ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The use of telehealth, such as remote patient monitoring (RPM), for chronic heart failure (CHF) impacts patient pathways. Patient-centricity in chronic disease management is valuable. Even though RPM is recommended in practice, the evaluation of patient satisfaction has been limited to date. The objective of this study was to assess the perceptions and satisfaction of patients with CHF when using RPM. METHODS: A voluntary declarative survey was conducted with users of Satelia® Cardio, an RPM web application which was included in an experimental model program in France funded by the ETAPES program initiative sponsored by the French Ministry of Health. Monitoring was based on patient-reported outcomes (seven questions on symptoms, one question on weight) which were answered online (digitally literate patients) or by phone with a nurse (patients with poor digital literacy). The survey included questions on perceived usefulness, ease of use and impact on quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Overall, 87% of the 825 patients were satisfied with having their CHF digitally monitored. Patients found that the application was easy to use (94%), problem free (95%), provided well-timed notifications (98%), easily accessible (96.5%), understandable (89%), and did not require an unreasonable amount of time to answer questions (99%). Most patients felt that RPM helped physicians provide better care during their follow-ups (70%, mean score: 7.98/10) and 45% of the digitally literate patients indicated an improved QoL. CONCLUSION: Poor digitally literate patients may need human-based or assisted RPM. Patients monitored daily for CHF through RPM expressed strong satisfaction and acceptance.
