Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nat Protoc ; 16(1): 27-60, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33208978

ABSTRACT

Interactions between RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and RNAs are critical to cell biology. However, methods to comprehensively and quantitatively assess these interactions within cells were lacking. RNA interactome capture (RIC) uses in vivo UV crosslinking, oligo(dT) capture, and proteomics to identify RNA-binding proteomes. Recent advances have empowered RIC to quantify RBP responses to biological cues such as metabolic imbalance or virus infection. Enhanced RIC exploits the stronger binding of locked nucleic acid (LNA)-containing oligo(dT) probes to poly(A) tails to maximize RNA capture selectivity and efficiency, profoundly improving signal-to-noise ratios. The subsequent analytical use of SILAC and TMT proteomic approaches, together with high-sensitivity sample preparation and tailored statistical data analysis, substantially improves RIC's quantitative accuracy and reproducibility. This optimized approach is an extension of the original RIC protocol. It takes 3 d plus 2 weeks for proteomics and data analysis and will enable the study of RBP dynamics under different physiological and pathological conditions.


Subject(s)
Proteomics/methods , RNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , RNA/metabolism , Humans , Jurkat Cells , Oligonucleotides/metabolism , Protein Binding , Workflow
2.
Mol Cell ; 74(1): 196-211.e11, 2019 04 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30799147

ABSTRACT

The compendium of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) has been greatly expanded by the development of RNA-interactome capture (RIC). However, it remained unknown if the complement of RBPs changes in response to environmental perturbations and whether these rearrangements are important. To answer these questions, we developed "comparative RIC" and applied it to cells challenged with an RNA virus called sindbis (SINV). Over 200 RBPs display differential interaction with RNA upon SINV infection. These alterations are mainly driven by the loss of cellular mRNAs and the emergence of viral RNA. RBPs stimulated by the infection redistribute to viral replication factories and regulate the capacity of the virus to infect. For example, ablation of XRN1 causes cells to be refractory to SINV, while GEMIN5 moonlights as a regulator of SINV gene expression. In summary, RNA availability controls RBP localization and function in SINV-infected cells.


Subject(s)
Epithelial Cells/virology , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Sindbis Virus/genetics , Transcriptome , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , 5' Untranslated Regions , Binding Sites , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Exoribonucleases/genetics , Exoribonucleases/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Viral , HEK293 Cells , HeLa Cells , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/genetics , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/metabolism , Protein Binding , RNA, Viral/metabolism , RNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Ribonucleoproteins, Small Nuclear/genetics , Ribonucleoproteins, Small Nuclear/metabolism , SMN Complex Proteins , Sindbis Virus/growth & development , Sindbis Virus/metabolism , Sindbis Virus/pathogenicity , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/metabolism , Virus Replication
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL