hypovolaemia remains unclear. We tested the hypothesis that preoperative fasting does not significantly increase the proportion of patients with hypovolaemia according to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) criteria. METHODS: Patients of ASA status I-III and without bowel preparation were included in a non-inferiority, prospective, single-centre trial. Patients underwent passive leg raising (PLR) test and TTE at admission (Day 0) and after 8 h fasting (Day 1). The primary hypothesis was that an 8 h preoperative fasting does not increase the proportion (margin=5%) of patients with a positive PLR test ('functional approach'). The secondary hypothesis was that echocardiographic filling pressures or stroke volume (margin 10%) are not affected by preoperative fasting ('static approach'). RESULTS: One hundred patients were included and 98 analysed. After an 8 h fasting, the change in the proportion of responders to PLR was -6.1% [95% confidence interval (CI)=-16.0 to 3.8] of responders to PLR test on Day 0 when compared with Day 1. Because 95% CI was strictly inferior to 5%, there was no significant increase in the proportion of PLR responders on Day 1 when compared with Day 0. The 95% CI changes of static variables were always fewer than 10%, meaning that preoperative fasting induced significantly no relevant changes in static variables. CONCLUSION: Preoperative fasting did not alter TTE dynamic and static preload indices in ASA I-III adult patients. These results suggest that preoperative fasting does not induce significant hypovolaemia. Clinical trial registration NCT 01258361.


Echocardiography/methods , Fasting/physiology , Hemodynamics/physiology , Hypovolemia/diagnosis , Preoperative Care/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Stroke Volume/physiology
11.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 33(3): e29-33, 2014 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24456614

INTRODUCTION: The utility of bedside ultrasound (US) performed by emergency physicians has been proven for multiple purposes. There are no data about this technique in emergency departments (ED) in France. The primary objective is to determine the availability of ultrasound device (UD) in EDs and in prehospital settings in France. Minor objectives are to determine the number and type of UD, the most current applications of US and the factors correlated with availability of UDs in the setting of emergency medicine. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive, multicenter survey from December 2010 to June 2011, including all EDs and prehospital units in France. A questionnaire was sent by e-mail. Non-responders were contacted by telephone with one recall. RESULTS: The response rate was 74% (327/440) for EDs and 73% (278/379) for prehospital units. A UD is available in 52% (171/327) (CI 95% [46; 58]) of EDs and in 9% (25/278) (CI 95% [5; 13]) of prehospital units. Among departments having no access to UDs, 29% of EDs and 12% of prehospital units have plans to implement emergency physician-performed US. The most common US applications are focused assessment with sonography for trauma and pleural exams. CONCLUSION: Availability of UDs in French public hospital EDs is 52% and 9% in prehospital units. Despite the progressive expansion of the technique over the last years, bedside ultrasonography is not yet completely integrated in the physical examination of the patient in an emergency situation in France. A reassessment will be required to confirm the current trend of expansion.


Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Point-of-Care Systems/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Medical Services/supply & distribution , Emergency Service, Hospital , France , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Prospective Studies
12.
Br J Anaesth ; 112(6): 1015-23, 2014 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24293326

BACKGROUND: The optimal resuscitation fluid for the early treatment of severe bleeding patients remains highly debated. The objective of this experimental study was to compare the rapidity of shock reversal with lactated Ringer (LR) or hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 at the early phase of controlled haemorrhagic shock. To assess the influence of vascular permeability in this model, we measured plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels during the experiment. METHODS: Thirty-six anaesthetized and mechanically ventilated piglets were bled (<30 ml kg(-1)) to hold mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 40 mm Hg for more than 30 min and were resuscitated in two randomized groups: LR (n=14) or HES (n=14) at 1 ml kg(-1) min(-1) until MAP reached its baseline value of ±10%. MAP was maintained at its baseline value for 1 h. The time and fluid volume necessary to restore the baseline MAP value were measured. RESULTS: The time to restore the baseline MAP value of ±10% was significantly lower in the HES group (P<0.001). During the initial resuscitation phase, the infused volume was 279 (119) ml in the HES group and 1011 (561) ml in the LR group (P<0.0001). During the stabilization phase, the infused volume was 119 (124) ml in the HES group and 541 (506) ml in the LR group. Biological data and plasma VEGF levels were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Restoration of MAP was four times faster with HES than with LR in the early phase of controlled haemorrhagic shock. However, there was no evidence of increased vascular permeability.


Fluid Therapy/methods , Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives/therapeutic use , Isotonic Solutions/therapeutic use , Plasma Substitutes/therapeutic use , Resuscitation/methods , Shock, Hemorrhagic/drug therapy , Animals , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Capillary Permeability/drug effects , Disease Models, Animal , Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives/blood , Random Allocation , Ringer's Lactate , Shock, Hemorrhagic/blood , Swine , Time Factors , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/blood
13.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 32(11): 742-8, 2013 Nov.
Article Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24135731

INTRODUCTION: "Critical Care Units" are intended to admit patients with multiple organ failure. The severity of patients admitted is variable. The aim of the study was to estimate the number of days that an optimum care organization could release, and therefore the additional admissions that would have been allowed. Estimates of earnings related to the various supplements were carried out jointly. METHODS: Reporting days associated or not with a resuscitation care during the year 2011 in an ICU of a university hospital (16 beds), optimized patient flow simulation, and computation of medical act inducing financial supplements. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifty-seven patients (SAPS II from 0 to 110, 41% ventilated more than 48hours, mortality=26%) were admitted representing 5095days (occupancy rate=87%). Two hundred and twenty-two patients (34%) did not trigger supplement for resuscitation care for 415days in the unit. Four hundred and thirty-five patients have triggered this supplement representing 4680days, including 3035days with resuscitation care and 1645 (35% of days valued resuscitation, 32% of total days) without any. The entire year 2011 has generated earnings of 3,980,192€. Optimization of management would have allowed the admission of additional 235 to 295 patients and potential additional earnings from 524,735€ to 1,063,804€, depending on the occupancy rate chosen (80% or real 2011s) and the severity of discharged patients. CONCLUSION: Optimization of the patients flow between "Critical Care", Intensive Care and Continuous Monitoring Units would increase the number of patients admitted in "Critical Care" Units without any financial loss related to supplements.


Critical Care/economics , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/economics , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Monitoring, Physiologic/economics , Monitoring, Physiologic/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , France , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Multiple Organ Failure/therapy , Resuscitation/economics , Resuscitation/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
14.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 32(10): e121-7, 2013 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23867539

OBJECTIVE: Postinduction hypotension during general anaesthesia could be corrected by a rapid cardiac preload optimization by fluid infusion. The type of fluid to be used in this context remains debated. The aim of our study was to compare the amount of fluid challenges required to optimize stroke volume after induction of anaesthesia with colloid (HES) or crystalloid (0.9% NaCl). DESIGN: Open randomized prospective parallel-group study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six adult patients scheduled to undergo orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive, either 0.9% NaCl (n=28), or HES (n=28). Cardiac preload optimization directed by oesophageal Doppler was performed after induction with fluid challenges of 250ml of solution until stroke volume (SV) no longer increased by 10%. Primary endpoint was: number of fluid challenges required to achieve SV optimization. Secondary endpoints were: number of patients responding to the first fluid challenge, proportion of patients requiring ephedrine and the ephedrine dose required to restore arterial pressure. RESULTS: Percentages of responders were 61% and 63% in the 0.9% NaCl and HES groups, respectively. Number of fluid challenges necessary for SV optimization was not significantly different between 0.9% NaCl group and HES group (2 [1-2] versus 2 [1-2], P=0.33). Number of patients needing ephedrine, and well as the associated ephedrine dose, did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that after induction, crystalloid and colloid expand the intravascular volume with equivalent efficacy immediately after administration and correct in a similar way the postinduction hypotension.


Anesthesia/methods , Fluid Therapy/methods , Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives/therapeutic use , Plasma Substitutes/therapeutic use , Saline Solution, Hypertonic/therapeutic use , Stroke Volume/physiology , Adult , Arterial Pressure/drug effects , Crystalloid Solutions , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/methods , Ephedrine/therapeutic use , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Isotonic Solutions/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Intraoperative , Respiratory Mechanics/physiology , Sample Size , Single-Blind Method , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use
15.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 32(2): 84-8, 2013 Feb.
Article Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23337340

INTRODUCTION: The interest of tight glucose control in ICU is still debated. In France, no data are available regarding this therapy and the implementation of its guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: Sub-study of a one-day audit performed between January and May 2009. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a one-day audit performed in 66 ICUs, trained residents collected data regarding the presence of a formal glucose control protocol and its practical application. RESULTS: A formalized glucose control protocol was found in 88% of patients. During the day before the audit, 3645 glycemia measurements were performed accounting for six measurements [4-9] per patient with a median higher value of 1.6 [1.4-2.1]. Hypoglycemia (<0.8 g/L) and hyperglycemia (>1.4 g/L in non-diabetic and >1.8 g/L in diabetic patients) were found in 81 (15%) and 326 (58%) patients respectively. Two episodes (0.36%) of severe hypoglycemia (<0.4 g/L) were reported. Factors associated with glucose control protocol application were: a high SOFA score, cardioversion, mechanical ventilation, intracranial pressure monitoring, steroid use and nurse to patient ratio less than 1/2.5. Hepatic failure was the only factor associated with hypoglycemia. DISCUSSION: Glucose control protocols are available in more than 80% ICUs but their implementation is still imperfect. However, the median glycemia meets international current recommendations. Severe hypoglycemia is a very rare event in ICU.


Blood Glucose/drug effects , Hyperglycemia/drug therapy , Hypoglycemia/drug therapy , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Aged , Clinical Protocols , Critical Care , Diabetes Complications/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Electric Countershock , Female , France , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Hyperglycemia/blood , Hyperglycemia/epidemiology , Hypoglycemia/blood , Hypoglycemia/epidemiology , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Liver Failure/complications , Liver Failure/therapy , Male , Medical Audit , Middle Aged , Nurses , Respiration, Artificial , Risk Factors , Steroids/adverse effects , Steroids/therapeutic use
16.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 31(7-8): 583-90, 2012.
Article Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22763311

INTRODUCTION: Fluid therapy is one of the major elements of severe sepsis and septic shock management. A systematic initial fluid bolus is recommended before evaluation of left ventricular filling pressure by the use of indicators of fluid responsiveness, preferentially dynamic ones. A massive fluid therapy could be damaging for the patient. Dynamic indicators of fluid responsiveness are not often relevant in the emergency department. This study was aimed to evaluate the use of indicators of fluid responsiveness by emergency practitioners during septic shock management. STUDY DESIGN: Cross sectional survey using anonymous self-questionnaire. METHODS: We included all practitioners working in public emergency department of Languedoc-Roussillon (France). Primary-end point was the use of one indicator of fluid responsiveness at least. Uni- and multivariate analysis was conducted to find associated factors. RESULTS: Of 232 practitioners included, we collected 149 questionnaires (response rate=64%). Hundred and eight practitioners (72% [64-79%]) used at least one indicator of fluid responsiveness. Fifty-six practitioners (38% [30-46%]) used echocardiography, 54 practitioners (36% [29-44%]) used blood lactate concentration, 45 practitioners (30% [23-38%]) used passive leg raising. The use of indicators of fluid responsiveness is associated with easy access to echography device (odd ratio=2.94 [1.16-7.62], P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Emergency practitioners use preferentially less invasive and less time-consuming indicators of fluid responsiveness.


Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Fluid Therapy , Hospitals, Public/statistics & numerical data , Shock, Septic/therapy , Adult , Biomarkers , Blood Volume , Colloids/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Crystalloid Solutions , Echocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Female , Fluid Therapy/adverse effects , Fluid Therapy/statistics & numerical data , France/epidemiology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Isotonic Solutions/therapeutic use , Lactates/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Posture , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Shock, Septic/blood , Shock, Septic/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
17.
Anaesthesia ; 67(9): 999-1008, 2012 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22708696

