ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The effect of various sleep traits on the risk of lung cancer differs among pre-existing studies. This study aims to systematically review and synthesise the association between sleep duration and insomnia with the incidence of lung cancer. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 23 April 2023 for observational studies examining the effect of sleep quantity or insomnia on lung cancer incidence. We pooled maximally-adjusted hazard ratios and odds ratios separately using random effects inverse variance weighted models. The risk of bias of observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: We included 11 observational studies with a pooled cohort of 5,049,141 patients. The mean age of the patients was 49.5 ± 17.7 years, and 51.4% were males. The risk of bias ranged from low-moderate. Individuals who slept for a shorter or longer duration than the reference range of sleep per night showed an increased risk of lung cancer by 11% (HR:1.11; 95%CI:1.00-1.23) and 16% (HR:1.16; 95%CI:1.06-1.27) respectively. Furthermore, individuals with insomnia symptoms had a 9% greater risk of lung cancer than those without symptoms (HR:1.09; 95%CI:1.05-1.13). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that insufficient sleep, excessive sleep and insomnia may be associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. Physicians should be mindful of this association and encourage healthy sleep practises among patients. Given the observed heterogeneity among some pre-existing studies, future research with longer periods of follow-up, greater control for covariates and objective testing of sleep parameters may add value to this topic.
ABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the current state of sleep medicine accreditation and training in Asia by conducting a comprehensive survey across 29 Asian countries and regions facilitated by the Asian Society of Sleep Medicine (ASSM) to identify existing gaps and provide recommendations for future enhancements. METHODS: The ASSM Education Task Force Committee designed a survey to gather data on accreditation, education, and training standards in sleep medicine, including information on challenges in enhancing education in the field. RESULTS: With an 86% (25 countries/regions) response rate, the survey showed that sleep medicine is recognized as an independent specialty in just nine countries/regions (36% of the countries/regions surveyed). Ten countries/regions have established sleep medicine training programs, with Japan and Saudi Arabia offering it as a distinct specialty. Significant disparities in training and accreditation standards were identified, with many countries/regions lacking formalized training and practice guidelines. The survey also revealed that most local sleep societies across Asia support the development of an Asian Sleep Medicine Training Curriculum led by the ASSM. However, several barriers significantly impede the establishment and development of sleep medicine training programs, including the scarcity of trained specialists and technologists and the absence of national accreditation for sleep medicine. CONCLUSIONS: The survey highlights the need for standardized sleep medicine training and accreditation across Asia. Developing an Asian Sleep Medicine Training Curriculum and promoting ASSM accreditation guidelines are key recommendations. Implementing these strategies is essential for advancing sleep medicine as a widely recognized discipline throughout Asia.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a serious but underdiagnosed condition. Demand for the gold standard diagnostic polysomnogram (PSG) far exceeds its availability. More efficient diagnostic methods are needed, even in tertiary settings. Machine learning (ML) models have strengths in disease prediction and early diagnosis. We explored the use of ML with oximetry, demographic and anthropometric data to diagnose OSA. Methods: A total of 2,996 patients were included for modelling and divided into test and training sets. Seven commonly used supervised learning algorithms were trained with the data. Sensitivity (recall), specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) (precision), negative predictive value, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and F1 measure were reported for each model. Results: In the best performing four-class model (neural network model predicting no, mild, moderate or severe OSA), a prediction of moderate and/or severe disease had a combined PPV of 94%; one out of 335 patients had no OSA and 19 had mild OSA. In the best performing two-class model (logistic regression model predicting no-mild vs. moderate-severe OSA), the PPV for moderate-severe OSA was 92%; two out of 350 patients had no OSA and 26 had mild OSA. Conclusion: Our study showed that the prediction of moderate-severe OSA in a tertiary setting with an ML approach is a viable option to facilitate early identification of OSA. Prospective studies with home-based oximeters and analysis of other oximetry variables are the next steps towards formal implementation.
ABSTRACT
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, evidence supporting this association in the Asian population is scarce. Given the differences in the epidemiology of CVD and cardiovascular risk factors, as well as differences in the availability of healthcare resources between Asian and Western countries, an Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology (APSC) working group developed consensus recommendations on the management of OSA in patients with CVD in the Asia-Pacific region. The APSC expert panel reviewed and appraised the available evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Consensus recommendations were developed and put to an online vote. Consensus was reached when 80% of votes for a given recommendation were in support of 'agree' or 'neutral.' The resulting statements provide guidance on the assessment and treatment of OSA in patients with CVD in the Asia-Pacific region. The APSC hopes for these recommendations to pave the way for screening, early diagnosis and treatment of OSA in the Asia-Pacific region.
ABSTRACT
Rationale: In 2020, lung cancer was the leading cause of cancer deaths and the most common cancer in men. Although obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been postulated to be carcinogenic, epidemiological studies are inconclusive. Objectives: To investigate the associations between OSA and the incidence and mortality of lung cancer. Methods: Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus) were searched from inception until 6 June 2021 for randomized controlled trials and observational studies examining the association between sleep apnea and incident lung cancer. Two reviewers selected studies, extracted data, graded the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Random-effects models were used to meta-analyze the maximally covariate-adjusted associations. Results: Seven studies were included in our systematic review, among which four were suitable for meta-analysis, comprising a combined cohort of 4,885,518 patients. Risk of bias was low to moderate. OSA was associated with a higher incidence of lung cancer (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.53), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 97%). Heterogeneity was eliminated, with a stable pooled effect size, when including the three studies with at least 5 years of median follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.37; I2 = 0%). Conclusions: In this meta-analysis of 4,885,518 patients from four observational studies, patients with OSA had an approximately 30% higher risk of lung cancer compared with those without OSA. We suggest more clinical studies with longer follow-up as well as biological models of lung cancer be performed to further elucidate this relationship.
Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Cohort Studies , Humans , Incidence , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Observational Studies as Topic , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been associated with improved patient satisfaction and comfort compared to tracheostomy in patients who are ventilator dependent. We present a case of a young man who fell off a platform and sustained a traumatic third and fourth cervical vertebrae (C3/4) fracture dislocation with bilateral facet dislocation, in whom a trial of mouthpiece NIV was attempted. We discuss the issues surrounding this method of ventilation in ventilator-dependent patients.
Subject(s)
Cervical Cord , Joint Dislocations , Noninvasive Ventilation , Spinal Cord Injuries , Cervical Cord/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Vertebrae , Humans , Male , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A major challenge with the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Mask tolerability is an important determinant of adherence, however evidence to guide selection of mask interfaces is lacking. METHODS: We conducted a randomized crossover trial of mask interfaces in CPAP therapy for moderate-to-severe OSA to assess adherence and efficacy of CPAP therapy with nasal mask, nasal pillow and oronasal masks. Demographic data, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores and craniofacial measurements were also analysed for associations with adherence with oronasal masks. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included in the study (mean ± SD age: 46 ± 12 years; body mass index: 29.9 ± 5.6 kg/m2 ; apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI): 53.6 ± 24.0 events/h). Patients had better adherence with nasal masks (average night use: 3.96 ± 2.26 h/night) compared to oronasal masks (3.26 ± 2.18 h/night, P < 0.001) and nasal pillows (3.48 ± 2.20 h/night, P = 0.007). Residual AHI was higher with oronasal masks (7.2 ± 5.2) compared to nasal masks (4.0 ± 4.2, P < 0.001) and nasal pillows (4.1 ± 3.3, P < 0.001). Twenty-two (25.9%) patients had the best adherence with oronasal masks (4.22 ± 2.14 vs 2.93 ± 2.12 h/night, P = 0.016). These patients had lower NOSE scores (15 (0-35) vs 40 (10-55), P = 0.024) and larger menton-labrale inferioris/biocular width ratios (31 ± 3% vs 28 ± 4%, P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Nasal masks are the preferred interface during CPAP initiation. Patients with less nasal obstruction and a proportionally increased chin-lower lip distance to mid-face width may have better CPAP adherence with an oronasal mask interface.
Subject(s)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/instrumentation , Face/anatomy & histology , Masks , Patient Compliance , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Adult , Asian People , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Obstruction/etiology , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is limited data on long term Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) adherence in Southeast Asian countries. This is a prospective study on CPAP adherence among Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients in a Southeast Asian privately funded healthcare system. METHODS: Patients with moderate-severe OSA who had been initiated on CPAP at least one year previously were contacted for a scripted telephone interview to assess compliance and factors associated with CPAP adherence. RESULTS: Of 135 consecutive patients diagnosed to have moderate to severe OSA, 78 (57.8%) were initiated on CPAP treatment while 57 (42.2%) rejected CPAP upfront. 41 (52.6%) who initiated CPAP remained adherent at one year. OSA severity (AHI, ODI) and symptomatic improvement after CPAP were associated with better adherence. Presence of machine related side effects was associated with lower adherence. Inconvenience, cost and poor disease perception were reported as major barriers to uptake of CPAP therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this Southeast Asian privately funded healthcare system, almost half of all patients with significant OSA rejected CPAP treatment upfront, but adherence among those who started CPAP is comparable to other reports. Challenges with CPAP acceptance as well as CPAP adherence need to be addressed to improve outcomes.