We conducted an observational prospective multicenter study to describe the practices of mechanical ventilation, to determine the incidence of use of large intra-operative tidal volumes (≥10 ml.kg(-1) of ideal body weight) and to identify patient factors associated with this practice. Of the 2960 patients studied in 97 anaesthesia units from 49 hospitals, volume controlled mode was the most commonly used (85%). The mean (SD) tidal volume was 533 (82) ml; 7.7 (1.3) ml.kg(-1) (actual weight) and 8.8 (1.4) ml.kg(-1) (ideal body weight)). The lungs of 381 (18%) patients were ventilated with a tidal volume>10 ml.kg(-1) ideal body weight. Being female (OR 5.58 (95% CI 4.20-7.43)) and by logistic regression, underweight (OR 0.06 (95% CI 0.01-0.45)), overweight (OR 1.98 (95% CI 1.49-2.65)), obese (OR 5.02 (95% CI 3.51-7.16)), severely obese (OR 10.12 (95% CI 5.79-17.68)) and morbidly obese (OR 14.49 (95% CI 6.99-30.03)) were the significant (p ≤ 0.005) independent factors for the use of large tidal volumes during anaesthesia.


Airway Management/methods , Anesthesia, General , Body Weight/physiology , Intraoperative Care/methods , Tidal Volume/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , Female , France , Humans , Insufflation , Male , Middle Aged , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Function Tests
18.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 31(5): 427-36, 2012 May.
Article Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22541983

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report current anaesthetic management brain-dead organ donors and to assess its impact on delayed kidney graft function (DGF). METHODS: To achieve this retrospective multicenter study, brain-dead patient records were analysed for the years 2005 to 2007. Expanded donor criteria, length of stay in ICU, duration of brain death, respect of recommended cold ischemia time, preoperative and intraoperative management, type of anaesthesia, hemodynamic and respiratory parameters during organ retrieval, and impact of anaesthesia on DGF were analysed. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-nine out of 165 files were available. Sixty-two percent of donors received anaesthetic drugs. There were no differences in demographic characteristics between the anaesthesia group (group A) and the no-anaesthesia group (group NA). In group NA, the mean arterial pressure (MAP)>65 mm Hg was more frequent (53% vs. 29%, P<0.01), but did not differ for maximal MAP. In group A, maximal heart rate was higher (120 vs. 105b/min, P=0.02) and donors received significantly more colloids (P<0.01). Independent risk factors of DGF included absence of hydroxyethyl starch infusion during the preoperative period and mechanical ventilation without PEEP. CONCLUSION: During organ retrieval, 62% of organ donors received anaesthetic drugs. Use of anaesthesia lead to lower MAP requiring more fluid challenge with colloids but did not influence the DGF.


Anesthesia , Brain Death/physiopathology , Delayed Graft Function/physiopathology , Kidney Transplantation/physiology , Tissue Donors , Tissue and Organ Procurement/methods , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure/physiology , Electroencephalography , Female , France , Heart Rate/physiology , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives , Ischemia/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Plasma Substitutes , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Mechanics/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
19.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 30(12): 877-82, 2011 Dec.
Article Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22050834

BACKGROUND: The cardiac output (CO) is classically measured in intensive care unit patients. pulse contour (PC) method allows monitoring of CO. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of PC to assess the fluid responsiveness defined as an increase in CO more than or equal to 15% after 500 mL hydroxyethyl starch over 20 minutes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this observational prospective study, patients in shock in whom a PC method was inserted were included. CO was measure using the PC and thermodilution methods before and after a fluid challenge indicated by the physician. The correlation coefficient was measured, the diagram of Bland and Altman was built and the percentage of error (Critchley and Critchley method) was calculated. The ability of PC to diagnose fluid responsiveness was assessed using a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Sixty-two fluid challenges were performed in 37 included patients. After fluid challenge, r(2) was 0.05 (P<0.01), the bias between PC and thermodilution was 0.3 ± 1.2L/min and the percentage of error was 36%. The area of the ROC curve was 0.601 [0.468-0.723]. CONCLUSION: In ICU patients with shock, PC cannot replace thermodilution to diagnose fluid responsiveness.


Cardiac Output , Pulse , Thermodilution , Aged , Female , Humans , Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives , Male , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results
...